On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:36:05PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:
> 2) Bug is in os delivered gcc but not in port gcc.
>a) port has more or less patches / os gcc has been modified
> --> Didn't someone told they are the same?
Port has less patches. If you look at
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:15:34PM -0800, Ed Hall wrote:
> Exception-handling is broken with -O in -stable, and has been for years.
> FreeBSD is one of the few systems that use setjmp/longjmp stack unwinds
> to implement exceptions, so when the GCC folks broke that path, it was
> never fixed. The
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:13:35AM +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> > A known issue. The install process deliberately ignores this as a
> > non-fatal error.
>
> Why not test for it like this (or similar):
>
> [ -x /usr/sbin/kldxref ] && /usr/bin/kldxref (etcetera...)
>
> If the new CURRENT testers
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> uname extracts the various strings it can report from the running kernel
> using sysctl. Unless you have a faked uname, it will return the
The cluster has used a faked out uname(1) for a long time.
The problem turned out to be with
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/
This isn't good:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/TenDRA-4.1.2.log
building TenDRA-4.1.2 on gohan17
in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/31459
with arguments: TenDRA-4.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The failures were caused by compiled utilities dumping core with sig11
> or sig10 during compilation of the port. Toolchain people, please
> look into this; the error logs are at
I am not sure we can say anything about the errors d
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Gvim will link against nonexistent libraries, some of them seem to
> be derived from libXThrStub library name and some Xlib function
What revision of port/editors/vim/Makefile do you have?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:13:39AM +, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am attaching the output you requested, but I am sure, this wouldn't
> be very helpful though:
>
> /usr/bin/cc (which cc)
> Using builtin specs.
> gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) (cc -v)
>
> I also looked at all the M
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 12:26:09PM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Saying that, I haven't use ENABLE_NLS anywhere. This happened to me, a
> couple of weeks ago, but I had to go Germany, so I wasn't able to report
> it then.
>
> All my buildworld's use to work perfectly, but I am getting this proble
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:56:08PM +, Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
>/data/dev/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libbfd/../../../../contrib/binutils/bfd/sysdep.h:135:
> libintl.h: No such file or directory
This only happens if ENABLE_NLS is defined. However,
$ cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils
$ fi
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:06:41PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> pedicular~;locate libintl.h
> /usr/local/include/libintl.h
> /usr/src/contrib/texinfo/lib/libintl.h
> pedicular~;pkg_info -W /usr/local/include/libintl.h
> /usr/local/include/libintl.h was installed by package gettext-0.10.35_1
> pe
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Alex Popa wrote:
> cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -funsigned-char -I.
>-I/usr/src/usr.bin/awk/../../contrib/one-true-awk
>/usr/src/usr.bin/awk/../../contrib/one-true-awk/maketab.c -o maketab
> ./maketab > proctab.c
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared ob
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:57:01PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Is gdb broken on Alpha, or is it just me?
>
> ds10#gdb
> ^C
> ds10#gdb -k
Can you give the gdb51 port a try? We really need to see how usable that
is on Alpha.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 01:31:25PM -0800, Glenn Gombert wrote:
> the diskless(s) scripts have a number of problems with them that need
> to be fixed as well..inorder to get diskless kernels booting properly...
And
actually since my last commit to them, diskless works OK except for /var.
To
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 03:04:28PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> -# If /tmp is a symlink, assume it points to somewhere writable, like
> -# /var/tmp, otherwise, use a small memory filesystem for /tmp.
> +# If /tmp is not writable, use a small memory filesystem for /tmp.
> #
> # XXX: mtree runs to
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:39:33AM -0800, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> I chose to go a slightly different route than Gordon, in that I have not
> tried to make the scripts compatible with NetBSD (His scripts include
> conditionals for NetBSD, mine don't). These are my reasons.
The point you are missing
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 03:44:03PM +0100, Christopher Sharp wrote:
> * Stephen L. Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > /usr/src/sys/dev/isp/isp.c: In function `isp_reset':
> > /usr/src/sys/dev/isp/isp.c:633: warning: cast discards qualifiers from
> > pointer target type
> > *** Error code 1
> A s
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:17:49AM -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> Should committers be updating those files when they update /etc/rc? If so,
> I'll need to change the sendmail startup routines.
No. That will pull them off the vendor branch before we are ready for
that.
To Unsubscribe: se
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:00:52AM -0500, Kevin Way wrote:
> As one of the many people who've done some initial work on the port,
> I can tell you that it seems to me that there's not a lot of interest
> in this project, beyond criticizing the work of those who've made
> attempts to do any work, o
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:30:50AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>2. Use the existing boot_crunch.conf, but move sbin/dhclient/* back
> to a single top-level Makefile. This does not work at the
> moment, because the objects in each subdirectory are built with
> different c
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:39:22PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> Note that new dhclient requires some libraries which are *not*
> installed to /usr/lib (libdhcp, libres, libomapi, and libdst).
They are built and linked statically. This is not possible with
crunch_gen?
To Unsubscribe: send m
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:43:02PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > the same as publishing it. P4 is an aid to the developer to do PRIVATE
> : > work. As long as the work is in P4 it is up to the developer to
> : > keep it in sync with -current. From the project's perspective
> : > work in P4 doesn
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:51:54AM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> David,
>
> I've noticed that after a recent make world gdb started producing
> warnings during startup. Please fix.
Please send patch. This will require gdb to be updated to GDB 5.1.1 --
something I am not going to do. This also
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:39:31PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> +---[ Glenn Gombert ]--
> | There is a problem in -Current now between SCSI card(s) and the ATA
> | drivers, On my Dell 410 Workstation at work I commetned out the ATA driver
> | stuff (it was not used
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:15:44PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > You need a different ve
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure
> you have the right version.
I got the same problem with Xwrapper -- and it was compiled on this
5-CURRENT w/in the past 6 months.
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:02:02PM -0500, Glenn Gombert wrote:
> There is a problem in -Current now between SCSI card(s) and the ATA
> drivers,
For how long has this problem existed?
This is being typed from a dual Athlon system with 5 SCSI busses
(AHC,SYM,ISP) several disks, CD burnger; and wit
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:13:22PM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> > echo "+++ mount_md of /var"
> > -mount_md ${varsize:=65536} /var 1
> > +mount_md ${varsize:=32m} /var 1
>
> One problem with making the mds so big is that it uses type malloc
> which afaict uses malloc(9) to get the backing sto
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 05:00:37PM -0600, robert garrett wrote:
> Could someone tell me where documentation concerning the
> use of perforce and or, how to gain access to is located?
>
> Up until very recently I was not aware of it's existence.
> This would make it very difficult for someone new
The existing very bazaar and local policy in rc.diskless1 is Just Wrong;
and looks like no other Unix diskless configuration I've ever seen. I
plan on committing this patch to negate this.
The use of an MFS /var should also be settable. Otherwise installing
ports(packages) is just a total PITA.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:29:46AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Actually, there was a discussion at BSDCon as to whether or
> not to drop the a.out support in order to decrease the patch
> size necessary to make the FSF distributed code do what FreeBSD
That is true for GCC. For contrib/binutils
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 07:33:22AM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe this can now be committed?
> >
> > NO
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 03:39:08PM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 13:29, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "Michael D. Harnois" wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 04:03, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 2
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:05:31AM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> I ventured into this brave new world a few days ago and ran into
> this very problem. Alexander's patch (along with a make install in
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils) fixed it, as advertised.
>
> Maybe this can now be committed?
NOT u
>> I'm fairly sure JHB does not have a patch to address this but, please,
>> be my guest and check P4.
>
> Actually he does. Maybe you should have checked p4 first yourself.
Users of Perforce are starting to force the rest of us to learn and use
it. That is totally not acceptable for th
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:02:38PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> $ cc p.c -o p
> cc: installation problem, cannot exec `cpp0': No such file or directory
Fixed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 05:53:59AM -0800, Edwin Culp wrote:
> On my daily build, my kernels are broken as per log:
>
> ===> wi
> cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PIII850N; MAKESRCPATH=/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm
> make -
> f /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aicasm/Makefile
> Warning: Object directory not ch
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:02:38PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Using ktrace(1), I found that now cc searchs its subcomponents in
> /usr/libexec/elf. However, installworld puts them in /usr/libexec.
...
> Could this problem be related to the recent changes to
> src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/freeb
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:51:31PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Bitkeeper enforces the linux devleopment model
> to a large extent,
In what way(s)?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 04:30:43PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > it's problematic to do an apr port at this time because there is no
> > stable release of apr, and subversion requires bleeding edge apr to
> > function anyway.
>
> *shrug* so we need a port of a devel version of apr. It's
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:32:31PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> People like to bitch and moan about my commits but, frankly, there isn't
> much to really bitch and moan about if you actually look at the commits.
I really did not think I was bitching about your commit. I just thought
th
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :I request that you give say a 3 day review period for this.
> :I know JHB still has limited email access (no DSL yet).
> :This may be something he should review.
>
> Sigh. Are you intending to ask me to have JHB review every
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:12:16AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> While testing some Giant removal stuff I noticed that my current
> system sometimes got into an extremely non-optimal flip-flop situation
> between two processes contesting Giant on an SMP system which halved the
> s
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 04:23:33PM +0500, Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky wrote:
> MT> I tried to look with ports/devel/ddd but got stuck by the fact
> MT> that the problem seems to be ld-elf.so.1 and not wdm.
>
> MT> (gdb) core-file /wdm.core
> MT> Core was generated by `wdm'.
> MT> Program terminated
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 06:14:42PM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> It was in chroot created today as:
>
># cd /usr/src
># cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs upd -dP
># make buildworld
># make installworld DESTDIR=/X/chroot
># cd /usr/src/etc && make destri
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:59:02PM +0300, Andrej Cernov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 17:35:27 +0300, Vladimir B.Grebenschikov wrote:
> >
> > Programm linked against libpng.so on -CURRNET causes SIGBUS on startup
> >
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> >
> > % cat > trypng.c
> > #include
> >
> > main(in
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> a modular compiler system, and that all we are asking for is the ability
> to add to the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:05AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> On current On stable
> -- --
> real7m 43.392s 4m 53.100sin /usr/src for current
> user0m 11.692s 0m 4.203s
> sys 3m 4.601s 0m 2.248s
>
> real6m 40.322
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:57:47PM +0100, BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
> I've changed my /etc/make.conf from the default, to be
> MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
> since I find myself often building new kernels (plus identical
> modules) without updating the rest of the
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:29:57PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> - is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
> code goes? Or is that what you mean by "bad optimised code" ?
We shall see.
> - The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
> on
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> So what? When I install gcc on a non-native platform (such as HP-UX or
> Solaris),
> > Again, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM you are trying to solve? Just laziness of not
> > being willing to type ``pkg_add -r gcc30'' or ``pkg_add -r gcc3
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> I believe, what I see. And that is, FreeBSD includes both -- gdb and
> gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And I want to be able to use that
> same libbfd for my own development and for porting of other compilers
> and to
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to
> > turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this.
> > There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast
> > 1.2
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:54:22PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > how about a port that uses the installed sources
> > together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
> > compiled wit the rest of the system.
>
> FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> David O'Brien writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> > > to provide at system bui
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:30:22PM -0500, Nat Lanza wrote:
> Surely you see the difference between "That's an interesting idea; can
> you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works
> out?" and "WhereTF is your patch to do this?".
Yes there is. Earlier on in the thread I wou
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:57:47PM +0100, BOUWSMA Beery wrote:
> I've changed my /etc/make.conf from the default, to be
> MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true # do not build modules when building kernel
> since I find myself often building new kernels (plus identical
> modules) without updating the rest of the
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:55:26PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> stuff; the ports stuff will be more problematic, of course,
> but much of that is already broken, in that the system
> compiler is passed, but the g++ compiler is searched out
> and preferred (!@#!$!@ autoconf/automake).
env CXX
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:41:33AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Ports does the same thing: hand tweaks stuff instead of
> pushing the patches back to the projects that originated
> it.
*sigh* Terry I respect your programming knowledge, but you are wrong
here. I send out a *LOT* of patches to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:39:36PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > 3.1 will also be slower on the Alpha. It is really an issue of the code
> > generator. Generating x86 code on an Alpha is faster than generating
> > [native] Alpha code. The Alpha code generator is slow. It may be that
> > all 64
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:30:22PM -0500, Nat Lanza wrote:
> Surely you see the difference between "That's an interesting idea; can
> you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works
> out?" and "WhereTF is your patch to do this?".
Yes there is. Earlier on in the thread I wou
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:40:31AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> David O'Brien writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> > > to provide at system bui
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:29:57PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> - is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
> code goes? Or is that what you mean by "bad optimised code" ?
We shall see.
> - The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
> on
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> I believe, what I see. And that is, FreeBSD includes both -- gdb and
> gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And I want to be able to use that
> same libbfd for my own development and for porting of other compilers
> and to
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:00:19AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Max Khon wrote:
> > please calm down. seems that you have never installed gcc from ports.
> >
> > gcc 2.95 from ports is installed as gcc295/g++295
> > and correctly gets its bits from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/xxx,
> > gcc 3.0x from p
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:54:22PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > how about a port that uses the installed sources
> > together with some uploaded parts to 'reconstitute' gcj as if it had been
> > compiled wit the rest of the system.
>
> FreeBSD does a fairly evil thing:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:38:02PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Yes it comes as part of binutils.
>
> Ok.
>
> > No we should not go down this path. You've already been told that
> > there is no official
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> So what? When I install gcc on a non-native platform (such as HP-UX or
> Solaris),
> > Again, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM you are trying to solve? Just laziness of not
> > being willing to type ``pkg_add -r gcc30'' or ``pkg_add -r gcc3
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> a modular compiler system, and that all we are asking for is the ability
> to add to the
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:45:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> configuring/linking/executing? I only ask because I
> would like to stop having to update my -current tree and
> then having to copy an old binutils over it so that
> things will work. Any information is appreciated.
first
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
> of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
> standard platforms that come as part of the gcc release.
You do realize that means Ada f
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:53:42PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On 6 Feb, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> >> > dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
> >>
> >> > libbfd a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:46:22PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare.
>
> > libbfd anf libiberty do not have version numbers, are not maintained
> > (i.e. there is no official releases). every project includes its own
> > libiberty and imho a
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:05:16PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want to
> > turn on all the support libs, etc.. that would be needed with this.
> > There is a reason the gcc30 port takes 25 minutes to compile on a fast
> > 1.2
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:19:19AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> BTW, how about, may be, if the stars are right, bringing in the Java
> support too? gcj is now one of the compilers, that come with the GCC
> package...
Uh, NO! It is not needed by the base system. We really do not want
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:21:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> Well, I think that's true: no one is saying you can't fix the warnings you
> find by turning up the warning level.
Well... it would be nice if people would do CORRECT fixes. From
some things DES was saying, people are making some r
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:12:38AM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> IMO, this is a good reason to not have WARNS contain -Werror at this
> time. NO_WERROR is a good way to fix this (again IMO). I see a great
> need to let warnings "hang out", and in an ideal world I see an need
> for (new) warnings to
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:10:05AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> On current On stable
> -- --
> real7m 43.392s 4m 53.100sin /usr/src for current
> user0m 11.692s 0m 4.203s
> sys 3m 4.601s 0m 2.248s
>
> real6m 40.322
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:40:50AM -0500, Steve Ames wrote:
> Is 'AJ' still set in the malloc options? I seem to recall setting
> /etc/malloc.conf once in CURRENT for performance reasons.
Yes it still is. That is the other thing Garance needs to decide if he
wants on or off.
To Unsubscribe: s
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:02:34AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> WITNESS can really hurt. Quite possibly I should turn it off in
> GENERIC now (I wouldn't mind if someone else did that.)
I think it should stay. Especially as we are not getting much usage in
-CURRENT. If we turn it off by defaul
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 07:06:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> If you use the argument that one shouldn't set WARNS because a new
> compiler will cause the tree to break, then there's no point having it
> at all since that condition will always be true.
The difference is _impending_.
--
-- D
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:56:45PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
> If this fixes a problem, then please go ahead and commit it. :-)
Many reasons to not rush this:
Maybe because we are in the middle of a discussion.
Maybe to educate others why the change was bad so others will not attempt
the same ch
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 03:30:32PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> This delta breaks buildworld. gcc(1) has a known bug-feature
> of hiding some errors in standard system headers, making them
> invisible without -I.
...
> and compile now can't survive the WARNS=4.
Not to mention there is ZERO way
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:43:23PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> The fix was as simple as this:
Thanks!! Committed.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:24:54PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > This still *is* -CURRENT, right? If it doesn't break, once in a
> > while, how will new things be tested by the -CURRENT userbase?
>
> A "make world" before commit? Is this a trick question?
Please se
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:51:54PM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
> Is "ld --version" a reliable indicator?
Should be.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:07:19AM -0500, Alan Eldridge wrote:
> How are you going to tell, in the objprelink port, what version of
> binutils you're working with? If you patch it to fix the -current problem,
> you'll likely break -stable.
I plan on MFC'ing Binutils 2.12.0 when it is released in
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:20:39AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> That's easy to say when signing up somebody else to do the work.
>
> Seriously though, in spite of pretending otherwise, i386 *is* our reference
> platform, and the "other" platforms require people with the hardware and
> interest to k
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 07:08:21PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> David!
>
> After the latest binutils import, attempts to cross-compile
> Alpha fail at the cross-tools stage of buildworld as shown
> below. Please also note sed(1) complaints about nonexistent
> ldscripts/ files. I suspect that
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:51:08PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> Recent -current on my system at work exhibits processes getting stuck in the
> ``inode'' state, causing the system to become unusable and requiring a reboot.
>
> I have been seeing this for about a week now; anyone else?
I have been l
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know how to get this on -CURRENT now days?
>
> No problem for me.
>
> .. enable it in /etc/pam.conf:
> login authsuffi
I am unable to get OPIE challenges from telnetd as I can with S/Key in
RELENG_4. Ie:
login: obrien
s/key 187 re99461
Password:
s/key 187 re99461
Password [echo on]:
Anyone know how to get this on -CURRENT now days?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "uns
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:17:43PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The problem is that the exported FSs exports are managed in the
> per FS mount code, and they really ought to be managed in higher
> level code (above the VFS layer, but still in the kernel).
>
> This is incidently what prevents us
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:00:19PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - The MBR partition table is not "obsolete", it's a part of the PC
> >architecture specification.
>
> Its design is antique. Or rather: it's missing a design. See other
> mail for the
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:36:49PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> The patch is at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/i386_asm.patch. Mostly it
> does the following:
Can you compile some files with gcc30 and see if you get any
new/different warnings about this. Also look at the i386.md file for
b
Ok, who (and what) broke the kernel build?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:23:43PM +0300, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
> Is mozilla broken or it is a local problem?
...
> /usr/include/malloc.h:3: #error " has been replaced by "
Yes, Mozilla is doing wrong things.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 07:09:18AM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > This probably needs to be changed so that awk is a buildtool, and one
> > is built early to use when building the loader.
It doesn't need to be a build tool... unless you want to make 'ls' a
build tool also. We had one bump in
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 07:39:28AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Yes, there are some intentional differences between gcc and gcc.295 etc due
> >to some commits being deliberately left out.
>
> OK; I think the following may qualify as something broken that you
> requested notification about:
T
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 10:10:08AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> /usr/src/lib/compat/compat4x.alpha /tstsys/alpha/compile/GPLUS
> yorp.feral.com > root make obj all install clean
You cannot do this due to make(1) evaluation timming. You need to do:
roo
601 - 700 of 1694 matches
Mail list logo
