Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Christopher Vance
I had a consistent death-of-compiler in 4.5-STABLE a week or so back which looked like the compiler was knotted. I didn't see anything on the lists about it, and assumed it was something I did. So I saved my /etc, reinstalled bindist from 4.4 CD, restored /etc, and successfully did make world to

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Sorry, I've been committed the code, because some IrDA : controller(generic one) already there, there are no such driver : *NOW* and some people may become happy with /usr/ports/comm/birda : port. Traditio

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Terry Lambert
"M. Warner Losh" wrote: > But would an IrDA specific driver do anything differently than sio > would? SIR is effectively an 16550 UART from what I've seen so far. > Maybe I'm missing something? Yes; it would allow remote control protocols, and some IrDa self-clocking protocols that aren't possib

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Michael Smith wrote: > > May be it is time to commit this line ? > > No. This would mean that sio(4) will attach to any IrDa port and > preclude an IrDa-specific driver from doing so. I'd be happy to have one of these, if you have an IrDa driver lying around for FreeBSD, and haven't committed

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Terry Lambert
I've often thought that owner, group, and mode should be defaulted in the registration process for the device. This would let defaults be set in the source code, so in the worst case, you can rebuild the kernel to get them. This would also allow low granularity persistance to be handled in teh s

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Sunday 03 March 2002 12:30 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : cc -O2 -Wall -pipe -pedantic -ansi -march=pentiumpro -elf -Wall > : -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common -c > :

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Takanori Watanabe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Smith wrote: > >No. This would mean that sio(4) will attach to any IrDa port and >preclude an IrDa-specific driver from doing so. I think so too. But >If any variation of this patch is committed, at the very least sio(4) >should return a lower pref

unsubscribe

2002-03-03 Thread syous
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]…'²æìr¸›zǧvf¢–Ú&j:+v‰¨·ž è® "¶§²æìr¸›yúÞy»rêëz{bžØ^n‡r¡ûazg¬±¨

help needed: freebsd gcc bug breaks STLport and OpenOffice

2002-03-03 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, It looks like our modified FreeBSD GCC breaks the STLport tests, as it breaks OpenOffice too. If one uses a normal unmodified stock gcc version (gcc 2.95.2 or 2.95.3), and compiles it on STABLE or CURRENT, the coredump goes away. Note that there are no special flags, only c++ -pthread -Wal

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Brandon S. Allbery
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 16:42, Michael Smith wrote: > Well, except that it has no flow control, is only half-duplex, and you > might want to attach an IrDa stack to the device. > > If all the IrDa stack work is being done in userland, then this probably > makes sense. If not, then at the very lea

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
VERY INTERESTING but then if I go back to /usr/src and try to complete the build make buildworld -DNOCLEAN I get the same error cc -O2 -Wall -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/csu/../../../contrib/gcc.295/config -I. -DIN_GCC -finhibit-size-directive -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Vladimir B.
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 00:42, Michael Smith wrote: > > But would an IrDA specific driver do anything differently than sio > > would? SIR is effectively an 16550 UART from what I've seen so far. > > Maybe I'm missing something? > > Well, except that it has no flow control, is only half-duplex, an

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Still get the signal 11. Same file. Same place. : Only no warnings about the braces this time. What happens if you cd to src/lib/csu/i386-elf and do a make? You make need to do that as root... Warner

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
I remembered a while back, I added BDECFLAGS= -W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align \ -Wcast-qual -Wchar-subscripts -Winline \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith \ -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-protot

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Michael Smith
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : No. This would mean that sio(4) will attach to any IrDa port and > : preclude an IrDa-specific driver from doing so. > : > : If any variation of this patch is committed, at the very least sio(4) > : s

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : No. This would mean that sio(4) will attach to any IrDa port and : preclude an IrDa-specific driver from doing so. : : If any variation of this patch is committed, at the very least sio(4) : should return a

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : cc -O2 -Wall -pipe -pedantic -ansi -march=pentiumpro -elf -Wall : -fkeep-inline-functions -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common -c : /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c:70: warning: ANSI C forbids braced-

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
I took your advice. sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=5 cd /usr/src make buildworld same file, same place, same error. I did notice that If I do that one compile manually... that file works... But the same fix _does not_ work for the next one. Thanks again. kern.maxvnodes: 49149 kern.maxproc: 1044

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Michael Smith
> > > So try adding > > > {0x10f0a34d, NULL} > > > to sio_ids in /sys/dev/sio/sio_isa.c > > > > It works: > > > > sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio1 port 0x280-0x287,0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > sio1: type 16550A > > I have tried this patch for Sony VAIO PC

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Julian Elischer
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: > >On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Crist J. Clark" writes > >> : > >> >I've checked the manpages, the files in /etc, and Googled, and I can't

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >OK - I thought you had something much more complex in mind after > >your example: "plugging the nuclear reactor into the serial port > >where you had a a modem plugged in yesterday". > > No, that was to show why "persistence" i

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: >> Not really, the basic idea is just a linked list of rules: > >> name=="/dev/uscanner*" -> chmod 0644 >> driver=="bpf" -> chown user > >> It's not too much work, I just havn't had the time for it yet. >> (Junior Kernel Hackers can a

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread David Malone
> >Do you have any designs for this ruleset stuff? From what you said > >at BSDconEurope it will have to be fairly complicated to achieve > >the your aim of being better than a static permission for a given > >device. > Not really, the basic idea is just a linked list of rules: > name=="/d

Re: Netgraph, device drivers and mutexes

2002-03-03 Thread Julian Elischer
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > Hackers, Ah here we have teh one part of -curretn netgraph that is not yet fully implemented.. Netgraph has it's own locking, using a spinlock in the worst case but trying like crazy to avoid havong to use it. It implememts a reader-writer (shared/exclusive) locking

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: >On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Crist J. Clark" writes >> : >> >I've checked the manpages, the files in /etc, and Googled, and I can't >> >find the answer. I am begining to

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread David Malone
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Crist J. Clark" writes > : > >I've checked the manpages, the files in /etc, and Googled, and I can't > >find the answer. I am begining to worry there isn't one. How does one > >change the permissi

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Riccardo Torrini wrote: > On 03-Mar-2002 (08:20:46/GMT) Thierry Herbelot wrote: > >> cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > > > a signal 11 is generally linked to bad memory chips > > ...and/or overclocked CPU :) And/or a pmap code bug. At boot time, try setting kern.m

Netgraph, device drivers and mutexes

2002-03-03 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hackers, i have some (probably stupid) questions about Netgraph, device drivers and mutexes. i'm using -current as of this weekend. i have written draft version of the driver for 3com/HP Bluetooth Card (PC-Card). the driver is a pure Netgraph node, i.e. no device nor network interface register

Request for testers of ATA RAID support

2002-03-03 Thread Søren Schmidt
As some might have noticed I've done some significant work on the ATA RAID support (for Promise & Highpoint controllers) all thanks to Advanis which has made this possible. The code as it is now in -current allows for RAID1's (mirrors) to be properly handled when a disk dies, that means the syst

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 03-Mar-2002 (17:02:35/GMT) Crist J. Clark wrote: > I think some people missed the point of the earlier question. I'm really sorry :( Next time I'll double read the messages. Riccardo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:42:10PM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote: > On 03-Mar-2002 (16:31:36/GMT) Crist J. Clark wrote: > > > How does one change the permissions on dynamically created > > devices? That is, when the node comes into existence, it has > > the permissions I want, and not necessarily

RE: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 03-Mar-2002 (16:31:36/GMT) Crist J. Clark wrote: > How does one change the permissions on dynamically created > devices? That is, when the node comes into existence, it has > the permissions I want, and not necessarily the defaults. You can (must?) use /etc/rc.devfs [...] # Setup DEVFS, ie p

Re: devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Crist J. Clark" writes : >I've checked the manpages, the files in /etc, and Googled, and I can't >find the answer. I am begining to worry there isn't one. How does one >change the permissions on dynamically created devices? That is, when >the node comes into existe

devfs(5) Permissions

2002-03-03 Thread Crist J. Clark
I've checked the manpages, the files in /etc, and Googled, and I can't find the answer. I am begining to worry there isn't one. How does one change the permissions on dynamically created devices? That is, when the node comes into existence, it has the permissions I want, and not necessarily the de

Re: Build broken and not building modules

2002-03-03 Thread Glenn Gombert
try "make -DNO_WERROR kernel" it overrides the complier warning messages being generated at the moment (that are treated as errors) . Aleksander Rozman - Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi ! > > I am trying to compile in my code for kernel, but every time I start > > compile (e

Build broken and not building modules

2002-03-03 Thread Aleksander Rozman - Andy
Hi ! I am trying to compile in my code for kernel, but every time I start compile (even without my code) it stops in modules. It seems that latest commits have a lot of modules errors. Is there a way to override building modules. To build kernel I usually go to i386/compile/NAME directory and

RE: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Edwin Culp
I've cvsuped and built world and new kernels on 6 machines this morning. Two are SMP PIII's, 3 PIII servers, and my laptop, with no problems. I did the same yesterday morning. All cvsups at 3-5 am PST. All seperate builds and in seperate locations. This probably doesn't help but hopefully you w

RE: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Edwin Culp
I've cvsuped and built world and new kernels on 6 machines this morning. Two are SMP PIII's, 3 PIII servers, and my laptop, with no problems. I did the same yesterday morning. All cvsups at 3-5 am PST. All seperate builds and in seperate locations. This probably doesn't help but hopefully you w

ftpd ESTALE patch

2002-03-03 Thread John
Hi, I've had the following patch installed for some time now. Basically, we ran into a situation where files being generated/stored to a fileserver from client A and then handed by out by ftp from a different client host was failing. The following patch handles the recoverable ESTALE s

Re: ACPI issues and questions (Dell Inspiron 3700)

2002-03-03 Thread Vladimir B.
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 19:31, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 12:32:47AM +0900, Takanori Watanabe wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jose M. Alcaide" wrote: > > >1. The sio1 port (IrDA) is not detected. I had to add > > > > > > hint.sio.1.at="isa" > > > hint.sio.1.por

RE: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
I've verified it on an an additional 3 machines. 5.0-CURRENT 4.5-STABLE 4.4-RELEASE that doesn't include the original 4.5-RELEASE I highly doubt its cpu or memory at this point ? Any other great ideas ? Thanks for the help. END ---

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 03-Mar-2002 (08:20:46/GMT) Thierry Herbelot wrote: >> cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > a signal 11 is generally linked to bad memory chips ...and/or overclocked CPU :) Riccardo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: 5.0-CURRENT makebuild world fails

2002-03-03 Thread Thierry Herbelot
"Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: > > For about the past 2 weeks or so, I've gotten the below error and I don't > know what to do about it. > This is on a FBSD4.5-RELEASE system w/ custom kernel. > Hello, with must be a local error : I've built a -Current world+kernel last week, without any problem