Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maksim Yevmenkin writes:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely
surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in
this at all. I got very few replies from few people
(Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert - thanks!) and
unsubscribe
--
katty
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Hi,
and Martins patch:
This one works standalone and with 2 and 3 above. It seems to have
increase ftp transfer rates too from 8600Kbytes/sec to 10577Kbytes/sec.
Cool.
Ofcourse, for some odd reason, if the ftp was done from a Windows XP Pro
machine, it's only 6722KBytes/sec.
Hmm.
Hi,
1) dc driver uses wrong case to read MAC from eeprom.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35482
This one seems to break data sending/receiving as the only thing that
works is pinging and that's only on the alias/secondary IP and not the
primary IP network which is
The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review,
though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any
glaring problems.
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top.
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review,
though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any
glaring problems.
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:09:05 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Vincent On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote:
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
---
boot -v might
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Julian On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote:
I compiled the kernel last nite and I haven't been able to boot into the
system with that kernel. This is where the kernel hangs
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
The locking changes in union_link() need a thorough review,
though the light testing of that I performed didn't turn up any
glaring problems.
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have
been because locking all the way down is harmful?
Bruce Evans wrote:
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have
been because locking all the way down is harmful?
For a stacked local media FS, you can end up with a deadlock, if
a lower vnode is
On 10 Sep 2002, Sid Carter wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:09:05 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Vincent On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Vincent Poy wrote:
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
1) dc driver uses wrong case to read MAC from eeprom.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/35482
This one seems to break data sending/receiving as the only thing that
works is pinging and that's only on the alias/secondary IP
Hi Martin:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:
and Martins patch:
This one works standalone and with 2 and 3 above. It seems to have
increase ftp transfer rates too from 8600Kbytes/sec to 10577Kbytes/sec.
Cool.
Seems to depend on which notebook the card is in. With the
On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
On 10 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have
been because
On 10 Sep, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have
been because locking all the way down is harmful?
For a stacked local media FS, you can end up with
Regardless of whether the xl driver is linked into the kernel or
loaded as a module, the machine freezes shortly after ifconfig-ing
the card. Sunday's -current. Complete freeeze -- can not go into
debugger...
More information available upon request...
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
I worked around this by making the driver a child of pci instead of a
child of acpi. (Which is even more correct too)
My driver is a child of acpi again and at this point it always seems to be
called at resume too. I don't know
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
The changes are obviously just cleanups for leaf file systems, but I
wonder why everything wasn't always locked at the top. Could it have
been because locking all the way down is harmful?
I think this is because some places are still worrying
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply.
BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the
reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()?
I think it is. It has some internal locking (v_interlock at least), and
only
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:11:15PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
I worked around this by making the driver a child of pci instead of a
child of acpi. (Which is even more correct too)
My driver is a child of acpi again and at this point it always seems to be
called at resume too. I don't
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
It seems that old laptops don't have VGA specific ACPI objects, so
many people will be happy if we can implement non-ACPI VGA driver w/
ATI chips hack.
BTW, have you checked for XFree86 code? Hopefully we might find
some hints
I just bought an new battery and that combined with the fact that
I've seen so many recent emails about acpi that I decided to check my
laptop. I've never really been able to take advantage of acpi with it
and may never be able to, but previously I was able to do an acpidump
and now I get:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very
few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert -
thanks!) and that's it.
I'm very interested, as
I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure:
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../build -I../misc -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/local/include -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wno-char-subscripts -c cpio.c
FUJIMOTO Kou wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maksim Yevmenkin writes:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely
surprised that FreeBSD community seems not interested in
this at all. I got very few replies from few people
(Julian Elischer,
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
:
: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
: FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very
: few replies from few
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
:cc1: warnings being treated as errors
:/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c: In function `cardbus_driver_added':
:/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/dev/cardbus/cardbus.c:319: warning: unused variable
:`cardattached'
:*** Error code 1
I
On 10-Sep-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
:
: I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
: FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very
few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry Lambert -
I got this on the bento cluster this morning (-current from about 2 days ago):
/x: bad dir ino 3180135 at offset 0: mangled entry
panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Debugger(panic)
Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
db trace
Debugger(c03f45bc,c0473f80,c040e087,ceac4974,)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:21:31AM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure:
Known problem; see the list archives for a patch.
Kris
msg42849/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
subscribe freebsd-current [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Julian,
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very
few replies from few people (Julian Elischer, Terry
Am Di, 2002-09-10 um 19.48 schrieb Julian Elischer:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Chris Dillon wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
I still would like to hear from people. I'm extremely surprised that
FreeBSD community seems not interested in this at all. I got very
I've seen the scrn_timer() one too:
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc049b3f0(0xc0657200) 0.003659743
c049b3f0 t scrn_timer
as well as uma_timeout().
Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc047c6b0(0) 0.002146136
c047c6b0 t uma_timeout
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
Do you think that there is a change that this is in the direction of DPMS,
or is that very unliky? I tried to find the spec for DPMS but it seems to
be a closed on (at least to non-members).
It seems that old laptops don't
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Regardless of whether the xl driver is linked into the kernel or
loaded as a module, the machine freezes shortly after ifconfig-ing
the card. Sunday's -current. Complete freeeze -- can not go into
debugger...
More information available upon
Yes. we are aware of the work and we are pleased that it is hapenning, but
few of us have even SEEN any bluetooth stuff yet..
certainly in the US it's not yet being marketted a lot.
Fry's Electronics in the SF bayarea has a bunch of bluetooth
gadgets. Go to www.outpost.com and search for
On 11 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply.
BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the
reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()?
I think it is. It has some internal locking
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
On 11 Sep, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
I have just one thing to add to Robert's reply.
BTW, is it safe to call ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED() in the SMP case after the
reference has been dropped with vput() or vrele()?
On 10 Sep, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
I'm mostly worried about the vnode being recycled as something else
after the vput() or vrele() call. I think a better approach would be to
add the assertion checks to vput() and vrele(), which would mean that we
could
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
... Also, last time I tried to use the ddb
show lockedvnods command, I got the problem attached below due to locking
issues, which makes it a lot harder to debug locking problems...
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD
On Tuesday 10 September 2002 10:11 am, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:21:31AM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
I was trying to update linux_base and got the following build failure:
Known problem; see the list archives for a patch.
Kris
Already applied those patches, still
On 08-Sep-2002 (19:54:17/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote:
There have been at least two gcc upgrades since then. I believe
the easiest way to upgrade to today's -current would be to install
a fairly recent snapshot ... instead of trying to debug ...
I have tryed with a middle version (1 jul
On 9 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
On 9 Sep, Robert Watson wrote:
What I'd actually like to do is lock vp on going in to the VOP. I need to
grab the lock in the link() code anyway to do the MAC check. UFS and
others all immediately lock the vnode on entry anyway...
Here's a patch to
On 9 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
nfs_link() contains the following code:
/*
* Push all writes to the server, so that the attribute cache
* doesn't get out of sync with the server.
* XXX There should be a better way!
*/
VOP_FSYNC(vp,
=== usr.bin/uudecode
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode created for
/usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-D__FBSDID=__RCSID
/usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c
echo uudecode: /usr/lib/libc.a .depend
cc -O -pipe -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings
-Wswitch
-Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:09:55PM -0700, walt wrote:
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings
-Wswitch
-Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wno-uninitialized -c
On 7 Sep, Garrett Wollman wrote:
I just noted the following:
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368
lock order reversal
1st 0xc438e6a8 process lock (process lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368
2nd 0xc0413d20 filelist lock
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On 2002-09-11 00:04, Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now last doubt: after next upgrade to post-gcc_3.2 is a complete port
rebuild necessary because c++ ports stop working or not?
Yes.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
On 7 Sep, Garrett Wollman wrote:
I just noted the following:
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:368
lock order reversal
1st 0xc438e6a8 process lock (process lock) @
On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote:
I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen
before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or
pre-allocating should always be a last resort.
That is ok as long as there aren't other threads that can mess things up
after
uudecode compiles again, but now I'm getting this making world:
=== share/tabset
uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/3101.uu
uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/9837.uu
uudecode: stdin: 9837: character out of range: [33-96]
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/share/tabset.
Dunno whether the problem is
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
uudecode compiles again, but now I'm getting this making world:
=== share/tabset
uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/3101.uu
uudecode /usr/src/share/tabset/9837.uu
uudecode: stdin: 9837: character out of range: [33-96]
*** Error code 1
Stop in
On 10 Sep, Don Lewis wrote:
On 10 Sep, Nate Lawson wrote:
I'm not sure why fdcheckstd() and setugidsafety() couldn't both happen
before grabbing the proc lock. Dropping locks in the middle or
pre-allocating should always be a last resort.
That is ok as long as there aren't other threads
61 matches
Mail list logo
