...
Best Regards
K.
De : Natacha Porté
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Vendredi 7 juillet 2017 9h44
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] warning about unsaved changes with `fossil checkout
--keep`
Hello,
*snip*
Have I left anything unclear?
Na
4/ Ok it's Warren comments ... So I don't take it too seriously. I like to read
his comments when I've got times so I could laugh, sometimes loudly...I urge
Warren to sometimes talk about security : it's VERY amusing...(The MD5 discuss
: wow)I say : SOMETIMES, not every day..
Team knows nothing about ergonomics, too ?(Poor of
me)
Best Regards
K.
De : Lonnie Abelbeck
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Dimanche 5 mars 2017 23h31
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.1 beta. Was: Progress report of Fossil 2.x
On Mar 5, 2017, at 5:01 PM, Ri
d so on is necessary...Of course the Fossil Team did not get it ... [until
people ask for it]
Best Regards
K.
De : Lonnie Abelbeck
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Dimanche 5 mars 2017 16h30
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Version 2.1 (prerelease)
On Mar 5, 20
Is your Fossil app compiled with the Official SQLite ?
As I remember, you seem to have a better approach ... [a better SQLite]
Just sayin'
Best Regards
K.
De : Jan Nijtmans
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Vendredi 3 mars 2017 13h54
Objet : [fossil-users] Foss
...
Serious project = Plans ! OK ?
If for you SHA1 is not a serious project, then I would like you to explain it
to us... :D
5/ All this said :I've noticed that there are too much details in Linus Torvald
discuss. I suppose that he was thinking about guys like you Warren ?You know
the guy that
Hello,
Does this mean that it is not so hard to adapt SHA algorithm to a better one ?:D
DRH suspected that it would be hard :D :D :D
Of course I don't agree with DRH ; I will never agree with him about security
discuss either ... :-|
Thank to "sgbeal". :-)
Best Regards
K.
ople to use Git not Fossil ...
Git is more secure than Fossil (first reason to use a VCS)Git could be
centralized or not. I am wondering if Fossil could be centralized... Now you've
said that it is semi-centralized by NATURE.
Regards
K.
De : Warren Young
À : Fossil SCM user's
what I've expected...
c) I like this sentence :"especially in light of previous
>SHA-1 related discussions on list"
the discussion is not over, it is the beginning ... :D
2/ When I reply to ALL I've got these TWO e-mail ...Which one is the correct
one...?
Best Rega
id I've
asked ?
I like this talk from you :
« Provides win32/win64 versions of sqlite3.dll, which work better
(smaller/faster/longer paths) than the dll's provided by sqlite.org . »
A better Fossil will be a good idea... :-)
Best Regards
K.
De : Jan Nijtmans
À : Fossil SCM us
»
So do I :-)
@Joerg said :
> « [...] What repo checksum does is compute a separate checksum over the
concatenation of all files [...] »
Hmmm...
You should say that EACH files are checksumed AND the repo itself is checksumed.
This should explain why it takes so long for a large repo... No
ing especially what is relevant for everyone :checksums, 32/64 bits for
Linux/Windows, compilation, etc.
Have a nice day Joerg. (It's time to me to talk to Will)
2/ Mister Will Parsons I presume ?
> « [...] Can we all now just stop replying to his [censored by K.], or better
> y
is not relevant if you can...
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Dimanche 13 novembre 2016 10h58
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Download v1.36 Linux x86 tar.gz actually contains
64bit binary
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:24 AM, K. Fossil us
> « [...] I have no idea what you think I wrote. [etc...] »
Ah ?No the answer was for Luca not for you, Scott ... ! :-D
Of, course, little software may not need Gantt software, however it is better
to use such a tool.I will answer all the rest when I could but not now...
Best Regards
;t see why ??), why don't Fossil create a 1.36.1?
[too much] Pride ? Huh ?
My point was : Why do Fossil show a 1.36 FEW days BEFORE SQLite.
(FEW days IS the key of MY point of view before yours)
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Ven
most of the time there are some glitches that may suggest people that
Fossil is not that serious.
Unfortunately, I was right...
Beyond that, I don't understand why SQlite is not 3.15.1 ...
Best Regards
K.
De : Artur Shepilko
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé
Hi,
1/ I've got a question : is bogus bounces NOT already solved ?
2/>backticks instead [of $(...)]
Can't we use pipes ?
Best Regards
K.
De : Andy Goth
À : Fossil Users Mailing List
Envoyé le : Mercredi 9 novembre 2016 3h03
Objet : [fossil-users] Follow-up to reve
Hi,
I agree with Scott.
The checkin should not change many things (nothing with VS) when it comes to
compiling...(The latest release is not that far...)
That's the point.
Best Regards
K.
De : Richard Hipp
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mercredi 2 novembre
Hi,
Yesterday I've noticed that Fossil was down for a long time...drh said one day
that inetd stopped : may be it was the case yesterday ?
Best Regards
K.
De : jungle Boogie
À : General Discussion of SQLite Database
; Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Samedi
guration to use
Mercurial at least. I dunno.
Best Regards
K.
De : Nathaniel Reindl
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Vendredi 28 octobre 2016 13h07
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] OT: Facebook engineers preferring hg to Git
On Oct 28, 2016, at 07:33, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
ld be 1.36 ...
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Don't you know that there are some website that host Fossil ? I do ...
I am quite sure that people who do want to use Fossil, newbies, would like so
much the way how a Fossil user, I mean YOU, think ! (Luca has Fossil in
production ! Wow !)
Well played. (I could not imagine the impact of wh
ich is a
good idea, immutability is a good idea, concurrency is in mind, etc.
However, I don't see anything that would convince me to use Rust for Fossil.
Concurrency improvement could be a good reason, however may I suggest that the
Fossil team would wait so some "falla
Mercurial, so why would people try Fossil ?
c) Fossil is not the same as Git in many areas. Git is not used as a webserver,
it is not a single file, etc.
If I sum up what you've said it seems that for you people should only test
Fossil and report it inside this mailing list and that
)
that you would like to have or that you really appreciate...e) If you could,
tell us about the release which suited the best.(sometimes old release are
better ...)
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http
k ! :-)Wake up man ! :-D
Best Regards
K.
De : Luca Ferrari
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 octobre 2016 6h25
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:02 AM, K. Fossil user
wrote:
> For example, today
No matter who did it, we should expect incidents like this to get worse in
the future »
As Luca said, Fossil users don't need security talks ... :-D
Hmm ...
Now I've got a question just for me : why do we want security in Github ?
Best Regards
K.
My fault. »
No, you don't have the skills to understand : you could not know everything.
That is one of the reason why I am here : I don't know anything about Fossil, I
always learn something new most of the time.
For example, today I've learned that Luca is not aware about security l
ake changes.
Notice that it is said that inetd should not be used :
It is even said « run separate daemons » ...
At least read Joerg explanations ...They are well explained. :-P
Best Regards
K.
De : Warren Young
*snip*
___
fossil-
s the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating,
communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for
customers, clients, partners, and society at large »
Marketing - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing
« The holistic marketing concept looks at marketing
these are what you don't like :
>« People don't really use Fossil : they do use git/mercurial/etc »
Is that untrue ? Nope.
>« Those who use Fossil use command line most of them. »
Is that untrue ? Nope.
NB: Command line is better for scripting.
Best Regards
K.
De : Shal Farl
I pretend that it is better to try to keep
them, which is a marketing strategy.
Didn't I ask for "another approach, for example a marketing approach" ? Hmm ?
Sorry if I hurt : I've said that Truth is better.
(I try not to hurt when I could but obviously it is not time for l
purpose of SSH (long talk with the Fossil users) is to help people use
secure remote command line...
(This is how I understand it)
4/ I was wondering if Fossil have got something that is not "command line". I
dunno.
Best Regards
K.
De : Scott Doctor
À : Fossil SCM
/improve marketing.
Best Regards
K.
De : Nikita Borodikhin
*snip*
Hi Richie,
*snip*
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
security issue when
it comes to inetd.
Best Regards
K.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
that I do
want that myself.
And for the record, I don't want to use Mattermost with Fossil as an
IM/Chat/communication-thing-you-may-think.E-mail suffice.
Best Regards
K.
De : Warren Young
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Samedi 22 octobre 2016 3h08
Objet : Re
Hi again,
Most of the time I try not to interact with people discuss.
However, I was astonished by what a community manager answered to another guy.
So I decided to give my opinion about it.
> « You admitted to not using branches, apparently because you don’t see the
> point of them in a single-d
Hi,
However, xinetd or inetd are not recommended...
Best Regards
K.
De : Nathaniel Reindl
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 21 octobre 2016 21h48
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Can fossil bind to a single address?
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, at 05:28 PM, Steven
k about that".However, I think that THIS unmet need (sha options)
are unmet needs that I do want as soon as possible, please !
Best Regards
K.
De : Scott Robison
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mercredi 19 octobre 2016 18h48
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] on sha1 a
Hi,
1/ Does Fossil use SHA1 ?OoToo bad if it is.At least I expect that we've got a
choice : sha256, sha512, etc. ...
2/ However, when people use Fossil in a local PC, even MD5 should not be an
issue.3/ Thanks for this reminder.
Best Regards
K.
De : bch
À : fossil-users@lists.f
Hi again,
1/ Malware or anything related? NOT at all !
2/ Yep resubscribe. However it could bother some people (not me tough).
Best Regards
K.
De : Scott Doctor
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mardi 18 octobre 2016 2h25
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] disabled d
ago).Whatever is your project, you will need a marketing
tool, and most of the time most of the basic tools : it is not about money, it
is about Future [of the project].
Best Regards
K.
De : Scott Robison
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Lundi 17 octobre 2016 15h56
ple when it comes to something outside
the computer reality...(A geeky attitude i suppose ?)
3/ Try to see if it is because Fossil send something that is supposed to be
from Yahoo ?They would like to avoid phishing issue for example ?
4/ BTW thank you for your advice and your job.I don&#x
me
compilation issue with the Windows OS realm. Which is a shame in my point of
view.
Would you dare to say what I've sum up above ? I do recommend not, but it's up
to you sir.
Best Regards
K.
De : Joerg Sonnenberger
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Dimanche 1
people to use Fossil after that : very hard.
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Fossil is safe... I've got my
response now. This is why I laugh out loud)
The only good news is that someone dare to say there is an issue.You should
thank him.
Pray that your system was/is not hacked ...
Best Regards
K.
De : Richard Hipp
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
7;t explain my point of view.When people
don't get why marketing (communication) is important, they do not deserve
anything from me.
To sum up my point in this thread, when I've seen many thread about compilation
issue, it is an evidence of at least a lack of documentation, and believ
ime used and I agree with
that.
Best Regards
K.
De : Joerg Sonnenberger
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Samedi 15 octobre 2016 23h02
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:01:17PM +0900, Osamu Ao
Hi,
The good question is : Why don't they use autoconf/automake like most people
do, at least CMake even if I don't agree with this ?
Snobism ? :-P (LOL)
Best Regards
K.
De : Osamu Aoki
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Samedi 15 octobre 2016 4h01
Objet
Hi,
1/ Thank you Osamu Aoki !
2/ make it simple :if someone, let's call him John, would like to create a
special option "--butter=salted" and one day Fossil did it then IMHO John
should change his option, like "--my-butter=salted".In fact, I think that an
unknown option should be logged "unknown
I read this :"Please steal ideas and code from Fossil"There are no serious
reason for people to use Fossil.In the past I was a huge fan of it...
1/ I ask for a poll I was told that I was ... (no matter what).2/ I've tried to
compile Fossil it did not... In the past, it did nicely: I've created my
agree to disagree.I must admit one thing : I like Fossil and I am stupid to
like it.
I would test 1.35, because I like it, but at this level of discuss I don't
think that I would give any information about bugs I would found : it's a lose
of time I don't want to deal with.I guess t
"poll" inside.MY
game is about the poll...
How could I convince people to use Fossil if even a poll is an issue,or worst
irrelevant ?
Best Regards
K.
De : Andy Bradford
Cc : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:10
Hello again,
I've received that message :"Your membership in the fossil-users mailing list
is currently disabled due to excessive bounces"
That's not serious ... ><
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users
atterMost,
etc) that you decide to follow it, unless you do create a serious poll about
it.One of the goal of a serious project must be the future of it (is a project
whose VCS is CVS the future? Not for me...) and the related way to
discuss/communicate/etc. (Which communication is the future?
Hi,
People read docs : this is one way to find typos... :-)just sayin'
Best Regards
K.
De : Richard Hipp
À : Fossil SCM user's discussion
Envoyé le : Mardi 21 juin 2016 20h04
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Fossil :: typos
On 6/21/16, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote:
> Hi, jus
Hi,
It seems that some mails goes to the spam box...
I've noticed this when it comes to David Simmons e-mail.
Did someone have this issue ? Could it be fixed ?
Best Regards
K.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
It is strange to me to see my mail in your mailing list response.Is it not
supposed to be hidden ? Even for respect to people privacy ?
I'm asking because suppose that I don't want to be spammed because of this, it
would be hard to stop spams, even with appropriate tools...
Best Regards
A.
Hi,
I'd like to know how to setup commit hooks on a fossil server
so that, for example, I can perform an automatic checkout,
run tests and restart a server. I intend to use this for
deploying projects on a server - sort of like heroku's
deploy using "git push".
This has come up a few times in the
Hello,
what do you mean by :
"can build fossil directly on the sourceforge machine"
1/ SSH access and download of checkins ?
2/ SSH access + ./configure directly with sourceforge... ?
Best Regards
K.
From : Mark Janssen
Cc : jim Schimpf
... :-)
Best Regards
K.
Themba Fletcher wrote :
'fossil update -n' will just show you what would change if you ran fossil
update.
'fossil sync' will just sync the repo and not make any changes but not make any
changes to your checkout. Fwiw, I believe update with -n sy
Hello,
fossil open myrepo.fossil --keep
fossil update
## updates downloads files and they are stored in the current directory.
Can't fossil do something like :
fossil update --keep
# so NO files are written in the current directory ?
Best Regard
thought that if I click the
FIRST trunk then it should say 200... not 101...
But maybe, the number of lines are 200 but the trunk IS only 101 ?
If it is the case, I like it... However, it seems not.
I don't know...
Best Regards
K.
Stephan Beal wrote:
Try this:
http://fossi
1/ at most 200 entries
Ah ok...
2/ Is it possible that you put a tooltip when the mouse is hovering ?
(at most 200 entries, for example)
3/ Thanks for the b=trunk...
I was wondering *if* it should not be b=trunk then...
Best Regards
K.
Richard Hipp wrote :
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:44
1/ else does not break here... :-)
It runs as expected...
(if entries are over 20 then 20)
2/ Depending on the trunk I click on, it may say 14 or 15 or 11...
14 timeline items related to "trunk" occurring around 2013-02-07 15:28:18
Best Regards
K.
__
, change it to :
else if( nEntry<200 ){
Best Regards
K.
Stephan Beal wrote :
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:44 PM, K. Fossil user wrote:
I can read 101 entries... when it should be 200...
>Two buttons appear [20 entries], which is correct and [200 entries] that
>should not exists..
m is 2013-01-03 22:33
Best Regards
K.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
is it a DNS resolver issue ?
Best Regards
K.
Edward Berner wrote :
I think that for static linking on Linux you may need to look at what
the embedded Linux folks are doing. I think the alternate libc
libraries (musl libc, uclibc, dietlibc, etc.) have static linking as an
explicit design goa
l_ run into platform-level limitations which we
>cannot fix
>at the application level."
>
>--
>- stephan beal
>http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/http://gplus.to/sgbeal
While I use SQLite statically, Fossil I do not. I look at Fossil as a user
level program and SQL
on Jan 31, 2013, K. Fossil user wrote:
>
>You do understand what Stephan said.
>It is not what I've said, it is what Stephan said...I agree with you.
>P.S.: Next time you received a mail from Fossil just click on the button
>called [reply
>to all], otherwise I [or some
less installs and less issue because some dependencies
are not found or are hard to find...
Best Regards
K.
De : "k...@lightpowered.org"
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 février 2013 0h49
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] I
ng said, but if I do, I would disagree
that Fossil sans networking support would be "nearly useless".
I use Fossil locally exclusively. I may be in the minority. I do not know.
^K
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
eate the fossil file locally and then send my work via SSH (sFTP,
etc.)...
Best Regards
K.
Stephan Beal wrote :
Why don't fossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one
which will forbid the static option ?
>Isn't that a good idea ?
That's like asking,
ossil create a lite version that could be static and the full one
which will forbid the static option ?
Isn't that a good idea ?
Best Regards
K.
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote :
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:33:24PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> For example, OpenSSL seems to not support static link
>So you have to build an executable per-distro -- welcome to
>Linux.
Is it the same with *BSD systems ?
(Thank you for your tought: it's really appreciated !)
Best Regards
K.
Nico Williams wrote:
>>
>> bld/shell.o: In function `find_home_dir':
>>
able to run fossil with no changes.
However, as you said it, we can't deal with that... Just too bad...
Best Regards
K.
Nico Williams wrote:
> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \
> --with-openssl=auto \
> --json \
> --markdown
> $ make
> ./src/shell
ing
bld/http_socket.o: In function `socket_open':
./src/http_socket.c:148: warning: Using 'gethostbyname' in statically linked
applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version
used for linking
Best Regards
K.
Stephan Beal wrote:
I've downloa
target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by
`bld/VERSION.h'. Stop.
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
in
Created autoconfig.h
make: *** No rule to make target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by
`bld/VERSION.h'. Stop.
If someone could explain me it would be great.
I've seen these issues yesterday, however I decided to wait today for another
more recent source.
(fossil update)
Hello everyone,
Can't we use GnuTLS instead of openSSL ?
Wget decided to use GnuTLS instead of openSSL...
Best Regards
K.
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
K. Fossil user wrote:
People would like to use a DVCS everywhere with any distro with the SAME
binary, not the one specific to a d
ies to fix this.
Best Regards
K.
stephan beal wrote :
On Linux the networking-related libraries cannot be statically linked (for
reasons i once knew but no longer recall). Or they _can_ be linked but the
linker will warn you that it's not _really_ statically linking them and that
the
with option:
--static
This issue occur with/without openSSL.
I would like to point you out that readline is not used.
Distribution : Porteus 1.2, 64bit.
(Slackware based live CD)
Best Regards
K.___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil
ich seems likely to
>result
>in an adverse outcome:
>
>
>
>
> http://chronicleoutdoors.com/wp-content/gallery/cougar-photo/mountainlion.jpg
Love it.
^K
>
>
>--
>D. Richard Hipp
>
>
>d...@sqlite.org
>
>
>_
And blindness indeed. The download option may be found in check-in pages.
Therefore the latest trunk check-in download link is found at:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/55a28e7f5a
Thanks again.
^K
on Dec 20, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:40
That is great to see. So I've looked in Download and Code, and I am still not
able to figure out how I can download a snapshot of the current source of trunk.
Please pardon what must be blindness on my part.
^K
on Dec 20, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Thu, Dec 20, 2
Thank you for refining the presentation of moved-not-deleted files.
Is this code now integrated into the primary trunk, or at least is that the
intention? My question when I went to do commits for these moves just became,
"how do I ensure I continue to use the improved code".
Thanks
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:12 PM, K wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>However, I'm still curious why files must split upon move?
>
>It isn't a requirement. The page is simply showing all artifacts that
>represent a
&
Thanks for sharing!
^K
on Dec 17, 2012, Michael Richter wrote:
>
>You know, for someone using a tool that hasn't paid for it, you have a real
>tone of
>overweening entitlement. Perhaps you need to look up the definitions involved
>in
>"free software" and
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:00 PM, K wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>#2 is fixed, no longer showing moved files as deleted in the check-in
>overview. Thank
>you. #1 is not fixed.
>
>
>Alternative fix is here
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, K wrote:
>
>
>
>I've been asked to clarify the confusion behavior I've run into.
>
>
>
>$ fossil open project.fossil
>
>
>
>$ mkdir source
>
>$ mkdir
quot;File
file.h" and "File source/code/file.h", with the code below.
Issue #5 is that at this point, I'm confused and have no idea what's going on.
What am I looking at? Why did my file get deleted and split from its history &
existence just because I moved it?
^K
articulate what I believe would be the correct behavior in this case.
^K
on Dec 17, 2012, Themba Fletcher wrote:
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, K wrote:
>>
>> If you cannot provide justification for this behavior
>>
>
>I'm a bit confused by the tone of
letion.
If you cannot provide justification for this behavior, we should move to
discussing the behavior Fossil should exhibit.
^K
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:49 PM, K wrote:
>
>
>
>As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather
As I said, I did not DELETE any files, but rather moved them. fossil changes
reported them as RENAMED. And in the check in, they are being reported as
DELETED.
I'm just asking how in the design of Fossil you justified this decision. Please
directly address this vs skirting it.
^K
on D
on Dec 17, 2012, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
>On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM, K wrote:
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>
>
>I've done a number of fossil mv file.h source/code/ today, then issued a
>commit.
>The check-in reports that all of the files I'
o.c."
Why is a file I moved using "fossil mv", then on the file system, being
reported as deleted? Now when I look at the history of the 'new' files, they
don't show their entire history.
What is going wrong please?
^K
_
ps: I found the following;
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/49478/git-ignore-file-for-xcode-projects
Xcode sure is a nightmare.
^K
on Dec 16, 2012, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
>
>I use the following string for Admin > Settings > ignore-glob:
>
>*/xcuserdata/*,build/*,*.mode1v
on Dec 16, 2012, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
>
>I use the following string for Admin > Settings > ignore-glob:
>
>*/xcuserdata/*,build/*,*.mode1v3,*.pbxuser,*.orig
Thank you Dmitry. What are your thoughts on:
*/xcuserdata/*,build/*,*.mode1v3,*.pbxuser,*.orig,*/DerivedData/*
o handle this is: "echo 'xcuserdata/' >>
.gitignore && git add *.xcodeproj".
What would be the equivalent in Fossil please? Or equivalent aside, what is the
proper solution to this when using Fossil?
Thank you in advance for any help.
Kind regards,
^K
_
is happy apparently.
Thanks again for taking the time to write kk.
^K
on Dec 16, 2012, kk wrote:
>
>On 12/16/2012 K wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Fossil SCM, have not used any other SCMs,
> > and am trying to do something relatively complex for
> > me. It involves
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
