in the review
buildouts for each of these PLIPs.
peace,
Ok, I revisited this plip and it looks good now. So +1 for me on this
one.
Danny.
PLIP 126 framework review #3 by Danny Bloemendaal, 2009-02-11
=
Reviewed this plip after
On 20 jan 2009, at 23:08, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 21:43, Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de wrote:
Do whatever you feel is right considering that I missed the
deadline.
personally i think it'd be stupid to not consider changes that were
ready
for a while now. i mean,
Ok, I reviewed this plip and these are my findings:
PLIP 126 framework review #3 by Danny Bloemendaal, 2009-01-27
=
review steps
the bundle was reviewed on OSX 10.5.6 doing the following:
* bundle checkout, buildout
On 27 jan 2009, at 20:19, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
As admin I also visited the folder and the navtree links me to the
Link object while the folder listing
redirects me to the target url.
An additional remark. I notice the consideration in the readme for not
adapting the various views
On 27 jan 2009, at 21:07, David Glick wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
notes and observations
--
I reviewed this plip from a UI perspective of course. So I started
by creating a folder as
admin with a Link in there. Published both items
Ok, I reviewed this plip and did some tests with ttw locking and
indeed it seems to work. I leave all the technical review stuff to
people with brains.
I have a remark for the help text below Enable locking for through-
the-web edits though. I think that the line Disabling locking here
will
I was on vacation the past week and I will catch up and review in the
coming days.
Danny
On 23 jan 2009, at 10:07, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
We are not almost a week into the two review period, and at this point
two out of the required 22 reviews have been done, two PLIPs have not
been
On 22 nov 2008, at 03:30, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 20.11.2008, at 09:47, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Nov 19, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
It looks to me like we're getting a pretty good list of
nominations.
yes, very good! :)
Shall we close
as a framework-team member for Plone 3 and I'd like to continue this
work. Especially now that we have rather radical and new plans for 4.0
so I want to make sure that we stick to state of the art, modern UI
and interaction patterns.
Danny Bloemendaal
Sorry, wasn't online yesterday but for me this is a good idea.
On 6 nov 2008, at 01:17, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
danny, raphael, and also steve and jon,
would that work for you? that's to say, realistically, like in
being able to do all necessary reviews etc on time? :) if not,
please
On 3 nov 2008, at 21:33, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 03.11.2008, at 10:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I've been told the framework team wants to be involved with setting
timeframes for releases. I want to propose to take this one step
further
during the PLIP handling phase: I would like the framework
On 29 okt 2008, at 10:05, Tom Lazar wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
Well, I am all in favor of having the UI fixed. Perhaps some of the
kss boys can do this. You need to have a hover event that shows a
button next to the widget (button can styles using css
On 26 okt 2008, at 22:42, Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi team,
There's been a lot of activity and excitement about Plone 4 after the
Plone Conference, and I'd like for us to start moving on the
development
for it.
Hanno Schlichting has said that he'd like to be the release manager
for
Plone
Is it correct that http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/245 hasn't
been officially proposed for 3.3? I can't remember we discussed it
though.
Danny
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
Thank you Steve. I think this covers what I remembered as well. Good
work.
Danny
On 20 okt 2008, at 00:20, Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my notes from the DC Framework Team meeting. Please discuss
anything I've missed, gotten wrong, or stated too absolutely. We'll
eventually codify the
On 16 okt 2008, at 17:35, Martin Aspeli wrote:
- Create a site wide portlet category for portlets that should show
on all pages (unless blocked).
Then how do you unblock them? If I have such a global portlet and at
some point a folder blocks the portlets and redefines them and in a
On 17 okt 2008, at 01:29, Jon Stahl wrote:
One other thought to contribute to this topic:
Right now, the system renders all placeful portlets, then all group
portlets, then all type portlets.
Grouping is bad. Especially if you allow some form or ordering. No
user wants to be bound by an
On 9 okt 2008, at 07:27, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to propose PLIP 243 for Plone 3.3: Replace workflow
history
viewlet with content history viewlet.
Motivation
==
The 'history' list in a document view does not show the full history
of
an object but only the workflow
On 9 okt 2008, at 11:29, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I did mention that on the web-version of the PLIP. Site actions
works since it mostly contains rarely-used items, which includes
manage portlets. But you are very correct in that document actions
would technically be
On 27 sep 2008, at 16:15, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose PLIP 238: Disable inline editing by default
Motivation
--
I suspect that by now most of us have realized that the current
inline editing
behaviour in Plone 3 is not very practical. It has two main problems:
* it
On 28 sep 2008, at 07:47, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I guess I'm the first one. I want to propose PLIP 228 for Plone 3.3.
I feel that removing the removal of the 'Add Item' dropdown in many
places in Plone 3 is a regression in behaviour, and makes adding
content
a lot
It seems that this plip has a few valid comments that seem to extend
it. What will the plip exactly be? Is it only about direct linking or
also a better way to use it to link internally? For the latter you
could imagine a different widget that either uses the yet-to-come
Sounds good but for my understanding could you please give me more
info and refresh my memory of what this sorting was for originally?
On 5 okt 2008, at 16:47, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
hi,
i'd like to propose PLIP 241[*] for plone 3.3: removing the unused
auto-sorting, -ordering code would
On 6 okt 2008, at 03:22, Raphael Ritz wrote:
David Glick wrote:
I'd like to propose PLIP #240 for inclusion in Plone 3.3:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/240
This PLIP is intended to provide several avenues toward
addressing the problem of content accidentally getting left in a
On 9 okt 2008, at 11:32, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
First: remove the Display menu and add a field to the settings tab of
the edit form where it belongs.
-1 for 3.x.
- This breaks existing documentation and expectations.
Mmm.. change the docs then ;-)
- The display
Is that on 808 7th St NW, Washington?
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=engeocode=q=fado+pub,+Washington,+DC+20037ie=UTF8ll=38.900919,-77.021027spn=0.018269,0.043473z=15
And what time exactly?
On 3 okt 2008, at 17:17, Steve McMahon wrote:
Hi Framework Team,
I asked our conference social
-2008-dc/dinner-and-drinks
My cell is +1 530.219.1431
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Danny Bloemendaal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that on 808 7th St NW, Washington?
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=qhl=engeocode=q=fado+pub,+Washington,+DC+20037ie=UTF8ll=38.900919,-77.021027spn=0.018269,0.043473z=15
Can't we have a Page somewhere where everybody puts their info on?
(hotel, arrival-departure, cellphone etc).
I for instance arrive on sunday in the afternoon and it would be nice
to know who is around at that time as well.
:)
Danny.
On 11 sep 2008, at 18:38, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On
, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Danny Bloemendaal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we have a Page somewhere where everybody puts their info on?
(hotel,
arrival-departure, cellphone etc).
I for instance arrive on sunday in the afternoon and it would be
nice to
know who is around at that time as well
I arrive on Sunday 5 and leave the next Sunday.
On 4 sep 2008, at 22:33, Steve McMahon wrote:
I'm not on the team, but will be happy to be scribe and facilitate in
any other way that might be helpful.
I'll be in DC Monday through Sunday.
--
Steve McMahon
Reid-McMahon, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm hoping to be there too.
On 14 jul 2008, at 22:27, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
I'll be in D.C. and would attend the meeting on whichever day it
may be held.
I'll be there, Saturday to Monday. I'm giving a training course
Monday and Tuesday, though.
Martin
--
Author of
I will be on vacation from 9-23 august.
On 29 jun 2008, at 21:43, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Can the members of the framework team mail me some information on
their availability for the next couple of months? If there are
periods of a week or longer that you know you will not be able to
large.
Danny Bloemendaal
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the
review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that was
sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them. I'm now working on
my last one #212. And to be honest, I didn't know that I had to vote
for plips I
On 18 feb 2008, at 01:28, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 16, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
As you guys know I'm here to review plips when it requires UI
attention. So I did 201 (and still working on that next week). As
far as I can tell there aren't other plips that need
Hi folks,
I have been thinking (yes, I try that occasionally) and I must say
that we really need some sort of better tooling for the entire review
process. It is all too scattered if you ask me. I really don't know
where I have to find what I need to know for reviewing. Plone.org,
track,
this.
Why not?
My suggestion solves that part :)
Danny Bloemendaal.
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
As you guys know I'm here to review plips when it requires UI
attention. So I did 201 (and still working on that next week). As far
as I can tell there aren't other plips that need that attention from
me (please correct me if I'm wrong).
So, I guess that's my status.
Danny.
Today Florian made some changes to überselectionwidget to use the same
pattern as Mac OS Finder's column view and it rocks and I really think
that this is the way how it should work. Add search, good mouse/
keyboard navigation, object details etc to it and you have a very
powerful and easy
On 19 jan 2008, at 11:29, Tom Lazar wrote:
andi, sorry about the silence, i've fallen a bit ill (that noro
virus that's going round here in berlin, watch out...)
i think the idea with trac is excellent and have, in fact, been
harbouring similar ideas in that regard but kept quiet since i
On 24 dec 2007, at 04:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less
technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual
usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to suggest
(when
On 24 dec 2007, at 11:24, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 24 dec 2007, at 04:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less
technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual
usecase
On 23 dec 2007, at 01:31, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
PLIP 184 is about adding new portlets. I've got two covered and
mostly complete:
- plone.portlet.static[1] provides static text with a Kupu widget
- plone.portlet.collection[2] provides a listing based on a collection
Is it an
After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less
technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual
usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to suggest (when
thechcnically possible) to add such a section in a plip. I'd like to
see a real-world
On 15 dec 2007, at 23:24, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 15 dec 2007, at 21:25, Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi guys,
Just a quick email to say that I have been traveling (and without
internet connection :( ) since before the PLIP deadline.
The one I want in 3.1 isn't really a core thing
Sorry for the delay guys. I commented on all the plips.
On 22 dec 2007, at 12:22, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
hi all,
On Dec 22, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
ps: i still got 4 votes to cast, but have to go offline, since i'm
occupying a room in which people want to go to sleep
I tot
On 14 dec 2007, at 18:52, Alec Mitchell wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 7:56 AM, Malthe Borch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so, while i also like the idea, i'm not too sure if plone should
ship
with it. i'd agree with martin we should discuss and think this
through
a little further. nevertheless,
On 14 dec 2007, at 21:10, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose PLIP 219: New site search implementation
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/219
Since I discussed this with Wichert together with Cornelis in depth
I'm all for it. It will greatly improve search results for a UI
On 13 dec 2007, at 08:41, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 11.12.2007, at 13:35, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I'd like to see the following for 3.1:
#210: Improve UI support for objects on multiple workflows
DCWorkflow allows for a chain of workflows to be specified for a
type.
please
On 13 dec 2007, at 12:51, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
I truely think that this isn't as trivial as it may seem. Is it
only a UI issue? I know plone relies on several locations for the
review_state attribute. What if an object has several states (which
is possible
On 12 dec 2007, at 00:03, Encolpe Degoute wrote:
I'd like to see the following for 3.1:
#214: Merge of CMFPlacefulWorkflow into CMFPlone/WorkflowTool
CMFPlacefulWorkflow is now mature enough to be merge into the
workflow tool:
* since two major version there's no critical bug on it
Hi folks,
Just a small request: can we stick to this list for all framework
communications? Prevents a lot of double emails ;-)
Danny
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
52 matches
Mail list logo
