On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 05:41:11PM +0200, Raphael Ahrens wrote:
> Ahh, thank you.
> ke...@kpa.biglobe.ne.jp wrote on Sat, 06.Jul.13 00:03:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:11:41 +0200
> > Raphael Ahrens wrote:
> >
> > > When I execute "cd /usr/ports/editors/vim; make config" I get
> > > =
Hi,
Jens Jahnke wrote on Fri, 05.Jul.13 18:49:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:52:59 +0200
> Raphael Ahrens wrote:
>
> RA> To get to the bottom of the problem here my make.conf received with
> RA> my now again working gvim, thanks to the remark of Kent. :)
> RA>
> RA> WITH_X11=YES
> RA> O
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:52:59 +0200
Raphael Ahrens wrote:
RA> To get to the bottom of the problem here my make.conf received with
RA> my now again working gvim, thanks to the remark of Kent. :)
RA>
RA> WITH_X11=YES
RA> OPTIMZED_CFLAGS=YES
RA> MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2
RA> BUILD_OPTIM
e this does not work. Unless I hack the Makefile and force it to
> enable gui mode it just isn't compiled in.
Try running 'make show-options' and see what you get. Mine shows that
virtually everything is disabled. If I run 'make showconfig' then it
shows n
wrote:
> > >
> > > C> Hey Raphael :-) Go to /usr/ports/editors/vim and make deinstall
> > > C> reinstall it, that works for me, and it helps with dialogs in texmode
> > > C> as well :-)
> > >
> > > for me this does not work. Unless I
Ahh, thank you.
ke...@kpa.biglobe.ne.jp wrote on Sat, 06.Jul.13 00:03:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:11:41 +0200
> Raphael Ahrens wrote:
>
> > When I execute "cd /usr/ports/editors/vim; make config" I get
> > ===> No options to configure
>
> try: setenv WITH_OPTIONS=yes
that did the trick
> > > C> Hey Raphael :-) Go to /usr/ports/editors/vim and make deinstall
> > > C> reinstall it, that works for me, and it helps with dialogs in texmode
> > > C> as well :-)
> > >
> > > for me this does not work. Unless I hack the Makefile and force
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:11:41 +0200
Raphael Ahrens wrote:
> When I execute "cd /usr/ports/editors/vim; make config" I get
> ===> No options to configure
try: setenv WITH_OPTIONS=yes
--
Kent.N
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Raphael Ahrens
wrote:
>> Have you tried "make config" (as root) select X11 and graphical
> When I execute "cd /usr/ports/editors/vim; make config" I get
> ===> No options to configure
No options? Are you root? I have those http://justpaste.it/30li
Try:
su
s still build without x11 support. The only thing working
right now is manually tweaking the Makefile. Otherwise I always end up
with a ./configure --enable-gui=no ...
Regards,
Jens
--
05. Heuert 2013, 15:47
Homepage : http://www.jan0sch.de
Antique fairy tale: Little Red Riding Hood.
Modern f
and make deinstall
> > C> reinstall it, that works for me, and it helps with dialogs in texmode
> > C> as well :-)
> >
> > for me this does not work. Unless I hack the Makefile and force it to
> > enable gui mode it just isn't compiled in.
>
> Try a
CeDeROM wrote on Fri, 05.Jul.13 13:47:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Raphael Ahrens
> wrote:
> > I tried this, but I get the same result.
> > The thing is in the make prozess it prints
> > defaulting to: don't HAVE_X11
> > checking --en
gt; C> as well :-)
>
> for me this does not work. Unless I hack the Makefile and force it to
> enable gui mode it just isn't compiled in.
Try a make rmconfig first and then make install.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jens
>
> --
> 05. Heuert 2013, 13:19
> Homepage : http
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Raphael Ahrens
wrote:
> I tried this, but I get the same result.
> The thing is in the make prozess it prints
> defaulting to: don't HAVE_X11
> checking --enable-gui argument... no GUI support
> checking X11/SM/SMli
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:56:32 +0200
CeDeROM wrote:
C> Hey Raphael :-) Go to /usr/ports/editors/vim and make deinstall
C> reinstall it, that works for me, and it helps with dialogs in texmode
C> as well :-)
for me this does not work. Unless I hack the Makefile and force it to
enable
Hi Tomek,
I tried this, but I get the same result.
The thing is in the make prozess it prints
defaulting to: don't HAVE_X11
checking --enable-gui argument... no GUI support
checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... yes
checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence..
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Raphael Ahrens
wrote:
> After my last update of vim I can't use gvim anymore.
> If fails with the following message
> E25: GUI cannot be used: Not enabled at compile time
> Now what do I have to do to compile vim with GUI support?
Hey
Hi list,
After my last update of vim I can't use gvim anymore.
If fails with the following message
E25: GUI cannot be used: Not enabled at compile time
Now what do I have to do to compile vim with GUI support?
Thanks,
Raphael
___
fr
Hi list,
since my last (01.07) upgrade of vim, I can't use gvim anymore.
It fails with the following error message:
E25: GUI cannot be used: Not enabled at compile time
What do I have to do to again compile vim with GUI support?
Thanks,
Ra
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:26:25 -0800
>> Subject: Re: just thought of a new gui port!
>> From: Waitman Gobble
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012 5:20 PM, "Robert Bonomi" wrote:
>> >
>> >
&
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:26:25 -0800
> Subject: Re: just thought of a new gui port!
> From: Waitman Gobble
>
> On Nov 27, 2012 5:20 PM, "Robert Bonomi" wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:10:50 -0800
> > > From: Ga
> wunderground is definitely a great site however at least in my location the
> temperature can be off as much as ten degrees, its almost like they are
> reading from a station on top of the mountain, and I.m in the valley. Its
> an issue of being on the coast I suppose, for example it could be 80
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
It looks like Oregon Scientific has some cool weather station models with
USB connectivity, might work well with a FreeBSD system...
wunderground is definitely a great site however at least in my location the
temperature can be off as much as ten degre
On Nov 27, 2012 5:20 PM, "Robert Bonomi" wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:10:50 -0800
> > From: Gary Kline
> > Subject: just thought of a new gui port!
> >
> >
> > 2. I live so close to the airport weather station that im sure
> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:10:50 -0800
> From: Gary Kline
> Subject: just thought of a new gui port!
>
>
> 2. I live so close to the airport weather station that im sure
> that would tell me tons more stuff that I could pick up outside the
> hous
how about a local weather GUI that reports the outdoors highs and
lows [temps], and the barometric scale and the forecast?
we've got one in a shaded area on our deck that pings an indoors
receiver every 10-15 minutes. I can't get too cl
On 07/07/2012 23:08, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 07/07/2012 23:04, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I think gpart is the newer disk partitioning program for FreeBSD,
replacing the older gpt still used in NetBSD and DragonFlyBSD.
No. gpart is the tool - it supports both mbr and gpt partitioning
schemes.
Sor
nt such opinion naturally.
As for the original question have a look at the gparted live cd, full GUI
no idea how it is freebsd related.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On 07/07/2012 23:04, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I think gpart is the newer disk partitioning program for FreeBSD, replacing the
older gpt still used in NetBSD and DragonFlyBSD.
No. gpart is the tool - it supports both mbr and gpt partitioning schemes.
--
Bruce Cran
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:58:06 -0400, Carmel wrote:
> I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I
> heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
> FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
I think gpart is the newer disk partitioning
What happened to the idea of "having a choice" ? If you want to keep
living in the 80's with a text based menu, go ahead, I prefer a click
not only me but anyone that wants productivity do live in 80's text based
interfaces or even 60-70's command line interfaces.
These are facts.
And partiti
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: 07 July 2012 14:50
To: FreeBSD
Subject: Re: GUI for "gpart"
> I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpar
2012/7/7 Wojciech Puchar :
>> I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I
>> heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
>> FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
>
> no idea. If you want it with already inst
I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I
heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
no idea. If you want it with already installed system, try to compile
linux software.
Anyway i see no reason
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:58:06 -0400, Carmel wrote:
> I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I
> heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
> FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
I'd suggest to look into the PC-BSD installe
I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I
heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for
FreeBSD and comparable with KDE?
--
Carmel ✌
carmel...@hotmail.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
Update.
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Devin Teske
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:05 PM
> To: FreeBSD Questions
> Subject: Broken amd64 packages: cvsup-without-gui a
Hi all,
Running FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6 here, we've noticed that both the amd64 build of
"supfilesrv" as installed by the "sup-2.0.20060802" package AND the amd64 build
of "cvsupd" as installed by the "cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_4" package, both
segment
do any of you remember the name of the port that set up a GUI square
or rectangle and allowed easy expansion of code underneath? it let
you do-GUI-framework-quick-and-easy.
my key-click program is close enough that i want to move on to the
part where the mute or speech-impaired user clicks on
>>
>> It is better to install KDE or GNOME as the base GUI or it is better to have
>>> any other ? (I do not know what could be).
>>>
>>
>> This is one of those ask a hundred different people get 100 different
>> answers. I prefer KDE which would work wel
Hello all.
Thanks for you comments and advice.
Jorge Biquez
At 10:55 p.m. 12/10/2011, Carl Johnson wrote:
Adam Vande More writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jorge Biquez
wrote:
>
> It is better to install KDE or GNOME as the base GUI or it is
better to have
>> an
Adam Vande More writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
>
> It is better to install KDE or GNOME as the base GUI or it is better to have
>> any other ? (I do not know what could be).
>>
>
> This is one of those ask a hundred different people get
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
It is better to install KDE or GNOME as the base GUI or it is better to have
> any other ? (I do not know what could be).
>
This is one of those ask a hundred different people get 100 different
answers. I prefer KDE which would work we
is to
have a graphical interface also running with the base (FreeBsd 8.2).
Is that correct? If so, here are some questions:
It is better to install KDE or GNOME as the base GUI or it is better
to have any other ? (I do not know what could be).
What do you think is the best option to save har
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:57:28AM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:40:39AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:40:39 -0700
> > From: "Randal L. Schwartz"
> > Subject: Re: what are the plain GUI text editors tha
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:40:39AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:40:39 -0700
> From: "Randal L. Schwartz"
> Subject: Re: what are the plain GUI text editors that use the abbrev [as in
> vi]?
> To: Gary Kline
> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lis
> "Gary" == Gary Kline writes:
Gary> several months ago i asked this list if there were any =easier= text
Gary> editors than vi[m] that had the abbrev ability.
GNU Emacs is easier for me than vim is. And it has abbrev mode.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1
puter' suite.
IIRC, there was at least one--like kate--that was able to use
abbreviations and help those folk who cannot type fast and/or who
are hunt-andd-pek type typist [like me] who never take their eyes
off the keyboard.
i plan on using gvim ((maybe)) and one GUI type editor. i'm
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Sudhakar K wrote:
> Sir,
> i'm new to freebsd 8.2, i downloaded full dvd iso. I installed once.
> But on gui. Can you please tell me how to install this release and use
> gui desktop.
> Now its only a dos like environment. Please help me. I&#
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html
2011/8/9 Sudhakar K
> Sir,
> i'm new to freebsd 8.2, i downloaded full dvd iso. I installed once.
> But on gui. Can you please tell me how to install this release and use
> gui desktop.
> Now its only a
Hi--
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Sudhakar K wrote:
> i'm new to freebsd 8.2, i downloaded full dvd iso. I installed once.
> But on gui. Can you please tell me how to install this release and use
> gui desktop.
> Now its only a dos like environment. Please help me. I'm new
Sir,
i'm new to freebsd 8.2, i downloaded full dvd iso. I installed once.
But on gui. Can you please tell me how to install this release and use
gui desktop.
Now its only a dos like environment. Please help me. I'm new to freebsd.
--
<%-- *Sudhakar K* --%>
<http://www.featuriz
I know St. Peter won't call your name, freebsd-questions!
2011/03/30 22:00:14 +0100 Graham Bentley => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
GB> Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend [less dependencies = better]
tkdvd
should use it patched for -joliet-long ever.
73! Peter pg
-08]
>
>
While not a GUI it's minimilistic, give bashburn a shot
Port: bashburn-2.1.2_2
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/bashburn
Info: CD burning bash script
--
Port: mybashburn-1.0.2_2
Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/mybashburn
Info: Ncurses CD burning bash script
Bashburn I
Try tkdvd. It is in ports tree (sysutils/tkdvd)
--
Gökşin Akdeniz (Gökşin Akdeniz)
Anahtar parmakizi/key fingerprint= FE10 8C14 A144 4FDE BE18 D5E3 E758
F49A 8A5D F8AE
[Son kullanma tarihi/expire date: 2011-06-08]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thanks for your several considered replies
> 1) If you're already got KDE libs, k3b / k3b-kde4 is pretty light
> 2) I find that Gnome has pretty good built-in support
> 3) Polytropon as 1,2 mostly
I shoud have been more specific. Im running xorg with vtwm
and trying to stay light / minimal as pos
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Graham Bentley wrote:
> Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend [less dependencies =
> better]
>
If you're already got KDE libs, running sysutils/k3b or sysutils/k3b-kde4 is
pretty light. It's feature set is comparable if not better
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:00:14 +0100, "Graham Bentley" wrote:
> Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend
> [less dependencies = better]
I don't know of a stand-alone GUI program, but all the "big"
desktop environments have a favourite. The one provided by
Gn
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 22:00 +0100, Graham Bentley wrote:
> Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend [less dependencies = better]
Depends on what you want to write.
I find that Gnome has pretty good built-in support (both for writing
ISO's and dysjoint files/directories).
--
Which GUI CD writing software can you recommend [less dependencies = better]
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 08:21:20PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
> > vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
&
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 06:49:18PM -0700, Fred wrote:
> On 02/21/11 18:32, Gary Kline wrote:
> > iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
> > vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
> > abbreviations that vi do
On 21 February 2011 20:49, Fred wrote:
> On 02/21/11 18:32, Gary Kline wrote:
>>
>> iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
>> vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
>> abbreviations that vi d
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
>vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
>abbreviations that vi does?
>
kate, the bundled text editor for K
On 02/21/11 18:32, Gary Kline wrote:
iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
abbreviations that vi does? I ask this because I don't know
wmany many people with spee
iF we throw out "gvim" since it is simply the GUI variant of
vim, are there are other GUI editors that use the kinds of :ab
abbreviations that vi does? I ask this because I don't know
wmany many people with speech imopairments or who cannot speak
On 23/09/2010 04:29, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under terminal/shell
> mode. Since all my needs to solve have been solved that way I have never
> tried any graphical interface.
>
> I was wondering if you can tell suggest me based on yo
I love Fluxbox too for its lightweightness and configurability. If you find
it too minimalistic, I think that XFCE can be a good compromise also since
it runs quite fast compared to KDE and Gnome while having most of their
functionalities. XFCE is also compatible with Compiz...
On Fri, Sep 24, 201
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> I was wondering if you can tell suggest me based on yoru experience on what
> path to follow? KDE? any other?
Using fluxbox here for ages (used olvwm, ctwm, and fvwm[2] before. It's low
overhead, very low cpu/disk/memory footprint, very fast
pointed out that is written in C (as did the homepage)
> >> . . . AND you concluded some sort of insult; not my problem.
> >>
> >> Do you need a rim-shot for every joke?
> >
> > 1. Who said I took insult? You assume too much.
> >
> > 2. Th
Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> >On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Chip Camden
> >wrote:
> >> Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> >>
> >> I'm not too sure what you're asking "certain window should be moved by
> >> default to specific workspaces." Since you read th
On 09/23/10 10:46, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Thursday, September 23, 2010 a las 09:36:03AM +0100, Frank Shute
escribió:
My belief is that people who are comfortable with Gnome/KDE are people
who are familiar with working in a GUI such as Windows® and haven't
come from the commandline.
On 09/23/10 18:22, Adam Vande More wrote:
> If you tried on KDE 4.1, 4.2, then yes things have improved a lot.
4.3 was
> pretty big update in terms of stability, and 4.4 has been far more solid
> than not.
I tried 4.5.1 on 8.1/i386 with every port updated, on a 4-core AMD CPU
with a Radeon HD
On 09/23/10 11:04, Mike Clarke wrote:
That's very similar to my experience too but I'm getting the feeling
that I might have to move over to KDE4 before much longer due to
reduced KDE3 support with some of the apps:
Same here.
I delayed trying KDE4 since my old box was too old; as soon as I go
> 1. Who said I took insult? You assume too much.
>
> 2. That was not a very clever joke, anyway. Where's the punchline?
>
> 3. That doesn't answer my question about the Scrotwm page.
>
> Even *I* am not so socially stunted as to think a comment like that on
> the S
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:07:28PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>> >
>> > If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
>> > lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively main
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
>>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
>>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
>>
On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>
>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
>> vim-like (among other things ;-).
>
> Why is "written in
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >
> > If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
> > lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
> > vim-like (among other things ;-).
>
> Why
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad,
> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and
> vim-like (among other things ;-).
Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotw
On 22 September 2010 23:29, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under terminal/shell
> mode. Since all my needs to solve have been solved that way I have never
> tried any graphical interface.
>
> I was wondering if you can tell suggest me based
If you prefer terminal applications you may get happy with blackbox. Its
one of the smallest, but fully functional GUIs. And it is still kosher
according to Unix standards. Its my favorite, I even prefer it to
fluxbox, what is a little fancier.
Cheers
herb langhans
--
sprachtraining langhans
her
>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Chip Camden
>wrote:
>> Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
>>
>> I'm not too sure what you're asking "certain window should be moved by
>> default to specific workspaces." Since you read the man page I'm
>> guessing you're not talking about changing
Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> > Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Chip Camden
> >> wrote:
> >> > Quoth Jorge Biquez on Wednesday, 22 September 2010:
> >> >> Hello all
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Chip Camden
>> wrote:
>> > Quoth Jorge Biquez on Wednesday, 22 September 2010:
>> >> Hello all.
>> >>
>> >> In all these years I have been working with FreeB
Quoth Neal Hogan on Thursday, 23 September 2010:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Chip Camden
> wrote:
> > Quoth Jorge Biquez on Wednesday, 22 September 2010:
> >> Hello all.
> >>
> >> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under
> >> terminal/shell mode. Since all my needs to solv
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Chip Camden
wrote:
> Quoth Jorge Biquez on Wednesday, 22 September 2010:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under
>> terminal/shell mode. Since all my needs to solve have been solved
>> that way I have never tried any graphical
On Thursday 23 September 2010, Adam Vande More wrote:
> If you tried on KDE 4.1, 4.2, then yes things have improved a lot.
> 4.3 was pretty big update in terms of stability, and 4.4 has been
> far more solid than not. All the base KDE apps seem to work
> appropriately, at least the ones I use.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
> When I first tried KDE4 it was much slower than KDE3, have things
> improved sufficiently since then for me to think about upgrading?
>
If you tried on KDE 4.1, 4.2, then yes things have improved a lot. 4.3 was
pretty big update in terms of s
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:57:46PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>
> You don't have to choose one of those, there are lots of varied window
> managers, and advocates for each. There's an overview here on fd.o:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Desktops. Many of those are in ports.
That's a much s
Quoth Jorge Biquez on Wednesday, 22 September 2010:
> Hello all.
>
> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under
> terminal/shell mode. Since all my needs to solve have been solved
> that way I have never tried any graphical interface.
>
> I was wondering if you can tell suggest m
ightweight, allthough "obsolete" (but still powerful)
GUI is XFCE. When I write XFCE, I mean XFCE version 3. If I
would mean Xfce 4, I would write Xfce. :-)
A highly customizable and "still" quite professional environment
is fvwm2. You can add as much stuff as you like, but you can als
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:57 -0600, "Warren Block"
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Jorge Biquez wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if you can tell suggest me based on yoru experience on what
> > path to follow? KDE? any other?
>
> The Handbook covers setting up the three major desktop environments in
> ht
On Thursday 23 September 2010, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> After years of KDE3 I tried KDE4 and switched back in half a day.
> I found it crawling slowly, with continuous crashes, rendering bugs
> and missing features...
>
> Of course, YMMV.
That's very similar to my experience too but I'm getting
El día Thursday, September 23, 2010 a las 09:36:03AM +0100, Frank Shute
escribió:
> My belief is that people who are comfortable with Gnome/KDE are people
> who are familiar with working in a GUI such as Windows® and haven't
> come from the commandline.
Totally wrong for me. I co
ments, browser, email, etc)
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Jorge Biquez
>
I remember years ago that I first started using Linux in just the
console and did so for about 6 months before I set up X. It was such a
pleasure to get away from a GUI and to a CLI :)
When I did set up X, I us
El día Thursday, September 23, 2010 a las 09:38:03AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli
escribió:
> On 09/23/10 06:53, Adam Vande More wrote:
>
> > As stated before, it's really a personal matter. I like kde4 a lot,
> > ...
> > It's also
> > lighter and faster than KDE3. It's pretty stable too, but not c
On 09/23/10 06:53, Adam Vande More wrote:
As stated before, it's really a personal matter. I like kde4 a lot,
...
It's also
lighter and faster than KDE3. It's pretty stable too, but not completely
so.
Strange.
After years of KDE3 I tried KDE4 and switched back in half a day.
I found it crawl
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> In all these years I have been working with FreeBSd under terminal/shell
> mode. Since all my needs to solve have been solved that way I have never
> tried any graphical interface.
>
> I was wondering if you can tell suggest me
1 - 100 of 552 matches
Mail list logo
