On 05/14/2013 08:56 PM, Joe wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 05/14/2013 08:32 PM, Joe wrote:
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the lost
memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out if that l
When stopping vnet jails get message about lost memory pages.
What console commands show available memory pages so I can determine the
lost memory pages after 100 stopped jails?
Want to find out if that lost memory page message is bogus or not.
Thanks
___
12M uwait 0 18.3H
> > 39.06% /usr/local/diablo-jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Xmx512m -jar JDownloade
> >
> > ...how can the size of the resident memory of pid 6913 be > 512
> > megabytes?
>
> I don't know but you can inspect the java application with the java
>
y of pid 6913 be > 512
> megabytes?
I don't know but you can inspect the java application with the java
console (jconsole). There are several stats on memory usage.
With JDownloader (doing nothing), I see 57 MB of "non heap memory
usage", and "only" 30 MB of heap mem
hi there,
maybe i'm missing something obvious, but i don't quite understand the following
top(1) output:
last pid: 13875; load averages: 0.73, 0.75, 0.68
65 processes: 2 running, 62 sleeping, 1 waiting
CPU 0: 19.5% user, 0.0% nice, 13.3% system, 0.0% interrupt, 67.2% idle
CPU 1: 20.3% user
Jon Schipp writes:
> You wouldn't want to know when your machine has reached periods of high
> memory utilization?
No, I want to know when my machine would perform better if it had more
memory. Keeping memory in use when it otherwise would be "free" means I
get *better* performance.
> Occurren
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> I'm under the impression that virtual memory and physical memory usage are
> very different.
>
> e.g. vmstat and top report very different memory values.
>
If I assume this is an XY problem, and your true goal is find out
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Lowell Gilbert <
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> Jon Schipp writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Nov 3 08:17:46 2011
> > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 09:18:06 -0400
> > From: Jon Schipp
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Check Memory Usage
Jon Schipp writes:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
>> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>>> RELEASE)?
>>> In vain of 'free'
Hello Jon,
Perhaps the port sysutils/freecolor.
Cheers ...
Mark
>Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>RELEASE)?
>In vain of 'free' in Linux.
>I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if
anyone
>has a "
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 10:06:19 -0400
Jon Schipp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
>
> > On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
> >> RELEASE)?
> >
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 03:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
>
>> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
>> RELEASE)?
>> In vain of 'free' in Linux.
>>
>> I know you can check
On 11/3/11 9:18 PM, Jon Schipp wrote:
> Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
> RELEASE)?
Hi Jon,
Check out the port /usr/ports/sysutils/sysinfo .
HTH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
Is there a program to check physical memory usage in FreeBSD(using 8.2
RELEASE)?
In vain of 'free' in Linux.
I know you can check the values with sysctl, I was just checking if anyone
has a "cleaner" option.
I was always curious.
Thanks
Jon
___
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Coert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like this:
>
> Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k buffers
> Swap: 4192924k total, 0k used, 4192924k
On Thu, 27 May 2010 11:52:15 +0200
Coert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like
> this:
>
> Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k
> buffers Swap: 4192924k total,0k used, 419292
Hello all,
Just a question, on Linux the output of top's memory usage looks like this:
Mem: 2075424k total, 1760848k used, 314576k free, 151872k buffers
Swap: 4192924k total,0k used, 4192924k free, 1214052k cached
on FreeBSD:
Mem: 48M Active, 945M Inact, 190M Wired,
On Thursday 18 March 2010 18:28:48 Jayadev Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
> Is there any system call
> do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I
> couldn't find the p
On Thu 18 Mar 2010 at 18:30:00 PDT J. Johnston wrote:
On 03/18/10 10:28, Jayadev Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn'
On 03/18/10 10:28, Jayadev Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn't
find the port which it is coming
from yet.
Thanks,
Hi,
I need to find the memory usage of a process, from inside the process.
Is there any system call
do this ? I was trying to find it from 'top' utility source code. I couldn't
find the port which it is coming
from yet.
>I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
>and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
>somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
>to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep for
>information via
Manish Jain wrote:
I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep f
Hello,
I am looking for a convenient way using C to retrieve the current CPU
and memory utilization of a process of which I have the pid. Can
somebody please give me a hint of which system-calls/library-functions
to use for this ? I don't want to use the system() function or grep for
informa
s is one cause for filled Active memory: a process polling multiple file
descriptors, like a File Alteration Monitor under current desktops.
The other, as Dan Nelson described, is file cache. If you want to be sure it's
this, then reboot the machine and run:
/etc/periodic/security/100.ch
hen reboot the machine and run:
/etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid
You should see memory usage going up. If this causes a performance problem
(i.e. You sometimes are subject to heavily increasing loads on a mailserver,
that causes a lot of forks and file cache memory isn't unloaded fast en
gt; What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
> >>>>> memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
> >>>>> different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
> >>>>> mem
- tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production
box?
I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
sort by resident memory usa
mething but I fail to see what is using it - tried
> >>> different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
> >>> memory does not show at all.
> >>>
> >>> A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production
&
ory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it -
> >>> tried different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big
> >>> chunk of memory does not show at all.
> >>>
> >>> A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this
but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production
box?
I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
sort by resident memory usage, which helps.
ps will sort by memory usage when gi
but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production
box?
I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
sort by resident memory usage, which helps.
ps will sort by memory usage when gi
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets near the by now 3G plus memory shown as "Active". Maybe one
gig is accounted for,
I'm not that familiar with FreeBSD yet, but the kernel uses memory which
might not be charged against any
.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production box?
I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
sort by resident memory usage, which helps.
Well, my problem is that if I add up all I *can* see in top or ps it
never gets nea
the stat tools but a big chunk of
> > memory does not show at all.
> >
> > A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production
> > box?
>
> I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
> sort by resident me
at all.
>
> A proper tool for analyzing memory usage "live", this is a production box?
I've always been able to get what I need from top. You can do -o res to
sort by resident memory usage, which helps.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://pe
Hello,
What is a good way to find out how memory is used? Have a 6.4 box where
memory is used by something but I fail to see what is using it - tried
different switches to ps(1), tried the stat tools but a big chunk of
memory does not show at all.
A proper tool for analyzing memory usage
Grant Peel skrev:
Hi all,
Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any FreeBSD
utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use mrtg to show memory
and disk usage?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Le Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:47:32 -0500,
"Grant Peel" a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any
> FreeBSD utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use
> mrtg to show memory and disk usage?
Mrtg needs a script that returns four lines :
-
uade it to make the equivalent queries to get disk or memory usage
stats.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninop
Hi all,
Does anyone have scripts they may be willing to share the parses any FreeBSD
utility (top, w, etc) suitable for using the output to use mrtg to show memory
and disk usage?
-Grant
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On 2007-12-17 06:00, Patrick Dung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have correction with the script but still doesn't work:
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/bash
> for user in `ps -A -o user | sort | uniq | tail +2`
> do
> echo "user: $user"
>
>ps aux -U $user | tail +2 | while read line
>do
>
>
I have correction with the script but still doesn't work:
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
for user in `ps -A -o user | sort | uniq | tail +2`
do
echo "user: $user"
ps aux -U $user | tail +2 | while read line
do
mem=`echo $line | awk {'print $4'}`
echo "mem: $mem"
TMPSUMM
Hello, any idea about why below script is not working?
The final sum is empty..
#!/usr/local/bin/bash
for user in `ps -A -o user | sort | uniq | tail +2`
do
echo "user: $user"
ps aux -U $user | tail +2 | while read line
do
mem=`echo $line | awk {'print $4'}`
echo "mem
Philip Radford wrote:
[ ... ]
When using the top command I get the following in regards to memory usage.
Mem: 223M Active, 970M Inact, 175M Wired, 50M Cache, 112M Buf, 73M Free
Swap: 3029M Total, 12K Used, 3029M Free
Can someone advise me which figure relates to actual physical memory
which
Hi All,
This is a question which probably applies to all unix based OS as well as
FreeBSD.
When using the top command I get the following in regards to memory usage.
Mem: 223M Active, 970M Inact, 175M Wired, 50M Cache, 112M Buf, 73M Free
Swap: 3029M Total, 12K Used, 3029M Free
Can someone
From what I read you should only change kern.maxdsiz, changing
kern.dfldsiz makes every process allocating this amount of memory by
default, thats bad.
Something like:
kern.maxdsiz="1395864371" # 1.3GB
#kern.dfldsiz="1395864371" # 1.3GB
#kern.maxssiz="134217728" # 128MB
would do the trick for
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Thaddeus Quintin wrote:
Or maybe it's trying to ask for a big shared memory segment...?
Your guess is as good as mine. Are there tools or anything else I
can use to try and figure this out?
MySQL probably has some documentation which would help, although if
you
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Thaddeus Quintin wrote:
I already took care of that, it was in my first email-
I tweaked /boot/loader.conf to allow larger data size for
processes already (rebooted after changes)-
kern.maxdsiz="1395864371" # 1.3G
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Thaddeus Quintin wrote:
I already took care of that, it was in my first email-
I tweaked /boot/loader.conf to allow larger data size for
processes already (rebooted after changes)-
kern.maxdsiz="1395864371" # 1.3GB
kern.dfldsiz="1395864371" # 1.3GB
kern.maxssiz="13
On Jul 19, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Charles Swiger wrote:
FreeBSD defaults to having a 512MB maximum process datasize. Add
something like:
kern.dfldsiz="1G"
...to /boot/loader.conf.
I already took care of that, it was in my first email-
I tweaked /boot/loader.conf to allow larger data siz
On Jul 19, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Thaddeus Quintin wrote:
The issue that I'm having is that when I start up MySQL I get a
couple "Out of Memory" errors before it actually starts up. Looks
like this-
060719 11:55:35 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 43656
/usr/local/libexec/mysqld: Out of m
I'm working on a FreeBSD 6.1 machine and setting up MySQL 5.0 with
some InnoDB tables.
The machine has 2GB of RAM and will primarily be used as a database
machine and will also be serving files over NFS (not high volume).
The issue that I'm having is that when I start up MySQL I get a
cou
ecot,
> > > mysql5.0, cacti, and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc
> > > shell, etc).
> > >
> > > when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs),
> > > its nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available
snmp, my bx irc shell, etc).
> >
> > when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its
> > nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows several
> > perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but that would
> &
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:19:41PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> i just upgraded to the new phpsysinfo rc2, and it shows more detailed
> information about what the memory usage is doing. it shows that 1.57GB is
> being used by buffers. what is the significance of 1.57GB of mem
hen ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its
> nearly always showing less than 100mb of ram available. top shows several
> perls (probably spamassassin), 8 or so httpds (typical), but that would
> probably only account for (a liberal guess) 500-600 mb of ram.
&g
i have a server that has 2GB ram, recently upgraded from 1GB ram. it runs
apache2.0 with php5, sendmail with spamass-milter, dovecot, mysql5.0, cacti,
and a couple other small things (like snmp, my bx irc shell, etc).
when ever i look at the memory usage (via phpsysinfo, or cacti graphs), its
* David Banning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You might also consider switching to something like lighttpd, which
> > uses a single process that's generally about 1/3 the size of an
> > equivilent httpd process.
>
> I like these ideas. Thanks. What is the downside, if any, to using
> lighttpd? Is
> Moving things like mod_php and mod_perl stuff to FastCGI avoids each
> httpd having a copy of the interpreter and its various data structures
> each, and segments the memory of the interpreters outside httpd so it's
> easier to see what's using the memory; you'll have fewer copies running
> too,
* David Banning ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I seem to have a lot of memory being eaten by httpd (part output of top);
> Any ideas to have httpd timeout sooner to preserve memory?
MaxRequestsPerChild is there to cope with leaks, it won't help if Apache
is using a lot of memory to start with thou
to have httpd timeout sooner to preserve memory?
>
> If you want to reduce the memory usage, avoid using mod_perl or PHP. httpd
> ought to shrink down to ~5MB or so per process.
Here is the thing though. I can "apachectl restart" and memory is
plentiful. So it seems like htt
he is normally run in a prefork mode, which means it keeps
lots of children (default is 5, plus the master) running all of the time.
Any ideas to have httpd timeout sooner to preserve memory?
If you want to reduce the memory usage, avoid using mod_perl or PHP. httpd
ought to shrink down to ~5
I seem to have a lot of memory being eaten by httpd (part output of top);
62310 nobody 18 0 26792K 21516K lockf0:04 0.00% 0.00% httpd
162 root 2 0 4328K 2244K select 0:04 0.00% 0.00% sendmail
63909 nobody 18 0 26824K 21528K lockf0:03 0.00% 0.
Gregor Mosheh wrote:
I was looking at my top output and was surprised to
see that the bulk of my 512 MB of memory was in use,
since the server really has fairly little running.
It's not a problem, but I was wanting some
clarification on where this memory was being used, for
my own education.
The or
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
Gregor Mosheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was looking at my top output and was surprised to
> see that the bulk of my 512 MB of memory was in use,
> since the server really has fairly little running.
> It's not a problem, but I was wanting some
> clarifi
I was looking at my top output and was surprised to
see that the bulk of my 512 MB of memory was in use,
since the server really has fairly little running.
It's not a problem, but I was wanting some
clarification on where this memory was being used, for
my own education.
The original goal was that
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:39:40PM +0200, Mipam wrote:
> I have a question about usage of memory.
> Despite the well documented articles about it some things are still
> unclear. In top we see memory devided in several items:
Try this article, buy the guy who wrote some very large chunks of the
Hi,
I have a question about usage of memory.
Despite the well documented articles about it some things are still
unclear. In top we see memory devided in several items:
Active, inactive, buffered, wired and free.
The active memory is clear, it's what is in use by programs now.
Wired mem is also c
Artem Koutchine wrote:
Hi!
I need to figure out how much memory process really takes.
For example, i am running 100 perl scripts, they are all the
same source and i guess some memory is shared among them
(mostly perl interperter i guess). So, i need to know how much
memory is shared and how much m
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Artem Koutchine wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need to figure out how much memory process really takes.
> For example, i am running 100 perl scripts, they are all the
> same source and i guess some memory is shared among them
> (mostly perl interperter i guess). So, i need to know how much
Hi!
I need to figure out how much memory process really takes.
For example, i am running 100 perl scripts, they are all the
same source and i guess some memory is shared among them
(mostly perl interperter i guess). So, i need to know how much
memory is shared and how much memory is used for each
In the last episode (Sep 12), Jesse Guardiani said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Sep 12), Jesse Guardiani said:
> >> Dan Nelson wrote:
> >> > In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
> >> >
> >> >> 2.) What, exactly, is RES? `man top` describes it as this:
> >> >> "
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 12), Jesse Guardiani said:
>> Dan Nelson wrote:
>> > In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
>> >
>> >> 2.) What, exactly, is RES? `man top` describes it as this:
>> >> "RES is the current amount of resident memory", but does
>> >>
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
>
> > In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
> >> 1.) Where is my Free memory going? I can't account for it
> >> in the SIZE and RES columns of the various processes.
> >> These are relatively constant.
> >
> >
In the last episode (Sep 12), Jesse Guardiani said:
> Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
> >
> >> 2.) What, exactly, is RES? `man top` describes it as this:
> >> "RES is the current amount of resident memory", but does
> >> that mean RES is included
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
>> 1.) Where is my Free memory going? I can't account for it
>> in the SIZE and RES columns of the various processes.
>> These are relatively constant.
>
> Disk cache.
I thought it might be something like that. My la
I consider a Bad Thing.
Having said that, yes, it is still a very memory intensive pipeline.
I took some time to profile the memory usage a few days ago, and it
looks like the most memory the pipeline should ever use at any given
point in time is ~12780K, with the following processes running:
As I watch the email travel down the qmail-smtpd->qmail-qfilter->
custom-python->>qmail-scanner->clamd->qmail-queue "pipeline",
J> I watch the memory usage with `top`.
J> Memory is critical in this type of application, since I run my
J> qmail-smtpd "pipeline
In the last episode (Sep 11), Jesse Guardiani said:
> 1.) Where is my Free memory going? I can't account for it
> in the SIZE and RES columns of the various processes.
> These are relatively constant.
Disk cache.
> 2.) What, exactly, is RES? `man top` describes it as this:
> "RES is
smtpd->qmail-qfilter->
custom-python->qmail-scanner->clamd->qmail-queue "pipeline",
I watch the memory usage with `top`.
Memory is critical in this type of application, since I run my
qmail-smtpd "pipeline" under DJB's softlimit program. I MUST
know how much memory
Florian Lorenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, I mean login class and I ran cap_mkdb afterwards.
>
> Any other hints?
What does limits(1) tell you?
> Florian
>
> > > I tried to limit core-use of mldonkey by putting it into a seperate
> > > login group with a lowered maxmemorysize but that
Yep, I mean login class and I ran cap_mkdb afterwards.
Any other hints?
Florian
> > I tried to limit core-use of mldonkey by putting it into a seperate
> > login group with a lowered maxmemorysize but that had no effect. I also
> > niced it up, but that has no effect on swap usage, of course.
>
ts swapping. This is in
> general not a big problem but it slows down the whole machine, which is
> also running several other services. My question now is how to limit the
> mldonkey-precess' memory usage. I've got 64 MB of core and the CPU is a
> Pentium 166, so not to fast at a
nning several other services. My question now is how to limit the
mldonkey-precess' memory usage. I've got 64 MB of core and the CPU is a
Pentium 166, so not to fast at all, but sufficient for everything else.
top tells me that under normal load, without the mldonkey, about about
five MB o
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:13:15AM -0500, Matt Winslow wrote:
> > I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
> > yesterday from 80MB to 256MB, because it always used to sit at 93-94% used
> > when I had 80. Well now that I installed more, it's sitting at 93% used
> >
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:13:15AM -0500, Matt Winslow wrote:
> I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
> yesterday from 80MB to 256MB, because it always used to sit at 93-94% used
> when I had 80. Well now that I installed more, it's sitting at 93% used
> again. Being
Thus spake Matt Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
> yesterday from 80MB to 256MB, because it always used to sit at 93-94% used
> when I had 80. Well now that I installed more, it's sitting at 93% used
> again. Being newer to BSD, is
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Matt Winslow wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:13:15 -0500
> From: Matt Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Question about memory usage
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
> yeste
CTED]
> Subject: Question about memory usage
>
>
> I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
> yesterday from 80MB to 256MB, because it always used to sit at 93-94% used
> when I had 80. Well now that I installed more, it's sitting at 93% used
>
I'm running FreeBSD 4.5, on a P-133 system. I just upgraded my RAM
yesterday from 80MB to 256MB, because it always used to sit at 93-94% used
when I had 80. Well now that I installed more, it's sitting at 93% used
again. Being newer to BSD, is there a way I can check what is using
memory...or do
Steve Wingate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to figure out why X11 is using so much memory on my
> workstation. Here is the output from 'top':
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 236 steve 2 0 215M 210M select 1 435:16 0.05% 0.
I'm trying to figure out why X11 is using so much memory on my
workstation. Here is the output from 'top':
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
236 steve 2 0 215M 210M select 1 435:16 0.05% 0.05% XFree86
215MB seems like alot to me. OTOH, this
94 matches
Mail list logo
