[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4879] Mark redundant buildings in sdl-client

Follow-up Comment #5, patch #4879 (project freeciv): I thought it was a feature that has been in SDL_ttf for a very long time. Since 2.0.10 in 2010; added here http://hg.libsdl.org/SDL_ttf/rev/0f803b00e43b. Looks like the package in Debian was rotting for some years.

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22271 Summary: If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city. Project: Freeciv Submitted by: None Submitted on: 2014年07月05日 09時05分11秒 Category: None Severity: 3

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22271 (project freeciv): Which version of Freeciv? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22271 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #3402] Effect to limit veteran level

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #3402 (project freeciv): This could alternatively be implemented with patch #4902 and a Veteran_Combat=0 effect (although it would be harder for the AI and potentially help generation to understand the net effect).

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4902] Unit veteran level requirement type

Update of patch #4902 (project freeciv): Summary: Unit veteran level requirment type = Unit veteran level requirement type ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Also to limit the maximum veteran level, per patch #3402. I assume this

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4904] More than 16 user flags

URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4904 Summary: More than 16 user flags Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 11:53:40 BST Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal Status:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22272 Summary: Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure) Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 11:53:20 BST Category: None

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #22271 (project freeciv): Sorry. This bug occurs in ver2.2.7 and ver2.4.2. But probably occurs in ver2.3.x , I think. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22271

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4905] Document that ruleset flag descriptions are optional

URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4905 Summary: Document that ruleset flag descriptions are optional Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 12:14:51 BST Category: docs Priority: 5 -

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

Update of bug #22271 (project freeciv): Status:None = Confirmed Release: = 2.2.7, 2.4.2 Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21792] Request colour coded messages

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21792 (project freeciv): 2.6 will have icons on each message (patch #4165). Will that do? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?21792 ___ Message sent

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22273] Add action to the Unit UserData as a property and method

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22273 Summary: Add action to the Unit UserData as a property and method Project: Freeciv Submitted by: None Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 01:09:06 PM UTC Category: editor

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4906] Culture from Achievements

URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4906 Summary: Culture from Achievements Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 04:32:44 PM EEST Category: general Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Update of bug #22272 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-S2_5-role-range.patchSize:1 KB

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4905] Document that ruleset flag descriptions are optional

Update of patch #4905 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-rulesetdoc-flag-helptxt-optional.patch Size:14 KB File name:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22244] Illegal trade route Active setting counterintuitive; document this

Update of bug #22244 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Assigned to:None = jtn Summary: Illegal trade route Active setting counterintuitive = Illegal trade route

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22272 (project freeciv): I think this is a bit more complicated to implement in S2_5 due to network protocol freeze (and TRUNK version requires capstr bump). You are changing meaning of the role bits (what old server/client considers role n, new server/client considers

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4847] Veterancy level Superb to alien ruleset

Update of patch #4847 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Update of bug #22272 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = In Progress ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Oops, you're right. ___ Reply to this

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4848] Adventurer cities can grow to size 3 without Basic Infrastructure

Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4848 (project freeciv): - Updated against svn - Reworded Adventurers help and documentation - Remomed update date from README.ruleset_alien as it's supposed to be kept up to date when ever ruleset changes (file #21280)

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #22271 (project freeciv): I'm leaning to (2). Me too. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22271 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #22272 (project freeciv): For S2_5, renumbering roles to leave a gap in the specenum should be sufficient, I think, without any messing around with capabilities. (Technically I think there's currently nothing stopping a ruleset from specifying a role name in a combat

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4811] civ2civ3: increase explorer vision

Update of patch #4811 (project freeciv): Priority: 3 - Low = 5 - Normal Status:None = Ready For Test Assigned to:None = cazfi Planned Release:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4608] civ2civ3 rules: added pre-fortress

Update of patch #4608 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Assigned to:None = cazfi ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4812] civ2civ3: increased fuel of air units

Update of patch #4812 (project freeciv): Category:None = rulesets Planned Release: = 2.6.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #2: In civ1 or civ2,

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #22272 (project freeciv): I think there's currently nothing stopping a ruleset from specifying a role name in a combat bonus, which would then go over the network as its specenum value in a UTYF Wrong. I misread the code. Roles have their own enum, it's just that it

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22272] Last (16th) user flag overlaps with role range (= assertion failure)

Update of bug #22272 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Try again. (file #21281, file #21282)

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22274] Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22274 Summary: Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 07:56:34 PM EEST Category: None

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22274] Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #22274 (project freeciv): Bisecting result: S2_5 r24500 works, r24501 does not. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22274 ___ Message sent via/by Gna!

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22274] Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua

Update of bug #22274 (project freeciv): Planned Release: = 2.5.0, 2.6.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #2: S2_5 r24500 works, r24501 does not. That's bug #19909. Oh dear.

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22274] Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #22274 (project freeciv): Yes, I got it working by reverting bug #19909 patch. This is a blocker for 2.5.0, but as ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?22274

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22274] Database backend 'random characters' not supported by database.lua

Update of bug #22274 (project freeciv): Category:None = general Severity: 3 - Normal = 5 - Blocker ___ Follow-up Comment #4: ...but as people

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4812] civ2civ3: increased fuel of air units

Follow-up Comment #3, patch #4812 (project freeciv): I'm liking your alternative solution. Something similar was suggested in the greaturn forums. I made this patch with increased fuel because it is the way I played in my latest game, and it is the only way I found to recreate air to air

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22275] Warning about 0-size calloc at luascript_signal.c:223

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22275 Summary: Warning about 0-size calloc at luascript_signal.c:223 Project: Freeciv Submitted by: cazfi Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 10:55:47 PM EEST Category: general

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4907] Building flags not documented

URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4907 Summary: Building flags not documented Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 21:20:14 BST Category: docs Priority: 5 - Normal

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22276] city_build_free_buildings() doesn't send great wonder info as intended

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22276 Summary: city_build_free_buildings() doesn't send great wonder info as intended Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 22:22:56 BST Category: None

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22277] raze_city() can try to remove improvement twice

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22277 Summary: raze_city() can try to remove improvement twice Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 22:24:54 BST Category: None Severity: 2 - Minor

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22278] gameloss_style=Barbarians savepalace noise

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22278 Summary: gameloss_style=Barbarians savepalace noise Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Sat 05 Jul 2014 22:27:04 BST Category: None Severity: 2 - Minor

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21437] Autosettlers ignoring special resources (mining hills without coal when coal is available)

Update of bug #21437 (project freeciv): Category:None = ai Status:None = Ready For Test Planned Release: = 2.6.0

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4895] Remove threaded ai wrapper function twai_restart_phase()

Update of patch #4895 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4881] FC_LIBCHARSET

Update of patch #4881 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4907] Building flags not documented

Update of patch #4907 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-rulesetdoc-building-flags.patch Size:6 KB File name:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22276] city_build_free_buildings() doesn't send great wonder info as intended

Update of bug #22276 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-S2_5-S2_4-report-free-great-wonders.patch Size:1 KB

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22277] raze_city() can try to remove improvement twice

Update of bug #22277 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-S2_5-S2_4-raze-city-assertion.patch Size:1 KB

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22278] gameloss_style=Barbarians savepalace noise

Update of bug #22278 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress = Ready For Test ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk-S2_5-gameloss-barbarian-noise.patch Size:1 KB

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22271] If we lose the first city, there is no palace in the second city.

Update of bug #22271 (project freeciv): Status: Confirmed = Ready For Test Assigned to:None = jtn ___ Follow-up Comment #5: Other behaviour

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22175] experimental ruleset 1-turns_left == 2-turns_left assert failure

Update of bug #22175 (project freeciv): Category:None = general Status:None = Duplicate Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22124] double free or corruption on sdl2-client shutdown

Update of bug #22124 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Also sdl-client

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4898] Enable ferry stat checking on debug builds

Update of patch #4898 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21629] civ2 - barb cities can't build anything due to waste

Update of bug #21629 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Planned Release: = 2.4.3, 2.5.0, 2.6.0 ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Of the possible

[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4842] Scenario earth-160x90: Updated starting positions

Update of patch #4842 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #22279] Unit cannnot perform diplomat action from Ocean

URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?22279 Summary: Unit cannnot perform diplomat action from Ocean Project: Freeciv Submitted by: taka Submitted on: 2014年07月06日 04時54分12秒 Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal