On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:53:43 -0500
Mark Beaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to build a FreeBSD based PVR station with at least Svideo output
and ideally digital coax sound (maybe not dolby digital)
Currently I have:
P3 350
448 Megs of ram
160Gigs of storage
I'd like to know if
I'd like to build a FreeBSD based PVR station with at least Svideo output
and ideally digital coax sound (maybe not dolby digital)
Currently I have:
P3 350
448 Megs of ram
160Gigs of storage
I'd like to know if anyone has had any luck with this type of system if so,
what kind of hardware.
If
Does anyone know of a high availability solution that works on freebsd? I
have two freebsd servers and would like to have them operate in a way that
if one fails, the second kicks in.
Thanks.
Joseph.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Joseph Begumisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know of a high availability solution that works on
freebsd? I have two freebsd servers and would like to have them
operate in a way that if one fails, the second kicks in.
Take a look at net/freevrrpd.
--
Christian Laursen
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:41:41PM +0300, Joseph Begumisa wrote:
Does anyone know of a high availability solution that works on freebsd? I
have two freebsd servers and would like to have them operate in a way that
if one fails, the second kicks in.
How you do this depends very much
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 03:41:41PM +0300 or thereabouts, Joseph Begumisa wrote:
Does anyone know of a high availability solution that works on freebsd? I
have two freebsd servers and would like to have them operate in a way that
if one fails, the second kicks in.
And what about this one
http://redundancy.redundancy.org/fbsd_lb.html
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Begumisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:41 AM
Subject: High Availability Solution
Does anyone know of a high availability solution that works on freebsd? I
have
I'm still having problems getting my wife's palm to show up on my system.
Here's my dmesg:
uhci0: VIA 83C572 USB controller port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 11 at device 16.0
on p
ci0
usb0: VIA 83C572 USB controller on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 August 2004 at 14:58:02 -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, JJB wrote:
The fact of life is all the Unix mail clients adhere to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email while
indenting with a quote character.
Not
is all the Unix mail clients adhere to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email while
indenting with a quote character.
Not true. Pine doesn't. Mulberry doesn't. I don't believe Evolution
does. I'm pretty sure the Firefox solution (don't recall the name)
doesn't
On Aug 10, 2004, at 6:25 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Here's a good reason to top-post: I'm referring to the message as a
whole, rather than to the content.
What reference to a whole? Whole what?
This message came in while I was writing my previous message in this
thread. It shows *exactly*
(This message is also located at the bottom of the message, and also
in-line)
[top post]
Oh boy, am I tired of this discussion that in some kind of nature law
must pop up every three or four month.
| Here's a good reason to top-post: I'm referring to the message as
a
| whole, rather
be so much nicer if you just informed the
MS/Windows top poster of the above links so they know about the
solution to fix their email clients to adhere to the Unix email
format used on this list.
Geez this is tough to ask cause it has nothing to do with FreeBSD, but
has anyone tried this (Outlook
On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 12:24:24 PM Bart Silverstrim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:45:13 -0400
|From: Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: Top posting solution
|To: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Content-Type: text
about the
solution to fix their email clients to adhere to the Unix email
format used on this list.
Thanks for you attention
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Unix hard liners, Please instead of complaining to the
top posters, it would be so much nicer if you just informed the
It would actually be much nicer if they'd just quit trying to enforce
their preferences on others.
MS/Windows top poster of the above links so they know about the
solution to fix
to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email while
indenting with a quote character.
Not true. Pine doesn't. Mulberry doesn't. I don't believe Evolution
does. I'm pretty sure the Firefox solution (don't recall the name) doesn't.
But I'm trying to think why someone
literate mail. I just ignore their messages. That's not
helpful either, except to me.
MS/Windows top poster of the above links so they know about the
solution to fix their email clients to adhere to the Unix email
format used on this list.
Please provide a cite/ref to the Unix email format
Hi Paul,
--On Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:13 PM -0500 Paul Schmehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I'm trying to think why someone would be posting to a freebsd list
from a Windows box
Because some of us are working in part on building / servicing a
predominantly Windows network during the day,
of complaining to the
top posters, it would be so much nicer if you just informed the
It would actually be much nicer if they'd just quit trying to
enforce
their preferences on others.
MS/Windows top poster of the above links so they know about the
solution to fix their email clients to adhere
mail clients adhere to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email while
indenting with a quote character.
Not true. Pine doesn't. Mulberry doesn't. I don't believe Evolution
does. I'm pretty sure the Firefox solution (don't recall the name)
doesn't.
Thunderbird gives
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, JJB wrote:
So your a hard core purest on the other side of the coin.
You know absolutely nothing about my position on this subject other than
what you infer from the formatting of the posts I've made. The fact that
I reject specious argument from incorrect facts is
On Aug 10, 2004, at 5:20 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
It would actually be much nicer if people would return to literacy
standards that existed, not only in the computer world, before
Microsoft came along. I've long given up actively trying to help
people write literate mail. I just ignore
On Aug 10, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, JJB wrote:
The fact of life is all the Unix mail clients adhere to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email while
indenting with a quote character.
Not true. Pine doesn't, for example. It begins a
On 2004-08-10 18:14, JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, JJB wrote:
The fact of life is all the Unix mail clients adhere to the Unix
email format of posting the reply to the bottom of the email
while
indenting with a quote character.
Not true.
CRAP. HERE WE GO AGAIN.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JJB
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Top posting solution
Over the years I have seen many posts on this list where Unix
hard
solution
] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
] X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
[ Only someone condemned to support Windows users would want to understand the
relationship between Outlook and OE in more detail, so
itself:
] From: JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Subject: RE: Top posting solution
] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
] X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
[ Only someone condemned to support Windows users would want
doesn't work with Outlook itself:
] From: JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Subject: RE: Top posting solution
] Message-id:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
] X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
[ Only someone condemned to support
all this
time, leave alone the thread!
But anyway, Bill says they use LDAP, yes? How about this solution:
# High Availability Mail server
http://bsdvault.net/sections.php?op=viewarticleartid=99
http://bsdvault.net/sections.php?op=viewarticleartid=100
Looks like what Bill
Bill and everyone,
I know it is already August. I did not read this list all this
time, leave alone the thread!
But anyway, Bill says they use LDAP, yes? How about this solution:
# High Availability Mail server
http://bsdvault.net/sections.php?op=viewarticleartid
Hi all,
We have many Mysql's running here, and just to tell you, there
are fixes/workarounds for the behaviour you see:
FreeBSD 4.8 / 4.9 / 4.10 :
--
Compile port with WITH_LINUXTHREADS=YES or remove tcpwrappers
support manually from the build if it hangs with libc_r.
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi all,
We have many Mysql's running here, and just to tell you, there
are fixes/workarounds for the behaviour you see:
FreeBSD 4.8 / 4.9 / 4.10 :
--
Compile port with WITH_LINUXTHREADS=YES or remove tcpwrappers
Is there a solution to this problem - IBM x-Server 345 with Raid Controller
6i?
Thanks,
Jim
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been struggling to find the best virtual server solution based on a
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. I was hoping some members of the list could help me
take this decision. I have questions/thoughts regarding vmware/bsd jails:
- Vmware
- Does it run 5.2.1 nicely ?
i think yes. it emulates
Hi,
I've been struggling to find the best virtual server solution based on a
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. I was hoping some members of the list could help me
take this decision. I have questions/thoughts regarding vmware/bsd jails:
- Vmware
- Does it run 5.2.1 nicely ?
- Does a Guest OS
Hi Bill,
I know how to set up failover with a backup MX. That's not what I'm
looking for. We have a cyrus-imap server with lots of users
connecting via IMAP, while everything gets backed up, this only
happens once a night. Thus, if the server were to go up in smoke
right before the
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bill Moran wrote:
The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out
there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the
mailboxes. I was wondering if it could be done with Coda, but I don't
know anything about Coda, and it doesn't
On Jun 21, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
You'd be much better off with some sort of NAS in a raid
config, even if it were home grown, to store the spools.
We already have a home-grown NAS (just a FreeBSD box with Vinum
RAID) but
it doesn't protect me if the machine with the drives has a
On Jun 22, 2004, at 12:57 AM, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
On Jun 21, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
You'd be much better off with some sort of NAS in a raid
config, even if it were home grown, to store the spools.
We already have a home-grown NAS (just a FreeBSD box with Vinum
RAID)
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Bill Moran wrote:
During my research of the IMAP protocol, I determined that _the_best_
way to store email for high-performance would be to put them in a
database. This is because IMAP doesn't see email as a big blob of
text like POP does. It sees the headers as one
Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Bill Moran wrote:
During my research of the IMAP protocol, I determined that _the_best_
way to store email for high-performance would be to put them in a
database. This is because IMAP doesn't see email as a big blob of
text like
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I don't think that stuffing email into a database is a particularly good
idea since that means keeping large blobs of non-relational data floating
around, something that the filesystem can do a
The other advantages is it would scale like nobody's business. Since the
data is in postgres, you could use multiple backends (replicated with
Slony)
and have the IMAP daemons contact different back ends if the load got
heavy. With a little work, the system could failover silently as well.
David E. Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, we'll never know till someone tries it. It looks like
Dovecot is going to try it eventually, but it seems like they have
other priorities at this time.
Someone already stores mails in a database: Oracle (Email Server and
Collaboration
Hi Bill,
The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out
there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the
mailboxes.
Depending on the size / number of messages: how about using rsync and
OpenBSD's CARP?
True, it will not be realtime, but the
Nico Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out
there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the
mailboxes.
Depending on the size / number of messages: how about using rsync and
OpenBSD's CARP?
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nico Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out
there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the
mailboxes.
Depending on the size / number of
Christian Laursen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nico Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
The other option is to take what appears to be the best IMAP server out
there (Cyrus) and figure out a way to do real-time mirroring of the
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Laursen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
If you are running FreeBSD 5, you should be able to make a filesystem snapshot
and rsync from there.
I suppose I should have commented on that ;)
We're not running FreeBSD 5 on these production
Bill Moran wrote:
Christian Laursen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are running FreeBSD 5, you should be able to make a filesystem snapshot
and rsync from there.
I suppose I should have commented on that ;)
We're not running FreeBSD 5 on these production machines yet ... but it's
likely we will be
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Christian Laursen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are running FreeBSD 5, you should be able to make a filesystem snapshot
and rsync from there.
I suppose I should have commented on that ;)
We're not running FreeBSD 5 on
On June 21, 2004 11:20, Bill Moran wrote:
...
Does anyone have a solution to provide real-time mirroring of IMAP
folders?
...
Hi. I know I'm a little late to the game, but I'm going to posit an
alternative quite different from anything that's been suggested so far.
It seems to me
Bill Moran wrote:
David E. Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, we'll never know till someone tries it. It looks like
Dovecot is going to try it eventually, but it seems like they have
other priorities at this time.
Someone already stores mails in a database: Oracle (Email Server and
a night. Thus, if the
server were to go up in smoke right before the backup occurred, we'd lose
something like 23 hours worth of emails.
Does anyone have a solution to provide real-time mirroring of IMAP folders?
I don't mind manual intervention to get the thing running again, I just want
to ensure
connecting via IMAP,
while everything gets backed up, this only happens once a night. Thus, if the
server were to go up in smoke right before the backup occurred, we'd lose
something like 23 hours worth of emails.
Does anyone have a solution to provide real-time mirroring of IMAP folders?
I
for. We have a cyrus-imap server with lots of users connecting via IMAP,
while everything gets backed up, this only happens once a night. Thus, if the
server were to go up in smoke right before the backup occurred, we'd lose
something like 23 hours worth of emails.
Does anyone have a solution
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:25:20PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
The return can be significant. The company I am doing this for provides IMAP
mail services for business. If a filesystem crashes and service is down for a
while, we can easily lose clients. If we had some sort of failover, we'd be
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:25:20PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
The return can be significant. The company I am doing this for provides IMAP
mail services for business. If a filesystem crashes and service is down for a
while, we can easily lose
Bill Moran wrote:
It's the mailboxes themselves that are difficult to get. Best we've got right
now is backing up the Cyrus mail folders using rsync ... but this is very time-
consuming, and (thus) only done once a day. In order for it to be done right,
Cyrus has to be shut down while it's
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
It's the mailboxes themselves that are difficult to get. Best we've got right
now is backing up the Cyrus mail folders using rsync ... but this is very time-
consuming, and (thus) only done once a day. In order for it to be done
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
[ I don't think that stuffing email into a database is a particularly good
idea since that means keeping large blobs of non-relational data floating
around, something that the filesystem can do a better job of handling... ]
Actually ... you got me
Bill Moran wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
The latter uses one-message-per-file, and ought to work *much* better both in
terms of performance and stability, and in terms of playing nice with the way
rsync wants to back things up.
Doesn't really matter. Fact is, the mail
Keep in mind that storing mail in a RDBMS as a backup requires an
efficient method to restore mail into your mail server's format.
Would it be possible to have a second mail server internal to your
network that would receive copies of the mail from the primary mail
server to store them as a
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
The latter uses one-message-per-file, and ought to work *much* better both in
terms of performance and stability, and in terms of playing nice with the way
rsync wants to back things
Lucas Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that storing mail in a RDBMS as a backup requires an
efficient method to restore mail into your mail server's format.
I'm looking at RDBMS _being_ the native format. Dovecot has this
on the TODO list, but it's low priority for that project.
Bill Moran wrote:
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ I don't think that stuffing email into a database is a particularly good
idea since that means keeping large blobs of non-relational data floating
around, something that the filesystem can do a better job of handling... ]
[ ... ]
During
Just a thought, but couldn't you write the imapd process to act more
like a web application server in the RDBMS scenario. You can cache
data and limit the number of select statements executed on the actual
data store. Although one wouldn't have something like cookies for
sessions, the
happens once a night. Thus, if the
server were to go up in smoke right before the backup occurred, we'd lose
something like 23 hours worth of emails.
Does anyone have a solution to provide real-time mirroring of IMAP folders?
I don't mind manual intervention to get the thing running again, I just
On Saturday 19 June 2004 06:15 pm, Chris Smith wrote:
Is there an easier to manage solution that DOESN'T involve qmail where I
don't need to give users REAL accounts?
I'm using Cyrus IMAP (and POP) on my FreeBSD server. There is no direct
correlation between Cyrus accounts and system
user account per mailbox etc. Its performance is
piss poor and the users are complaining (there are 500 of the buggers and
they poll it all day and night).
Is there an easier to manage solution that DOESN'T involve qmail where I
don't need to give users REAL accounts? I've seen several qmail
with
virtual domains and one user account per mailbox etc. Its performance is
piss poor and the users are complaining (there are 500 of the buggers and
they poll it all day and night).
Is there an easier to manage solution that DOESN'T involve qmail where I
don't need to give users REAL accounts
For the records:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Could anybody tell me how I can make Texmacs recognize maxima?
texmacs uses a bash sript
/usr/local/libexec/TeXmacs/bin/maxima_detect
its first line must be changed to
#!/compat/linux/bin/bash
Uli.
3C920B-EMB (device id
9201) and 3C920B-EMB-WNM (device id 9202).
3) If it is solution, may be 3C920B-EMB-WNM Integrated Fast Ethernet
Controller (device id 9210) will work in such way?
Thanks for the answers.
Links:
kern/64522: 3COM 3C920B onboard Asus P4R800-VM not supported
(http
After reading an agonizing thread in freebsd-hackers from back in 2000 with
no solution in layman's terms, this is how I got this to work.
My system:
Celeron 1.7Ghz
MSI MS6526 v2 mobo (Intel arch, apparently this and/or the bios is the
problem)
WD 40GB HDD
The problem:
After doing a new cd
I'm looking for a solution to the following VPN setup:
FreeBSD server on public IP address
Private, firewalled office LAN
Road warrior laptop users requiring access to the LAN
Users are anywhere in the world, possibly behind NAT
Users run Win2k or XP
Several people are using notebooks in the office, the big desktop computer
stores music. A good speaker is pluged into the desktop computer (FreeBSD).
What do you think is the best solution to share the speaker?
These are what I can think of:
* Marc Lehmann wrote a perl module for playing
In the last episode (Feb 28), Zhang Weiwu said:
Several people are using notebooks in the office, the big desktop
computer stores music. A good speaker is pluged into the desktop
computer (FreeBSD).
What do you think is the best solution to share the speaker?
These are what I can think
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 28), Zhang Weiwu said:
Several people are using notebooks in the office, the big desktop
computer stores music. A good speaker is pluged into the desktop
computer (FreeBSD).
What do you think is the best solution to share the speaker?
These are what
is the best solution to share the speaker?
These are what I can think of:
* Marc Lehmann wrote a perl module for playing music with mpg123. Write a
cgi script and let people select playlist/control play on the webpage.
* Find a existing good mpg123 frontend, modify it, let it control
Hi,
has someone a solution for the following geometry problem with
IDE disks on a raid controller?
When activating the raid (RAID1) the system sees a different geometry
on ar1 than it saw on ad5 and thus finds no filesystems.
System is FBSD5.2R, EPoX 4GEA+, HPT372N, 2*77GB HDS + 2*114GB Maxtor
I was playing around with kde 3.2 and a crashing artsd was locking up
my sound system - any further attempts to use sound from gnome or xmms
or anything failed with
/dev/dsp - device busy
messages. fstat and lsof showed nothing holding the device. A reboot
would fix it, but why reboot
On Monday 09 February 2004 01:37, Mike Harding wrote:
I was playing around with kde 3.2 and a crashing artsd was locking up
my sound system - any further attempts to use sound from gnome or xmms
or anything failed with
/dev/dsp - device busy
messages. fstat and lsof showed nothing holding
Solution to failed ZIP drive install
The BIOs setting was the fault.
I cleared it by disabling the BIOs internal motherboard settings and
installing a printer card that I set to run at IRQ 7 - 0278 .
This brought up the zip drive with no problem.
Then I removed the card and reset the internal
Hello again,
I was able to recover all deleted partitions :)
I found this program http://ls.si.ru/freebsd/find-super-blocks.c
it provides me sufficient information for recreating both
partitions.
From another FreeBSD machine it was as easy as:
prue5# ./find-super-blocks /dev/ad2s2
FS_MAGIC at
), is it possible? (Solution)
Hello again,
I was able to recover all deleted partitions :)
I found this program http://ls.si.ru/freebsd/find-super-blocks.c
it provides me sufficient information for recreating both
partitions.
From another FreeBSD machine it was as easy as:
prue5
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Saint Aardvark the Carpeted wrote:
The problem seems to come in at lines 142/143: before this,
sin.sin_addr.s_addr is localhost (as set at line 130), as is
hent-h_addr_list[0][0]. *After* this, it's set with the Weird IP,
bind_tohost() is called,
Matthew Seaman disturbed my sleep to write:
Please do submit a PR with your analysis and a patch. It's slightly
perturbing that no-one spotted this a long time ago, but these things
happen from time to time.
Thanks for taking the time to reply! I'm glad to find out I'm not
completely wrong
A while back I came across some strange behaviour with ypset(8). I was
having trouble at work making a host bind to our NIS server, so I thought
I'd try using ypset. When running these commands:
domainname [domain]
ypbind
ypset -h localhost -d [domain] 192.168.0.254
and
Hi all thanks for all your answers.
The solution that i found was to add to my ipnat.rules this lines:
map dc1 192.168.10.0/24 - 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map dc1 192.168.10.0/24 - 0/32
and to my rc.conf this :
static_routes=linux
route_linux=192.168.0.0/16 192.168.1.3
regards.
Hi all
Hi all thanks for all your answers.
The solution that i found was to add to my ipnat.rules this lines:
map dc1 192.168.10.0/24 - 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map dc1 192.168.10.0/24 - 0/32
and to my rc.conf this :
static_routes=linux
route_linux=192.168.0.0/16 192.168.1.3
regards.
Hi all, I
Hello List,
I have a question that's slightly off-topic, but not. I install high-end
surveillance equipment for CCTV and such. I have a rather large client in
Minneapolis who's using Dedicated Micros digital video recorders. The
particular model we're using has a 500 GB hdd, but this client
In the last episode (Dec 31), Eric F Crist said:
I have a question that's slightly off-topic, but not. I install
high-end surveillance equipment for CCTV and such. I have a rather
large client in Minneapolis who's using Dedicated Micros digital
video recorders. The particular model we're
This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
would affect such a backup solution.
However, I could use a push in the right direction
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
would affect
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 09:31:36AM -0500, Brent Bailey wrote:
Hello,
Im looking for you thoughts and opinions on Anti -Spam and Anti virus
solutions for email servers. Im getting ready to implement a email server
solution for an ISP. Im very use to sendmail as ive been able to compile
| Before certain events in New York, we used to talk about
hypothetical
| jumbo jets when considering our disaster plans. Secure off-site
| backups are a necessity. Take care thought that the off-site
location
| really is secure. I did hear that some of the businesses in the
World
| Trade
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 04:35, Joachim Dagerot wrote:
This solution sounds nice, I can even imagine setting up an additional
machine (on the same location though) to have a somewhat galvanic
isolation between the disks. Only fire, earthquake and a neutronbomb
would affect such a backup solution
Hello,
Im looking for you thoughts and opinions on Anti -Spam and Anti virus
solutions for email servers. Im getting ready to implement a email server
solution for an ISP. Im very use to sendmail as ive been able to compile
sendmail to do rbl checks and use access.db and procmail filtering
system if they are running cdrecord suid-root.
This is a very important question indeed. The answer is kind of
complicated, because of course, if any such detailed scenario existed,
that would constitute a bug in cdrecord, and the immediate solution
would be to fix it. The problem comes from
301 - 400 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
