On 10/12/10 8:58 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
We have a call scheduled for today. Since we've had all of one new review in
the past two weeks, is it still worthwhile for us to get together to talk? Do
we have any updates to the PLIPs we've already cast votes for to discuss?
I think we should
Hello everyone,
We are fast approaching the final PLIP deadline for Plone 4.1, this is your
last chance to get a proposal in before the process starts again for Plone 4.2.
The framework team has already considered many PLIPs, including all those
submitted by the earlier deadline for
On 2010-08-12, at 2042, Eric Steele wrote:
We've got 30 PLIPs in for 4.1 already (http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24),
so it's time to get together and start talking. Can I assume that next
Tuesday at 14:00 UTC will work, or should I set up another Doodle thing?
That's going to be
On 2010-08-16, at 1345, Laurence Rowe wrote:
Note the later email:
Sorry, I meant the later one, just quoted the wrong thing. Personally I'd like
it 2 hours earlier, but 8pm CEST (1800 zulu) is ok.
Matthew
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Hello everyone,
As I'm sure many of you know, the Plone 4.x framework team has been set up and
we had our first meeting on Tuesday. There we decided to open the call for
PLIPs this week, with a deadline of the 30th August 2010. However, if you are
considering submitting an PLIP that is
On 2010-06-15, at 0021, Steve McMahon wrote:
I have created a new mailing list, framewor...@lists.plone.org for discussion
of the nominations for the Plone 4.x Framework Team. I am the initial owner
and will facilitate discussion but not vote.
What's the process here? I assume it's a free
On 2010-06-15, at 0039, David Glick wrote:
It is open to folks who 1) have not been nominated
That'll teach me not to respond to emails after midnight...
Matt
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
On 2010-03-09, at 0250, Eric Steele wrote:
So... now that those bums are out the door, how do we go about
appointing a 4.x team for me to abuse?
Well, on a more general note, I think we need a bit better separation
between the 4.x and 5.x teams to avoid conflicts between the needs of
On 2009-10-28, at 1858, Martijn Pieters wrote:
Let's meet at the lobby right now and head out?
Where to? I'm at my hotel (the centrum) at the mo.
Matt
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
• A new design from Iain (screenshot) that I have implemented as a
static HTML version on top of the Plone markup (with the
main_template changes. Note that the typography and pull-down menu
will be different — closer to what you see on plone.org right now.
Is that the new design for
Hello all,
To confirm, are we meeting at 1800 UTC on #plone-framework tomorrow?
Matt
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
On 20 Jun 2009, at 19:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
Isn't 4.0 deliberately a short-hop release, with minimal new
feautres,
mostly intended to move the platform forward (to modern versions of
Zope, Python, CMF)? Keeping the window short emphasizes that fact, at
least to my outsider's eyes.
Hmm,
On 20 Jun 2009, at 20:54, Laurence Rowe wrote:
So if your PLIP isn't ready now, don't worry. There'll be another
chance to get it in with 4.1
With the usual caveat that 4.x releases are as ambitious as 3.x
releases. The reason we need a 4.0 release is so we can put the
things Laurence
Hi all,
I'd like to open a public discussion on where tracs should be. As
some of you may know, I'm very much against the PLIPs-in-trac system
that has been implemented following out-of-band discussions last year.
I think we need to make a proper decision, I'm not sure how that will
Hi all,
We've had a PLIP that was clearly a feature request,
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9257
I've moved it to a feature request against installers, I hope nobody
minds, but it's clearly not a PLIP. Any objections to continue
gardening this list?
Matt
On 30 May 2009, at 22:23, David Glick wrote:
Raphael raised a question about the consequences of backwards-
incompatible changes for add-on developers. Switching to a newer
Zope and CMF will indeed probably have some consequences. But this
is a major version bump of Plone, so I think
On 26 May 2009, at 10:59, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I think someone has to try and see what kind of changes are acutally
required to make a current Plone 3.3rc3 run on Zope 2.12 or even
better
a real client side with a collection of add-ons.
I doubt it's very hard, a concerted effort by me
On 5 May 2009, at 12:44, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
The general idea that seems to have met some consensus is to go for a
Plone 3.5 release up next. We'd skip any 3.4 release and go for a 3.5
that is similar in spirit to the Plone 2.5 release. It tries to both
refresh some of our technical
On 5 May 2009, at 13:20, Martin Aspeli wrote:
snip
Yes, I agree with all of these, and do think they're needed.
So, 3.5 is a compromise. The skipping of 3.4 actually helps back the
story up. We could try something else, like Plone 2009, but I'm
pretty sure we'd regret that in 2010 for
On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Calvin Hendryx-Parker wrote:
Mr. Wilkes, can you post the link to that scheduling software that
you mentioned on the call? We can setup a mock week and basically
vote on which days/times work best.
Sorry, sent from the wrong address and it didn't get
On 13 Mar 2009, at 19:30, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule
is
going to be. I'll try to join
On 14 Mar 2009, at 00:13, Jon Stahl wrote:
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
To be honest, the travel time isn't a massive factor, it only adds a
few
On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote:
In partial answer,
http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/WheredItGoOnPloneTrunk
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8805
http://dev.plone.org/plone/query?component=NuPlone+Themeorder=iddesc=1
http://dev.plone.org/plone/changeset/23493
Regards
Graham
(ccing wiggy in as a ping as he requested for such issues in #8839)
On 4 Jan 2009, at 03:06, Martin Aspeli wrote:
This is actually really bad, and I think it should block the 3.2 full
release (i.e. with installers).
+1
I think we need to:
1) Get a release of Products.NuPlone that works
On 25 Dec 2008, at 17:39, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
we just decided to move all
PLIP's to Trac for Plone 4 and no longer use plone.org/products/plone
for it.
Incidentally, I missed this, where was it discussed? Are we going to
have a new workflow for PLIPs?
Matt
On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:50, Graham Perrin wrote:
Excellent to see Trac being used in this way. Thanks.
Ah, hadn't noticed this thread yet, sorry.
If we're going to use Trac for PLIPs I'd say we need the same or
similar workflow to what we currently have and have some policy on
priorities,
On 23 Dec 2008, at 12:47, Graham Perrin wrote:
I assume that in exceptional circumstances (imagine a very well
formed Feature Request) a Feature Request (type) in Trac may be
converted to a PLIP (type).
PLIPs have their own numbering and are currently stored exclusively on
plone.org.
on those factors.
I think I'll answer this, as in my initial mail nominating myself you
asked about my UI experience:
On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:54, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
- loves to make sure a user interface is as simple as possible
Less so, I'm a terminal junkie. I know what I hate
On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:29, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
- excels at reading and understanding other people's code
Yes, not only do I do regular code reviews at work I have worked as a
coursework marker for a masters level university java course. Part of
my job is that when I see an interesting
Well, I'll get the ball rolling on this.
I'd be interested in serving on the 4.x team. Although I've not made
masses of commits to Plone I do know the internals very well, I think
I must have pdbed or read most of it over the years and I'm
comfortable with development versions. I think
30 matches
Mail list logo
