On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
notice if something
On 02/19/2012 10:39, Terrence Koeman wrote:
I'm just done converting from named.root to slaving the root, I
checked which servers allow axfr (at least for me...) and added them
all as masters.
Given that some of the root server operators don't really like people
doing this routinely it would
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones, depending
on what you choose to slave). I
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
Given their success
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
than DOMAIN whois) on http://www.internic.net/whois.html) and also for each
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
Yes, you can run BIND on the same FreeBSD machine as your web server.
You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
than
Now after refreshing my memory (it happened one year ago) I
could remember that I did register the nameservers. I found the
option in my registar to add to some domain i.e. mydomain.com
the entries ns1.mydomain.com, etc. I think that the problem I
had was related with the IPs. The VPS
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:06:39AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
Hello,
You /can/ have a nameserver with same IP as www. And you /can/ multihome
your NIC with multiple IP on same machine,
ie,
www.example.com 192.168.0.131 and 192.168.0.132 (if you want, optional
extra address for www)
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis
innervisionnetw...@gmail.comwrote:
Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my
domain
Hi Daniel,
You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns
I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND.
Basic
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
was not able to automatically update in the system with my
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:54:59PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
was not able to automatically update in the system with my
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:24:59PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS was the
Sure, like you say, it is possible running BIND and Apache.
But, is it possible|convenient that the name server reside in
the same machine that host (with apache) the domain names served
by it? Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I
am lost :-).
Or to simplify the
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I am
lost :-).
Where you are now, so once were most of us. :-)
Sure, like you say, it is possible running BIND and Apache.
But, is it possible|convenient that the name server reside in
the
Hello,
I've been using FreeBSD as a local nameserver (with my own .local
domains!) for quite some time. FreeBSD comes with a name server already
installed; you don't need to get it from the ports, although I'm not
sure what difference it makes. The one that comes with FreeBSD can be
enabled with
On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
specific domain.
This sounds like a job for a
On 11/3/11 8:51 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote:
I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x,
and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do
I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a
On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You can simply create a forward zone.
Actually, yes, that's a good idea too. Should have much the same effect
and it's been available in BIND approximately forever. There's
difference in the niggling details of how it all works, so worth
On 11/3/11 11:35 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Actually, using a view that matches only the VPN's IP range would do the
trick easily and efficiently.
Views are a way of giving a different answer depending on who is asking
the question -- how does
It depends...
some VPNs push routes, including default routes, and nameservers and
search paths, but it's up to the client on how to handle it. Some of
these will set /etc/resolv.conf, etc.
What *kind* of VPN are you talking about? OpenVPN? PPTP? L2TP?
I generally prefer dnscache to BIND,
On 08/07/2011 23:04, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 08
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Gary, add
named_flags=-c /etc/namedb/named.conf
to /etc/rc.conf. Or change /etc/namedb/named.conf to the /var
version if you like/there is no symlink.
Dan
Dan! I think
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 07:49:43AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 07:49:43 -0600
From: Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gary Kline kl...@magnesium.net
X
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:14:21AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:14:21 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 23:04
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file not
found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that fails is looking for /etc/named.conf. The
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/named.conf: file
not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
The first one that
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011, at 22:58, Gary Kline wrote:
Jul 7 10:16:33 ethic named[54366]: none:0: open: /etc/
named.conf: file not found
Jul 7 10:17:56 ethic named[54371]: starting BIND 9.3.6-P1 -c /
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:25:34AM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 00:25:34 -0700
From: Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:01:45 +0100
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On 08/07/2011 08:25, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 7 July 2011
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:27:12AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:12 -0600
From: Dan Busarow d...@buildingonline.com
Subject: Re: DNS and file system messed up...
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
On Jul 8, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Matthew
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:00:42PM +, Gary Kline wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:00:42 +
From: Gary Kline kl...@magnesium.net
Subject: DNS and file system messed up...
To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Guys,
I'd be much obliged to learn why /etc/rc.named
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:57:27PM +0300, Kenneth Parit wrote:
Hello,
I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror sites
due to disconnections.
Since I am contactable any day/time of the year and
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:57, Kenneth Parit kennethpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror sites
due to disconnections.
Since I am contactable any day/time of the
On 3 April 2011 18:10, Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:57, Kenneth Parit kennethpa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I look forward to becoming the DNS Administrator for my country Kenya.
It is impossible to download FreeBSD 8.2 from any of the mirror
alternatively try one of the torrents, it should survive disconnections far
better than ftp etc
Yes, try the torrents. I don't seed them for nothing. This is
probably one of the best ways to get FreeBSD.
Here they are: http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080/
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing NAT.
Said Juniper had a smart DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on DNS
packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the DNS ALG to
fix the problem.
If your ns is behind a NATing device, start
On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing
NAT. Said Juniper had a smart DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on
DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the
DNS ALG to fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 21:40:02, Jonathan Chen wrote:
I've got a small DNS server on my home network, and ever since May 6,
2010 (co-incidentally DNSSEC root sign day), lookups on freebsd.org have
started failing. eg:
Uh, the DURZ was installed on j.root;
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:02:13AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 21:40:02, Jonathan Chen wrote:
I've got a small DNS server on my home network, and ever since May 6,
2010 (co-incidentally DNSSEC root sign day), lookups on
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:25:43 -0800, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:29:30AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
You have some serious DNS issues with your current setup. I think you
should start by:
1) *Removing* from the NS records of your domain the name
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using
DAve wrote:
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME.
The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a
website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to
have
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: DNS Question
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a
All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
this.
example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
I was taught this was not good form
worse, it's illegal.
, but
All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
this.
example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
I was taught this was not good form
worse, it's illegal.
how
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should
have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if i
had control
how is this illegal?
CNAME rule:
a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
for the node domain.tld:
domain.tld. soa ...
domain.tld. ns ...
domain.tld. cname otherdomain.tld.
this node has a CNAME and other data, so it's illegal, no matter what you
want to do, or
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have
an A record to the host for the main domain record, but
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the canonical name
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
on all these domains, use A records
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh
millenia2...@hotmail.com wrote:
how is this illegal?
CNAME rule:
a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
for the node
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:07 -0700
xSAPPYx xsap...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
on all these domains, use A records
You can use the domains for mail provided that that they share MX
servers, if example.com has a CNAME pointing to
As it turns out - following a new installation, named.conf is
in /var/named/etc/namedb with a symlink from /etc/namedb.
To keep all my original DNS records and settings
I had restored a backup to /etc/namedb which destroyed the
symlink - as a result when I altered /etc/namedb/named.conf
named
Replies interspersed
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:15 -0400, David Banning wrote:
I have had my dns server working fine in the past but now it seems
to be down and I can't locate the reason.
Here are some details;
# dig @127.0.0.1 mylocaldomain.com
Is this a real registered .com or some
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Zamri Besar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... tools to manage a big deployment of dns and dhcp services?
What do you mean by big? Or, how big is big.
--
regards,
dg
..but the more you use clever tricks, the less support you'll get ... --
M.W.Lucas
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
I have a machine with two built in
Jim presented these words - circa 7/21/08 6:30 PM-
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
I have a machine with two built in NICs on the
Joshua Frugé wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning vuln that seems to be all the rage lately?
I'm running freebsd
--On Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:05:11 -0500 Joshua Frugé
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
when i resume it to its current configuration
Obtain DBS server automatically the problem is back, is this a problem in
my DNS server?
I'm using the FreeBSD 6.2 version...
I already restarted the DNS Server /etc/rc.d/named restart but nothing
happens the problem is still
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Christer Hermansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
when i resume it to its current configuration
Obtain DBS server automatically the problem
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.1.62
could it be my firewall blocking it? but i didn't change any configuration
from it..
Thanks in advance for your help..:(
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.1.62
According to the resolver(5) documentation, it should
Ok..I have follow your post D Hill, but it doesn't solve the problem
Please HELP...
Thanks..:(
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:45 AM, D Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 09:36 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server192.168.1.62
The problems with what you've just posted are:
1.
On Fri, 2 May 2008 at 15:35 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:36:51AM +0800, Ruel Luchavez wrote:
before i post here i already check the /etc/resolve.conf and this is what's
inside of it
domain name myplace.com.ph
name server 101.1.21.1
name server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ruel Luchavez wrote:
Hi,
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
That is somewhat different to what
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on
how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is
no
command for it?
You might like to try
# rndc reload
Cheers
Thanks in advanced..
On Monday 14 April 2008 11:02:43 Ruel Luchavez wrote:
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
If you start reading here:
I have BIND DNS Server in my freebsd, i keep on searching in google on how
to restart it?
/etc/rc.d/named restart
is there a command to restart it like the squid and dhcp? or there is no
command for it?
Thanks in advanced..
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
国徽 wrote:
Hello,
I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script
/etc/namedb/make-localhost used in the document, So I can't go on
now? Please tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!
Unfortunately the documentation
Hi Erik:
I don't recall the how-to explaining the usage of this script. I too,
just recently setup a DNS server for a couple domains. My
recommendation is to familiarize yourself with the Administrators
Reference Manual (ARM) on BIND's website:
http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/arm93/
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:09:53AM +0200, Deian Popov typed:
Hello,
I have the following problem with bind:
it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
bind is unable is unable to
Ruben de Groot writes:
I have the following problem with bind:
it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
bind is unable is unable to update it's zone files after dhcpd leases
Thank you both, you solved the problem!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ruben de Groot writes:
I have the following problem with bind:
it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the
system
all files and directories
Deian Popov wrote:
Hello,
I have the following problem with bind:
it is configured to run as bind:bind and after every reboot of the system
all files and directories under /etc/namedb become owned by root:wheel so
bind is unable is unable to update it's zone files after dhcpd leases IP to
any
Hi there,
On 20/02/2008, Jordan Gordeev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
See /etc/rc.d/named and /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist.
And please, next time don't be so quick on mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO questions is exactly dedicated for this purpose. Of course the OP
could've solved the problem on
please read apache manual and set up httpd.conf right. it's not only
possible, but very often used, i have 30 sites on one IP
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 06:00:27PM -0500, Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP address
Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have
Hi,
Of course, just setup a virtual host in your httpd.conf file point
the dns to the same ip. Apache will take care of the rest.
To be a litthe bit more precise, in your Apache configuraton you need
something like:
NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1
VirtualHost 10.0.0.1
ServerName
Brian Finniff wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP address and
somehow each one becomes distinct? If so,
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:00:27 -0500
Brian Finniff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people on the
Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you only have one IP
address, would it be possible to forward each domain to the same IP
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:50:17 +1100
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 18:00:27 -0500
Brian Finniff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is, if you are running a website for 2 different people
on the Internet and they both wanted to acquire a domain but you
only
if your not running with -4 you will get this, unless you
have IPv6 configured of course...
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Barnett
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 7:46 PM
To: freeBSD
Subject: DNS Cache - Bind
I'm running
Jack Barnett wrote:
I'm running Bind 9.3.4 on FreeBSD 6.2 for my local network.
It doesn't have any zones, it's just a local DNS that has a bunch of
forwarders.
The first request is slow (between 150 and 300 ms) - but after that
(the next query on same domain) is fast (less then 10 ms
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:59:20PM +0100, Jay Azimi wrote:
Hi,
I have a network run under Windows 2003 server with
About 13 stations.
Hmmm. THere are many versitile persons with cross system experience
on this list, so you might get some help.But, your message doesn't
neo neo wrote:
could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
Please stop posting the same question multiple times.
Also,
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html
Nick.
___
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
internet depends on it.
exactly. it's quite easy to make domains not synchronize to slaves right
etc.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:56:31 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care.
The internet
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:16:46AM -1200, neo neo wrote:
hi
For NAT ;
i already configure internal and external ip . And also finished gateway.
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Will you be doing your own DNS or will that be done by your ISP?
by the way , route add
Hello there hiding behind an anonymous email account whoever you are,
Not knowing what you really ask for, since you don't provide much
information I assume that you want to setup a small dns for LAN with
forwarding to your ISP?
If this is correct may I suggest that you have look at djbdns
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:16:46 -1200
neo neo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but i don't know how to configure DNS . plz .. ?
Read the same handbook as adviced earlier. And for DNS the O'Reilly
book is great. DNS is no toy. It should be handled with great care. The
internet depends on it.
--
Dick
On Thursday 15 March 2007 14:53, neo neo said:
could u please tell me detail how to configure DNS ip ?
You really need to read the handbook. Most of your questions will be
answered there.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html
Bind and DNS questions here:
On 2/26/07, Jacques Beigbeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
My question is related to PF performances with large state tables.
FreeBSD : 5.5
hw.model: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz
hw.physmem: 2138378240 = 2 Gb
If I put a mail server
20 SMTP hits per second (thanks to spam...)
On Jan 15, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Bob McIsaac wrote:
linux quest wrote:
Dear Jay The FreeBSD Communities,
Thanks for putting your time and patience to help me out. Anyway,
I tried it out, both changing the rc.conf and the dhclient.conf
(one at a time). After that (for both of the ways), I
linux quest wrote:
I have a problem with the DNS setting in FreeBSD. Every 1 hour, I will not be able to ping google.com (because I need to type in my ISP's DNS into /etc/resolv.conf) May I know what is the best solution for this, so that I do not have to type in my ISP's DNS to the resolver all
Jay Chandler wrote:
linux quest wrote:
I have a problem with the DNS setting in FreeBSD. Every 1 hour, I
will not be able to ping google.com (because I need to type in my
ISP's DNS into /etc/resolv.conf) May I know what is the best solution
for this, so that I do not have to type in my ISP's
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
