find, nor does LINT ...
ctrl+alt+esc.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
ke to understand what's going on here.
There's also a chance someone will jump in with the answer you're
looking for.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
I don't have anything more than this.
>But they seem to be harmless.
>
> --
> B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Index: vinumconfig.c
Applied, thank you
superuser
> 10928305672udp 0.0.0.0.11.233 - superuser
Any of you folks tried recompiling CFS?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
ot;vinum/control")
> >It doesn't matter if I have devfs compiled in or not.
> >And I get similars during kldunload.
> >
> > It's on an i386 based system with source from 21th March.
>
>
> Same here.
>
T USERS MORE INFO PLZ K THNX.
--
-Alfre
There's rumors that something is broken in keyserv, if someone can
get me a good diagnostics on how to reproduce the failure/problem
I should be able to fix it. Of course patches are welcome as well.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a pie
s well as
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/rpc.yppasswdd/yppasswdd_server.c:692.
>
> Maybe I won't build -CURRENT for a little while :-}
Don't worry, ru fixed it, I'm about to undo the whole schebang
because sys/socket.h shouldn't have this definition.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTE
t;
> mount_nfs: rpcbind on server: RPC: Program not registered
Have you run mergemaster?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumul
about the BABUG meeting on Thursday? There's gonna be a film
crew from IBM-Linux there and a tutorial on netbooting.
http://www.bafug.net/meetings/NextMeetingBerk.html
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
lse {
> + p += sz;
> + while(sz--)
> + *ri++ = '?';
Why didn't you use strlcpy/memcpy as suggested?
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + *ri
I Mean)
> interfaces! :-)
I think only because you have "freebsd.org" in your "search" directive.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
CLI tool for it, like iostat
> or somethink else.
>
> Another idea?
I think what he's saying is that libdevstat is OK, it's just that
the tools that use it sum up the stats instead of displaying them
inidividually.
I would look at fixing iostat because libdevstat seems to pro
er not keep other people's cruft in our system. It
will eventually go away, and the longer we keep it as a crutch,
the more people are going to be hurt by it when/if it disappears
completely.
Those people need to fix thier modules. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PRO
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 21:20] wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 20:39:03 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 15:21] wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 3:27:02 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >&
* Boris Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 20:52] wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes:
> >
> > >What's up with devfs not gc'ing itself? Ie, after a directory
>
r-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Sep 26 1999 vinumdrive0 -> /dev/da1e
> > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Sep 26 1999 vinumdrive1 -> /dev/da2s1e
> >
> > Ok, now is there a way to get rid of these symlinks when vinum goes
> > away? Ok, if there isn't a way to delete them
* Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 15:21] wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 March 2001 at 3:27:02 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Vinum+DEVFS doesn't make the million symlinks that non-devfs
> > vinum does.
>
> The only symlinks that the non-devfs version
* Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 12:19] wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 12:02] wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew
>Jacob writes:
> > >
ys are in docco mode, you might as well document how one
detects a devfs system in a running system. There's an example
in the vinum(8) source:
if (sysctlbyname("vfs.devfs.generation", NULL, NULL, NULL, 0) == 0)
devfs_is_active = 1;
else
devfs_is_active = 0
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 09:02] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Vinum+DEVFS doesn't make the million symlinks that non-devfs
> > vinum does.
>
> Why not? make_dev_alias() is cheap and easy to use.
Take a l
* Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010311 02:29] wrote:
>
> I'll sneak in my experience with DEVFS+vinum here as well:
>
> vinum: loaded
> vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da3s1f
> vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1e
> vinum: updating configuration from /dev
ay build will not accept
> /usr/bin, /usr/bin/, or /usr/bin/openssl . It always reponds with :
> "Could not find OpenSSL in /usr/bin" or whatever other Directory I type.
> Can someone please shed some light on the issue?
Did you try '/usr' ? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[E
; Second, I'd like to have this 'nfsd -r' removed, cause
> it's broken in the concept anyway and useless. Kill nfsd and
> restart does the same, and the binding is done the right way.
I'd like to kill 'nfsd -r' however it makes more sense to fix -r
so
ple of hours ago that ought to fix this.
You should cvsup then rebuild and reinstall libc and libc_r.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 21:46] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010222 21:35] wrote:
> > > With the great libc debacle of 2001, I have not tried
> > > to update my system for about 2 weeks. I
removed.
Why are you using -current and not reading commit messages? :P
Peter Wemm made it the default and it's no longer optional.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Daniel C. Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010220 19:39] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > * Akinori MUSHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010220 11:19] wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1):
>
* Akinori MUSHA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010220 11:19] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1):
>
Sounds good, just make sure the regex engine matches the one that
the other find(1)'s use.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL
h _still_ works for my config.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
he date of the last
>known version without known major problems. (or "." if no known problems)
This is a good idea, however it would take someone dedicated to
maintaining this as well as doing regression testing. Those
regression tests could easily be ported to -stable making for
ME]; /* name of subdisk */
+dev_t dev;
};
/*** Plex definitions ***/
@@ -498,6 +499,7 @@
u_int64_t multistripe; /* requests that needed
more than one stripe */
int sddowncount;
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010215 10:15] wrote:
> This looks right, except that Bruce says that SCARG isn't to be
> used, instead just use uap->path.
Also, you can't call strlen on a userland pointer. please test patches
before submitting them!
>
&
roware AG, UNIX solution and service provider
> Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, Switzerland
> Phone: +41 79 370 26 05, Fax: +41 61 826 93 01
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscrib
/ world target to check for cross
version upgrades and do the magic (or at least print out those
instructions).
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010212 17:28] wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Sorry, I made the mistake of looking at this bikeshed and lost my nerve.
> > > The patch I was going to commit was:
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/stdio.diff
it for a couple of hours/days?
Current from Sat Feb 10 17:00:18 looks ok, there were just some
patches to the scheduler but no one has complained yet. Let us
know. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk.
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 12:52] wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain
> > an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you
&
-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed
and ported to -stable ASAP.
Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate
routines? Or must it all be choosen at compile time?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child;
ooks correct, need_resched() needs sched_lock.
I'm currently looking to see if forward_roundrobin() does as well.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
x27;re limited to
24 bits.
> The only way to implement them on these platforms is to use a lock.
> Now I'm wonder if the use of a sleep mutex is allowed or is a simple
> spinning lock the sensefull choice.
Either one would work.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 17:25] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 06:29] wrote:
> > > "Leif Neland" wrote:
> > > > While the error-messages are clear, I don't remember seeing
* Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 06:29] wrote:
> "Leif Neland" wrote:
> > While the error-messages are clear, I don't remember seeing any heads-up, or
> mentioning of this in UPDATING
> >
> > Or is it just me...?
>
> No, there wasn't one.. The commit message was pretty clear - You
I'm trying to install -current on a dual CPU machine with an Adaptec
7880, it's hanging somewhere after the scsi probe (no indication
that it's over) and sysinstall starting up.
Can anyone recommend a -current snapshot that will work?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[
es,
it's been a long time since I looked at this, if I can find it again
I might be able to do something about it.
To answer your question about VLF (which I had to guess at) assuming
you mean Very Large Files:
1) yes some tools break on them, I don't have a list handy.
2) BSD has had
* Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010125 11:07] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Alfred Perlstein and I have ported TI-RPC to FreeBSD Current. You can find
> the latest snapshot here:
>
> http://www.attic.ch/rpc.diff_01114001.tgz
>
> Patches and bugfixes are welcome.
Can
't let it go! I was hoping to replace my Solaris box with either
> FreeBSD or NetBSD as my main home directory server. FreeBSD 4.2 panics part
> way through the first LADDIS runs I was using to test it with and I can't get
> NetBSD to start as a LADDIS client (I hadn't go
* Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 10:32] wrote:
> In the last episode (Jan 24), Daniel Eischen said:
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > * Daniel M. Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010124 05:26] wrote:
> > > > As discussed a few da
_r.so.5,
> you'll need to rebuild them without the -pthread option using -lc_r.
>
> For porters, the __FreeBSD_version has been bumped to 500016 to
> reflect the above change.
This is ambiguous, can you provide old/new examples of how to
compile/link a single C source file?
thanks,
cently.
> >
> > this /etc/exports file was working fine a couple of weeks ago.
> > Is this related to the 'ucred' thing people have been talking about?
>
> Possibly, are your kernel and world out of sync? You should've gotten
> evil console messages about try
from userland this weekend, but you can
have a shot at it if you'd like.
The other option is to at least fix mount and friends to use
something other than ucred, and slowly remove it (struct ucred)
from userland.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the hear
re `struct ucred' and not a
> well-defined, user-exportable credential structure (like struct
> cmsgcred used for SCM_CREDS ancillary data).
I looked at fixing this once, but got scared off because of binary
compatibility issues. Would 'fixing' mount to use cmsgcred be
acceptable?
ces the lockup.
>
> So the only thing I can think of is that you guys have something in
> your src trees that cvs & I dont...
>
> Now what ?
What are the compile flags you are using?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 14:35] wrote:
>
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Which means we don't have to drop the lock over the socket unless
> > we'd block on allocation.
>
> No. You'd still have to drop it for now. Remem
* Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 10:43] wrote:
> It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > >
> > > I suggest creative manpower is used to stabilize -current, instead
> > > of fine trimming which API's should stay or not...
> >
> > I st
gt;
> Then you misunderstood me, I don't have anything in the dept
> of SMP hw which can trigger it.
If you could be more vague it would assist me greatly in figuring
out what's broken.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have th
* Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 10:02] wrote:
> It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > >> Peter Wemm and I suspect that ata doesn't need it. Right now I'm
> > > >> running several make -j128 buildworlds and buildkernels w
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 09:24] wrote:
>
> I'm not going to axe it for a few days, this is a really amazing
> API that Matt added, the problem is utility and useage over code
> complexity.
>
> It's just a proposal.
I found several plac
* Randell Jesup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 08:14] wrote:
> >It seems Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> I have a patch here that removes await/asleep from the kernel API.
> >>
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/noasleep.diff
> >>
> >> Mat
* Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010117 04:27] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This ought to be documented.
>
> A good start would be to add example of MODULE_VERSION and
> MODULE_DEPEND usage to one of the templates in
> /
.
I plan on applying the delta within a few days.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
operations (hint: no 64-bit atomic operations are
> implemented on i386's). If they need to be atomic, then they must use
> locks.
Just wondering, can't you use 'LOCK addl' and then use 'LOCK addc'?
add longword, add longword with carry? I know it would be pretty
e wasn't sufficient then.
> Whatever.. developers should pay more attention and committers should
> be more explicit.
~ % man 9 module
No entry for module in section 9 of the manual
~ % man 9 MODULE
No entry for MODULE in section 9 of the manual
~ % man 9 MODULE_VERSION
No entry for MODULE_
* Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010116 10:33] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received the patch to add counter for fork() set from Paul. I've
> tested it on my -CURRENT and -STABLE boxes, and it seems fine for me.
> So, I post his patch for review.
>
> Thanks, Paul.
* Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 10:00] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> Any comment?
Why not just use a dynamic sysctl for this?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EM
www.freebsd.org/handbook/cutting-edge.html
(read the entire chapter)
> I am confused - what is the problem with BSD or is it me ?
Well it's sorta BSD's fault for being a pain with -CURRENT, but
it's your fault for running -CURRENT without having the necessary
kernel-foo to do
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010112 18:56] wrote:
>
> On 13-Jan-01 Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > I've actually been seeing this for about 2 months now but only just
> > now got motivated enough to enable crashdumps and get some information
> > on what happens whenver I try to use the printer a
st pass into all operations (fileops) on that file.
It's not a major rewrite of any code, you just need an extra
parameter per fileop and store it in the struct file.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010111 20:13] wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:12 PM, Alfred Perlstein
> > [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > * Carl Makin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010111 14:52] wrote:
> > > >
> > &
psignal(p, SIGCONT);
mtx_exit(&sched_lock, MTX_SPIN);
+ psignal(p, SIGCONT);
} else {
mtx_exit(&sched_lock, MTX_SPIN);
if (uap->data) {
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECT
0x0008 /* discard EOT's (^D) on output) */
> +#define OCRNL0x0010 /* map CR to NL on output */
> +#define ONOCR0x0020 /* no CR output at column 0 */
> +#define ONLRET 0x0040 /* NL performs C
t we'd have enough feedback to begin ironing
out the kinks.
I want this in the user's faces, taunting and enticing them to
use it and give us feedback. :)
So can you commit this?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
)calloc(1, sizeof(*o) * (fd->fd_lastfile + 1));
if (KMCPY(o, fd->fd_ofiles, (fd->fd_lastfile + 1) * sizeof(*o)) == -1)
...which I sent to Darren yesterday evening could be applied.
I haven't heard back however.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"
* Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 03:32] wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Anyone else seeing this for the last two days in the buildkernel target?
I see annoying breakage when compiling with -j, are you using it?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTE
do with -CURRENT, don't install it."
> Combined with the point that we should not divert efforts from libh,
> I hold the opinion that we should not import this.
I think it should be brought in and quickly MFC'd for the next
4.3 release.
I see no conflict between these two effor
n/sysv_msg.c,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -u -r1.27 sysv_msg.c
--- sysv_msg.c 2000/12/01 08:57:45 1.27
+++ sysv_msg.c 2000/12/05 16:57:34
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
NULL
};
+SYSCALL_MODULE_HELPER(msgsys, 6);
SYSCALL_MODULE_HELPER(msgctl, 3);
SYSCALL_MODULE_HELPER(msgget, 2);
SYSCA
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001127 21:56] wrote:
> * The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001127 18:12] wrote:
> >
> > Morning all ...
> >
> > Every since the SMPng code went into -current way back when, I've
> > been experie
his?
Serial console, add BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER (sp?) to your kernel config and
hook your laptop up to it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
L */
> #include
>
> My machines are churning through a make world right now..
Ick, shouldn't it just be required that one include sys/mbuf.h before
this include file?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in
ts *much* saner, and no
> one has even seen fit to comment on it yet :-(.
This patch may break compliance, ENOEXEC is the proper error code,
the shell should try to be a bit smarter about explaining why
ENOEXEC was returned.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I ha
* Steven E. Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001116 09:27] wrote:
> It seems to only do it SMP... the same machine built with a non-SMP
> kernel (same source code) runs just fine for extended periods.
John just checked in some code last night that may address your
problems.
I would try a new kernel, an
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001115 03:39] wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> i'm using libfetch.
> I want to get a file in passive mode in my local disk.
> If I read trace from the remote machine, the transfert is okay
> but i can't find my new imported file in the local disk.
> Can you help me
x27;t stuck in disk wait, but they still returned EBUSY.
>
> Force means force, damnit!
Yes, this used to work quite well for some time, I have no idea
who broke it. Maybe you can sprinkle some printfs in the code and
narrow it down a bit?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAI
intain a releng4 mirror, I really wouldn't mind
that at all.
> if "piss off" is an exceptable answer here, then I'd like for u to say so.
Tony, you have a remarkable way of putting things into perspective,
and I couldn't have said it better myself.
--
-Alfred Perlstein -
rtians from
area 51.
They're requesting that people stop blowing smoke and spreading
rumor, innuendo and FUD. Machines go down, networks go down, deal
with it!
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk.&qu
* Salvo Bartolotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001007 12:14] wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
> On 10/7/00, 12:13:28 PM, Alfred Perlstein <[EMA
sr/obj over to your -current then doing several
'make -k installworld' followed by a 'make installworld' to make
sure it's all been installed then by building a kernel using the
"make buildkernel" method described in src/UPDATING.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PRO
the same time offering extremely useful advice. Jordan,
Mike Smith and John Polstra to name a few, all in one incident
actually. I think without their application of knowledge and
smack-down I wouldn't have learned nearly as much.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PR
current.
> I have a better idea, how about an option on the install to save buffer
> cache to a floppy disk , or atleast the portion that caused the automatic
> reboot??? Gdb anyone?
Sure, send patches, follow my previous advice or simply piss off.
jeez,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[E
* Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000927 18:26] wrote:
> OK
> Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
> 12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
> crash dump before any FS's are mounted or even before I tell FBSD where to
> p
rashdump you
shouldn't be running -current or you should at least ask nicely.
And -current is covered in the handbook:
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html
later,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
l running at the
equivelant of splhigh, all interrupts are blocked until a context
switch in kernel land.
There's work in progress to mpsafe the drivers (at least for
ethernet, more will arrive later).
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000920 12:46] wrote:
> Can the configuration for bootup and initial installation be configured to
> detect (and configure) a serial console. This would be very useful for
> rackmount systems. Yes, I know it can be done manually after the
> installation i
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000919 23:51] wrote:
>
> UNNEEDED #includes in the FreeBSD kernel
>
> agp_if.c
>
>
[snip]
These reports would be a lot more useful if you included the last person
to touch these files along with the first line of the Copyright.
-Alfred
* Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000824 14:52] wrote:
> I don't know if this is related to the problems you guys are looking at,
> but I have a box that every so often (every couple of months) panics
> with a "panic: recieve 1" panic. This panic happens when the socket
> character count is bogu
* Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 22:05] wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 14:29] wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a feeling that this is related to missing
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 15:55] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Nope, that doesn't fix it. I got the same panic on the very first
> > > try.
> >
> > hmm,
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 15:39] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Let's take a more paraniod approach (back out my spl in chgsbsize):
> >
> >
> > Index
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 15:03] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > John can you try this patch and let us know if you still experiance
> > crashes?
>
> Will do. I
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000823 14:29] wrote:
>
> I have a feeling that this is related to missing spl protection around
> the chgsbsize subsystem, this was probably an issue before I touched it
> but since I touched it last I'll have a look-see.
>
>
ny time soon.
> I'll append my kernel config file to this mail. The system is a
> uniprocessor PII/400.
I have a feeling that this is related to missing spl protection around
the chgsbsize subsystem, this was probably an issue before I touched it
but since I touched it last I'l
401 - 500 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
