At 09:16 -0600 15/5/08, Linda G. Gallagher wrote:
Thanks for this, but it still won't work for me. I did exactly what Hedley
outlined, but still no luck.
I'm late on this thread but it seems to be mainly about Adobe Updater. Forgive
me if I've misunderstood.
I am sorry for Linda, but sort of
Further to my previous mail, I have just 'permitted' yet another installation
of Adobe Bridge 1.0.3, then checked what version of Bridge actually is
installed.
It's 1.0.4.6.
Automatic updaters are great when they work. Apple's is first-rate.
--
Steve
On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
Hi, Sayed:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set all other attributes of the character style to As Is. This is
easiest to do when the cursor is not in a text frame.
Hmmm ... yes, but that is already the situation that I have - all *other*
attributes are already As
You can't do this with stock FrameMaker. You would need two character
formats.
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing
585-659-8267
www.frameexpert.com
To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to do is
have a *single* Character tag (called Emphasis), that *automatically*
Hi, Peter.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to do is
have a *single* Character
tag (called Emphasis), that *automatically* makes the selected text
Italic in paragraphs that have a
default font
Hi, Rick.
To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to
do is
have a *single* Character tag (called Emphasis), that
*automatically*
makes the selected text Italic in paragraphs that have a default
font that
is Regular, and makes the selected text Regular (non-Italic)
Paul Findon wrote:
On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
replying to
the sender, you include information that
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since
If I were you, I'd put this on hold for a few days and wait until
the update is posted to the FM support download site, and then try it
manually.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=22platform=Windows
It sounds as if something may have gotten munged during the
download...
What I did what start Frame. Checked for update, and once the update window
came up I closed Frame. Once I did this it loaded just fine.
Z
**
Ann Zdunczyk
President
a2z Publishing, Inc.
Language Layout Translation Consulting
Frame Gang,
I'm in the process of testing the evaluation copy of Technical
Communication Suite and have run into a couple of crashes.
I've got a book (created in Frame 7.2) that I've opened in Frame 8.0
(p273) and tried to convert to PDF. I can get the book to update just
fine, but when I save
I think this was pretty common in the 0 release, but was fixed
pretty quickly. And it didn't affect everyone, so there may have been
some file content or organization that contributed to it. Assuming
this is the same bug (cause never really was IDed, I don't believe),
it was fixed in the first
Most, if not all, of the problems are from the fntcache.dat file on the C
drive. To fix this problem, do the following:
Open Notepad. Enter this text in Notepad:
del c:\windows\system32\fntcache.dat
shutdown -s
Save the file as a .bat file on your desktop. Mine is called
delfontcache.bat When
My client is intending to convert a number of publications from Publisher to
Frame. She is thinking that the firm will have to cut in Publisher, paste into
Frame, and reformat. Is there an easier way?
Howar Rauch
Technology Transfer, Inc.
Linking Creators and Users of Technology
933 North 18th
Without knowing all the ins and outs of Publisher... for text:
If Publisher can save files as RTF, that would be the easiest way to go.
If it can't, I'd PDF the files and export from PDF to RTF.
Then open the RTF file in Frame and copy-and-paste all into a clean
empty FM template file (so that
I don't have hands-on experience with this, but I would look into:
Publisher - RTF - Frame
Publisher - Text - Frame
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing
585-659-8267
www.frameexpert.com
My client is intending to convert a number of publications from Publisher to
Frame. She is thinking that the firm
I believe this is the default Mailman set up, usually used to reduce
the risk of the email loops that Jeremy already mentioned.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Fred Ridder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no
-Original Message-
Without knowing all the ins and outs of Publisher... for text:
If Publisher can save files as RTF, that would be the easiest way to
go.
If it can't, I'd PDF the files and export from PDF to RTF.
Unfortunately, the RTF output from PDF in Adobe Acrobat, results in
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since 1996, and
Framers is the only list
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
Terrible approach!! The e-mail client world has been relying on
Markzware offers a Publisher-to-InDesign converter. Not sure if it
will help, but it's worth a look.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Howard Rauch
My client is intending to convert a number of publications from Publisher to
Frame. She is thinking that the firm will have to cut in Publisher,
I have these in a template I am trying to purify, due no doubt to PNG graphics
'pollution'. In the past the following solutions have been offered:
. Shlomo Perets: save as .mif, re-open and re-save as .fm
. Richard Combs: Find the PNG graphic lurking in your file and convert it to
something
I think the salient question, Howard, may be this: From where are the Publisher
documents getting their content? After all, Publisher is a page-layout program,
and, unlike Frame, isn't really designed for both writing text and laying it
out in the same application. I know of few Publisher users
At least one major email list that I subscribe to uses LISTSERV email
list management software. In this scheme, one posts messages to a
LISTSERV-powered server which in turn redistributes the posting to
all of the subscribers, either as individual email messages or in
digest format, comprising
Syed,
If you look at the headers on these messages, you'll see many lines
that include clues such as:
Precedence: list
List-Id: An email list for FrameMaker discussions.
framers.lists.frameusers.com
The email client can look for the clues too, and based on the presence
or absence of
Hi Richard,
You are quite right. I did not address Alan's argument, the reason
being that his points did not resonate with me.
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
On 16 May 2008, at 18:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
Hedley is not asking for a reply-to-all. What he, I and, no doubt,
others want is reply-to-list. In other words, when you click your
Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the
Paul
Although I subscribe to both types of mail lists, I never noticed
the difference regarding the presence or absence of the Reply To:
field and the way that my email client responds to its absence or
presence. Thanks for pointing this out.
Dennis...
Actually, there are 2 major problems with Word's autonumbering feature. The
first one is setting it up properly, for which we do have control. The
second one is stability, for which we have absolutely no control. From my
own experience, I have not yet found a way to get stable numbering in a Word
I'm surprised that no one has commented on how well the FM CDs
function as mini-Frisbees.
Get a good spin on one and you can sail it clear across a software
engineering lab...
And they make good coasters.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Richard Pesant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually,
Hi Richard:
I agree the FrameMaker's numbering system is far superior to Word's system.
However, in Word, you can stabilize the numbering system. Go to
ToolsProtect Document and click the box Limit formatting to a
selection of styles. Click the Settings link and from there, you can
choose
Unless you meant stabilize, as in once the Style is created, Word
doesn't mysteriously delete the indents. That has happened to me on
more than one occasion!
Deirdre
On 5/16/08, Deirdre Reagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Richard:
I agree the FrameMaker's numbering system is far superior to
Art Campbell, who is clearly in Friday mode, wrote:
I'm surprised that no one has commented on how well the FM CDs
function as mini-Frisbees.
Get a good spin on one and you can sail it clear across a software
engineering lab...
And they make good coasters.
Well, CDs and DVDs do work
Linda,
Perhaps running the Windows Installer Cleanup Utility will help. There might
be a mangled Installer process stuck somewhere. Here is the description:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290301
The download link is inconspicuous about halfway down the page.
Mike Wickham
However, in Word, you can stabilize the numbering system. Go to
ToolsProtect Document and click the box Limit formatting to a
selection of styles. Click the Settings link and from there, you can
choose which styles the document's users can employ and which they
cannot.
I just did a couple
At 09:16 -0600 15/5/08, Linda G. Gallagher wrote:
>Thanks for this, but it still won't work for me. I did exactly what Hedley
>outlined, but still no luck.
I'm late on this thread but it seems to be mainly about Adobe Updater. Forgive
me if I've misunderstood.
I am sorry for Linda, but sort of
Further to my previous mail, I have just 'permitted' yet another installation
of Adobe Bridge 1.0.3, then checked what version of Bridge actually is
installed.
It's 1.0.4.6.
Automatic updaters are great when they work. Apple's is first-rate.
--
Steve
On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
>
> wrote:
>
>> Which is worse? --
>>
>> - You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
>> replying to
>> the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
>>
Hi, Sayed:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, wrote:
>> Set all other attributes of the character style to As Is. This is
>> easiest to do when the cursor is not in a text frame.
>
> Hmmm ... yes, but that is already the situation that I have - all *other*
> attributes are already "As Is". So,
You can't do this with stock FrameMaker. You would need two character
formats.
Rick Quatro
Carmen Publishing
585-659-8267
www.frameexpert.com
> To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to do is
> have a *single* Character tag (called "Emphasis"), that *automatically*
>
Hi, Peter.
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, wrote:
> > To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to do is
> > have a *single* Character
> > tag (called "Emphasis"), that *automatically* makes the selected text
> > Italic in paragraphs that have a
> > default font
Hi, Rick.
> > To iterate (in case I was not clear - my apologies): what I want to
do is
> > have a *single* Character tag (called "Emphasis"), that
*automatically*
> > makes the selected text Italic in paragraphs that have a default
font that
> > is Regular, and makes the selected text Regular
Paul Findon wrote:
> On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Which is worse? --
> >>
> >> - You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
> >> replying to
> >> the sender, you include
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> I've been using lists since 1993 and running several
In case anyone is interested, I've tried and retried everything everyone has
suggested (thank you!), but I still cannot get the update to run. I even
grabbed the file locally and tried to run it. I've tried after a reboot and
after a complete shutdown and opening only Acrobat or Captivate to try
If I were you, I'd put this on "hold" for a few days and wait until
the update is posted to the FM support download site, and then try it
manually.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=22=Windows
It sounds as if something may have gotten munged during the
download...
What I did what start Frame. Checked for update, and once the update window
came up I closed Frame. Once I did this it loaded just fine.
Z
**
Ann Zdunczyk
President
a2z Publishing, Inc.
Language Layout & Translation Consulting
Most, if not all, of the problems are from the fntcache.dat file on the C
drive. To fix this problem, do the following:
Open Notepad. Enter this text in Notepad:
del c:\windows\system32\fntcache.dat
shutdown -s
Save the file as a .bat file on your desktop. Mine is called
"delfontcache.bat" When
Interesting. I'm on 22 different email lists, and this is the only one
with that particular behavior that I'm aware of. As I mostly lurk, the
issue has never come up for me before.
Gail
Fred Ridder wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all."
My client is?intending to convert a number of publications from Publisher to
Frame.?She is thinking that the firm will have to cut?in?Publisher, paste into
Frame, and reformat. Is there an easier way?
Howar Rauch
?
Technology Transfer, Inc.
"Linking Creators and Users of Technology"
933 North
Hmmm...I'm on 217,406 lists and they're all different.
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Gail Former
> Sent: 2008-05-16 11:31
> To: Fred Ridder
> Cc: Framers
> Subject: Re: default
Without knowing all the ins and outs of Publisher... for text:
If Publisher can save files as RTF, that would be the easiest way to go.
If it can't, I'd PDF the files and export from PDF to RTF.
Then open the RTF file in Frame and copy-and-paste all into a clean
empty FM template file (so that
I believe this is the default Mailman set up, usually used to reduce
the risk of the email loops that Jeremy already mentioned.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Fred Ridder wrote:
>
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>>
> -Original Message-
> My client is intending to convert a number of publications from
Publisher to Frame. She is thinking
> that the firm will have to cut in Publisher, paste into Frame, and
reformat. Is there an easier way?
I have seen a few response suggest trying RTF output from
> -Original Message-
> Without knowing all the ins and outs of Publisher... for text:
> If Publisher can save files as RTF, that would be the easiest way to
go.
> If it can't, I'd PDF the files and export from PDF to RTF.
Unfortunately, the RTF output from PDF in Adobe Acrobat, results in
Markzware offers a Publisher-to-InDesign converter. Not sure if it
will help, but it's worth a look.
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Howard Rauch
>> My client is intending to convert a number of publications from Publisher to
>> Frame. She is thinking that the firm will have to cut in
I have these in a template I am trying to purify, due no doubt to PNG graphics
'pollution'. In the past the following solutions have been offered:
. Shlomo Perets: save as .mif, re-open and re-save as .fm
. Richard Combs: Find the PNG graphic lurking in your file and convert it to
something
I think the salient question, Howard, may be this: From where are the Publisher
documents getting their content? After all, Publisher is a page-layout program,
and, unlike Frame, isn't really designed for both writing text and laying it
out in the same application. I know of few Publisher users
At least one major email list that I subscribe to uses LISTSERV email
list management software. In this scheme, one posts messages to a
LISTSERV-powered server which in turn redistributes the posting to
all of the subscribers, either as individual email messages or in
digest format, comprising
Syed,
If you look at the headers on these messages, you'll see many lines
that include clues such as:
Precedence: list
List-Id: "An email list for FrameMaker discussions."
The email client can look for the clues too, and based on the presence
or absence of them, can provide another
Hi Richard,
You are quite right. I did not address Alan's argument, the reason
being that his points did not resonate with me.
> - You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
> replying to
> the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
>
On 16 May 2008, at 18:36,
wrote:
>> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>>> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
>>> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> Terrible
Paul
Although I subscribe to "both types" of mail lists, I never noticed
the difference regarding the presence or absence of the "Reply To:"
field and the way that my email client responds to its absence or
presence. Thanks for pointing this out.
Dennis...
Actually, there are 2 major problems with Word's autonumbering feature. The
first one is setting it up properly, for which we do have control. The
second one is stability, for which we have absolutely no control. From my
own experience, I have not yet found a way to get stable numbering in a Word
I'm surprised that no one has commented on how well the FM CDs
function as mini-Frisbees.
Get a good spin on one and you can sail it clear across a software
engineering lab...
And they make good coasters.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Richard Pesant
wrote:
> Actually, there are 2 major
Hi Richard:
I agree the FrameMaker's numbering system is far superior to Word's system.
However, in Word, you can stabilize the numbering system. Go to
Tools>Protect Document and click the box Limit formatting to a
selection of styles. Click the Settings link and from there, you can
choose
Art Campbell, who is clearly in Friday mode, wrote:
> I'm surprised that no one has commented on how well the FM CDs
> function as mini-Frisbees.
> Get a good spin on one and you can sail it clear across a software
> engineering lab...
> And they make good coasters.
Well, CDs and DVDs do work
Linda,
Perhaps running the Windows Installer Cleanup Utility will help. There might
be a mangled Installer process stuck somewhere. Here is the description:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290301
The download link is inconspicuous about halfway down the page.
Mike Wickham
> However, in Word, you can stabilize the numbering system. Go to
> Tools>Protect Document and click the box Limit formatting to a
> selection of styles. Click the Settings link and from there, you can
> choose which styles the document's users can employ and which they
> cannot.
I just did a
70 matches
Mail list logo
