[fossil-users] typo on wiki page - low priority

I know this page is marked obsolete but my OCD prevents me from not mentioning the slight type on the Fossil-2.0 wiki entry: 10 to Fossil for Fossil 2.0. However, when the 11 [Shattered attach](https://shattered.io/) against SHA1 appeared 12 on 2017-02-23, I am pretty sure you

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On 20 July 2016 at 11:50, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:16:53 -0600: > >> https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/embeddeddoc.wiki >> >> In order to view such content in the wiki, the viewing user needs >> checkout

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:16:53 -0600: > https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/embeddeddoc.wiki > > In order to view such content in the wiki, the viewing user needs > checkout rights on the whole repository. If you can't give your > viewer-only users

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On Jul 17, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 7/15/16, Warren Young wrote: >> >> In order to view [embedded documentation] content in the wiki, the viewing >> user >> needs checkout rights on the whole repository. > > In general, this is true.

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On 7/15/16, Warren Young wrote: > > In order to view [embedded documentation] content in the wiki, the viewing > user > needs checkout rights on the whole repository. In general, this is true. But there is one obscure exception. On the Setup/Access page there is a "Public

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On 15 July 2016 at 20:16, Warren Young wrote: > On Jul 15, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: >> >> 1) does there happen to be a "howto" anywhere describing quick setup >> w.r.t. security, perhaps from a wiki-only standpoint? > > I posted my

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On Jul 15, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Michai Ramakers wrote: > > 1) does there happen to be a "howto" anywhere describing quick setup > w.r.t. security, perhaps from a wiki-only standpoint? I posted my philosophy on that here:

[fossil-users] allow downloading wiki page attachments for users without Read permission

A user with the following permission flags: bcfhjkmnprtw for a site in which the virtual users Reader, Developer, Anonymous and Nobody have no default privileges, cannot download an attachment directly from a wiki page attachments list. The list points to URIs such as this one:

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

) -Original Message- From: Andy Bradford Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 7:36 AM To: Tony Papadimitriou Cc: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images Thus said "Tony Papadimitriou" on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:2

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

-- but the ideal would be to have the image display directly.) -Original Message- From: The Tick Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 3:25 AM To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images On 10/19/2015 9:36 AM

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

Thus said The Tick on Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:25:04 -0500: > How can I remove the attachment now? Click on the details link next to the attachment. There is a Delete button there. All it does, really, is delete the link from the Wiki page to the artifact. The artifact does still exist and

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

Thus said The Tick on Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:25:04 -0500: > This is similar to what I want to do so I gave it a try--I added an > image to a wiki page as an attachment. It's not what I want. It adds > text to the bottom of the page that says "Attachments". Did you edit the Wiki and add

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

Thus said "Tony Papadimitriou" on Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:24:49 +0300: > My question is how can I add this image to the repo in a way that it > is not part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)? Attach it to the Wiki page. Then add an img tag to the Wiki page using the /raw

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

The logo is a special case handled in the site-level config iirc. - stephan (Sent from a mobile device, possibly from bed. Please excuse brevity, typos, and top-posting.) On Oct 21, 2015 19:56, "Ron W" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tony Papadimitriou

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > Similar problem here. I thought I would get the image to display as part > of the Wiki page and not as an attachment link. > > Is there a way to make the attached image display directly when opening > the wiki page? (I

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > The logo is a special case handled in the site-level config iirc. > I only used it as an example because it was the only image file I found on the Fossil site. (Only glanced through several pages that seemed likely

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On trunk, in contexts where TH1 is allowed (not wiki?), you should now be able to do: set image [encode64 [artifact trunk path/to/some.png]] -- Joe Mistachkin ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On 10/19/2015 9:36 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 10/19/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: My question is how can I add this image to the repo in a way that it is not part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)? I only need it for the purpose of being shown in the wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:25 AM, The Tick wrote: > This is similar to what I want to do so I gave it a try--I added an image > to a wiki page as an attachment. It's not what I want. It adds text to the > bottom of the page that says "Attachments". > > How can I remove the

[fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

I’m trying to add an image to a wiki page. I want the image to be stored inside the same fossil repo (i.e., not external link). I read about all the possible ways one can create links with the [...] syntax. For example, I can either use the artifact ID, or an image name. My question is how

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

On 10/19/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > My question is how can I add this image to the repo in a way that it is not > part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)? > I only need it for the purpose of being shown in the wiki page but I do not > want it to be part

[fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I added a few suggestions to the Fossil 2.0 wiki page https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0 without discussing them on the mailing list. Probably a bad idea, sorry about that. So I'm drawing everyone's attention to it. The

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

On 05/03/15 21:23, Andy Goth wrote: [...] One thing that repeatedly surprised me when learning Fossil was that the open command opens the repository into the current working directory. This left me either confused at there being no apparent effect (except a hidden file called .fslckout, in

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/5/2015 3:54 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: On 5 March 2015 at 12:23, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: ⭕: Cherrypick merge (resembles a cherry) ❌: Backout merge (signifies removal) FWIW, these are tiny, faint boxes in google chrome.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

Hi Andy, On 5 March 2015 at 14:15, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/5/2015 3:54 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: On 5 March 2015 at 12:23, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: ⭕: Cherrypick merge (resembles a cherry) ❌: Backout merge (signifies removal) FWIW, these are tiny, faint

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

I think the ⭕ is not a good cherrypick symbol. It's closer to a cherry than ❌, for example, but still not really close to a cherry -- the circle, and the color have well-known symbolic baggage associated w/ them that (imo) ought to preclude it from being used as cherry-pick. Better off w/ , no?

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

Hi Andy, On 5 March 2015 at 12:23, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: I added a few suggestions to the Fossil 2.0 wiki page https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wiki?name=Fossil+2.0 without discussing them on the mailing list. Probably a bad idea, sorry about that. So I'm drawing

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0 wiki page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/5/2015 5:12 PM, bch wrote: I think the ⭕ is not a good cherrypick symbol. It's closer to a cherry than ❌, for example, but still not really close to a cherry -- the circle, and the color have well-known symbolic baggage associated w/ them

[fossil-users] 'test-page++.wiki' in release-checklist not accessible atm

Hello, while browsing fossil's docs, I noticed the 'test-page++.wiki' in item #4 on https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki is not accessible. I don't really understand why - building that version locally and running using 'server' works ok. Probably known /

Re: [fossil-users] 'test-page++.wiki' in release-checklist not accessible atm

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki is not accessible. I don't really understand why - building that version locally and running using 'server' works ok. The trunk works for me

Re: [fossil-users] 'test-page++.wiki' in release-checklist not accessible atm

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, while browsing fossil's docs, I noticed the 'test-page++.wiki' in item #4 on https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki is not accessible. I don't really understand why -

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jiri Navratil j...@navratil.cz wrote: If you click on Fossil project home page on second line (below the one we are discussing), you will get Obsolete Page with reference to the same path I'm using. Hi! Yeah, i saw that but i was a bit confused by the visual

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Jiri Navratil j...@navratil.cz wrote: noticing it and letting me know. It's fixed http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/53ce8d2863 You caught a bug i didn't see: the double slash (i didn't realize %R added that, but it makes sense that it would). It's in

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jiri Navratil j...@navratil.cz wrote: Are you fine with my approach? Could you help me to get them to trunk from unplanned fork? Hi! Was the intention really to show the whole URI path to the page? On my system the first entry in the /wiki page looks like:

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

Hello, Thank you for helpful replies. I had /MyStartingPage under Admin/Configuration (setup_config) in Index Page field. I changed it to /wiki/MyStartingPage and now I have MyStartingPage wiki page as the default page. May I sugest two changes? 1. Description of Index Page field under

[fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

Hello, is homepage for repository same thing as as home page for wiki? I had created a new repository wiki.fossil and had set project name to wiki and name of home page to /MyStartingPage. URL http://localhost:8108 is putting me to http://localhost:8108/MyStartingPage home button on third

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Jiri Navratil j...@navratil.cz wrote: is homepage for repository same thing as as home page for wiki? By default, yes, but you can change that in the configuration. I had created a new repository wiki.fossil and had set project name to wiki and name of

Re: [fossil-users] homepage (first wiki page) for a repository

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jiri Navratil j...@navratil.cz wrote: Hello, is homepage for repository same thing as as home page for wiki? It can be. But you can set up the homepage for the repository anyway you want. (1) Under Admin/Configuration you can select any page you want to be

Re: [fossil-users] Fix for wiki URL markup

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:54 AM, David Given d...@cowlark.com wrote: (How does one go about submitting a contributor agreement?) Hi! http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/copyright-release.html That needs to be printed out, filled out, and snail-mailed to the address at the bottom

[fossil-users] Fix for wiki URL markup

Hey, look, it's another one... This prevents the wiki formatter from adding the base URL to URLs starting with //. // is a rather obscure but incredibly handy feature of URLs that a lot of people don't know about. It's an *absolute* URL using the same schema as the currently loaded page. For

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:30:13 +0100, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: I'd like to contribute an article in the wiki, but even after logging as anonymous, I can't see any way to add a new page: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wcontent Are contributions limited to non-anonymous users?

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/permutedindex.wiki That one's generated that way on purpose by a program. Notice that Questions -- Frequently Asked also has 3 variants (Asked Frequently -- Question ...).

[fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

Hello I'd like to contribute an article in the wiki, but even after logging as anonymous, I can't see any way to add a new page: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wcontent Are contributions limited to non-anonymous users? Thank you. ___

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: I'd like to contribute an article in the wiki, but even after logging as anonymous, I can't see any way to add a new page: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wcontent Are contributions limited to non-anonymous users?

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:40:25 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: The wiki in the main repo is not really maintained any longer - the project generally prefers the embedded docs approach because those docs partake in the whole versioning/branching mechanism whereas wiki pages are

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Thanks. I guess that means I must create a new empty repository for the Fossil source code, synchronizing to fill it with the Fossil files, add a file in www, commit, and push the changes back to the official Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: @DRH: please correct me if i'm wrong in assuming that documentation patches do not necessarily need the waiver? The Contributor License Agreement (CLA) basically says: I recognize that Fossil uses the two-clause BSD

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:52:59 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: then paste that code here on the list (i think the list strips attachments) or send us a link to it. Before you can get commit access to the main repo you need to fill out a license waiver and snail-mail it to DRH. i

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Here's the changes made to index.wiki: www.pastebin.com/raw.php?i=x5X8gFFY And the little page I wrote in HTML: www.pastebin.com/raw.php?i=cTpqLd0g That seems to (in spirit, at least) duplicate the Quickstart page:

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:21:33 +0100, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: And the little page I wrote in HTML: www.pastebin.com/raw.php?i=cTpqLd0g One typo: Check current status ... This shows the list of changes that have been done and will be commited the next time you run fossil commit. It's

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:29:44 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: That seems to (in spirit, at least) duplicate the Quickstart page: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/quickstart.wiki The problem I had with the Quick Start is: - it includes commands that are

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: And the little page I wrote in HTML: www.pastebin.com/raw.php?i=cTpqLd0g http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/fiveminutes.wiki -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: And the little page I wrote in HTML: www.pastebin.com/raw.php?i=cTpqLd0g http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/fiveminutes.wiki It seems i

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:54:54 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/fiveminutes.wiki It seems i was wrong about the TITLE tag being completely ignored - the wiki uses that as the title. @Gilles: i'll get your last changes into that file

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:54:54 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: @Gilles: i'll get your last changes into that file in a few minutes. Oops, I forgot to show the command for Commit changes: fossil commit -m Added stuff ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:54:54 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: @Gilles: i'll get your last changes into that file in a few minutes. Oops, I forgot to show the command for Commit changes: fossil commit -m

Re: [fossil-users] Contributing to wiki?

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:56:36 +0100, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Oops, I forgot to show the command for Commit changes: fossil commit -m Added stuff Fixed: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/0fb6c829f2 Thanks Stephan. ___

[fossil-users] Request: Hierarchical wiki navigation

Hello. One of the main criticisms I have of most wiki software is that it demands users maintain their own navigational links when creating categories of pages. This usually results a total mess after a year or so of editing. I'd like to make a request that I'm currently unable to implement due

[fossil-users] PATCH: fossil wiki markup accepts HTML comments

Please, find attached a patch that allows to use HTML comments of the form !-- . -- in fossil wiki markup. This feature is especially handy for embedded documentations written using a text editor of choice. Comments allow to annotate wiki sources in meaningful way, comment out portions of the

Re: [fossil-users] PATCH: fossil wiki markup accepts HTML comments

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote: Please, find attached a patch that allows to use HTML comments of the form !-- . -- in fossil wiki markup. This feature is especially handy for embedded documentations written using a text editor of choice.

Re: [fossil-users] PATCH: fossil wiki markup accepts HTML comments

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:43, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Comments are not supported in wiki precisely because I don't want people, especially anonymous contributors, to be able hide things from view.  The idea is that all changes should be plainly visible, without having to click on

[fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

Hi, all! http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/fossil-sgb/json/wiki-editor.html (In the source tree: ajax/wiki-editor.html. See ajax/README for Apache install/config instructions.) Achtung: 1) It's ugly as sin. 2) It's non-intuitive (see below for instructions) 3) It cannot yet save, but

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/fossil-sgb/json/wiki-editor.html 1) It's ugly as sin. 2) It's non-intuitive (see below for instructions) Points 1 and 2 still apply, but... 3) It cannot yet save saving now

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: With this we now have all of the features we need to implement custom wiki editors/renderers for fossil: - Authentication - Fetch list of pages - Fetch content for page - Save page Create-new-page was just added,

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

So there's the markdown support some of you have been asking for. :) Sorry for stupid question but does that mean that you bundled a markdown library? if yes which one? Or how do you render the markdown? regards, Bapt ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

On 09/22/11 18:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: So there's the markdown support some of you have been asking for. :) Sorry for stupid question but does that mean that you bundled a markdown library? if yes which one? Or how do you render the markdown? You should have quoted one more sentence

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: So there's the markdown support some of you have been asking for. :) Sorry for stupid question but does that mean that you bundled a markdown library? if yes which one? Or how do you render the

Re: [fossil-users] Prototype JSON wiki editor demo online

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Martin S. Weber martin.we...@nist.govwrote: So the infrastructure is there now. All you need is to find and get a client-side markdown (or whichever wiki dialect you prefer) library and throw it at the content you're getting back from the json interface. In

Re: [fossil-users] Annotate for wiki pages

Do you mean in the same way editing a ticket appends by default? S. On Friday, March 11, 2011, Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, is there a way I can get an 'annotate' for wiki pages? Thank you, Lluís. ___ fossil-users

[fossil-users] Annotate for wiki pages

Hello, is there a way I can get an 'annotate' for wiki pages? Thank you, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] raw (internal) wiki pages

2011/2/16 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com This is related: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=7c36bea9f3 When following that link to: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact?name=e23719b08c7d5edc6d19d271f249edf871c1cd8atxt=1

Re: [fossil-users] raw (internal) wiki pages

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: For a wiki page created through the UI, is there an URL to access the raw page? I tried replacing /wiki?name=mywikipage with /raw?name=mywikipage, but that did not work. Hi, Ron! i posted this same question a couple

Re: [fossil-users] raw (internal) wiki pages

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: For a wiki page created through the UI, is there an URL to access the raw page? i posted this same question a couple weeks ago, but so far no

Re: [fossil-users] raw (internal) wiki pages

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:19:08PM -0500, Ron Wilson wrote: For a wiki page created through the UI, is there an URL to access the raw page? I tried replacing /wiki?name=mywikipage with /raw?name=mywikipage, but that did not work. This is related:

[fossil-users] On the wiki

I just want to throw this out there... Since I began using Fossil, I've tried to evangelize it because I know that the more users, the greater tool support, the longer life, the greater the product. Do you know how many people I've got to use Fossil for any length of time? 2 and one of them is

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:39:37 -0400 Jeremy == Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Jeremy As time goes on and I see such a strong stance against any Jeremy formal wiki syntax I get less and less excited about using Jeremy Fossil. Same here...I became so excited about Fossil and ready to leave darcs (although

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Other SCM's can't touch it even with Redmine/Trac. One suggested just using a distributed ticket system that

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:23:07 Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Yes. But, for all that, the lack of a complete wiki

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

On 5/16/2010 12:49 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:23:07 Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Yes.

Re: [fossil-users] On the wiki

incompatible? I'd suggest changing the checkbox option that exists right now Use HTML as the Wiki format to a drop down, HTML or Fossil Wiki or Creole. Jeremy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On 5/7/2010 1:11 AM, Gour wrote: On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:22:14 -0400 Jeremy == Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Jeremy People are going to be attracted to fossil as an all in one Jeremy package and if it can not provide the functionality needed in Jeremy the wiki, then people will

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:22:14 -0400 Jeremy == Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Jeremy People are going to be attracted to fossil as an all in one Jeremy package and if it can not provide the functionality needed in Jeremy the wiki, then people will say why use Fossil for SCM and then Jeremy have to interface

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Krum Pet wrote: Is there a way to delete a wiki page? Maybe by issuing SQL? If you simply want to hide the page so it is not listed using /wcontent then perhaps you could edit the 'tag' table and change the wiki-PageName tag to xwiki-PageName. I don't know

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On 3/18/2010 6:42 AM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: If you update to the latest experimental Fossil (specifically version http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/012d5e4f23 or later) and do fossil all rebuild then if you change the content of a wiki page to be empty, that wiki page will not show up

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

18, 2010 03:43 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page? On Mar 17, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: Is there a way to delete a wiki page? Maybe by issuing SQL? If you update to the latest experimental Fossil (specifically version http

[fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

Is there a way to delete a wiki page? Maybe by issuing SQL? Jeremy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

Of Jeremy Cowgar Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 14:03 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page? Is there a way to delete a wiki page? Maybe by issuing SQL? Jeremy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

would could be down to delete a wiki page. Jeremy ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On 3/17/2010 5:09 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: You could shun all the wiki artifacts associated with that page. There is no other way at present. Because the design of Fossil is to save everything forever, it is not clear would could be down to delete a wiki page. There has to be a way as

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

There is no such thing as a non-active Wiki page per se. You could remove links to said page if you want to keep it around and then edit the page to say Hey -- we're just keeping this for archival purposes. Otherwise, 'shun' is the tool to use. I've done in on some of my installations for pages

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

On 3/17/2010 6:44 PM, Michael Barrow wrote: There is no such thing as a non-active Wiki page per se. You could remove links to said page if you want to keep it around and then edit the page to say Hey -- we're just keeping this for archival purposes. Otherwise, 'shun' is the tool to use.

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Cowgar Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 17:22 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page? On 3/17/2010 6:44 PM, Michael Barrow wrote: There is no such thing as a non-active Wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Deleting a wiki page?

I agree with Jeremy that shunning is a pretty awkward way to clean up the 'desktop', but if that is the only way . . . I'm working on providing attachments right this moment. I have your request, though. I'll see what I can do D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com

Re: [fossil-users] user(), cgi(), wiki() report functions

Will, On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com wrote: I click on one of your links, and found myself at your fossil repo, logged in as btheado with full access to the Admin settings.  Eeek! Hmm. I noticed that shortly after I sent the email. I couldn't even logout.

Re: [fossil-users] user(), cgi(), wiki() report functions

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Brian Theado brian.the...@gmail.comwrote: Will,Hmm. I noticed that shortly after I sent the email. I couldn't even logout. i noticed a similar problem a couple days ago - it is impossible to log out when connecting to a local fossil server over the localhost

[fossil-users] user(), cgi(), wiki() report functions

I have ported the user() and cgi() sql functions from cvstrac to fossil. Also, I implemented functionality similar to cvstrac's wiki() function. I described what I did in a comment on this ticket: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/66de526498. I have deployed a clone of the fossil repo

Re: [fossil-users] user(), cgi(), wiki() report functions

Brian, I click on one of your links, and found myself at your fossil repo, logged in as btheado with full access to the Admin settings. Eeek! Will On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Brian Theado wrote: I have ported the user() and cgi() sql functions from cvstrac to fossil. Also, I

Re: [fossil-users] A Creole wiki parser for Fossil?

Hi Daniel Clark wrote My humble suggestions that I would find *very* useful as a user are: Thank you for the ideas and links, I'll follow them up. To add to your list is the perl HTML::WikiConverter module as used here: http://labs.seapine.com/htmltowiki.cgi. The ideas sound good but I

Re: [fossil-users] A Creole wiki parser for Fossil?

Daniel Clark wrote: I would think there would be something like libwiki or libmarkup or anywiki or anymarkup in existence that would make much of the above easier, but I've been unable to find it so far. Still haven't been able to find these or anything immediately usable, however these were