After running portsnap this morning:
bsd# pkg_version -v /home/oliver/version.txt
Makefile, line 54: Could not
find /usr/ports/print/cups-lpr/../../print/cups/Makefile.common
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
pkg_version: Failed to get PKGNAME from
On Sunday 30 July 2006 13:09, Oliver Iberien wrote:
After running portsnap this morning:
bsd# pkg_version -v /home/oliver/version.txt
Makefile, line 54: Could not
find /usr/ports/print/cups-lpr/../../print/cups/Makefile.common
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
pkg_version:
I am new to UNIX but know the basics of getting
around, writing simple shell scripts, etc. Is there
any way to use a short perl program as a shell script?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
On 7/2/06, Isaac Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to UNIX but know the basics of getting
around, writing simple shell scripts, etc. Is there
any way to use a short perl program as a shell script?
sat64% cat __END__ ./script.pl
#!/usr/local/bin/perl -w
print Hello world!\n;
__END__
From: Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/2/06, Isaac Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to UNIX but know the basics of getting
around, writing simple shell scripts, etc. Is there
any way to use a short perl program as a shell script?
sat64% cat __END__ ./script.pl
On 7/2/06, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/2/06, Isaac Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to UNIX but know the basics of getting
around, writing simple shell scripts, etc. Is there
any way to use a short perl program as a shell script?
Hi all
I am installing a new and all Freebsd system (no other OS in it). The goal
is to have a NFS for a network that has 2x200Gb in RAID 1 disks for data.
It has 3 disks:
- 80Gb Seagate IDE for FreeBSD OS alone
- 2xSATA Seagate 200Gb disks in RAID 1 with the ICH7R motherboard chipset
configured
In sysinstall appears:
- ad0 = HD 80GB (for FreeBSD OS at complete)
- ad12 = oine of the SATA HD I think
- ad8 = The other SATA HD I think
- ar0 = ??? (I suppose this is the RAID isnt'it?)
What must I do?
- Make only for ar0?
Is the right alternative - ad8 and ad12 do not
On 6/15/06, DSA - JCR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I am installing a new and all Freebsd system (no other OS in it). The goal
is to have a NFS for a network that has 2x200Gb in RAID 1 disks for data.
It has 3 disks:
- 80Gb Seagate IDE for FreeBSD OS alone
- 2xSATA Seagate 200Gb disks in
Hi,
okay I am trying to configure and implement cyrus-imapd 2.3.3 on my FreeBSD
machine. I am looking for a good HOW-TO tutorial to get started.
This is what I came up with:
http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/Cyrus-IMAP-7.html
Might there be other tutorials that explain things well.
Cheers,
Noah
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:38:57 -0700
From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
James Long wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e507630
Maan Jee wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e
On my system at least, /home is a symlink to /usr/home. I belive this
is the default.
On 5/15/06, Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a507630
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs
On 2006-05-15 17:20, Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1
On 5/15/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Not reliably. Folks could guess.
Post again and include the output of ls -l / this time.
It's
Look in /usr/home
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maan Jee
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:21 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Newbie File system
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
at /
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e
or even easier...
cd
pwd
On 5/15/06, Atom Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/15/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Not reliably.
Maan Jee wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0 100%
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Hi
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home directory
located?
at /
Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a50763055002 412018 12%/
devfs 1 1 0
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
From: Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Can someone explane that at which filesystem is my /home
James Long wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:20:33 +0200
From: Maan Jee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Newbie File system
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Can someone explane that at which filesystem
Many thanks to all who have helped me on this one - I won't post a
message in response to every suggestion, but they have all helped -
thank you!
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
hostname=frankbruno
ifconfig_re0=DHCP
keymap=uk.iso
Barnaby Scott wrote:
Many thanks to all who have helped me on this one - I won't post a
message in response to every suggestion, but they have all helped -
thank you!
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
hostname=frankbruno
ifconfig_re0=DHCP
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
sendmail_enable=NONE
This is fine, but according to rc.sendmail(8) `NONE' is deprecated and
will be removed in a future release (but, to be honest,
Daniel Bye wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
sendmail_enable=NONE
This is fine, but according to rc.sendmail(8) `NONE' is deprecated and
will be removed in a future
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:27:29PM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Daniel Bye wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
sendmail_enable=NONE
This is fine, but according to
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Daniel Bye wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
It turns out it was sendmail causing the delay, so now my /etc/rc.comf
reads:
sendmail_enable=NONE
This is fine, but according to rc.sendmail(8) `NONE' is deprecated and
will be removed
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Thanks for your reply. It didn't occur to me to look at the next line -
I thought it must still be doing the Configuring syscons thing!
Anyway, the next line is:
Initial i386 initialization:.
Armed with this knowledge, I
Barnaby Scott wrote:
Parv wrote:
...
and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5
minutes every time.
Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so,
press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and
login: waiting for input at the end.
No
Daniel Bye wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Thanks for your reply. It didn't occur to me to look at the next line -
I thought it must still be doing the Configuring syscons thing!
Anyway, the next line is:
Initial i386 initialization:.
Armed with this
Barnaby Scott wrote:
The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called,
does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an
entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format),
which will allow sendmail and other daemons to start.
OK, I
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Barnaby Scott wrote:
Parv wrote:
...
and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5
minutes every time.
Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so,
press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and
login: waiting for
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called,
does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an
entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the file for the format),
which will allow
Daniel Bye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Barnaby Scott wrote:
The fact that the operating system knows what the machine is called,
does not necessarily mean that the name is in the DNS. You can put an
entry in your /etc/hosts file (take a look at the
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Barnaby Scott thusly...
Parv wrote:
...
and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5
minutes every time.
Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so,
press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and
I have mangaged to install version 6.0 and have had a bit of a play, but
not before re-installing because the boot had been so slow, I
thought I must have mucked it up!
However it was just a slow point in the boot sequence - but one which I
still can't believe is normal.
The boot
Barnaby Scott wrote:
The boot sequence all goes smoothly, telling me all sorts of things I
never thought I'd need to know, and frankly don't understand, until it
gets to the following line:
Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver.
and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Barnaby Scott wrote:
The boot sequence all goes smoothly, telling me all sorts of things I
never thought I'd need to know, and frankly don't understand, until it
gets to the following line:
Configuring syscons: keymap blanktime screensaver.
and then stops! I have timed
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Barnaby Scott thusly...
I have mangaged to install version 6.0 and have had a bit of a
play, but not before re-installing because the boot had been
so slow
...
The boot sequence all goes smoothly
...
until it gets to the following line:
Configuring
Parv wrote:
...
and then stops! I have timed it - it stops for between 4 and 5
minutes every time.
Does your screen goes blank just after the above message? If so,
press [Enter] key, you should see the boot being continued, and
login: waiting for input at the end.
No the screen still has
Hi All,
I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this
list. I have used Linux for several years but would
like to see what FreeBSD is like.
tiny# uname -a
FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet
6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
[EMAIL
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this
list. I have used Linux for several years but would
like to see what FreeBSD is like.
tiny# uname -a
FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet
6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
[EMAIL
Jim Angstadt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to FreeBSD and a first time poster to this
list. I have used Linux for several years but would
like to see what FreeBSD is like.
Welcome!
tiny# uname -a
FreeBSD tiny.brc.localnet
6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0:
Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however there is one Windows-only application I
really cannot
Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however there is one Windows-only
On Thursday 04 May 2006 15:55, Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however
Barnaby Scott wrote:
I am new to FreeBSD (or any other Unix operating system) but am very
keen to make the switch. I have read as much as I can over the last
couple of years, and am very nearly ready to ditch the various Windows
versions on my network - however there is one Windows-only
Thanks for your interest in this.
A large part of the problem was in fact a bad cable.
I went back and forth between the command line and sysinstall. They seem not
to do the same things. It did seem to me that the disklabel in sysinstall and
the disklabel command-line tool did not necessarily
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:40:09PM -0700, Oliver Iberien wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to add a second IDE hard drive. I can't seem to get it
mounted, or to get what I put into sysinstall and what comes out when I use
the command line to agree.
Are you using the command line interface or
The short answer is to backup the files you want to save. As a general
rule, I suggest backing up:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/usr/local/www
The last one assumes you have some website(s).
If you are also worried about email, if you are using the standard
sendmail, also backup:
/var/mail
I would
Oliver Iberien wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 on a home machine and backing up to a DVD Burner,
probably using kdar, the dar archiver that comes with KDE.
My question is : which system files to back up, along with my personal stuff?
I'm used to using linux distributions that do your system
Oliver Iberien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What actually happens when you use Upgrade an existing system in
sysinstall? Do you end up with the X-server, etc., all functioning
as before, or is there a lot of cleanup to do afterwards?
X doesn't get automatically updated by that path; just the
I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 on a home machine and backing up to a DVD Burner,
probably using kdar, the dar archiver that comes with KDE.
My question is : which system files to back up, along with my personal stuff?
I'm used to using linux distributions that do your system backups for you.
The
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for FreeBSD and the software thar
you installed from ports. The last directory will det all of your user's data.
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for FreeBSD and the
software thar you installed from ports.
On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:00, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That will get all of the configuration files for
At 09:08 AM 4/16/2006, Oliver Iberien wrote:
On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:00, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:58 PM 2/22/2006, Andy Reitz wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At a minimum, you will probably want to back up the following directories:
/etc
/usr/local/etc
/home
That
What actually happens when you use Upgrade an existing system in sysinstall?
Do you end up with the X-server, etc., all functioning as before, or is there
a lot of cleanup to do afterwards?
(In my case, this would be from 6.0 to 6.1, whenever the release version of
6.1 comes out. I am getting
Hi,
I have been trying to add a second IDE hard drive. I can't seem to get it
mounted, or to get what I put into sysinstall and what comes out when I use
the command line to agree.
I can use sysinstall and then run newfs:
bsd# newfs /dev/ad1s1c
/dev/ad1s1c: 39205.5MB (80292804 sectors) block
Jim Stapleton wrote:
[ ... ]
When it comes to changing the default compiler a good rule of thumb is
that if you need to ask how to do it, then you should not do it.
That seems to be a general *nix world rule of thumb for just about everything...
The UNIX world is willing to give you a loaded
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net, but
on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
What you are
shell, log out and back in will be easier for a newbie):
$ which lynx
== read the handbook ==
Open the handbook in your web browser, I believe this is the correct
directory to the handbook, but I'm not currently on a BSD machine, so
I can't verify easily. Replace en with the appropriate directory
in earlier
installs, I had to log out and log back in before this would work (or
start a new shell, log out and back in will be easier for a newbie):
Your shell most likely is keeping a hash of what commands it knows about.
When you install a new one, the hash isn't updated automaticall, so
I did a make install clean in the lang/gcc40/ directory to get a
newer version of GCC, and it seems happy, so the next thing I did was
I replaced my /usr/bin/gcc, /usr/bin/g++, etc. binaries with hard
links to the /usr/local/bin/gcc-freebsd-4.0,
/usr/local/bin/g++-freebsd-4.0, etc. binaries.
Now
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:43:51AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
I did a make install clean in the lang/gcc40/ directory to get a
newer version of GCC, and it seems happy, so the next thing I did was
I replaced my /usr/bin/gcc, /usr/bin/g++, etc. binaries with hard
links to the
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Is there any way to set this new compiler as the default (such as
building the OS), without causing issues? Or would that be just a
royal pain in the posterior that is not worth the effort?
On 4/10/06, Erik Trulsson [EMAIL
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:01:21AM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote:
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Don't. But if you insist on doing that you could try putting
CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc40
CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++40
into /etc/make.conf. Just be aware that it will
When it comes to changing the default compiler a good rule of thumb is
that if you need to ask how to do it, then you should not do it.
That seems to be a general *nix world rule of thumb for just about everything...
___
On Monday 10 April 2006 16:01, Jim Stapleton wrote:
how do I setup make.conf to automatically use the new compiler?
Is there any way to set this new compiler as the default (such as
building the OS), without causing issues? Or would that be just a
royal pain in the posterior that is not worth
On Sunday 09 April 2006 20:38, infernus - Bluelight wrote:
I was thinking about setting up a FTP and Apache server +mail maybe..
But now when I see this black screen and don't have a clue on what to
do, or how to do enything..
I feel the hope is dripping into the sink!
Several people have
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net, but
on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
-
I just tested some commands
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net,
but on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
How do I enter some kind of interface, or desktop, like on the
screenshots? Is there a web-site or enything with tutorials
explaining how to do all this..
1) Install xorg. If you chose an x installation, such as x-user, then
you can skip this step. To see what's
Ivan,
Yes, you are a newbie as many of us are (including myself ;). You have
already gotten some pretty good responses pointing you in the right
direction to correctly set up a graphical desktop, such as the ones you saw
in the screenshots. However, what the responses have not mentioned, and I
infernus - Bluelight wrote:
Sorry for bothering this mailing list, but I realy need some help..
I find awsome screenshots from FreeBSD on various sites on the net,
but on my comp,
the only thing I see is a black screen with some white text on it, and:
$|
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 14:46, Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
snip
I tried make --with-default-tmpdir=/mnt/ramfs and received a message
informing me that this is not correct Make syntax.
No, you've got it all wrong! To build an application, you generally do this:
./configure
make
make
I've been trying to get FreeBSD 5.4 going on a friend's Celeron and
have been doing okay ... until now.
Question 1: How do I get automounting of cdroms working? Is it possible
in KDE or GNOME, when you put in a cd that the icon just appears on the
desktop (like it does in another OS I could
On 3/8/06, Bruce M. Axtens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to get FreeBSD 5.4 going on a friend's Celeron and
have been doing okay ... until now.
Question 1: How do I get automounting of cdroms working? Is it possible
in KDE or GNOME, when you put in a cd that the icon just appears
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required for
the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not available
through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux system. I am
running FreeBSD 5.4 with linux compatibility supported. Below
At 12:46 PM 3/8/2006, Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required
for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not
available through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux
system. I am running FreeBSD 5.4
On 3/8/06, Lawrence Petrykanyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
directed. What I don't understand is the last instruction of the second
option listed below, the line that says,
add --with-default-tmpdir=/mnt/ramfs to the JACK configure line when
you build it.
I tried make
Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is
required for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program
(JACK) is not available through the ports collection and is
intended for a Linux system. I am running FreeBSD 5.4 with
linux compatibility
Lawrence Petrykanyn wrote:
Hi!
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required for
the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not available
through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux system. I am
I have jackd(1) installed (from ports) but maybe
At 05:30 PM 3/8/2006, you wrote:
I am a newbie trying to compile the program JACK that is required
for the midi sequencer Rosegarden. This program (JACK) is not
available through the ports collection and is intended for a Linux
system. I am
Perhaps I'm not understanding the whole scenario
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 08:15 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:36 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:59, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
what about the dependency then? Ignore it? What if there are
files needed by xorg-clients? eg: libXX.so.Y and which
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and still
I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to upgrading
via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
Problem statement.
FreeBSD-Release-6
Install from minimal cd
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and
still I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to
upgrading via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so
I'm not a rough diamond.
of the ports collection in the install
guide at
www.a1poweruser.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ow Mun Heng
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:58 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Newbie Alert : pkg_add and packages Q (do not want
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 20:32 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 19:58, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and
still
$pkg_add -vr x11/xterm-206_1
pkg_add: package 'xterm-206_1' or its older version already
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Hi,
I've googled. I've read the handbook, I've read Absolute BSD and still
I can't understand FreeBSD Ports/Packages esp when it comes to upgrading
via packages. I'm from a Linux (gentoo linux) background so I'm not a
rough diamond.
rough diamond ... I like that idea.
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 21:37 -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
do pkg_info
look in the output for xterm. it will contain its complete name
if its name in the list output is xterm-203 then
I did that.
pkg_delete xterm-203 this will remove it
It says dependencies on xorg-clients.
Another poster said
301 - 400 of 1312 matches
Mail list logo
