8.11.1
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
BOFH excuse #120:
we just switched to FDDI.
On May 09 7:29+, Rajesh Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good day
>
> Do any one know how to execute extended ping in brocade ? like in cisco we
> use ping ip with the s
to decide which server to send traffic to, I think brocade calls it
'content switching').
HTH,
--
Eldon Koyle
On May 13 18:01+0100, Tamas Csillag wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While getting ready for the BCLP 2013, I'm considering getting a
> Serveriron for my home lab.
> Q
.
No joke... we got nailed by a 32-vip limit on the base ADX1000. Not
cool. I'm still bitter about it. Who sells a box at that price and
then limits it to 32 virtual addresses, anyway?
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
"I don't think so,&qu
they hit the LP CPU, and
should at least tell you the source IP, interface, and multicast group
for the offending traffic.
HTH,
--
Eldon Koyle
--
BOFH excuse #319:
Your computer hasn't been returning all the bits it gets from the Internet.
On Jun 03 10:32-0400, Walter Meyer wrote:
> W
DSR and source-nat are mutually exclusive features. If source-nat is
enabled globally, you would need to disable it on the VIP you want to
use DSR on.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
Where the system is concerned, you're not allowed to ask "Why?".
For clarity, the 'secondary' is only needed if you are adding a
secondary address in the same subnet as an existing address. You can
put multiple addresses on a single interface without any trouble at all.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
When the revolu
onnected
to the provider's two routers as it has the least amount of stuff in
between that could go wrong. It is possible that your ISP cannot
support that (if you are connected to a device that doesn't support BGP,
for instance).
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
On
ly put DNS servers behind the load
balancer and use source-nat, just like you do with your webservers.
Or are you having difficulty getting DNS replies back to the right
backend webserver?
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
The founding fathers tried to set up a jud
What does 'show ip bgp routes detail 74.1.1.34' give you on the bad
path? Hopefully that will at least tell you which router is
redistributing that route. Is it possible that a router somewhere was
configured to redistribute OSPF routes into BGP?
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Techn
tly where the router would
not replace a route with admin distance of 255 (even with a static route
with admin distance of 1), so be sure to use 254 or less on all of your
static routes. We only have ipv4 routes, but I'm assuming ipv6 would be
affected as well.
--
Eldon Koyle
Informat
oose. This
I would be interested to see how this was set up. That could be a
really useful tool for us. I didn't see anything in the 5.4 docs that
talked about forwarding a second copy; it sounded like typical PBR with
some VLAN matching added (but that could be a deficiency in the docs).
--
1024 16384 1024 1024 1024
No
--
Eldon Koyle
--
BOFH excuse #350:
paradigm shift...without a clutch
On Jan 24 19:20+, Kennedy, Joseph wrote:
> Are you using the same line cards in the XMR4 as you are in the XMR8's and
> XMR16's?
access-group
or
telnet access-group
Also check for statements like:
ip ssh client
Which have a similar functionality to the ACLs.
Do ssh/telnet work from other locations?
--
Eldon Koyle
On Feb 11 16:44+0100, Mathias Wolkert wrote:
> Anything special about this?
> Does not seem t
think that code is a bit new for most people to be comfortable running
it, so this is probably not a well-tested feature.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
Economists can certainly disappoint you. One said that the economy would
turn up by the last quarter. Well, I'm down to mine and it hasn't.
We have some 2U blowers from APC that pull from the front and push down
the side of our MLXe-8's (ACF201BLK or ACF202BLK, depending on your
voltage).
http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=107
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
Science may someday dis
Is this a single TCP/UDP connection? The spec requires LACP to use a
hash that guarantees a given flow will always hash to the same
interface. For LACP to work effectively, you need multiple flows.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
BOFH excuse #175:
OS swapped to
Could it be a cabling issue? Are there any errors?
Is flow control enabled?
--
Eldon Koyle
On May 08 14:13-0700, ebrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> Just spoke with a sysadmin working out of a different datacenter. They have
> FESX648-PREMs deployed and they're running sxr07400e.bin firmw
/1 128 2F FDESIGNATED FORWARDING 0 607c748ef800
1/1/2 128 2F FDESIGNATED FORWARDING 0 607c748ef800
1/1/3 128 2F FDESIGNATED FORWARDING 0 607c748ef800
1/1/4 128 2F FDESIGNATED FORWARDING 0 60
I am seeing some invalid data from SNMP on 5.6d. 10G interfaces will
periodically transfer at rates of multiple petabits per second and I am
also seeing SNMP reporting 4G RX/TX discards on an interface that reports 0
errors/discards on 'show stat' and 'show int'.
--
Eldon
We are running MLX and MLXe. Opening a ticket with Brocade is on my
to-do list.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
Mathematics deals exclusively with the relations of concepts
to each other without consideration of their relation to experience.
-- Albert Einstein
On Aug 13 6:33+0200, Youssef
rs such as:
router bgp
...
address-family ipv4 unicast vrf NAME
neighbor ...
These routes are then redistributed across your provider routers via the
BGP vpnv4 address family.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
If built in great numbers, motels will be used for nothing but illegal
purposes.
-
I finally heard back today, not sure how long it will take them to fix
it:
DEFECT000527089: 000527089 Seeing unexpected traffic spikes/dips during SNMP
IfInOctets Polling
I thought saw something about SNMP caching in the changelog... I'm
wondering if they did something wrong there.
--
I don't have any more information than that, sorry. They didn't need my
help to reproduce it, so I suspect others have reported the same issue.
FWIW, I didn't notice this with 5.6c, but we didn't deploy that version
as extensively.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
U
ll be.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
BOFH excuse #192:
runaway cat on system.
On Sep 28 10:48+0200, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
> Hello Eldon,
>
> Any feedbacks from BTAC regarding that SNMP defect ?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>
firmware release?
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
It is much easier to suggest solutions when you know nothing about the problem.
On Sep 29 11:40-0600, Eldon Koyle wrote:
> I gave up waiting on them. They claimed it was something with 32-bit
> counters, but do the
All are MLX-4 with single NI-MLX-MR management modules. I haven't
noticed other unusual behavior associated with this as of yet.
--
Eldon Koyle
Information Technology
Utah State University
--
BOFH excuse #195:
We only support a 28000 bps connection.
On Oct 01 1:07+0200, Youssef Benge
I have been getting those messages, but I had just assumed they were
correct. Is it possible that the remote device is running VRRP/HSRP?
Maybe it is time for me to start packet sniffing on this one.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to
do
It is quite odd that those two MAC addresses differ by one bit. Could
this be caused by a bad chip somewhere?
I do see both MAC addresses on my network for all of the messages I have
checked so far.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
America is the country where you buy a lifetime supply of aspirin for one
Are you using PIM or some other multicast routing, by chance? We had
some nasty issues where even small amounts of multicast would send the
LP cpu to 50% on our MLX routers. You might want to try the latest 5.5
release and see if that helps.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
The solution of problems is the
route.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Apr 16 0:18+0930, Stavros Patiniotis wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to terminate the inner vlan of a q-in-q frame onto a routed
> interface of a CES/CER router. I have the following setup, which isn't
> currently work. I can see t
05600b is a pretty early version. I think the latest is 05600f.
I try not no look too closely at release notes, as they can cause
various undesirable emotions ranging from depression to sheer terror.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Jun 15 16:55+0200, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
.
The default can also be changed globally. This has bit me more than once.
--
Eldon Koyle
--
Please excuse my autocorrect
On Sep 16, 2015 12:16 PM, "Dave Peters - Terabit Systems" <
d...@terabitsystems.com> wrote:
> Hi all—
>
>
>
> Having a little trouble with
I have seen other strange things on the ICX7750, the most concerning
of which is a temporary forwarding loop on an MCT LAG during every
boot.
The code still seems a bit immature...
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Michael Gehrmann
wrote:
> I've experienced two weird phenomena recently on ICX7750
on and if it's 10G or
> 40G specific.
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Eldon Koyle
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:54 PM
> To: Michael Gehrmann
> Cc: foundry-nsp@puc
You might check the number of MAC addresses it sees (sh mac)... if
there is a device going insane somewhere, it could exhaust the mac
forwarding DB and cause strange behavior.
sh default values | inc mac
SSH@mlx4#sh default values | inc mac
sys log buffers:50 mac age time:300 sec tel
Also, if you don't feel like TAC is handling your case as quickly as
they should, you can contact your SE and/or your VAR to put some
pressure on them.
--
Eldon
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Nick Cutting wrote:
> I found with OSPF – coming from cisco world – it has a much lower maximum
> me
Come to think of it, our last ICX issue ended up going around TAC.
Apparently, some part of the LLDP parsing for SNMP dies if a device
sends LLDP packets without much useful info (ie. windows 8/10, some IP
phones, some access points), and SNMP doesn't report hostnames, etc.
on any port after that
Could you also provide the output of 'show default values'?
You may need to change your cam-partition profile.
--
Eldon
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Chris Hellkvist via foundry-nsp
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> recently we connected another upstream to a Brocade MLX box.
>
> We noticed that the ML
768 0 No
> np-openflow-flow-entries : layer23ipv4 3 0
> 32768 0 No
> np-openflow-flow-entries : layer23ipv4 4 0
> 32768 0 No
> np-openflow-flow-entries : layer23ipv4
dules in
this device?
--
Eldon Koyle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Dennis op de Weegh wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have a Brocade MLXe-4 with one 4x 10 Gbit card and HSF’s.
>
>
>
> We get this warning in our logs:
>
>
>
> CAM IPv6 partition warning: total 655
Dennis,
I guess I mis-read your question. Please provide the output of 'show module'.
I suspect that slot 1 is not a -X card (1M IPv4 routes max), but a
NI-MLX-10Gx4 (512K ipv4 routes max).
--
Eldon Koyle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Eldon Koyle
wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
&
Dennis,
What version of code are you running? There could be a bug...
What does 'sh ipv6 route summary' say?
--
Eldon Koyle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Dennis op de Weegh wrote:
> Hi Eldon,
>
> Card 1 is a NI-XMR-10Gx4
>
> With the cam profile 768k IPv4 r
might be to contact Brocade TAC :/.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Dennis op de Weegh wrote:
> Hi Eldon,
>
> #sh ipv6 route summary
> IPv6 Routing Table - 27613 entries:
> 21 connected, 1 static, 0 RIP, 0 OSPF, 27591 BGP, 0 ISIS
> Number of prefixes:
>
VRRP IP address to use a different MAC
address...
I think Frank proposed this as a solution to a different problem once,
although I never heard if it worked.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Nick Cutting wrote:
> Or better yet, build a network without two gateways on the same
the
"traffic management configuration guide" (ie. only on physical
interfaces, need to run ipv6 rebind-acl after changes, etc).
--
Eldon Koyle
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Nick Adams wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
> Nothing so far. I hope that doesn’t indicate we’re out
Requests like this are probably not appropriate for this list. I'm
pretty sure Brocade frowns on this, and it could get people into legal
trouble.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:13 AM, misha wrote:
> Hi, guys.
> Could someone share firmware for B
I remember having a lot of trouble with multicast. I don't have the docs
handy, but I think there are some multicast cpu-protection commands you
could try.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Mar 29, 2016 9:21 PM, "Eldon Koyle" wrote:
> I remember having a lot of trouble with multicast. I d
try looking at the output of 'show span detail' and 'show span
802-1w detail' to see if that clears anything up for you.
Also, the priority is entered in decimal in the config (so you will
probably see a line like: 'spanning tree ... priority 25077' for your
device with
So neither "show span" nor "show 802-1w" shows spanning tree running? Is
this turboiron running routing code or switch code? IIRC, the default is
single spanning tree on switch code and no spanning tree on routing code.
--
Eldon Koyle
On May 17, 2016 2:12 PM, "Nick Cu
Sorry, my email client keeps using the wrong from address for this list.
On May 18, 2016 8:07 AM, "Eldon Koyle" wrote:
> You can run 40G without stacking on the 7750, although you may need to
> change some default stacking settings. What code version are you running?
>
>
d to ON, priority is level0”
>
>
>
> I cannot find what this does in any brocade documentation .
>
>
>
> Also – any Ideas why a trunk does not lower the cost of the link? Or get
> treated as an aggregated link by STP?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* eko...@g
> From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:28 AM
> To: Eldon Koyle
> Cc: Nick Cutting; foundry-nsp
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Spanning tree on brocade
>
>
>
> Eldon Koyle wrote:
>
>
>> That is _really_ old code on the turboiron
On May 19, 2016 7:45 AM, "Franz Georg Köhler" wrote:
>
> Am 18.05.16 um 16:12 schrieb ekoyle+puck.nether.net at gmail.com (Eldon
Koyle):
>
>> You can run 40G without stacking on the 7750, although you may need to
>> change some default stacking settings. Wh
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Nick Cutting wrote:
>
> > No routing at all
> >
> > The meltdown is almost certainly the result of 6 Fastirons, 2
> > turboIrons running a combination of IEEE, 802.1w and No spanning tree
> > at all. Ive diagrammed this now for each vlan, and
What code version? I've noticed that early code versions tend to have
a lot of "quirks".
Is it a brocade optic? That is probably the first question TAC will
ask. Then they will check the compatibility matrix (the 10G-SFPP-LR
is supported):
http://www.brocade.com/en/backend-content/pdf-page.htm
I'm still trying to recover from the sticker shock. They only have one
option for ipsec, a 4-port 10g card that lists for $120k in the US.
--
Eldon
On Aug 14, 2016 22:21, "Michael Gehrmann" wrote:
> Has anyone experienced/used the IPSEC modules for MLX or the like?
>
> Good/Bad/Ugly?
>
> --
>
st release.
Still too new for me. Their confidence in their own code inspires
confidence, don't you think?
--
Eldon
On Aug 15, 2016 4:21 PM, "Michael Gehrmann" wrote:
> I agree Eldon. It is pretty steep for a single purpose "one trick pony"
> card.
>
> O
to want to risk the new code.
>
> On 16 August 2016 at 15:39, Eldon Koyle
> wrote:
>
>> One other thing to consider carefully is what code version are you
>> required to run to support that line card and are you ready to upgrade past
>> the "target path"
We heard back a few months ago and I forgot to update this thread.
Their official response is: "The LLDP-MIB is not supported on
fastiron. Please send a feature request via your SE".
--
Eldon
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Eldon Koyle
wrote:
> Come to think of it, our last ICX i
Sorry, I'm getting a bit off the topic of this thread.
Apparently I am wrong about the end of support version for ICX64xx...
It is 08030 that is the last available version. The ICX6430-C12 is
only like 3 years old, though... seems a bit early to drop the line
from newer code versions.
There were
That firmware is ancient... You would probably have better luck if you can
upgrade it...
--
Eldon
On Oct 10, 2016 5:02 PM, "Winston Sorfleet" wrote:
> I picked up an old and out-of-support FGS648P for my basement (overkill,
> yes, but the PoE was nice for $110 CAD! Plus I wanted to play with
We use foundry-privlvl = 0 for admin access.
See also:
http://www.brocade.com/content/html/en/configuration-guide/FI_08030_SECURITY/GUID-A2449097-2DA4-4CD1-B2DA-C531D7A90587.html
--
Eldon
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Tom Storey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Implementing a TACACS server for a n
the office and Im at home.
> So I guess I'll resume on Monday if anyone else comes up with anything. :-)
>
> Thanks
> Tom
>
> On 4 November 2016 at 20:53, Eldon Koyle > wrote:
>
>> We use foundry-privlvl = 0 for admin access.
>>
>> See also: http://
_plus & do_auth provided you can distinguish by
>> device IP. You can authorize by priv levels or commands. I wrote about it
>> years ago here:
>>
>> http://www.tacacs.org/tacacsplus/2012/02/06/disable-account-on-brocade
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:32 PM
We have had issues with one or two older FESX switches where they failed
intermittently (ie. it would work after a cold boot for a random period of
time, anywhere from days to months, then stop passing traffic on a port
region). One was on a fesx 624hf+2xg that had well outlasted its useful
lifeti
been a while, but I remember having similar issues. I'll have to go
dig through my configs and see if it reminds me of anything else.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Dec 13, 2016 08:29, "Alexander Shikoff" wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Well, I'd like to bring this thread up again hopin
I guess I should have asked whether you are running pim first. Is there a
ve on that VLAN with ip pim configured?
--
Eldon
On Dec 18, 2016 10:03 AM, "Eldon Koyle"
wrote:
> What does your pim configuration look like? Especially your rp config.
>
> Making sure there is
For IGMP snooping to work, there must be an L3 device acting as an
IGMP querier on your L2 domain (typically a router). This device is
in charge of keeping track of which IGMP clients have asked for which
multicast groups, and periodically asking if they still want it. The
MLX would not need to b
Do you see any errors on any of the ports involved?
--
Eldon
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Jörg Kost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i will replace optics and fibre on the affected circuits and let you know.
> It is (was) a long time stable short distance (<1m) port channel with 10G
> SR-optics and I have
Heh... this doesn't surprise me, since I was told by BTAC that they do
not "support" LLDP-MIB on fastiron/ICX devices. We did end up getting
product management involved to get our issue fixed (namely, SNMP is
missing LLDP info for ports after a windows 10 device), but only in
the 8.0.30 code train
What protocols are you running over the GRE tunnel?
It might be helpful to include the GRE config from both sides.
The diagnostic guide says drop code 55 / Layer 3 invalid FID(PFE) means
"the forwarding information for a layer 3 packet is invalid in software".
--
Eldon
On Mar 29, 2017 11:23 PM
are you running ?
Best regards.
Le 30 mars 2017 à 07:57, Eldon Koyle a
écrit :
What protocols are you running over the GRE tunnel?
It might be helpful to include the GRE config from both sides.
The diagnostic guide says drop code 55 / Layer 3 invalid FID(PFE) means
"the forwarding information
Have you disabled icmp redirects? That is a common cause of unexplained
high cpu utilization. I think the command is: no ip redirect (either
interface or global).
Also, which code version are you running?
--
Eldon
On Apr 18, 2017 7:14 PM, "Joe Lao" wrote:
> Hello List
>
> My colleague poste
65 Copyright
>
> (config)#sh conf | inc icmp
> no ip icmp redirects
>
> on both
>
>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 8:57 AM
> *From:* "Eldon Koyle"
> *To:* "Joe Lao"
> *Cc:* foundry-nsp
> *Subject:* Re: [f-nsp] High CPU MLX-4
> H
eived on port 1/3:0
> Packets received on port 1/4:0
>
>
> After 20 seconds
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:22 PM
> From: "Eldon Koyle"
> To: "Joe Lao"
> Cc: foundry-nsp , "Perrin Richardson"
>
>
> Subjec
various packet counts per lp since the last run, I
usually ignore the first run.
--
Eldon Koyle
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 08:16 Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've run in strange issue on my MLXe-16: traffic on port which formerly
> had been in LACP LAG and was removed fr
You should probably start with the basics: get a "show ip osfp neighbors",
both working and not.
The first thing I would check is whether your route map is matching OSPF
traffic (esp. UDP from the peer interface IP to 224.0.0.5 or 224.0.0.6).
--
Eldon
On Mon, May 7, 2018, 15:32 wrote:
> Hell
On Mon, May 7, 2018, 20:04 Eldon Koyle
wrote:
>
> The first thing I would check is whether your route map is matching OSPF
> traffic (esp. UDP from the peer interface IP to 224.0.0.5 or 224.0.0.6).
>
Sorry, not UDP. OSPF is its own protocol
The problem you are going to run into is routing outbound traffic the
proper way. There the solutions I can come up with are policy based
routing (which doesn't seem very elegant) and VRF-lite (not sure if or how
well supported it is in your device).
For policy based, BGP session from corporate o
I'll second Dennis. Disabling icmp redirects is extremely important if you
have multiple addresses on a single interface.
If you have a lot of routes, you may need to change your system-max
values. Run 'show default values' and look for ip-route and ip-cache
values (and ipv6- equivalents). The
Could you include the output of 'show module'? Are these
BR-MLX-100GX2-CFP2-X or -M cards?
Do you have any non-X cards installed or configured? Does the management
module show up as a -X if you erase start and boot without any line cards?
--
Eldon
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 02:42 Franz Georg Köhl
You can enable cpu-protection on the vlan IIRC, I don't remember all the
caveats; definitely look at the manual before enabling.
--
Eldon
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 04:11 Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> I see on another device traffic hitting the CPU that looks like the same
> packet hits twice with di
Does anyone have a recommendation for a code version for MLXe?
The last I saw recommended here was recent 5.8, I'm wondering if it is
worth investigating 6.0 or later yet (or ever).
--
Eldon
___
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http
n
the lp cpu, so that may be a red herring.
--
Eldon
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 05:58 Franz Georg Köhler wrote:
> On Mo, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:22:19 -0600, Eldon Koyle <
> ekoyle+puck.nether@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You can enable cpu-protection on the vlan IIRC, I don't
Can you check the output of:
show default values | inc ipv6
--
Eldon
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 08:32 Dennis op de Weegh wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> We have for IPv6 system-max:
>
> system-max ipv6-cache 6
> system-max ipv6-route 6
>
>
>
> Kind regards/Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Dennis op
Which flavor of spanning tree are you running?
--
Eldon
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:32 AM Howard, Christopher <
christopher-how...@utc.edu> wrote:
> One vlan getting blocked by spanning tree should not bring down the lag.
> The vlan should only block on the interfaces required to remove the loop
What kind of experiences (good or bad) have people had with Juniper's
Fusion Provider edge? Are there any limitations I should be aware of?
I'm looking at it to simplify management in a campus network environment.
--
Eldon
___
foundry-nsp mailing list
Sorry, wrong list. I'm tired tonight.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 6:22 PM Eldon Koyle
wrote:
> What kind of experiences (good or bad) have people had with Juniper's
> Fusion Provider edge? Are there any limitations I should be aware of?
>
> I'm looking at it to simp
I had never even heard of those, and apparently nobody is claiming them.
When Brocade was scattered to the four winds, Broadcom says that
device went to Extreme:
https://www.broadcom.com/brocade-customers-partners
Extreme says it went to Ruckus:
https://community.extremenetworks.com/data-center-s
Does 'dm pstat' exist on the CES? It shows a bunch of counters since the
previous run, so ignore the first run.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 07:23 Jörg Kost wrote:
> Hello,
>
> do somebody know the reason for these log entries, that start filling up
> for a few days now? Platform is CES 2048CX, with 2
Are you using the default CAM partition profile? It's probably not
suitable for a full table.
Do all of your cards have the same FIB size, and is this large enough for
the number of installed routes?
Any IPv6 routes? IIRC, the advertised max FIB sizes are with all CAM
allocated to IPv4.
--
El
How many MAC addresses on that card?
I haven't seen that one before, but I suspect it means the device was
seeing new MAC addresses faster than it could program them in CAM.
If you don't expect a lot of L2 learning on that card, it could be a device
jabbering and sending random source MAC address
92 matches
Mail list logo
