I was wondering if anyone can tell me why Perl was not updated
to the latest stable release; i.e. 5.10.0 rather than 5.8.9
recently?
This was discussed within the last 2-3 weeks, either here or on
po...@. Check the archives.
If this is important, you can always
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:58:44 -0500
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone can tell me why Perl was not updated
to the latest stable release; i.e. 5.10.0 rather than 5.8.9
recently?
This was discussed within the last 2-3 weeks, either here or on
po
As a newcomer to freebsd and a long time Perl user, this was one of the
first things I noticed. 5.8.8 as distributed on freebsd 7.1 is
extremely old.
-Will
Jerry wrote:
I was wondering if anyone can tell me why Perl was not updated to the
latest stable release; i.e. 5.10.0 rather than 5.8.9
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:31:14 -0800,
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org said:
G The problem is that there are many, _many_ embedded A
G HREF=http://whatever Site/A in my hundreds, or thousands, or
G files. I only want to delete the http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_
G the other Href links.
Use perl
the http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_
G the other Href links.
Use perl. You'll want the i option to do case-insensitive matching,
plus m for matching that could span multiple lines; the first
quoted line above shows one of several places where a URL can cross
a line-break.
You
Href links.
Which would be best to use, given that a backup is critical?
sed or perl?
tia, as always,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
.
Which would be best to use, given that a backup is critical?
sed or perl?
IMHO, perl with the -i option to do in-place editing with backups. You
could also use the -p option to loop over files. See perlrun(1).
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl
the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
Which would be best to use, given that a backup is critical?
sed or perl?
IMHO, perl with the -i option to do in-place editing with backups. You
could also use the -p option to loop over files. See perlrun(1).
Roland
, or
thousands, or files. I only want to delete the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
Which would be best to use, given that a backup is critical?
sed or perl?
IMHO, perl with the -i option to do in-place editing with backups. You
could also use the -p
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:51:31 -0800, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
All right, then is this the right syntax. In other words, do
I need the double quotes to match the http: string?
perl -pi.bak -e 'print unless /m/http:/ || eof; close ARGV if eof' *
Close, but not exactly
Hi Gary,
Am Dienstag, 30. Dez 2008, 11:31:14 -0800 schrieb Gary Kline:
The problem is that there are many, _many_ embedded
A HREF=http://whatever Site/A in my hundreds, or
thousands, or files. I only want to delete the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
sed or perl
, or
thousands, or files. I only want to delete the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
Which would be best to use, given that a backup is critical?
sed or perl?
IMHO, perl with the -i option to do in-place editing with backups. You
could also use the -p
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:07:05PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:51:31 -0800, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
All right, then is this the right syntax. In other words, do
I need the double quotes to match the http: string?
perl -pi.bak -e 'print
or perl?
IMHO, perl with the -i option to do in-place editing with backups. You
could also use the -p option to loop over files. See perlrun(1).
Roland
All right, then is this the right syntax. In other words, do
I need the double quotes to match the http: string
the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
sed or perl?
Ruby. Untested:
$ ruby -i.bak -pe 'next if ~/href=([^]*)/i and $1 ==
http://example.com;' somefile.html
Probably you want to do something more sophisticated.
Bertram
Hi Bertram,
Well, after
Site/A in my hundreds, or
thousands, or files. I only want to delete the
http://junkfoo.com lines, _not_ the other Href links.
sed or perl?
Ruby. Untested:
$ ruby -i.bak -pe 'next if ~/href=([^]*)/i and $1 ==
http://example.com;' somefile.html
Probably you want to do
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 03:27:19 Jerry wrote:
Since it does seem to work quite well under Linux, I was wondering
if there was some fundamental flaw in FBSD that prevented it from
working correctly here. Even so, failing to get a major project like
Perl running properly in over a year
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:47:21 -0700
Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum bg271...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its
still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:45:12 +
Kris Kennaway k...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
It is still true that the change from 5.6 to 5.8 was very disruptive
because it broke lots of things in the ports tree.
Is this the official reason that Perl-5.10 has not been released into
the ports tree
Jerry ges...@yahoo.com writes:
Are ports being tied to specific versions of Perl? I did some
Googling and found that of the users that have installed Perl
from source on FBSD, most were not experiencing any major
problem. If every time Perl is updated it will require massive
changes
Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:45:12 +
Kris Kennaway k...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
It is still true that the change from 5.6 to 5.8 was very disruptive
because it broke lots of things in the ports tree.
Is this the official reason that Perl-5.10 has not been released
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum bg271...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still
not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8).
Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 18:47:21 -0700
Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
Jerry wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum bg271...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its
still not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still not in
FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8).
Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably? Is there
any schedule for when it will be added? This is a major release of a major
language
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum bg271...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its now just over a year since Perl 5.10.0 was relased, but its still
not in FreeBSD. (/usr/ports/lang only has 5.8).
Can someone tell me why? Is there any way to get it working stably? Is
there any
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 17:12:36 Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 24), Andy Kosela said:
The netprint perl script provided in the Handbook (9.4.3.2) is not
working.. or am I missing something:
plotinus:~ cat new.txt | lp.sh
Can't contact 10.10.21.12: Address family
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan
McKeown
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:41 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Netprint perl script from Handbook doesn't work
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 17:12:36 Dan
The netprint perl script provided in the Handbook (9.4.3.2) is not
working.. or am I missing something:
plotinus:~ cat new.txt | lp.sh
Can't contact 10.10.21.12: Address family not supported by protocol
family at /usr/local/libexec/netprint line 21.
plotinus: cat /usr/local/libexec/netprint
In the last episode (Sep 24), Andy Kosela said:
The netprint perl script provided in the Handbook (9.4.3.2) is not
working.. or am I missing something:
plotinus:~ cat new.txt | lp.sh
Can't contact 10.10.21.12: Address family not supported by protocol family at
/usr/local/libexec/netprint
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Sep 24), Andy Kosela said:
The netprint perl script provided in the Handbook (9.4.3.2) is not
working.. or am I missing something:
plotinus:~ cat new.txt | lp.sh
Can't contact 10.10.21.12: Address
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 12:33:29 Andy Kosela wrote:
($ignore, $ignore, $protocol) = getprotobyname('tcp');
$ perl -e 'print join(\n, getprotobyname(tcp));'
tcp
TCP
6
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part
Walt Pawley wrote:
wump$ time sed s/ .*// Desktop/klog kadr1
Note that this is a job for cut(1):
$ cut -d -f1 input
Interestingly, the fastest way to do that job is to use
a regular expression with Python. This is about twice
as fast as the proposed perl solution:
$ python -c 'import re
On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 15:16 -0700, Walt Pawley wrote:
At 10:01 AM +0100 8/23/08, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Walt Pawley wrote:
At the risk of beating this to death, I just happened to
stumble on a real world example of why one might want to use
Perl for sed-ly stuff.
... snip ...
wump
Walt Pawley wrote:
At 9:59 AM +0200 8/22/08, Oliver Fromme wrote:
wump$ ls -l Desktop/klog
-rw-r--r-- 1 wump 1001 52753322 22 Aug 16:37 Desktop/klog
wump$ time sed s/ .*// Desktop/klog kadr1
real0m10.800s
user0m10.580s
sys 0m0.250s
wump$ time perl -pe 's/ .*//' Desktop
Walt Pawley wrote:
At 9:59 AM +0200 8/22/08, Oliver Fromme wrote:
- The perl command you wrote above is pretty much a sed
command anyway (except you incorrectly used non-portable
regular expression syntax). Why use perl to execute a
sed command?
At the risk of beating this to death, I
At 10:01 AM +0100 8/23/08, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Walt Pawley wrote:
At the risk of beating this to death, I just happened to
stumble on a real world example of why one might want to use
Perl for sed-ly stuff.
... snip ...
wump$ ls -l Desktop/klog
-rw-r--r-- 1 wump 1001 52753322 22 Aug
file, or to STDOUT
I'm curious why Perl isn't a decent choice. I think I'd do something like
perl -pe 's/(.*?)\.(.*)\t.*/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/' input_file output_file
Which is also wrong. It gets a bit closer to Steve's desires I
suspect if one adds the appropriate
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Walt Pawley wrote:
I guess getting old, nearly blind and mind numbing close to
brain dead is better than the alternative. Try this (sooner or
later I've got to get it right)...
perl -pe 's/(.*?)\.(.*)\t.*/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/' input_file output_file
I
At 9:59 AM +0200 8/22/08, Oliver Fromme wrote:
- The perl command you wrote above is pretty much a sed
command anyway (except you incorrectly used non-portable
regular expression syntax). Why use perl to execute a
sed command?
At the risk of beating this to death, I just happened
I'm frequently having to modify/convert email addresses from one
format/domain to another.
Usually, I slap together a quick Perl script to do this for me. I don't
do it frequently enough to keep track which one of my scripts does this
for me, so I'm continuously re-inventing the wheel.
Some
Steve Bertrand wrote:
To put it plainly, can anyone, if it's possible, provide a single line
sed/awk pipeline that can:
To answer my own post, I found in some past notes something I drummed up
quite a while ago that I can most certainly modify to suit my needs:
# Cat the tcpdump output
Quoting Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
few passes over a few files.
To put it plainly, can anyone, if it's possible, provide a single
line sed/awk pipeline that can:
- read email addresses from a file in the format:
user.name TAB domain.tld
- convert it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:46:47AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
I'm frequently having to modify/convert email addresses from one
format/domain to another.
Usually, I slap together a quick Perl script to do this for me. I don't
do it frequently enough to keep track which one of my scripts
Barry Byrne wrote:
Quoting Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
few passes over a few files.
To put it plainly, can anyone, if it's possible, provide a single line
sed/awk pipeline that can:
- read email addresses from a file in the format:
user.name TAB domain.tld
- convert it to:
[EMAIL
Joseph Olatt wrote:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
where t.txt:
john.doeexample.com
This did the job, the only modification I needed to make was manually
replace $2 with the string of the domain I needed
El día Thursday, August 21, 2008 a las 05:54:29AM -0700, Joseph Olatt escribió:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
where t.txt:
john.doeexample.com
Despite of the magic awk(1) or while-loops: this is all
Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, August 21, 2008 a las 05:54:29AM -0700, Joseph Olatt escribió:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
where t.txt:
john.doeexample.com
Despite of the magic awk(1) or
cat tcpdump.txt | awk '{if ($3 != 192.168.100.204.25) print $3}' | \
awk '{FS = .} {print $1,.,$2,.,$3,.$4}' | sed s/ //g
why you all abuse cat command. simply awk tcpdump.txt
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Regards,
cat file.txt | ( while read user domain; do echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; done )
second cat abuser
while read user domain; do echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; done file.txt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
and third
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
...but that is just semantics, relative to the intent and purpose of this
no. using cat make one more pipe, one more process and is noticably slower
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
and third
If you have nothing nice to say, or can't contribute or point out more
efficient ways of doing things in a polite manner, then 'don't say
If you have nothing nice to say, or can't contribute or point out more
this is a contribution. unless you can't see it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
...but that is just semantics, relative to the intent and purpose of this
no. using cat make one more pipe, one more process and is noticably slower
Yes it's agreed...
I was joking around with Matthias for kind-heartedly pointing out the
err of our ways.
Steve
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:17:43AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED],
arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
a shorter way:
sed s/\\./_/g inputfile | awk '{print $1 @example.com}' outputfile
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:17:43AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Try the following:
cat t.txt | awk -F\t '{split($1, arr, .); printf([EMAIL PROTECTED], arr[
1], arr[2], $2);}'
a shorter way:
sed s/\\./_/g inputfile | awk '{print $1
On Thursday 21 August 2008 16:19:08 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If you have nothing nice to say, or can't contribute or point out more
this is a contribution. unless you can't see it.
There are assumptions that combining more than three
cats (*) in a pipeline, the universe will explode!
(*) That
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 15:12 +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
cat tcpdump.txt | awk '{if ($3 != 192.168.100.204.25) print $3}' | \
awk '{FS = .} {print $1,.,$2,.,$3,.$4}' | sed s/ //g
why you all abuse cat command. simply awk tcpdump.txt
Why do you abuse redundant input redirection?
Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
With Perl you can manipulate text
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:49:17 +0200 (CEST)
Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To put it plainly, can anyone, if it's possible, provide a single
line sed/awk pipeline that can:
- read email addresses from a file in the format:
user.name TAB domain.tld
- convert it to:
At 8:46 AM -0400 8/21/08, Steve Bertrand wrote:
- read email addresses from a file in the format:
user.name TAB domain.tld
- convert it to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- write it back to either a new file, the original file, or to STDOUT
I'm curious why Perl isn't a decent choice. I think I'd do
Perl isn't a decent choice. I think I'd do something like
perl -pe 's/(.*?)\.(.*)\t.*/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/' input_file output_file
Which is also wrong. It gets a bit closer to Steve's desires I
suspect if one adds the appropriate backslash ...
perl -pe 's/(.*?)\.(.*)\t.*/[EMAIL PROTECTED
, the original file, or to STDOUT
I'm curious why Perl isn't a decent choice. I think I'd do something like
perl -pe 's/(.*?)\.(.*)\t.*/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/' input_file output_file
Which is also wrong. It gets a bit closer to Steve's desires I
suspect if one adds the appropriate backslash ...
perl -pe
--On Monday, August 18, 2008 13:23:43 -0500 Len Conrad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fbsd 4.11
perl 5.8.8 installed by pkg_add
sorry, perl 5.8.5
postgrey 1.32
use.perl port
This machine has been running great for a week. Monday morning, postgrey was
stoppedand wouldn't start.
syslog
fbsd 4.11
perl 5.8.8 installed by pkg_add
postgrey 1.32
use.perl port
This machine has been running great for a week. Monday morning,
postgrey was stoppedand wouldn't start.
syslog:
Aug 18 14:20:35 mx1 postgrey[73387]: FATAL: ERROR: can't create DB
environment: No such file or directory
--On Monday, August 18, 2008 13:23:43 -0500 Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
fbsd 4.11
perl 5.8.8 installed by pkg_add
postgrey 1.32
use.perl port
This machine has been running great for a week. Monday morning, postgrey was
stoppedand wouldn't start.
syslog:
Aug 18 14:20:35 mx1
Hi
I dont like these bsdpan perl modules that I needed, but have.
I would like to build and install these modules myself with something
like debian's deb-make-perl.
Is there anything like that for freebsd, of how do you guys go about
with this.
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about why
perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a discussion on
some mailing list about either the number of arguments
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about why
perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a discussion on some
mailing list about either the number of arguments or the format of the
arguments and/or output of a base perl function having changed
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Yes I know how to use the OS, I'm more sking for historical rivia reasons.
-Dan
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about why
perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a discussion on
some mailing list
On Saturday 21 June 2008 01:02, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about
why perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a discussion
on some mailing list about either the number of arguments or the format
On Fri 2008-06-20 19:40:04 UTC-0400, DAve ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
No unused perl install, no issues with software getting confused about
which perl to run, no need for... what was that command to use the port
perl instead of the base perl? I cannot remember anymore.
The command
At 7:02 PM -0400 6/20/08, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker
about why perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall
a discussion on some mailing list about either the number of
arguments or the format
=on Perl support
IMAGEMAGICK_MODULES=off Modules support (broken)
IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB=on Bzlib support
IMAGEMAGICK_16BIT_PIXEL=on 16bit pixel support
IMAGEMAGICK_DJVU=off DJVU format support (needs threads)
IMAGEMAGICK_LCMS=on LCMS support
IMAGEMAGICK_HDRI
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about
why perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a discussion
on some mailing list about either the number of arguments or the format of
the arguments and/or output of a base perl function having
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about
why perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a
discussion on some mailing list about either the number of arguments or
the format of the arguments and/or output
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hello all,
I know it was a long time ago, but I was talking with a co-worker about
why perl was removed from the base in v5 -- I seem to recall a
discussion on some mailing list about either the number of arguments or
the format of the arguments and/or output
:
X11=on X11 support
IMAGEMAGICK_TESTS=on Run bundled self-tests after build
IMAGEMAGICK_OPENMP=off Enable OpenMP for SMP
IMAGEMAGICK_PERL=on Perl support
IMAGEMAGICK_MODULES=off Modules support (broken)
IMAGEMAGICK_BZLIB=on Bzlib support
Should I build ports/lang/perl5.8 WITH_THREADS=yes ?
I run FreeBSD-7.0-stable on old compaq armada1700 laptop.
I don't use perl myself much, but many ports I use rely on it.
How will this affect performance of perl on my laptop?
More to the point, are there any ports which require perl
Hi Anton.
I'm no expert here, but I found that installing perl
without threads works for the vast majority of ports.
In one occasion I needed to recompile perl with thread
because another port required so.
Also, I remember that using WITH_THREADS=yes came together
with a warning that it could
Just before FBSD-7 was released, I asked if Perl 5.10.0 would be
included in the new version. I was informed that it would not be;
however, it would be released shortly after FBSD-7 was released.
Well, FBSD-7 has been out for a while now; however, I still do not see
the updated version of Perl
Hello.
I'm interesting when perl 5.10 will be available in freebsd ports?
Always Want to ask same question about qt4.4.
--
Regards, Nickolay D. Hodyunya.
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi everyone,
I have a problem with perl-5.8.8_1. When I install it from the ports
(via make install clean or make package-recursive clean), it creates
symlinks from /usr/local/bin/perl to /usr/bin/perl:
[...]
Removing stale symlinks from /usr/bin...
Skipping /usr/bin/perl
Skipping
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 07:21:57PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
In order to setup postfwd (http://postfwd.org), of which there is no FreeBSD
port, several PERL modules are required; one of them, Net::DNS::Async, also
does not exist as a FreeBSD port. If I install this via CPAN, postfwd works
* Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-04 20:23:09 +0400]:
Try to request help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cc'ed). Perl ports are
usually very easy to create and maintain, so if you don't want to
spend 30 minutes learning, someone with enough experience can
probably do it in a couple
On May 4, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Yes, making a new port is the easiest way to install something
from CPAN.
I do prefer to keep everything organized in ports, so I created my
first port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/123382
Let's hope I
to look at
the log. I am not able to glean much in the way of solutions, so hoping
someone with a similar experience can help. I did see prior threads about the
looping problem but I am still unable to update perl.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED
fine until I realized it was looping. After the
3rd strike, I was told to look at the log. I am not able to glean
much in the way of solutions, so hoping someone with a similar
experience can help. I did see prior threads about the looping
problem but I am still unable to update perl.
What
the looping
problem but I am still unable to update perl.
What version of portmanager are you running? The last one is '0.4.1.9' I
believe. It might have been nice if you had also posted any pertinent
portions of the log file also. There was a looping problem in a very
old version
In order to setup postfwd (http://postfwd.org), of which there is no FreeBSD
port, several PERL modules are required; one of them, Net::DNS::Async, also
does not exist as a FreeBSD port. If I install this via CPAN, postfwd works,
but then this breaks portupgrade and portmanager when trying
Lowell Gilbert wrote
make: don't know how to make command-line. Stop.
Look in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/files/patch-makedepend
Really, we should submit this and a few others back to 5.8.9
Its really annoying in a when working in a mod_perl related world
to not have perl compile out of the box
Jay Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am attempting to compile Perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. I make
it through the configuration just fine, but when I attempt to run the
make command, I receive the following error message. I am creating a
custom install. The only parameter I am
I received the same error with both make and gmake.
Thanks,
Jay
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jay Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am attempting to compile Perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. I make
it through the configuration just fine, but when I attempt
I solved the problem with using Perl 5.10.0 on FreeBSD 7. But it is not stable.
Quoting Jay Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I received the same error with both make and gmake.
Thanks,
Jay
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jay Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am
I am attempting to compile Perl 5.8.8 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE. I make it
through the configuration just fine, but when I attempt to run the make
command, I receive the following error message. I am creating a custom
install. The only parameter I am changing is the installation location
Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
Tk
Encode
Encode::Unicode (Not sure if this is seprate from the Encode module)
Encode::Guess
HTML::Parser
LWP::Simple
I'm trying to understand how gtk20 and other graphic ports
--On February 24, 2008 3:30:18 PM -0800 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
Tk
Encode
Encode::Unicode (Not sure if this is seprate from the Encode
module) Encode::Guess
HTML::Parser
LWP
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:11:00 -0600
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On February 24, 2008 3:30:18 PM -0800 Gary Kline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have the following perl modules in ports?
Tk
Encode
Encode::Unicode (Not sure if this is seprate
is always appreciated.
Have fun!
All the best,
Kyrre
- Original Message -
From: Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 8:49 am
Subject: Perl error running lint on spamassassin?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I know I've been noisy of late, but that should slow down if I
ever get
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8: Undefined symbol
PL_exit_flags
You may consider updating every Perl modules after you have upgraded
Perl 5.8.8.
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
401 - 500 of 1476 matches
Mail list logo
