On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:49:08PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: It may also be worth mentioning that people should move /usr/include
: to (say) /usr/include.not before their next installworld and nuke
: /usr/include.not after it completes.
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 21:26:37, jkoshy (Joseph Koshy) wrote about Date for a working
-current?:
I'm in the processing of bring a 5-current system of Oct 2000 vintage
more upto-date.
The kernel built around May 23rd 2001, has been quite unstable, with
numerous warning on lock order
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 15:43:50, nk (Norbert Koch) wrote about downgrade:
Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
A ~month ago I downgraded my home system from -current to -stable (RELENG_4)
via buildworld+installworld. But to do it successfully I had to
replace
Find Out Virtually Anything You
Want
To Find the Truth About Anything and Anyone you
need to
use the Most Powerful Detective Tool on the Internet.
Click Here to start your Online
Investigation Now
Use what the Professionals use to
Find and Locate...
- your enemies, friends, debtors, a new
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Current (not -current;)) but contemporary) world building procedure
does not exclude headers from /usr/include out of compiler view.
This was broken in src/Makefile.inc1 rev.1.105. /usr/include was still
still needed in rev.1.104 for building
Doug Barton wrote:
Blast from the past. This patch seemed reasonable to me at the time, but I
notice you didn't commit it. Any reason why? The issue has just come up
again on -questions.
I seem to recall finding it had been fixed elsewhere, though
unfortunately I can't remember the
On Thu, 24 May 2001 19:56:33 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mine too. It also appears there's no canonical (i.e. rc.conf) knob
for configuring /tmp as a MD (there are however instructions in the
manpage which I hacked in manually on my system)
I sent patches for this when the whole MD thing
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:47:13 +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Wed, May 23, 2001 at 15:43:50, nk (Norbert Koch) wrote about downgrade:
Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable?
A ~month ago I downgraded my home system from -current to -stable (RELENG_4)
via
hello, world\n
so I thought I knew everything about DNS. Here's something that beats me.
I'm running -current as of a week or so ago, which means the resolver is
configured with /etc/nsswitch.conf (instead of /etc/host.conf which no
longer exists). I want the resolver to look in /etc/hosts and
On 24 Mai, Kris Kennaway wrote:
BTW, what happened to mount_mfs in current? It still gives this nasty
warning about migrating to mdconfig, waits 15 seconds and then panics
my machine.
Mine too. It also appears there's no canonical (i.e. rc.conf) knob
MSG-IDs:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:36:42PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
Sheldon Hearn posted a patch to add such a knob around January when we
were having this exact discussion. Personally, I think it only solves
half a problem; what if you want /tmp and /tmp2? And why should it be
limited to
Hello.
Today i try upgrade apache with php (old apache was compiled on -stable
before upgrade), but after upgrade apache core dumped. Apache compiled on
-stable work fine. It's look like that troubles in libc's tzset() or my
locales.
LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R
Time Zone - Moscow
gdb
# httpd not
I actually wrote a short program that emulates *all* of mount_mfs's
umpteen options with md, disklabel, and newfs, but nobody seemed
interested. My choice of name (mount_md) wasn't particuarly good,
either. Look at the -hackers and cvs-all archives around late January
and
Edging closer to making major device numbers a pesky compatibility
detail and generally bring the new DEVFS based world order closer:
20010525disk.patch
Create a general facility for making dev_t's depend on another
dev_t. The dev_depends(dev_t, dev_t) function
Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course, it
can. But can we have something like host type, where all smb-shares
available from a host are automaticly accessible? This may be added to
the host-type together with NFS, or be made part of a separate smbhost
type.
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is that
it's totally counter-intuitive to have a binary called mount_mfs that
doesn't mount an MFS
On 25 May, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is
that it's totally counter-intuitive to have a binary
Hi,
I noticed this panic for last few days on my -current
sandbox laptop.
When I do FTP get file from the machine running
-current causes panic like below (hand copied).
The machine running ftpd panics not FTP client side.
I have not tried FTP put yet... It may panic at FTP
client side as
Latest CVS from a couple minutes ago, on the kernel compile (make depend
goes fine)
[root@home] SMP.Kernel make
cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
On 25-May-01 Tamiji Homma wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this panic for last few days on my -current
sandbox laptop.
When I do FTP get file from the machine running
-current causes panic like below (hand copied).
The machine running ftpd panics not FTP client side.
I have not tried FTP put
RELNOTESng is now the default for -CURRENT release builds. Floppy
images get ASCII renderings only, while the CDROM and FTP areas get both
ASCII and HTML.
To disable all release note documentation building (i.e. for minimal
builds), define NORELNOTES at release-building time. Note that release
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Blast from the past. This patch seemed reasonable to me at the time, but I
notice you didn't commit it. Any reason why? The issue has just come up
again on -questions.
It shouldn't be needed. Instead, the following logic
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course, it
can. But can we have something like host type, where all smb-shares
available from a host are automaticly accessible? This may be added to
the
John,
Thank you for quick patch. But I hate to report The patch didn't work.
You need another patch to try ;-)
Here is trace back. I omitted details (I still do hand copy)
If you need exact trace back, I'll have to setup serial port.
panic: mutex vm not owned at ../../vm/vm_page.h:320
On 25-May-01 Tamiji Homma wrote:
John,
Thank you for quick patch. But I hate to report The patch didn't work.
You need another patch to try ;-)
It sort of worked. :) It got farther along. :) Please try the updated
sendfile.patch. Thanks.
Here is trace back. I omitted details (I
] Here's the rub: when I start X, my window manager ctwm tries to
] determine the hostname (to assign to HOSTNAME and then m4-process the
] .ctwmrc) This causes my machine to dial out. I've used tcpdump on port
] 53 (dns) by putting this in /etc/start_if.isp1:
] /usr/sbin/tcpdump -nli isp1 -c 16
On 25-May-01 Tamiji Homma wrote:
John,
Thank you for quick patch. But I hate to report The patch didn't work.
You need another patch to try ;-)
It sort of worked. :) It got farther along. :) Please try the updated
sendfile.patch. Thanks.
The second patch worked! You are so
On 25 May, David O'Brien wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:56:42AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Now that smbfs is in, can amd be used to mount smb shares? Of course,
it can. But can we have something like host type, where all
smb-shares available from a host are automaticly
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Blast from the past. This patch seemed reasonable to me at the time, but I
notice you didn't commit it. Any reason why? The issue has just come up
again on -questions.
It shouldn't be needed.
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 12:04:11PM -0500, Storms of Perfection wrote:
Latest CVS from a couple minutes ago, on the kernel compile (make depend
goes fine)
[root@home] SMP.Kernel make
cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
Here is a patch I have locally that would be useful for Bill Paul,
I think. I know, we could use flag0 for this, but it seems to
me that this will be an increasingly common option in hadware.
I know Bill had to set this manually as a compile time flag, for
lack of an option (same for the JMB
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:11:16PM +, Terry Lambert wrote:
Here is a patch I have locally that would be useful for Bill Paul,
I think. I know, we could use flag0 for this, but it seems to
me that this will be an increasingly common option in hadware.
Should this be implemented as a
Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if
necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not? At the moment, detaching
an md(4) disk will panic the system with a failed mtx_assert in
vm_pager_deallocate. This can be fixed one of two ways:
vm_pager_deallocate could be made to deal
I recently purchased a new Toshiba Satellite 2805 laptop, and I'm
trying to install -current on it =) When I tried to install from the
-current snapshots they all would lockup just after 'pcib0: ...' was
printed. So I tried a 4-stable snapshot and that worked
perfectly. However, I'm now trying to
* Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010525 22:22] wrote:
Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if
necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not? At the moment, detaching
an md(4) disk will panic the system with a failed mtx_assert in
vm_pager_deallocate. This can be fixed
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
The objection that impressed me the last time this was suggested is that
it's totally
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2001 09:34:16 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Why can't that program _replace_ mount_mfs? And assume the name too?
The objection that impressed me the last time this
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010525 22:22] wrote:
Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if
necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not? At the moment, detaching
an md(4) disk will panic the system with a failed mtx_assert
38 matches
Mail list logo
