Please hold off commits in -current for acouple of hours

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
I'm about to commit KSE milestone 2. I need to complete the merge over the whole kernel tree plus a few other parts. And I need to see a "make world" complete and run. If I have to keep re-doing this because people are committing, I'll never get there, because it's a 2 hour cycle At the

Re: Stand-down: Please hold off commits in -current for acouple of hours

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
Well I just found that I can't commit it at the moment because peter has put some protection on some of the nfs files.. I tried but it complained about it.. (forgot about that) I guess he'll have to commit it.. (hopefully not to many more clashing commits before he does that..) so stand down

HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
If you've been ignoring KSE till now you can do so for a little longer, but you should look at: A very slightly out-of-date paper describing what KSE will become: http://www.freebsd.org/~jasone/kse/ http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/ has some links of interest too. All modules must be

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hello Julian! Could you please post the list of all changed and new kernel API functions so that -doc guys can keep up with this? Like suser_td(9), etc. On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:17:13AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: If you've been ignoring KSE till now you can do so for a little longer,

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Mark Santcroos
Hi Julian, I didnt try the latest thediff's, but did you solve the panic at reboot issue? Mark On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:17:13AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: If you've been ignoring KSE till now you can do so for a little longer, but you should look at: A very slightly out-of-date

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:17:13AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: [...] KSE Milestone 2 definition: Milestone 2 is the last point in development where all algorythms used in the kernel are identical to that used in the non-kse kernel. i.e.

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
yes I believe so... On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Mark Santcroos wrote: Hi Julian, I didnt try the latest thediff's, but did you solve the panic at reboot issue? Mark On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 02:17:13AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: If you've been ignoring KSE till now you can do so

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Sep-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hello Julian! Could you please post the list of all changed and new kernel API functions so that -doc guys can keep up with this? Like suser_td(9), etc. suser_td() is going away. p_ucred in the KSE kernel is still per-process, and we need to hold the

RE: HEADSUP!! KSE commit imminent.

2001-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Sep-01 Julian Elischer wrote: Peter, Matt and I, (and a bunch of testers) have been banging on the KSE kernel for two weeks now. The state of the patch is: Everything runs except nwfs and smbfs (my head hurts whe I read them) We will be committing this in the next day or so, as we

Re: FreeBSD current is very slow

2001-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Sep-01 Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 10 Sep, David Hill wrote: [-current is slow] FreeBSD-current, by default, has debugging turned on in the kernel. Try recompiling your kernel without the debugging options, and it should work very quickly. Just put this symlink into /etc and

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Nate Williams
Congratulations Julian, and thanks for all the hard work to you and the rest of the folks! Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
My comment is that if this is a locking change than it should be part of the locking changes.. so it's just each of us 'batting' to put the patch in the other set.. I have no problem with changing it but I think that if it's needed to do locking, then it should be part of the locking patch.

No Subject

2001-09-12 Thread Jonathan Love

Re:

2001-09-12 Thread Jim Bryant
Jonathan Love wrote: jim -- ET has one helluva sense of humor! He's always anal-probing right-wing schizos! POWER TO THE PEOPLE! _ Do You Yahoo!?

Anyone experience problems with the tap device in current?

2001-09-12 Thread Doug Ambrisko
I just tried using tap in current. In both cases I don't see the /dev/tapX devices with devfs and accessing it without devfs doesn't work reporting Device not configured. I tried it as a module and built into the kernel. Does anyone have this working? a2# ls /dev acd0a cuala1

Re: Anyone experience problems with the tap device in current?

2001-09-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:59:16PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: I just tried using tap in current. In both cases I don't see the /dev/tapX devices with devfs and accessing it without devfs doesn't work reporting Device not configured. I tried it as a module and built into the kernel. Does

KSE Userland

2001-09-12 Thread Benjamin Close
Hi All, Just wondering if the KSE commit will affect userland as well. (I'm somewhat assuming it will). If so perhaps an entry in UPDATING could be useful. Cheers, Benjamin -- 3D Research Associate+61 8 8302 3669 School of Computer and Information

Re: Anyone experience problems with the tap device in current?

2001-09-12 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:59:16PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: I just tried using tap in current. In both cases I don't see the /dev/tapX devices with devfs and accessing it without devfs doesn't work reporting Device not configured. I tried it as a module and

Re: Anyone experience problems with the tap device in current?

2001-09-12 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:59:16PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote: I just tried using tap in current. In both cases I don't see the /dev/tapX devices with devfs and accessing it without devfs doesn't work reporting Device not configured. I tried it as a module and built into the kernel. Does

CVSup package for -current

2001-09-12 Thread Adam Kranzel
Hi Since bento does not seem to building -current packages right now, I have built a package of the most recent version of CVSup (with the billionth-second-since-the-epoch bug fixed) and put it up at www.blacktabby.org/files/cvsup-16.1_3.tgz Feel free to download it if you don't feel like

Re: pam problems on latest -CURRENT

2001-09-12 Thread Edwin Culp
I'm getting the same problem on one of my current servers and on others no thanks, ed Quoting Storms of Perfection [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | | | Sep 12 13:55:57 boom imapd[469]: imap service init from 192.168.0.40 | Sep 12 13:55:57 boom /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: | Sep 12 13:55:57 boom

Re: CVSup package for -current

2001-09-12 Thread Adam Kranzel
I did not see one annouced by jdp, sorry for the redundancy if there is already one available :) This is just one I built and put up because I was getting tired of compiling modula-3 repeatedly. thanks -Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

Re: HEADSUP!!!! KSE Milestone-2 COMMITTED

2001-09-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12-Sep-01 Julian Elischer wrote: My comment is that if this is a locking change than it should be part of the locking changes.. so it's just each of us 'batting' to put the patch in the other set.. You could have done 'suser(td-td_proc)' but instead you have changed an API that now has

Re: CVSup package for -current

2001-09-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:19:28AM -0700, Adam Kranzel wrote: I did not see one annouced by jdp, sorry for the redundancy if there is already one available :) There are 4.x, 3.5, and 2.2 binaries on jdp's page. Unfortunatly, if you don't have compat4x installed the 4.x binary doens't work and

Re: pam problems on latest -CURRENT

2001-09-12 Thread Edwin Culp
Julian, I started getting this yesterday and am still getting it today. * $FreeBSD: src/sys/sys/proc.h,v 1.180 2001/09/12 08:38:05 julian Exp $ I'm still running my yesterday's kernel. I'm sure that in my case it has nothing to do with your commit. ed Quoting Julian Elischer [EMAIL

Re: CVSup package for -current

2001-09-12 Thread Adam Kranzel
Hi... This is indeed a -current binary, built on -current of september third. I will leave it up just in case someone finds it useful, as disk space is not much of an issue. thanks -Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: anonymous-ftp cracked

2001-09-12 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
From: P. U. (Uli) Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: anonymous-ftp cracked Date: Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:52:23PM +0200 I am running -CURRENT (ok - though I do not know anything about computers) Why are you running -CURRENT? Users that are running -CURRENT are expected to be able to track

Re: CVSup package for -current

2001-09-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:16:14PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:19:28AM -0700, Adam Kranzel wrote: I did not see one annouced by jdp, sorry for the redundancy if there is already one available :) There are 4.x, 3.5, and 2.2 binaries on jdp's page. Unfortunatly,

KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far. (which is either good or bad depending on wheterh it means it all works or No-one is using it) Peter reminded me that we haven't changed the pc98 files for

Re: HEADSUP!! KSE commit imminent.

2001-09-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 09:44:30PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: At 15:32 -0400 11/9/01, Garrett Wollman wrote: I'm glad to see that, with a little help, you've managed to get the code into good-enough shape to make this work out. This is an important unit of functionality for FreeBSD 5.0 and I

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:18:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far. IA-64 compiles and runs in the simulator. I didn't upgrade my i386 or alpha boxes yet. If you

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : Peter reminded me that we haven't changed the pc98 files for : netgraph. In nearly all cases the changes will be identical to those : in the i386 files but we have no way of testing them.. Is there a reason that the netgraph files are i386

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:18:49PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far. IA-64 compiles and runs in the simulator.

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : Peter reminded me that we haven't changed the pc98 files for : netgraph. In nearly all cases the changes will be identical to those : in the i386 files but we have no way of testing them.. Is

anonymous-ftp cracked

2001-09-12 Thread P. U. (Uli) Kruppa
Hi, sorry for cross-mailing two lists! I am running -CURRENT (ok - though I do not know anything about computers) and just found about about 624 MB trash in my /var/ftp - this is my anonymous-ftp -directory. It was disposed in a sub-directory ../incoming/tagged/byDj-krok . What can I do

Re: FreeBSD current is very slow

2001-09-12 Thread Liu Siwei
--- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:02:39AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 11-Sep-01 Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 10 Sep, David Hill wrote: [-current is slow] FreeBSD-current, by default, has debugging turned on in the kernel. Try

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : They should be (mostly) not specific to i386 unless they have : endian-ness issues (which I think some might) : They are in files, not file.i386. netgraph isn't the issue. machdep hasn't been changed, along with others. I'm working on a

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Warner Losh
Actaully, the issues are that machdep and friends weren't updated. I'm updating now. :-( Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Alpha kernel breakage

2001-09-12 Thread Mike Barcroft
I'm seeing the following error building a kernel on my Alpha. The sources are updated as of a few minutes ago. [Output of 'make kernel KERNCONF=GENERIC NO_MODULES=true'] -- Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Sep 12 21:31:24 EDT

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Jim Bryant
Okay, from -CURRENT fetched at approximately 1320 CDT today, buildworld/installworld were successful, building the kernel was successful, booting failed with the following [copied by hand]: trap 12: page fault in kernel mode cpuid = 1 lapic id = 0100 virt. addr = 0x0 code = supervisor

Re: can't write CD-Rs with or without new DAO mode

2001-09-12 Thread Jim Bryant
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: After updating my system I can't burn CD-Rs successfully. Can anyone else? What happens is pretty simple: {/home/green/toxicity}$ burncd -s 8 -d audio /dev/null $(ls | trackclassify burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITWRITER): Input/output error acd0:

Re: FreeBSD current is very slow

2001-09-12 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 10:02:39AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 11-Sep-01 Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 10 Sep, David Hill wrote: [-current is slow] FreeBSD-current, by default, has debugging turned on in the kernel. Try recompiling your kernel without the debugging options, and

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread Warner Losh
# please excuse this message in English to the traditionally Japanese list. # Julians changes broke pc98 builds with his KSE commits. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warner Losh writes: : Actaully, the issues are that machdep and friends weren't updated. Please review

Re: KSE usage, and one forgotten item (PC98)

2001-09-12 Thread P. U. (Uli) Kruppa
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: I'm wondering how many people have tried running -current with the KSE-2 changes in it. I've had only one minor bug report so far. (which is either good or bad depending on wheterh it means it all works or No-one is using it) I do run -CURRENT

RE: anonymous-ftp cracked

2001-09-12 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Giorgos Keramidas Another common thing done in writable incoming/ directories is to create a file of fixed size, say 100 Mb, and use vnconfig to mount this file as the incoming/ directory of an FTP server.

RE: anonymous-ftp cracked

2001-09-12 Thread Kory Hamzeh
Yup, I had some jerk constantly fill up the filesystem of the ftp directory until I finally disabled all uploads. The ethics of some people just amazes me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Mittelstaedt -Original Message-

Re: Alpha kernel breakage

2001-09-12 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:55:31PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: I'm seeing the following error building a kernel on my Alpha. The sources are updated as of a few minutes ago. I had the same problem. Try using a different CVSup server. I had a kernel compiling shortly after the KSE stuff was

Re: anonymous-ftp cracked

2001-09-12 Thread Jim Bryant
This doesn't indicate that you were cracked if it was anonymous FTP. You may have been scanned for open ports, and it appears that they took advantage of your FTP being open. Set up logging via the inetd.conf line (man ftpd for options). Then you can at least use ipf or ipfw to ban the

pam problems on latest -CURRENT

2001-09-12 Thread Storms of Perfection
Sep 12 13:55:57 boom imapd[469]: imap service init from 192.168.0.40 Sep 12 13:55:57 boom /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Sep 12 13:55:57 boom /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so: Undefined symbol login_getclass To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the

Re: pam problems on latest -CURRENT

2001-09-12 Thread Julian Elischer
how 'latest' is 'latest'? (revision # of sys/proc.h would be a clue..) On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Storms of Perfection wrote: Sep 12 13:55:57 boom imapd[469]: imap service init from 192.168.0.40 Sep 12 13:55:57 boom /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Sep 12 13:55:57 boom /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so: