Re: OpenSSH 2.1

> Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the > crypto distribution as long as we have one. Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classified as crypto? I do recall someone saying something to tha

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:21:54PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I wonder if we even have to have it be part of the crypto distribution > in such an event. I always thought it would have been nice if it > could have come with the bindist, and if it doesn't have any "crypto" > dependencies or bits which explicitl

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

> * No longer a dependency on RSA (and therefore rsaref for US folks): SSH2 > can handle DSA keys which have no patent or usage restrictions. This means > we could now enable SSH2 out of the box in a crypto installation, with no > post-installation configuration requirements. We now have a truly f

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a currentthat compiles?)

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > I'd go along with that. What do the

Re: make release problem

>> In trying to build "make release" today, I discovered that the >> "vn" driver is required now to build the boot floppies. > >You make it sound like a new thing - the release process has required >the vn device for years. Jordan, Thanks for your time. I guess I need to rephrase my comment I'v

Re: make release problem

> In trying to build "make release" today, I discovered that the > "vn" driver is required now to build the boot floppies. You make it sound like a new thing - the release process has required the vn device for years. > I would suggest that this driver be added to "GENERIC". For It's already dy

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

> > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > I'd go along with that. What do the other committers think? I th

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

> > > I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read > > > that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if > > > someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal > > > to distribute the library as part of an application, please show

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

> > I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read > > that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if > > someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal > > to distribute the library as part of an application, please show me in >

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

> > I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read > that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if > someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal > to distribute the library as part of an application, please show me in > terms

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

> Check it out at: > http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/ > > "We want to support the momentum of Open Source operating systems such as > Linux® and FreeBSD by developing an Open Motif® licence for use with > Open Source operating systems." > > Also the OpenGroup is looking for sites to mirror t

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

Amancio Hasty wrote: > > Check it out at: > http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/ Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include , which FreeBSD doesn't have. So, I copied langinfo.h from /usr/compat/linux/usr/include, but even then, t

Motif is now Open Source 8)

Check it out at: http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/ "We want to support the momentum of Open Source operating systems such as Linux® and FreeBSD by developing an Open Motif® licence for use with Open Source operating systems." Also the OpenGroup is looking for sites to mirror their Motif dis

Re: linux-flashplugin...no sound?

On Mon, 15 May 2000, emre wrote: > Hi, > > This is really not that important and in case it doesn't work or if there > > is no solution for this, I'll live :) > > I'm running FreeBSD 5.0-2419-CURRENT on i386, and I'm using the ports > > from whatever date I installed the system. Linux

linux-flashplugin...no sound?

Hi, This is really not that important and in case it doesn't work or if there is no solution for this, I'll live :) I'm running FreeBSD 5.0-2419-CURRENT on i386, and I'm using the ports from whatever date I installed the system. Linux emulation and all that stuff works fine (I had a prob

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

Christian Weisgerber wrote: > (My original question should have gone out last Thursday but had > been stuck in a mail queue since.) > > Nick Hibma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > > > > Which host are you pilling from? I am slurping

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

(My original question should have gone out last Thursday but had been stuck in a mail queue since.) Nick Hibma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > > Which host are you pilling from? I am slurping things out of > cvsup.uk.freebsd.org and see

Re: buildworld error: now it's ngctl

Kent Hauser writes: > ===> usr.sbin/ngctl > cc -O -pipe -Wall -c /usr/src/usr.sbin/ngctl/types.c > /usr/src/usr.sbin/ngctl/types.c: In function `TypesCmd': > /usr/src/usr.sbin/ngctl/types.c:86: structure has no member named `type_name' > *** Error code 1 That commit was a couple of weeks ago.. y

src/bin/csh/csh.1 breaks R/O /usr/src builds

in src/bin/csh a make clean tries to delete csh.1 this fails if src is mounted Read-Only. Why is this file checked in in the first place if make clean wants to remove it ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam m

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

In message , Nick Hibma wri tes: >> On this machine which runs -CURRENT from two days ago or so, I'm >> seeing frequent cvsup client failures of this type: >> >> TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed >> >> I don't recall eve

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

Narvi wrote: > On Mon, 15 May 2000, Paul Richards wrote: > > The only problem being that at Desktop you can drop the $5 into the fine > > box when you leave work but I'd have to walk down the bank and either do > > a wire transfer or send an international money order. Apart from the > > hassle inv

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

> On this machine which runs -CURRENT from two days ago or so, I'm > seeing frequent cvsup client failures of this type: > > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > > I don't recall ever running into this before. Which host are you pilling from? I am slurping things out of c

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > >>> > >>> I thin

Re: cvsup6.freebsd.org

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be responding very well to ping, but when I connect to > this server with cvsup, it basically says "connecting to > cvsup6.freebsd.org", and does nothing else. Is this server working? It does seem to be having

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Ted Sikora: > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > > On this machine which runs -CURRENT from two days ago or so, I'm > > seeing frequent cvsup client failures of this type: > > > > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > > > > I don't recall ever r

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

At 10:52 PM -0700 5/14/00, Kris Kennaway wrote: >* No longer a dependency on RSA (and therefore rsaref for US folks): > SSH2 can handle DSA keys which have no patent or usage restrictions. > This means we could now enable SSH2 out of the box in a crypto > installation, with no post-installation

Re: cvsup on recent -CURRENT

Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > On this machine which runs -CURRENT from two days ago or so, I'm > seeing frequent cvsup client failures of this type: > > TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed > > I don't recall ever running into this before. > Same here. Last night was oka

cvsup on recent -CURRENT

On this machine which runs -CURRENT from two days ago or so, I'm seeing frequent cvsup client failures of this type: TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed I don't recall ever running into this before. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] T

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Paul Richards wrote: > "Brian W. Buchanan" wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > > > > > > I see this money scheme as an extension of the "finger pointing" > > > > which does nothing to build team spirit. > > > > > > That depends very much on the way it's

Re: vn.ko load/unload/mount = panic

Nick Hibma wrote: > > Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think you actually have to > disassociate any dev_t's from the driver (by clearing the si_drv[12] > fields) because we call destroy_dev and cdevsw_remove, so any later uses > of dev_t's get an error because the device has gone away. > >

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

On Mon 2000-05-15 (11:43), Paul Richards wrote: > The only problem being that at Desktop you can drop the $5 into the fine > box when you leave work but I'd have to walk down the bank and either do > a wire transfer or send an international money order. Apart from the > hassle involved there's the

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have acurrent that compiles?)

"Brian W. Buchanan" wrote: > > On Mon, 15 May 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > > > > I see this money scheme as an extension of the "finger pointing" > > > which does nothing to build team spirit. > > > > That depends very much on the way it's taken. At the moment, people > > take the pointy hat volun

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

> Darren Reed wrote: > > > > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > > > I'd go along with tha

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

On Sun, 14 May 2000 22:52:11 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote: > * Kerberos support is also limited to SSH1. Presumably this is still Heimdal Kerberos support, without MIT interoperability? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: Breaking "build world" costs $5? (was: Can we please have a current that compiles?)

Darren Reed wrote: > > > > Maybe the comitters ought to take an idea from many software companies and > > > contribute $5 to the beer fund every time they break the build. Have it > > > all come due at the next BSDcon to fund a committer beer bash. :-) > > > > I'd go along with that. What do th