Re: gpg-agent
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 19:24:33 Matt Emmerton wrote: > > I have been having trouble getting gpg-agent to work. kgpg complained > > about > > > the agent not running. I added this to my ~/.bashrc: > > > > GPG_TTY=`tty` > > export GPG_TTY > > > > This seems to have taken care of the problem but it only works when my > > default > > > shell is bash. If my shell is tcsh, it doesn't work. This is what I > > have > > in > > > my ~/.cshrc: > > > > setenv GPG_TTY tty > > > > Apparently this is wrong. Any ideas as to what I can try? > > I noticed that you're using backticks, so GPG_TTY gets set to the output of > the tty command - not the text "tty" itself. > Perhaps you want this? > > setenv GPG_TTY `tty` > Thanks, I forgot to put in the backticks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
One other thing you can try - set the ethernet adapter to 10BaseT half
duplex
and see if it gets better.
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyrre Nygård
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 7:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
>
>
> Hello.
>
> My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him.
>
> When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same
> network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95
> Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good
> information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy),
> so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the
> problem's at?
>
> Thanks guys,
> Kyrre
>
> # ifconfig -a
> sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> options=8
> inet6 fe80::20e:a6ff:fe53:d066%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 67.143.227.71
> inet 67.143.227.67 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.67
> inet 67.143.227.68 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.68
> inet 67.143.227.69 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.69
> inet 67.143.227.70 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.70
> inet 67.143.231.97 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.97
> inet 67.143.231.98 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.98
> inet 67.143.231.99 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.99
> inet 67.143.231.100 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.100
> inet 67.143.231.101 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.101
> inet 67.143.231.102 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.102
> ether 00:0e:a6:53:d0:66
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
> status: active
> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500
> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
> pflog0: flags=141 mtu 33208
>
> #cat /etc/rc.conf
> ifconfig_sis0="inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 255.255.255.248"
> defaultrouter="67.143.227.65"
> hostname="his.box~com"
>
> ifconfig_sis0_alias0="67.143.227.67 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias1="67.143.227.68 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias2="67.143.227.69 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias3="67.143.227.70 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias4="67.143.231.97 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias5="67.143.231.98 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias6="67.143.231.99 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias7="67.143.231.100 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias8="67.143.231.101 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias9="67.143.231.102 netmask 0x"
>
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=3217968
> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=3217968
> net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
>
> syslogd_enable="YES"
> syslogd_flags="-4 -v -v -s -s -l /etc/namedb/var/run/log"
> stunnel_enable="YES"
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflog_enable="YES"
>
> sshd_enable="YES"
> inetd_enable="YES"
> inetd_flags="-wWl"
> named_enable="YES"
> named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
> named_flags="-u bind -c /etc/namedb/named.conf"
> mysql_enable="YES"
> apache2_enable="YES"
> apache2ssl_enable="YES"
> sendmail_enable="NONE"
> courier_authdaemond_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapd_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapdssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapd_ssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_pop3dssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_pop3d_ssl_enable="YES"
> sqwebmaild_enable="YES"
> spamd_enable="YES"
> spamd_flags="-d -q -v -x -r /var/run/spamd.pid"
> clamav_clamd_enable="YES"
> clamav_freshclam_enable="YES"
> svscan_enable="YES"
> snmpd_enable="YES"
> proftpd_enable="YES"
>
> usbd_enable="YES"
>
> clear_tmp_enable="YES"
> update_motd="NO"
>
> linux_enable="YES"
>
> --
>
> # cat /etc/pf.conf
> ext_if="sis0" # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0
> loc_if="lo0"# lo0 - local interface 127.0.0.1
> table { 67.143.227.66, 67.143.227.67, 67.143.227.68,
> 67.143.227.69, 67.143.227.70 67.143.231.97 67.143.231.98 67.143.231.99
> 67.143.231.100 67.143.231.101 67.143.231.102}
> table { 205.209.177.60 }
> table { 67.143.227.66, 128.242.160.3, 68.83.182.43,
> 66.252.8.133 }
> table { 222.152.0.43, 219.89.75.39, 222.152.3.100,
> 222.152.4.82, 65.175.125.87, 59.188.133.195, 59.59.154.71,
> 222.245.97.116, 201.141.212.230, 208.53.3.92, 124.163.176.58,
> 213.230.128.226, 208.69.32.130, 65.175.125.94, 65.111.17.147,
> 216.15.177.196, 72.37.165.0/24, 200.184.163.0/24 }
>
> scrub in all
>
> #smtp forward
> rdr inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 2525 -> 67.143.227.70 port 25
>
> #block in quick on $ext_if from
> block drop in quick on $ext_if from to
>
> # Filtering: the implicit first two rules are
> pass in all
> pass out all
>
> # block all incoming packets but allow ssh, pass all outgoing tcp and udp
> # connections a
RE: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
sis ethernet cards are not known as very good cards.
Ted
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyrre Nygård
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 7:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
>
>
> Hello.
>
> My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him.
>
> When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same
> network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95
> Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good
> information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy),
> so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the
> problem's at?
>
> Thanks guys,
> Kyrre
>
> # ifconfig -a
> sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> options=8
> inet6 fe80::20e:a6ff:fe53:d066%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
> inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 67.143.227.71
> inet 67.143.227.67 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.67
> inet 67.143.227.68 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.68
> inet 67.143.227.69 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.69
> inet 67.143.227.70 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.70
> inet 67.143.231.97 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.97
> inet 67.143.231.98 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.98
> inet 67.143.231.99 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.99
> inet 67.143.231.100 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.100
> inet 67.143.231.101 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.101
> inet 67.143.231.102 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.102
> ether 00:0e:a6:53:d0:66
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
> status: active
> plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500
> lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
> pflog0: flags=141 mtu 33208
>
> #cat /etc/rc.conf
> ifconfig_sis0="inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 255.255.255.248"
> defaultrouter="67.143.227.65"
> hostname="his.box~com"
>
> ifconfig_sis0_alias0="67.143.227.67 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias1="67.143.227.68 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias2="67.143.227.69 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias3="67.143.227.70 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias4="67.143.231.97 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias5="67.143.231.98 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias6="67.143.231.99 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias7="67.143.231.100 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias8="67.143.231.101 netmask 0x"
> ifconfig_sis0_alias9="67.143.231.102 netmask 0x"
>
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=3217968
> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=3217968
> net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
>
> syslogd_enable="YES"
> syslogd_flags="-4 -v -v -s -s -l /etc/namedb/var/run/log"
> stunnel_enable="YES"
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflog_enable="YES"
>
> sshd_enable="YES"
> inetd_enable="YES"
> inetd_flags="-wWl"
> named_enable="YES"
> named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
> named_flags="-u bind -c /etc/namedb/named.conf"
> mysql_enable="YES"
> apache2_enable="YES"
> apache2ssl_enable="YES"
> sendmail_enable="NONE"
> courier_authdaemond_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapd_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapdssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_imapd_ssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_pop3dssl_enable="YES"
> courier_imap_pop3d_ssl_enable="YES"
> sqwebmaild_enable="YES"
> spamd_enable="YES"
> spamd_flags="-d -q -v -x -r /var/run/spamd.pid"
> clamav_clamd_enable="YES"
> clamav_freshclam_enable="YES"
> svscan_enable="YES"
> snmpd_enable="YES"
> proftpd_enable="YES"
>
> usbd_enable="YES"
>
> clear_tmp_enable="YES"
> update_motd="NO"
>
> linux_enable="YES"
>
> --
>
> # cat /etc/pf.conf
> ext_if="sis0" # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0
> loc_if="lo0"# lo0 - local interface 127.0.0.1
> table { 67.143.227.66, 67.143.227.67, 67.143.227.68,
> 67.143.227.69, 67.143.227.70 67.143.231.97 67.143.231.98 67.143.231.99
> 67.143.231.100 67.143.231.101 67.143.231.102}
> table { 205.209.177.60 }
> table { 67.143.227.66, 128.242.160.3, 68.83.182.43,
> 66.252.8.133 }
> table { 222.152.0.43, 219.89.75.39, 222.152.3.100,
> 222.152.4.82, 65.175.125.87, 59.188.133.195, 59.59.154.71,
> 222.245.97.116, 201.141.212.230, 208.53.3.92, 124.163.176.58,
> 213.230.128.226, 208.69.32.130, 65.175.125.94, 65.111.17.147,
> 216.15.177.196, 72.37.165.0/24, 200.184.163.0/24 }
>
> scrub in all
>
> #smtp forward
> rdr inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 2525 -> 67.143.227.70 port 25
>
> #block in quick on $ext_if from
> block drop in quick on $ext_if from to
>
> # Filtering: the implicit first two rules are
> pass in all
> pass out all
>
> # block all incoming packets but allow ssh, pass all outgoing tcp and udp
> # connections and keep state, logging blocked packets.
> block in l
Re: gpg-agent
> I have been having trouble getting gpg-agent to work. kgpg complained about > the agent not running. I added this to my ~/.bashrc: > > GPG_TTY=`tty` > export GPG_TTY > > This seems to have taken care of the problem but it only works when my default > shell is bash. If my shell is tcsh, it doesn't work. This is what I have in > my ~/.cshrc: > > setenv GPG_TTY tty > > Apparently this is wrong. Any ideas as to what I can try? I noticed that you're using backticks, so GPG_TTY gets set to the output of the tty command - not the text "tty" itself. Perhaps you want this? setenv GPG_TTY `tty` -- Matt Emmerton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Detecting CPU Type
RW wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:42:33 -0400 Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Olivier Regnier wrote: I searching to find information about my CPU type. i have this: CPU: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+ (1600.06-Mhz 686-class CPU) I must configure my CPUTYPE?= in /etc/make.conf. I'ts i686 (686-class) or i386 ? "i386" is the architecture; it includes all the similar processors including the 486, Pentiums, Athlon, etc. Other architectures are completely different hardware, eg Sun's SPARC. The 686-class is the specific processor within the i386 architecture. if you look in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf you'll see a list of options for CPUTYPE. athlon-xp might be the closest to your cpu. However, some folks here recommend against using overly specific cpu optimization. You can go safe and just use pentium4 I'm not sure that is safe, Athlons, Sempron etc are back-compatible to 686 i.e. Pentium Pro, which is way before Intel developed the Pentium4. Use athlon-xp (hyphen or no hyphen? I forget..). -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd config config file question
On 7/10/07, Huy Ton That <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The daemon is up and has been up for a long time. In fact, when I made these changes to sshd_config, for instance as a test maxauthtries to 3 I also reloaded it during a ssh terminal session. After which I logged back in and as a test, purposely errored the tries; it still defaulted to 6 despite the sshd_config file change and reloading. when I say I get no message I mean to state as such: $/etc/rc.d/sshd status <--carriage return $ <--no message after return. Thanks Pete. -Huy On 7/10/07, pete wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/10/07, Huy Ton That <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, it was unhashed. Thanks for pointing it out though. But the strange > > thing is when I run: > > > > /etc/rc.d/sshd status > > > > I get no message > > > > No message for start, restart, reload etc. I am performing these > commands as > > root. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > > > (couple things, please don't top post, and be sure to keep > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc'd on this thread so others can help you) > > i'm not sure what you mean about "no message". make sure you have > sshd_enabled="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. > > also check to see if sshd is running by using "ps". if it is not, try > starting it by hand - this will tell you if there are any errors on > startup. once it starts cleanly by hand then use the init script in > /etc/rc.d/sshd. > > the man page for sshd is very helpful, and should answer many of the > questions you may have - including how to start the daemon by hand, > etc.. type: > man sshd > > -p > > > > > -- > ~~o0OO0o~~ > Pete Wright > www.nycbug.org > NYC's *BSD User Group > Your PAM config may be overriding SSH's config (For the ignoring MaxAuthTries option). It sometimes does that, depending on how the login type is set up in the sshd_config file. Check your PAM config ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SiL S-ATA (Was: Installation woes with 6.2 release)
Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] > There are significant hardware defects with the SiliconImage 311x > chips, which can mostly be worked around if you accept a loss of > performance. These workarounds are implemented in both Linux and the > BSDs, but details are available here: > > http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Silicon+Image+3112 > +bugs&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 > > ...gives results such as: > > http://www.nabble.com/SII3512-rev0---t3995350.html Thanks for the reference! It was an interesting read, and it does calm me down a bit, as it suggests the problem to be limited to chips with rev <= 1, whereas all my cards are rev 2. Well, if nothing else, it will be interesting to test my cards with FreeBSD and see what happens. In the worst case, it won't be that hard for me to switch to another card (just hoping that it won't cause any data corruption). It will probably be a while before I get the drives to connect to them, but I'll try to remember to post the results of my testing. Fredrik Tolf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gpg-agent
I have been having trouble getting gpg-agent to work. kgpg complained about the agent not running. I added this to my ~/.bashrc: GPG_TTY=`tty` export GPG_TTY This seems to have taken care of the problem but it only works when my default shell is bash. If my shell is tcsh, it doesn't work. This is what I have in my ~/.cshrc: setenv GPG_TTY tty Apparently this is wrong. Any ideas as to what I can try? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.2 default bind9, question about customize logging [re-post]
this is what i have from 5.2
logging {
channel namedlog {
file "/var/log/named.log";
severity info;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
print-time yes;
};
category lame-servers {
null;
};
category default {
namedlog;
};
category xfer-out { namedlog;};
};
hope this help
On Jul 8, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Patrick Dung wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 6.2 with the default bind (not ports).
By default chroot is used.
When named start or stop, it does have log in /var/log/messages.
But for example, when some do domain transfer successfully, that is
not
logged (zone transfer denied is logged).
So I tried to add this part in named.conf (enabled local0.* in
syslog.conf) , but still no luck. Any suggestions?
logging {
channel named-log {
//syslog daemon;
syslog local0;
severity info;
print-category yes;
};
category default { named-log; };
category xfer-in { named-log; };
category xfer-out { named-log; };
category unmatched { null; };
};
Thanks
Patrick
__
__
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from
someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Detecting CPU Type
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:42:33 -0400 Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Olivier Regnier wrote: > > I searching to find information about my CPU type. > > i have this: CPU: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+ > > (1600.06-Mhz 686-class CPU) I must configure my CPUTYPE?= > > in /etc/make.conf. I'ts i686 (686-class) or i386 ? > > "i386" is the architecture; it includes all the similar processors > including the 486, Pentiums, Athlon, etc. Other architectures are > completely different hardware, eg Sun's SPARC. > > The 686-class is the specific processor within the i386 > architecture. if you look in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf > you'll see a list of options for CPUTYPE. athlon-xp might be the > closest to your cpu. However, some folks here recommend against > using overly specific cpu optimization. You can go safe and just use > pentium4 I'm not sure that is safe, Athlons, Sempron etc are back-compatible to 686 i.e. Pentium Pro, which is way before Intel developed the Pentium4. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: named listening on LAN
this is what I got:
listen-on {
127.0.0.1;
192.168.11.50;
};
Try that, restart and see if it works locally (from the server).
Also the logs spit anything out?
Other thing is firewall, I think simple blocks it by default? So you
might want to try that.
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I am slowly trying various features of FBSD and I have just enabled named
to be my local caching DNS server. It works fine but I have one question.
I would like it to be a caching DNS server for my LAN.
So following the Handbook I tried setting a proper LAN IP address of the
named machine:
listen-on { 192.168.11.50; };
However, when I restart named, it does not want to work (no DNS then). The
handbook suggests that when I want a caching server only, I should not
touch zones.
Any hint what I need to do to make it work for my LAN?
Thank you in advance!
Zbigniew Szalbot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
On July 10, 2007, Kyrre Nygård wrote: > Hello. > > My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him. > > When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same > network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95 > Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good > information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy), > so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the > problem's at? Are we comparing apples to oranges? 88.78 KBps (kilo bytes per second) = 710.24 Kbps (kilo bits per second) If this is true, then the FreeBSD box is faster :) Cheers. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: external drive
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 17:21:35 Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all, > > After yesterdays fiasco trying to upgrade 5.5 to 6.2 - I just grabbed a new > drive and did a clean install of 6.2 > > Its working great, no errors I'm happy- > > There are some files (basically some custom config and cf files) that I > would like to copy from the 5.5 drive - > So I put it in an external enclosure and needless to say windows wouldn't > recognize it - and the MAC OSX though it sees it , it wont let me mount it > (despite the fact that I clicked mount drive ) > > 2 questions; > > 1. Is there anything out there that would let me read a BSD drive from a > windows or mac machine? > 2. If I do just plug the drive into the BSD USB port will it cause any > conflicts as there will be duplicates of the main slices > /var > /usr etc.. > > Or am I safe just plugging it in and mounting it? > > > PS: Thanks to everyone for the feedback yesterday - I learned A LOT in the > last 24 hours > > > > > > > > > > Jean-Paul > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" you can just plug it into the bsd box, it wont mount automatically. you can create temporary mountpoints, say maybe: /media/usr /media/var /media/root and mount them on those. copy what you need out, and the unmount them when youre ready. hth, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
acpi_smbust_read_2: AE_ERROR 0x10 on a mac pro running -STABLE
I have a mac pro running amd64 -STABLE from about a week or so ago. The console and dmesg output are flooded by acpi_smbus_read_2: AE_ERROR 0x10 message. There will be a couple, then silence, then a burst of them, then The don't seem to be hurting anything, but they push other stuff out of dmesg. Can anyone help me identify the problem and reduce the chatter (short of commenting out the line that's generating the output...). Thanks, g. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Help making too quiet sound work on Mac Pro running -STABLE
I have a mac pro running amd64 -STABLE from a week or so ago. Most things are working well, but sound's not quite there. When I plug a set of powered speakers into the headphone jack on the front of the machine and max the mixer setting and the speakers, I can just barely hear an mp3 played by mpg123. I'm loading snd_hda from /boot/loader.conf, and /dev/sndstat tells me: FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Installed devices: pcm0: at memory 0x9310 irq 23 kld snd_hda [20070619_0045] (1p/1r/1v channels duplex default) There's a chunk of the dmesg output from a verbose boot at http://shrimp.alerce.com/misc/delicious-dmesg which seems to include all of the pcm info. What other info can I provide? g. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: X11 forwarding problems in FreeBSD 6.2 - no xauth data?
On 7/10/07, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:41:01 Pollywog wrote: > > I just did 'ssh' to one of the Linux hosts and when the connection was > made, I got this: > > Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. > > Does this possibly have something to do with the problem I mentioned in my > initial post in this thread? I am going to Google that error and see if I > can find something. I found out that "mcookie" generates magic cookies for xauth, but I do not have the mcookie command in FreeBSD, though it exists on my Debian Etch system and is part of the util-linux package. If I can find mcookie or a command that is analogous to it in FreeBSD, I might be able to fix this problem: http://rocketcalc.com/bread.php?key=22 From what I've read at http://www.linuxcommand.org/man_pages/mcookie1.html: mcookie generates a 128-bit random hexadecimal number for use with the X authority system. Typical usage: xauth add :0 . 'mcookie' Therefore, you should be able to use any random 128-bit hex number instead of mcookie. I'm not sure how secure it would be, but it should work just fine. Cheers Federico ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: X11 forwarding problems in FreeBSD 6.2 - no xauth data?
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Pollywog wrote: > I found out that "mcookie" generates magic cookies for xauth, but I do not > have the mcookie command in FreeBSD, though it exists on my Debian Etch > system and is part of the util-linux package. I think you need to generate a new cookie with $ xauth generate :0 . trusted See xauth(1) for more info. HTH, Pieter de Goeje ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: X11 forwarding problems in FreeBSD 6.2 - no xauth data?
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:41:01 Pollywog wrote: > > I just did 'ssh' to one of the Linux hosts and when the connection was > made, I got this: > > Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. > > Does this possibly have something to do with the problem I mentioned in my > initial post in this thread? I am going to Google that error and see if I > can find something. I found out that "mcookie" generates magic cookies for xauth, but I do not have the mcookie command in FreeBSD, though it exists on my Debian Etch system and is part of the util-linux package. If I can find mcookie or a command that is analogous to it in FreeBSD, I might be able to fix this problem: http://rocketcalc.com/bread.php?key=22 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
external drive
Hi all, After yesterdays fiasco trying to upgrade 5.5 to 6.2 - I just grabbed a new drive and did a clean install of 6.2 Its working great, no errors I'm happy- There are some files (basically some custom config and cf files) that I would like to copy from the 5.5 drive - So I put it in an external enclosure and needless to say windows wouldn't recognize it - and the MAC OSX though it sees it , it wont let me mount it (despite the fact that I clicked mount drive ) 2 questions; 1. Is there anything out there that would let me read a BSD drive from a windows or mac machine? 2. If I do just plug the drive into the BSD USB port will it cause any conflicts as there will be duplicates of the main slices /var /usr etc.. Or am I safe just plugging it in and mounting it? PS: Thanks to everyone for the feedback yesterday - I learned A LOT in the last 24 hours Jean-Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: X11 forwarding problems in FreeBSD 6.2 - no xauth data?
On Sunday 08 July 2007 18:03:49 Pollywog wrote: > I am having some problems with X11 forwarding. I can do X11 forwarding via > ssh between two machines running Linux, but if I try to do this from > FreeBSD (KDE) to either of the Linux machines, it only works if I use > startx to start KDE on the fbsd machine (a laptop). If I start KDE from > kdm, I get errors that go like this when I start the KDE app on the remote > host running Linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ kate > Xlib: connection to "localhost:11.0" refused by server > Xlib: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key > kate: cannot connect to X server localhost:11.0 I just did 'ssh' to one of the Linux hosts and when the connection was made, I got this: Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. Does this possibly have something to do with the problem I mentioned in my initial post in this thread? I am going to Google that error and see if I can find something. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FREEBSD 6.2
Hi, I try to install freebsd 6.2 on my freshly install hardware RAID1 (AIC-7901) But sysinstall always show me two HD but not one. Perhaps the driver is not load at the install and you must configure a kernel after . But i don't have this trouble with freebsd 5.x Thank for help Sebastien ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mount_smbfs 6.2-release and w2k3 standard r2
I hate not remembering things, so I just verified this on a Windows Server 2003 box I have access to. This feature (listening on port 139) is tied to NETBIOS over TCP/IP. Make sure it's enabled on the WINS tab of the Advanced TCP/IP settings dialog for the interface. BRILLIANT! Thats the one! Thanks a bunch. -- Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mount_smbfs 6.2-release and w2k3 standard r2
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, John Nielsen wrote: > On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Hi, I've done lots of googling and I get lots of solutions, but they > > don't work. > > > > I can smbclient to this share just fine: > > magneto# smbclient -U pgollucci glactus\\unix > > Password: > > Domain=[RIDERWAY] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 2] > > Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2] > > smb: \> ls > > . D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 > > 2007 .. D0 Fri Jul 6 > > 20:13:59 2007 > > > > 55750 blocks of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available > > BUT > > BUT > > > > mount_smbfs -W Riderway -I A.B.C.D //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unix > > /x1/backups-cdp Password: > > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection refused > > > > The share is valid, I can even write to it via smbclient. > > > > Does any one have any great ideas ? I've tried with and with -I, -W and > > replacing HOST with ip out-right. > > IIRC, Win2k3 only uses port 445 for smb/cifs by default, and our > mount_smbfs can only use 139 (or thereabouts :) ). It would be nice if > mount_smbfs were updated to work more easily with newer versions of > Windows, but in the meantime it should be possible to tell the Windows > server to also accept connections on the old port. Exactly how I don't > remember ATM, but I've done it before. I hate not remembering things, so I just verified this on a Windows Server 2003 box I have access to. This feature (listening on port 139) is tied to NETBIOS over TCP/IP. Make sure it's enabled on the WINS tab of the Advanced TCP/IP settings dialog for the interface. JN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mount_smbfs 6.2-release and w2k3 standard r2
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi, I've done lots of googling and I get lots of solutions, but they > don't work. > > I can smbclient to this share just fine: > magneto# smbclient -U pgollucci glactus\\unix > Password: > Domain=[RIDERWAY] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 2] > Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2] > smb: \> ls > . D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 > 2007 .. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 > 2007 > > 55750 blocks of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available > BUT > BUT > > mount_smbfs -W Riderway -I A.B.C.D //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unix > /x1/backups-cdp Password: > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection refused > > The share is valid, I can even write to it via smbclient. > > Does any one have any great ideas ? I've tried with and with -I, -W and > replacing HOST with ip out-right. IIRC, Win2k3 only uses port 445 for smb/cifs by default, and our mount_smbfs can only use 139 (or thereabouts :) ). It would be nice if mount_smbfs were updated to work more easily with newer versions of Windows, but in the meantime it should be possible to tell the Windows server to also accept connections on the old port. Exactly how I don't remember ATM, but I've done it before. JN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
named listening on LAN
Hello,
I am slowly trying various features of FBSD and I have just enabled named
to be my local caching DNS server. It works fine but I have one question.
I would like it to be a caching DNS server for my LAN.
So following the Handbook I tried setting a proper LAN IP address of the
named machine:
listen-on { 192.168.11.50; };
However, when I restart named, it does not want to work (no DNS then). The
handbook suggests that when I want a caching server only, I should not
touch zones.
Any hint what I need to do to make it work for my LAN?
Thank you in advance!
Zbigniew Szalbot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mount_smbfs 6.2-release and w2k3 standard r2
Hi, I've done lots of googling and I get lots of solutions, but they don't work. I can smbclient to this share just fine: magneto# smbclient -U pgollucci glactus\\unix Password: Domain=[RIDERWAY] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790 Service Pack 2] Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2] smb: \> ls . D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 2007 .. D0 Fri Jul 6 20:13:59 2007 55750 blocks of size 8388608. 55498 blocks available BUT BUT mount_smbfs -W Riderway -I A.B.C.D //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/unix /x1/backups-cdp Password: mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = Connection refused The share is valid, I can even write to it via smbclient. Does any one have any great ideas ? I've tried with and with -I, -W and replacing HOST with ip out-right. Some machine info below: uname -a FreeBSD magneto. .2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 08:43:30 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP amd64 kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 16 0x8010 967700 kernel 21 0x80a68000 30088smbfs.ko 33 0x80a99000 5358 libiconv.ko 43 0x80a9f000 20a0 libmchain.ko 51 0xb5fea000 9306 ipfw.ko 61 0xb604e000 795 accf_http.ko sysctl kern.securelevel kern.securelevel: 3 ls -ld /var/db/pkg/*samba* magneto# ls -ld /var/db/pkg/*samba* drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 6 20:36 /var/db/pkg/samba-3.0.25a,1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 6 20:19 /var/db/pkg/samba-libsmbclient-3.0.25a_1 namp glactus (the windows box) Not shown: 1665 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE 25/tcp open smtp 42/tcp open nameserver 80/tcp open http 88/tcp open kerberos-sec 135/tcp open msrpc 389/tcp open ldap 445/tcp open microsoft-ds 464/tcp open kpasswd5 593/tcp open http-rpc-epmap 636/tcp open ldapssl 1025/tcp open NFS-or-IIS 1723/tcp open pptp 3268/tcp open globalcatLDAP 3269/tcp open globalcatLDAPssl 3389/tcp open ms-term-serv MAC Address: 00:1A:A0:1E:1D:DD (Unknown) Device type: general purpose Running: Microsoft Windows 2003/.NET|NT/2K/XP OS details: Microsoft Windows 2003 Server Standart Edition SP1, Microsoft Windows 2003 Server, 2003 Server SP1 or XP Pro SP2 -- Philip M. Gollucci 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Detecting CPU Type
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 21:54:43 Olivier Regnier wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I searching to find information about my CPU type. > > With the following command: > # dmesg | grep -i cpu > i have this: CPU: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+ (1600.06-Mhz > 686-class CPU) > but with a > # uname -m > i have i386. > > I must configure my CPUTYPE?= in /etc/make.conf. > I'ts i686 (686-class) or i386 ? > > Can you give me information please ? > > Thank you. > > Olivier Regnier Hi Olivier, from the manual page of uname(1) you can see what the -m option shows you, namely the platform on which you are running FreeBSD: -m Write the type of the current hardware platform to standard out- put. This page gives information on what kind of platforms does FreeBSD run http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ -- PGP KeyID: 0x3118168B Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint BB50 2983 0714 36DC D02E 158A E03D 56DA 3118 168B pgpWIVoklXlLD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Detecting CPU Type
Olivier Regnier wrote: I searching to find information about my CPU type. i have this: CPU: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+ (1600.06-Mhz 686-class CPU) I must configure my CPUTYPE?= in /etc/make.conf. I'ts i686 (686-class) or i386 ? "i386" is the architecture; it includes all the similar processors including the 486, Pentiums, Athlon, etc. Other architectures are completely different hardware, eg Sun's SPARC. The 686-class is the specific processor within the i386 architecture. if you look in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf you'll see a list of options for CPUTYPE. athlon-xp might be the closest to your cpu. However, some folks here recommend against using overly specific cpu optimization. You can go safe and just use pentium4 -RW ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Selecting printer from apps core dumps. Howto debug?
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, at 22:06:58 +0100, Graham Bentley wrote: > Its odd because the cups test page works, printing from > mousepad and firefox works, but abiword bombs completely. > In the short space of time I see it on the screen after > clicking print I can see there is no entry for the printer. [...] > [SOLVED] Set printer as 'default' using cups webmin. > > All working - thanks :) Sorry to bring back the thread but I'm seeing this issue with a fresh install of everything on a new machine. Printing to an Epson USB printer from the CUPS test page works fine, as does printing from Opera using the lpr binary installed by CUPS. When trying to print via AbiWord or Claws Mail, they coredump. If the printer is not set as default in CUPS (which is how I had it set before reading this thread), it does bring up the print dialog in Abiword/Claws but it dumps when you select the printer. If the printer is set as default in CUPS, the app dumps right when opening the print dialog and before the printer even shows up on the list of available printers. I think it's a somewhat new problem somewhere because I've been using Xfce, CUPS, and these applications for quite a while on other machines with no problems. CUPS is enabled in xfce4-print as well as libgnomeprint, and GNOME printing is enabled in Claws Mail. The USB permissions are also set properly. I also tried running AbiWord outside of Xfce (in Xorg's default WM) which did the same thing. Maybe it's something with libgnomeprint since both apps use it and both have problems printing? Here is a list of relevant software versions on the non working machine: abiword-2.4.6_1 claws-mail-2.10.0 cups-base-1.2.11_2 cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_1 gutenprint-cups-5.1.3 libgnomecups-0.2.2_4,1 libgnomeprint-2.18.0_2 libgnomeprintui-2.18.0_1 xfce4-print-4.4.1_1 Here is a list of relevant software versions on a machine that is printing properly with Claws-Mail (and probably would with AbiWord if it didn't have a problem with some laser printers): abiword-gnome-2.4.6 claws-mail-2.8.1 cups-base-1.2.8 libgnomecups-0.2.2_2,1 libgnomeprint-2.12.1_3 libgnomeprintui-2.12.1_2 xfce4-print-4.4.0 Here's the backtrace from AbiWord if it helps: http://tntpowerhost.com/mixx941/gdb_abiword_print.txt Please let me know if I can provide any additional info. Thanks in advance for any suggestions on how to fix or debug this. -Mark -- Internet Radio: Party107 (Trance/Electronic) - http://www.party107.com Rock 101.9 The Edge (Rock) - http://www.rock1019.net IRC: MIXXnet IRC Network - irc.mixxnet.net (Nick: MIXX941) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Detecting CPU Type
Hi everyone, I searching to find information about my CPU type. With the following command: # dmesg | grep -i cpu i have this: CPU: Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 2800+ (1600.06-Mhz 686-class CPU) but with a # uname -m i have i386. I must configure my CPUTYPE?= in /etc/make.conf. I'ts i686 (686-class) or i386 ? Can you give me information please ? Thank you. Olivier Regnier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installation woes with 6.2 release
On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Fredrik Tolf wrote: Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Clearly you have a disk controller compatibility problem. I do know the Sil chips are terrible, and there is a long history of issues with these chips and FreeBSD! That's interesting to me. Is there any further information available on that subject? I've been using SiL chips with Linux for quite a while with no problems, and I was planning to do the same with FreeBSD as well, but if there are known problems with SiL and FreeBSD I may need to rethink that decision. (To be more exact, I've been using the SiL 311[24] chips) There are significant hardware defects with the SiliconImage 311x chips, which can mostly be worked around if you accept a loss of performance. These workarounds are implemented in both Linux and the BSDs, but details are available here: http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Silicon+Image+3112 +bugs&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 ...gives results such as: http://www.nabble.com/SII3512-rev0---t3995350.html -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installation woes with 6.2 release
I think I accidently posted a reply to this via private mail with an invalid source address, but I'm not sure what I did, so I'll take this opportunity to apologize to anyone to gets this message twice. Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Clearly you have a disk controller compatibility problem. I do know > the Sil chips are terrible, and there is a long history of issues with > these chips and FreeBSD! That's interesting to me. Is there any further information available on that subject? I've been using SiL chips with Linux for quite a while with no problems, and I was planning to do the same with FreeBSD as well, but if there are known problems with SiL and FreeBSD I may need to rethink that decision. (To be more exact, I've been using the SiL 311[24] chips) Fredrik Tolf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IPW3945 in 6.2
Tom Grove wrote: > What are the chances that IPW3945 will work in 6.2? Has anyone > accomplished this? Also, is it likely that the wpi drivers will be > ready for 7.0? > > -Tom > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > I have actually succeeded in making my 3945 work in 6.2 Release, but I used the January 2007 version of the wpi driver http://www.clearchain.com/~benjsc/download/20070125-wpi-freebsd.tar.gz This only works on the release version and it breaks if you perform a freebsd-update and recompile your kernel. I have only tested basic features (i.e. no encryption of any kind) but it worked ok. >From what I've read the driver is in heavy development and will probably go open for beta testing soon. I believe there will be a working solution either included in 7, or something you can download and compile yourself. Read more details here: http://www.clearchain.com/wiki/Wpi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: severely OT; re PUTTY [ssh]
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:44:58 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Peter Boosten wrote: >> Gary Kline wrote: >> >>> I was able to find, ldown load and instal the DOS/Windows ssh >>> utility, but am having trouble scp'ing stuff between my BSD side >>> and my W2K server. Anybody know what file I have to modify to >>> get permission on the windows computer? >>> >> >> Gary, >> >> Search for winscp, a (free) graphical drag&drop scp tool. >> I've seen some limitations with scp of putty (like file sizes over 2 >> Gigs). >> >> Peter >> > Gary, >If you're just trying to do file transferring/sharing in a local > 'secure' network, I suggest Samba in place of scp. You might also want to > consider Samba + VPN as well; scp is great for porting files over long > distances, or a last resort for dealing with Unix <=> Windows transferring, > but just seems incredibly kludgey when dealing with files/directories > otherwise (having to maintain an ssh connection, having to install a > scp/ssh client per machine for instance are what I consider kludgey). > Cheers, > -Garrett My trick for this is that I got some Windows system somewhere to install PuTTY (and some other nice to have software) on my memory stick. I just plug it in when I have to deal with a Windows system. -- David Benfell, LCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ NOTE: I sign all messages with GnuPG (0DD1D1E3). pgphBXfLoivtO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: > On Tuesday 10 July 2007 17:02:46 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > On 7/10/07, Kyrre Nygård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on > > > him. > > > > > > When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on > > > the same network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the > > > Linux got 624.95 Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man > > > isn't really into good information design (e.g. taking > > > something complex and making it easy), so his system is a mess. > > > Maybe some of you can help me locate where the problem's at? > > > > > > Thanks guys, > > > Kyrre > > > > Could you please show the uname -a info? > > It could be at his router does not understand the RFC1323 > extensions - try setting > > tcp_extensions="NO" > > In rc.conf I think the first thing I would do is go back to a default configuration. Turn off pf, take out all of the sysctls and see what happens. Then start adding things in one at a time until you find what breaks it. It doesn't take much to do 625K/sec, the default configuration is easily capable of 30 times that. My guess is that either one of the sysctl 'tunings' has broken something, or an interaction between two or more of them has caused an unexpected behavior, but that's an easy enough theory to test. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel pgphXFpsEuxsN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: severely OT; re PUTTY [ssh]
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:12:44 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Chad Perrin wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 12:44:46AM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> >>> P.S. If anyone tells anyone else that I know this stuff about Windows >>> I will deny it loudly and come looking for you. I do not need >>> any more conversations that start with, "Oh, you're a computer >>> engineer - I have this problem with my/childrens'/wife's/dog's >>> Windows machine..." :) >>> >> >> "Oh, well that's your problem right there. Here, try FreeBSD, or maybe >> this MacOS X thing, instead. That should solve the problem." >> >> Isn't that the right answer to all such questions? >Although ideal to use FreeBSD/OS X, many circumstances force people to > use Windows (for now..). >Another possible solution (since Tim brought up Windows -> BSD): > automount with mount_smbfs should do the trick. Just having the Unix server > run Samba would do the trick though. Yeah, I like this trick. And it worked for a while. Beautifully, I should add, except when Windows did its stupid media preview thing that took forever while navigating through directories. Then that idiot IT team at my university cut it off, I assume through packet filtering rules. (I wish they'd focus on getting things working that they're supposed to be supplying instead.) -- David Benfell, LCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ NOTE: I sign all messages with GnuPG (0DD1D1E3). pgpIqmzMJaxGS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 17:02:46 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > On 7/10/07, Kyrre Nygård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > > > My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him. > > > > When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same > > network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95 > > Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good > > information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy), > > so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the > > problem's at? > > > > Thanks guys, > > Kyrre > > Could you please show the uname -a info? > It could be at his router does not understand the RFC1323 extensions - try setting tcp_extensions="NO" In rc.conf ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How to create directory on MD via vnode?
Dear Sir, I would like to create directory on a memory disk(/dev/md0) via vnode operation, without mounting it to a mountpoint. How can I do that? Thank you! ___ Mp3疯狂搜-新歌热歌高速下 http://music.yahoo.com.cn/?source=mail_mailbox_footer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd config config file question
The daemon is up and has been up for a long time. In fact, when I made these changes to sshd_config, for instance as a test maxauthtries to 3 I also reloaded it during a ssh terminal session. After which I logged back in and as a test, purposely errored the tries; it still defaulted to 6 despite the sshd_config file change and reloading. when I say I get no message I mean to state as such: $/etc/rc.d/sshd status <--carriage return $ <--no message after return. Thanks Pete. -Huy On 7/10/07, pete wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/10/07, Huy Ton That <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, it was unhashed. Thanks for pointing it out though. But the strange > thing is when I run: > > /etc/rc.d/sshd status > > I get no message > > No message for start, restart, reload etc. I am performing these commands as > root. > > Any ideas? > (couple things, please don't top post, and be sure to keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc'd on this thread so others can help you) i'm not sure what you mean about "no message". make sure you have sshd_enabled="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. also check to see if sshd is running by using "ps". if it is not, try starting it by hand - this will tell you if there are any errors on startup. once it starts cleanly by hand then use the init script in /etc/rc.d/sshd. the man page for sshd is very helpful, and should answer many of the questions you may have - including how to start the daemon by hand, etc.. type: man sshd -p -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
According to Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If the print job is plain text, does it end in a formfeed? If not, the > printer may wait for one, and eventually timeout and print the page. I only send PostScript to this printer. My WWW browsers do this for me automatically and the FreeBSD port "print/enscript-letter" does the rest for me (plain text or ASCII files). > Depending on what processing you do to the source file, you may find > utilities like /usr/ports/print/enscript useful. I have been using enscript for about twenty years now... :-) Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
On 7/10/07, Kyrre Nygård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him. When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95 Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy), so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the problem's at? It's probably best to start at the basics and work up: 1) uname -ar on both systems 2) do both systems have identical hardware? 3)what are you coping over, lots of small files, one large file. i.e. what kind of benchmark are you using? that's the best place to start. it looks like you have a ton of pf stuff going on, and have made many changes to your kernel via sysctl. i didn't really look at that stuff closely - that info is kinda pointless w/o the basic hardware, OS data. -p -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd config config file question
On 7/10/07, Huy Ton That <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, it was unhashed. Thanks for pointing it out though. But the strange thing is when I run: /etc/rc.d/sshd status I get no message No message for start, restart, reload etc. I am performing these commands as root. Any ideas? (couple things, please don't top post, and be sure to keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc'd on this thread so others can help you) i'm not sure what you mean about "no message". make sure you have sshd_enabled="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. also check to see if sshd is running by using "ps". if it is not, try starting it by hand - this will tell you if there are any errors on startup. once it starts cleanly by hand then use the init script in /etc/rc.d/sshd. the man page for sshd is very helpful, and should answer many of the questions you may have - including how to start the daemon by hand, etc.. type: man sshd -p -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: cannot log in via console, cannot su(1), only as root
Hello Martinko: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of martinko > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 4:36 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: cannot log in via console, cannot su(1), only as root > > martinko wrote: > > hello list, > > > > i was updating sw configuration of my old computer and towards the > end i > > noticed i couldn't log in on local console other than root. i tried > > remote ssh using public keys which worked but i found out su(1) to > any > > user except root does not work either. i've no idea how i could > > possibly manage to "break" my system like this and unfortunately i > need > > to fix it by tomorrow. therefore i would really appreciate your > prompt > > hints as what to check etc. > > > > some more details follow ... > > upgrade from 6.0-R to 6.2-R > everything went ok .. > i was doing changes in /etc based on my other computer settings > i was working via ssh(1), therefore i haven't noticed when logging on > console stopped working. > > what works: > log in via ssh(1) using public/private keys > log in on local console as root > su(1) to root > > what doesn't work: > log in via ssh(1) using password > log in on local console as a normal user > su(1) to a normal user (it even doesn't ask for password a throws > "sorry") > > besides, as root i'm able to change passwords via passwd(1), but it > doesn't help and a normal user cannot change their own password (old > password check would fail). > > i ran vipw(8) and it doesn't seem to me there's something wrong with my > files. > > any hints pls ?? > The normal user would have to be a member of the "wheel" group to use su at any point. If your normal user logs in via ssh/console/whatever, they should be able to run the passwd command to change their own password. You wouldn't want them to su to do so. If you want to test this, add your normal user to the wheel group, log in again and see if it works. Regards, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (!work) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, William Bulley wrote: I have an HP 1320 (only has USB and parallel support) hooked to a FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE box using a USB cable. I have configured /dev/ulpt0 into my /etc/printcap file. Everything works fine and I am happy with this setup except for one odd behaviour. The last page of a multi-page print job will "linger" - somewhere - while the green light on the HP continues to blink -- as if data were being sent to it. If the print job is plain text, does it end in a formfeed? If not, the printer may wait for one, and eventually timeout and print the page. Depending on what processing you do to the source file, you may find utilities like /usr/ports/print/enscript useful. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sshd config config file question
Newbie question, I've made a change to /etc/ssh/sshd_config such as #MaxAuthTries 6 to MaxAuthTries 3 afterwards I /etc/rc.d/sshd reload as user root the change did not propagate? Any ideas? Am I doing this correctly? Also when I run: /etc/rc.d/sshd status I do not get any feedback. Am I editing the correct file? Thanks -Huy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
On 7/10/07, Kyrre Nygård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him. When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95 Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy), so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the problem's at? Thanks guys, Kyrre Could you please show the uname -a info? -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
IPW3945 in 6.2
What are the chances that IPW3945 will work in 6.2? Has anyone accomplished this? Also, is it likely that the wpi drivers will be ready for 7.0? -Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installation woes with 6.2 release
At 07:47 PM 7/9/2007, Kurt Buff wrote: On 7/9/07, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 04:20 PM 7/9/2007, Kurt Buff wrote: On 7/9/07, Derek Ragona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 03:43 PM 7/9/2007, Kurt Buff wrote: I've got a machine with 2GB of RAM, onto which I can install Windows XP with no issues. However, FreeBSD 6.2 Release is giving me fits on this machine. If any of you have insight, I'd surely appreciate you sharing The motherboard is an Intel D645 GEBV2. I've tried a couple of different disk arrangements, with no success. I've installed an IDE WD 180GB drive, which the motherboard BIOS detects just fine. When I boot from disk 1 for the FreeBSD install, it detects no hard drive. I've put in an Addonics ADSA2 PCI SATA card, which sports the SiL 1352A chipset, but the install blows up when installing to a 74GB Seagate drive - the kernel panics and it reboots while copying files to disk. Has anyone run into these problems? Google hasn't been particularly my friend on this one. I've tried reading the install docs on the CD, with no particular luck, but I could be missing something. Clearly you have a disk controller compatibility problem. I do know the Sil chips are terrible, and there is a long history of issues with these chips and FreeBSD! Can you find a regular IDE drive to plug into that motherboard? -Derek Plugging an IDE drive into the motherboard is the first thing I did - that's the case above where FreeBSD didn't see *any* HD. That's the one that really fries my brain, because the motherboard BIOS detects it correctly, and XP installs to it just fine. Any possibility the IDE master/slave jumper is not set right on that drive? On some intel MB's it takes a reboot into setup so that setup see's the hard drive, then check that it has that hard drive in the boot order. I know this seems a bit simple, but just trying to check all possibilities. I've never seen a problem with a standard IDE drive installation. After you had XP on the drive did you reformat the drive to clear it out? -Derek I think I'll go beat my lackey again. He was supposed to remove the jumper, and didn't do it. I took it off, and it's installing happily to the IDE drive. I'm gonna bag the SATA for now. Thanks for your help, Kurt I'm glad I could help. As an FYI windows ignores a lot of hardware issues until it simply can't run anymore, where FreeBSD is much better at error checking. Of course sometimes that can make it frustrating. If you can get a decent SATA controller you might try adding or switching to SATA in the future, but avoid the Sil ones. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: (no subject)
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I have a server in a host service that stopped this morning. After > a contact with the service support of them, I got the following answer to > the problem: > > [quote] > REBOOT SERVER > > Due to a failed switch replacement FreeBSD did not restore the network > link. This is a farly common issue with FreeBSD. > > I restarted the server and it should be back online shortly. > [end quote] > > It's a P4-3GHz, with the following, probably on-board, ether card: > vr0: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem > 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe0ff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 > > Is this a really known problem? Is there anything I can do to > avoid reboot? > I have some (local) servers with FBSD and never had such problem. > > - Marcelo > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've experienced this problem too. My ISP replaced a switch and my FBSD server never regained network connectivity. I had to logon via the console and reboot. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: (no subject)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:08:43AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a server in a host service that stopped this morning. After a > contact with the service support of them, I got the following answer to the > problem: > > [quote] > REBOOT SERVER > > Due to a failed switch replacement FreeBSD did not restore the network > link. This is a farly common issue with FreeBSD. > > I restarted the server and it should be back online shortly. > [end quote] > > It's a P4-3GHz, with the following, probably on-board, ether card: > vr0: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem > 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe0ff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 > > Is this a really known problem? Is there anything I can do to avoid > reboot? > I have some (local) servers with FBSD and never had such problem. > > - Marcelo > Just a guess - are you using autonegotiation on this NIC? Try to set media type manually using 'media' and 'mediaopt' ifconfig' flags. Yuri pgpSEfdd7ZEHR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Help! FreeBSD: 88.78 KBps, Linux: 624.95 KBps
Hello.
My friend is switching to Linux because FreeBSD is failing on him.
When downloading a file from a FreeBSD box and a Linux box on the same
network, the FreeBSD box got 88.78 KBps whereas the Linux got 624.95
Kbps. I have no idea what's wrong, but my man isn't really into good
information design (e.g. taking something complex and making it easy),
so his system is a mess. Maybe some of you can help me locate where the
problem's at?
Thanks guys,
Kyrre
# ifconfig -a
sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 fe80::20e:a6ff:fe53:d066%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 67.143.227.71
inet 67.143.227.67 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.67
inet 67.143.227.68 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.68
inet 67.143.227.69 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.69
inet 67.143.227.70 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.227.70
inet 67.143.231.97 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.97
inet 67.143.231.98 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.98
inet 67.143.231.99 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.99
inet 67.143.231.100 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.100
inet 67.143.231.101 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.101
inet 67.143.231.102 netmask 0x broadcast 67.143.231.102
ether 00:0e:a6:53:d0:66
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: active
plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
pflog0: flags=141 mtu 33208
#cat /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_sis0="inet 67.143.227.66 netmask 255.255.255.248"
defaultrouter="67.143.227.65"
hostname="his.box.com"
ifconfig_sis0_alias0="67.143.227.67 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias1="67.143.227.68 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias2="67.143.227.69 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias3="67.143.227.70 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias4="67.143.231.97 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias5="67.143.231.98 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias6="67.143.231.99 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias7="67.143.231.100 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias8="67.143.231.101 netmask 0x"
ifconfig_sis0_alias9="67.143.231.102 netmask 0x"
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=8388608
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=3217968
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=3217968
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
syslogd_enable="YES"
syslogd_flags="-4 -v -v -s -s -l /etc/namedb/var/run/log"
stunnel_enable="YES"
pf_enable="YES"
pflog_enable="YES"
sshd_enable="YES"
inetd_enable="YES"
inetd_flags="-wWl"
named_enable="YES"
named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named"
named_flags="-u bind -c /etc/namedb/named.conf"
mysql_enable="YES"
apache2_enable="YES"
apache2ssl_enable="YES"
sendmail_enable="NONE"
courier_authdaemond_enable="YES"
courier_imap_imapd_enable="YES"
courier_imap_imapdssl_enable="YES"
courier_imap_imapd_ssl_enable="YES"
courier_imap_pop3dssl_enable="YES"
courier_imap_pop3d_ssl_enable="YES"
sqwebmaild_enable="YES"
spamd_enable="YES"
spamd_flags="-d -q -v -x -r /var/run/spamd.pid"
clamav_clamd_enable="YES"
clamav_freshclam_enable="YES"
svscan_enable="YES"
snmpd_enable="YES"
proftpd_enable="YES"
usbd_enable="YES"
clear_tmp_enable="YES"
update_motd="NO"
linux_enable="YES"
--
# cat /etc/pf.conf
ext_if="sis0" # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0
loc_if="lo0"# lo0 - local interface 127.0.0.1
table { 67.143.227.66, 67.143.227.67, 67.143.227.68,
67.143.227.69, 67.143.227.70 67.143.231.97 67.143.231.98 67.143.231.99
67.143.231.100 67.143.231.101 67.143.231.102}
table { 205.209.177.60 }
table { 67.143.227.66, 128.242.160.3, 68.83.182.43, 66.252.8.133 }
table { 222.152.0.43, 219.89.75.39, 222.152.3.100,
222.152.4.82, 65.175.125.87, 59.188.133.195, 59.59.154.71,
222.245.97.116, 201.141.212.230, 208.53.3.92, 124.163.176.58,
213.230.128.226, 208.69.32.130, 65.175.125.94, 65.111.17.147,
216.15.177.196, 72.37.165.0/24, 200.184.163.0/24 }
scrub in all
#smtp forward
rdr inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 2525 -> 67.143.227.70 port 25
#block in quick on $ext_if from
block drop in quick on $ext_if from to
# Filtering: the implicit first two rules are
pass in all
pass out all
# block all incoming packets but allow ssh, pass all outgoing tcp and udp
# connections and keep state, logging blocked packets.
block in log all
# restrict SSH
#pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp from { , ,
} to $ext_if port 22 keep state
pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 keep state
# seems to work
pass in quick on $loc_if all
pass out quick on $loc_if all
# Cybercon server monitor
#pass in on $ext_if proto {icmp, tcp, udp} from 72.29.23.120 to any
all keep state
# for FTP
#pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 21 keep state
#pass in on $ext_if proto udp from any to $ext_if port 20 keep state
pass in on $e
(no subject)
Hi all, I have a server in a host service that stopped this morning. After a contact with the service support of them, I got the following answer to the problem: [quote] REBOOT SERVER Due to a failed switch replacement FreeBSD did not restore the network link. This is a farly common issue with FreeBSD. I restarted the server and it should be back online shortly. [end quote] It's a P4-3GHz, with the following, probably on-board, ether card: vr0: port 0xcc00-0xccff mem 0xfdffe000-0xfdffe0ff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 Is this a really known problem? Is there anything I can do to avoid reboot? I have some (local) servers with FBSD and never had such problem. - Marcelo ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Patching with freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to 6.2-RELEASE-p5
Stevan Tiefert wrote: > The problem is that in these two chapters of the handbook is not > handling freebsd-update... And if you use freebsd-update you need not > necessarily to do a buildkernel or buildworld. I've been meaning to write a handbook chapter about FreeBSD Update for many months, but haven't managed to find time, unfortunately. Obviously if someone else wants to write such a chapter, I'd be overjoyed to review it and help get it committed. :-) Colin Percival ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:41:34 -0400 William Bulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Do you have any ulpt0 configuration in /etc/rc.local? If the printer > > port is interrupt-driven, try polled standard mode, i.e. add > > > > lptcontrol -p -d /dev/[printer-port] > > > > to your /etc/rc.local. The kind of behaviour you described can > > occur in the interrupt mode (including cutting pages, printing them > > in chunks, etc.). > > > > Also try to switch the printer to the parallel port; if both can > > serve the printer, I'd always use the parallel one. > > > > If this doesn't help, please post here the content of > > your /etc/printcap and 'dmesg | grep ulpt0'. > > I have no /etc/rc.local file on this machine. > > Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't lptcontrol(8) deal > with the parallel port printer? I have USB connected. > Parallel port connection is unfeasible in my situation. Yes, of course, sorry; I badly mixed paragraphs of my reply, my answer was intented to be a recommendation to switch to parallel port and then to try polled mode. > > "content of your /etc/printcap": > > lp|default|hp|HP|ps|PS|Hewlett Packard LaserJet 1320 PostScript > Printer:\ :sh:\ > :lp=/dev/ulpt0:\ > :sd=/var/spool/lpd/hp:\ > :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\ > :mx#0: (Unrelated, do you have any special reason you don't have 'if' configured?) > > 'dmesg | grep ulpt0': > > ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr > 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected > ulpt0: detached > ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr > 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected > ulpt0: detached > ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr > 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: offline > ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected > ulpt0: detached > ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr > 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode Well, try parallel port if you can; that is the simple way I resolved many painful printing problems in the past. I'd also try using print/apsfilter to configure printcap. Then you should surely know if it's a usb port issue. Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Patching with freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to 6.2-RELEASE-p5
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 17:37 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On 09/07/07, Stevan Tiefert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I wanted to update via freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to > > 6.2-RELEASE-p5. But like you can see my system is after the update still > > p4! > > > > I have saved a script of my doing: > > > > Script started on Mon Jul 9 22:55:13 2007 > > vagabund# freebsd-update fetch > > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors found. > > Fetching metadata signature from update1.FreeBSD.org... done. > > Fetching metadata index... done. > > Inspecting system... done. > > Preparing to download files... done. > > > > No updates needed to update system to 6.2-RELEASE-p5. > > vagabund# freebsd-update install > > No updates are available to install. > > Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first. > > vagabund# uname -a > > FreeBSD vagabund.w33 6.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr > > 26 17:40:53 UTC 2007 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > vagabund# exit > > exit > > > > Script done on Mon Jul 9 22:55:45 2007 > > $ > > > > > > What is going wrong? Why he is not updating? > > http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:04.file.asc > > -p5 only affects one utility in userland, and not the kernel. > So the kernel at -p4 is itself ostensibly secure and doesn't > need to be updated. > Thanks. Normally I did everytime a buildworld and buildkernel and the uname -a was everytime changed. And now I was feared something gone wrong. Thanks again :-) ___ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: accessing mysql server remotely
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:15 +, Duane Hill wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 12:01 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: > > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 at 23:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: > > > >> Just a general question about mysql remote access. > >> > >> Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a > >> new db & table using a file on the local system which contains > >> the definition statements? > > > > Sure. As long as the account name used to login to MySQL has login access > > from the remote location. > > > > mysql -host=ip_or_hostname -user=username -password=password dbname < > > statements.sql > > My bad. The command line parameters should have two hyphens: > > mysql --host=ip_or_hostname --user=username --password=password dbname < > statements.sql > Whilst this syntax will work fine, it requires that the mysql server allow remote logins - well I already have a nice cryptographically secure way of allowing remote access, it's called SSH: cat statements.sql |\ ssh -C [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'mysql -u -p ' The main benefit of this is that my mysql server now only needs to run on localhost, and so cannot be touched by any external user. For an interactive mysql prompt, you'd need either to open up mysql, or forward a port: ssh -C -L13306:localhost:3306 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mysql -u -p -hlocalhost -P13306 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Patching with freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to 6.2-RELEASE-p5
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 17:11 -0700 schrieb Jay Chandler: > Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > What is going wrong? Why he is not updating? > > > > Really dumb question-- have you tried rebooting to commit the uname -a > display change? > Really dumb answer. Yes I did! ___ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
According to Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Do you have any ulpt0 configuration in /etc/rc.local? If the printer > port is interrupt-driven, try polled standard mode, i.e. add > > lptcontrol -p -d /dev/[printer-port] > > to your /etc/rc.local. The kind of behaviour you described can occur in > the interrupt mode (including cutting pages, printing them in chunks, > etc.). > > Also try to switch the printer to the parallel port; if both can serve > the printer, I'd always use the parallel one. > > If this doesn't help, please post here the content of your /etc/printcap > and 'dmesg | grep ulpt0'. I have no /etc/rc.local file on this machine. Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't lptcontrol(8) deal with the parallel port printer? I have USB connected. Parallel port connection is unfeasible in my situation. > "content of your /etc/printcap": lp|default|hp|HP|ps|PS|Hewlett Packard LaserJet 1320 PostScript Printer:\ :sh:\ :lp=/dev/ulpt0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/hp:\ :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\ :mx#0: > 'dmesg | grep ulpt0': ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected ulpt0: detached ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected ulpt0: detached ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: offline ulpt0: at uhub0 port 2 (addr 5) disconnected ulpt0: detached ulpt0: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 5, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Patching with freebsd-update from 6.2-RELEASE-p4 to 6.2-RELEASE-p5
Am Montag, den 09.07.2007, 19:16 -0400 schrieb Gerard: > On July 09, 2007 at 04:59PM Stevan Tiefert wrote: > > > > What is going wrong? Why he is not updating? > > You should check out these two URL's to get a better idea of what you > are attempting to do as well as how to accomplish it. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html > > The problem is that in these two chapters of the handbook is not handling freebsd-update... And if you use freebsd-update you need not necessarily to do a buildkernel or buildworld. ___ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 08:52:57 -0400 William Bulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an HP 1320 (only has USB and parallel support) hooked > to a FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE box using a USB cable. > > I have configured /dev/ulpt0 into my /etc/printcap file. > > Everything works fine and I am happy with this setup except > for one odd behaviour. The last page of a multi-page print > job will "linger" - somewhere - while the green light on the > HP continues to blink -- as if data were being sent to it. > > The lpq(1) command reports "no entries" when run, and then > about a minute or two later, this "last page" gets printed. > > Is there some configuration that I am missing? Is this an > artifact of the USB protocol? Is this the way the HP 1320 > laser printer operates? Is this a feature (or bug) of the > USB printer driver /dev/ulpt0 that is not documented? I've > read the man pages and searched using Google to see if this > is a known problem. Any suggestions will be gladly accepted. > I can live with this behaviour, but it seems very odd. Hello William, Do you have any ulpt0 configuration in /etc/rc.local? If the printer port is interrupt-driven, try polled standard mode, i.e. add lptcontrol -p -d /dev/[printer-port] to your /etc/rc.local. The kind of behaviour you described can occur in the interrupt mode (including cutting pages, printing them in chunks, etc.). Also try to switch the printer to the parallel port; if both can serve the printer, I'd always use the parallel one. If this doesn't help, please post here the content of your /etc/printcap and 'dmesg | grep ulpt0'. Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
odd HP 1320 printer behaviour...
I have an HP 1320 (only has USB and parallel support) hooked to a FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE box using a USB cable. I have configured /dev/ulpt0 into my /etc/printcap file. Everything works fine and I am happy with this setup except for one odd behaviour. The last page of a multi-page print job will "linger" - somewhere - while the green light on the HP continues to blink -- as if data were being sent to it. The lpq(1) command reports "no entries" when run, and then about a minute or two later, this "last page" gets printed. Is there some configuration that I am missing? Is this an artifact of the USB protocol? Is this the way the HP 1320 laser printer operates? Is this a feature (or bug) of the USB printer driver /dev/ulpt0 that is not documented? I've read the man pages and searched using Google to see if this is a known problem. Any suggestions will be gladly accepted. I can live with this behaviour, but it seems very odd. Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make package-recursive
On 10/07/2007, at 7:41 PM, Nejc Škoberne wrote: Hello, I would like to create a custom set of packages, so that they will be installable to my other FreeBSD boxen. As I understand, I have to use 'make package-recursive', but I have some problems with it: 1. Is there a way to tell 'make package-recursive' not to _install_ package, but only build it? It is annonying and time-consuming to deinstall every package after it is installed. 2. To refer to the previous point: I need to deinstall the packages which I 'make package-recursive'-ed before, or else some other package which also depends on a port which is already installed will not include that (already installed) package. How to change this behaviour? I would like that the packages, which I create via 'make package-recursive', _always_ include _all_ other dependent packages. Thanks for your help. P.S.: Do you guys have any scripts for building a customized package set? You have to install a package in order to build it, since the package is built from the installed files. Some level of transformation and rearrangement occurs during the install process, so there's no easy way to package without installing. You can look in to using tinderbox (available from ports) to build packages inside a jail. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: gdvrecv produces very BIG FILES
Dino Vliet wrote: However, this 2 minutes recording produced a dv file of +/512MB in size. I have a 60 minute casette so in theorie I would get a 15GB dv file? Right? > Is that normal, to have this big sized files as a result? According to the german Wikipedia < http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Video#Speicherplatzbedarf_pro_Kassette> it's normal. Oh, and please wrap your lines ;-) Philipp -- www.familie-ost.info/~pj ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: accessing mysql server remotely
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 12:01 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 at 23:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Just a general question about mysql remote access. Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a new db & table using a file on the local system which contains the definition statements? Sure. As long as the account name used to login to MySQL has login access from the remote location. mysql -host=ip_or_hostname -user=username -password=password dbname < statements.sql My bad. The command line parameters should have two hyphens: mysql --host=ip_or_hostname --user=username --password=password dbname < statements.sql - _|_ (_| | ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: accessing mysql server remotely
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 at 23:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Just a general question about mysql remote access. Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a new db & table using a file on the local system which contains the definition statements? Sure. As long as the account name used to login to MySQL has login access from the remote location. mysql -host=ip_or_hostname -user=username -password=password dbname < statements.sql - _|_ (_| | ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: accessing mysql server remotely
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:40:07PM -0400, fbsd2 wrote: > Just a general question about mysql remote access. > > Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a > new db & table using a file on the local system which contains > the definition statements? > > Thanks > Of course, it's possible. It's the same as you would use it locally, with added hostname parameter: mysql -h -u -p < yourfile.sql (that's basic syntax, check mysql(1) manpage). HTH, Yuri pgpjBOBlWiJmy.pgp Description: PGP signature
accessing mysql server remotely
Just a general question about mysql remote access. Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a new db & table using a file on the local system which contains the definition statements? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
accessing mysql server remotely
Just a general question about mysql remote access. Is it possible to login to my remote mysql server and create a new db & table using a file on the local system which contains the definition statements? Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
make package-recursive
1. This is not possible since files may be generated or modified on the fly during the installation process. 2. Don't know exactly what you mean, but... a. you don't have to install under /usr/local b. man jail c. cat /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/tinderbox/pkg-descr There are some nice articles about this on the web. -- Regards, Karel Miklav ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make package-recursive
Nejc Škoberne wrote: Hello, I would like to create a custom set of packages, so that they will be installable to my other FreeBSD boxen. As I understand, I have to use 'make package-recursive', but I have some problems with it: 1. Is there a way to tell 'make package-recursive' not to _install_ package, but only build it? It is annonying and time-consuming to deinstall every package after it is installed. 2. To refer to the previous point: I need to deinstall the packages which I 'make package-recursive'-ed before, or else some other package which also depends on a port which is already installed will not include that (already installed) package. How to change this behaviour? I would like that the packages, which I create via 'make package-recursive', _always_ include _all_ other dependent packages. Thanks for your help. P.S.: Do you guys have any scripts for building a customized package set? Bye, Nejc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" There is another little know way to create packages, assuming you have them already installed on the source machine: The pkg_create command. It can create installation packages from the already installed ones. Even better, it can create all dependency packages as well in one go with the -R option. For example, in my test machine I have the xorg 7.2 installed. I can create packages for the whole system with: pkg_create -Rb xorg-7.2 You have to get the exact name of the installed pkg using the pkg_info or pkg_version command, i.e. in the above example pkg_info |grep -i xorg The utility creates the packages in the directory you are currently in. I usually do this /usr/ports/packages I used it last week to create packages for sudo, bash, xorg, xfce, portupgrade and others all of which installed without a hitch on my other machines. In fact I plan to create custom CDs with latest packages to use on my new BSD installations and spare the endless download-compile cycle... Hope this helps, Manolis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: gdvrecv produces very BIG FILES
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:26:30AM -0700, Dino Vliet wrote: > However, this 2 minutes recording produced a dv file of +/512MB in size. I > have a 60 minute casette so in theorie I would get a 15GB dv file? Right? Is > that normal, to have this big sized files as a result? Yup. The raw DV dump from a camera produces humongous amounts of data. -- Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "You can get farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone" - Al Capone ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gdvrecv produces very BIG FILES
Dear all, I managed to connect my new canon mini dv camera to my firewire port on my freebsd amd64 machine and used gdvrecv to transfer the first 2 minutes of my first recording (did I mention I really like FreeBSD and I'm so glad it's possible t do this first step:-) However, this 2 minutes recording produced a dv file of +/512MB in size. I have a 60 minute casette so in theorie I would get a 15GB dv file? Right? Is that normal, to have this big sized files as a result? ps Unfortunately Kino didn't compile sucessfully on my FreeBSD box, so I had to revert to my Linux partition and process the file there (I already asked the port maintainer of Kino what I could do to get it working on my amd64 system_ - Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
unusual off topic question
Hello, I would like to ask to some of you gurus... if you know some good virtual server service at a low prize. I know that there are such services around where you can install your own machine virtualized or real, and manage it remotely and you have controlo also on power on and power off switch. Anyone of you can suggest me a good provider for this service ? thanks Rick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
make package-recursive
Hello, I would like to create a custom set of packages, so that they will be installable to my other FreeBSD boxen. As I understand, I have to use 'make package-recursive', but I have some problems with it: 1. Is there a way to tell 'make package-recursive' not to _install_ package, but only build it? It is annonying and time-consuming to deinstall every package after it is installed. 2. To refer to the previous point: I need to deinstall the packages which I 'make package-recursive'-ed before, or else some other package which also depends on a port which is already installed will not include that (already installed) package. How to change this behaviour? I would like that the packages, which I create via 'make package-recursive', _always_ include _all_ other dependent packages. Thanks for your help. P.S.: Do you guys have any scripts for building a customized package set? Bye, Nejc ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
