Docs (
https://docs.getutm.app/settings-qemu/devices/network/network/#hardware)
say that the emulated network device is a “virtio-net-pci” device. Docs
also mention that the OS will require a driver for it. virtio is a common
interface for modern Linux, Windows, and I think Mac OS VMs. For
Hello there!
I’ve been venturing a bit into DOS world once again just for run, and it seems
that my UTM virtual machine doesn’t automatically set up networking. I
installed the networking packages from FDIMPLES, but when I boot the machine, I
get „QEMU network detected“ and right after that
I've found that the ADM PCNet adaptor in QEMU (-device pcnet) with the
matching DOS drivers work well under FreeDOS. I wasn't able to get any of
the other QEMU emulated ethernet devices to work properly under DOS.
I spent a lot of time fighting with the Intel adaptors - it seems the QEMU
Hi,
> On Sep 6, 2022, at 11:43 AM, Phil Reynolds
> wrote:
>
> I had FreeDOS 1.2 working quite nicely, networking included, on qemu,
> but I am lost as to (a) how I originally achieved it (b) how I might do
> likewise with 1.3 - is there any specific documentation I can follow?
By default
I had FreeDOS 1.2 working quite nicely, networking included, on qemu,
but I am lost as to (a) how I originally achieved it (b) how I might do
likewise with 1.3 - is there any specific documentation I can follow?
--
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-free...@tinsleyviaduct.com
Web:
Long time ago, I had an orinoco card that was 802.11b that was supposed to
work with DOS. Could never get it to work, eventually threw it out in
frustration.
Some very good and interesting suggestions have been made. However, I
believe the cheapest/easiest may be a simple wireless bridge. An
IMO, ISA is a better option for truly vintage machines. I think if someone
combined the ideas PiModem/Wifi232, Pi Virtual Floppy [0], and ISA8019 [2]
(which is an NE2000!), then that would be the ideal. An ISA card powered
by a Pi Zero W that could emulate a Floppy/HDD/CD-ROM/DVD-ROM and provide
Hi! Eric
as for the wi-fi I have solved the problem in an empirical
way: I have long bought
a TP-Link TPL-MR3020 mini router which
detects available wireless networks and which
has an ethernet port to
which I can connect my laptop .
It also has the possibility to connect
- on the move
Thanks for the links, Louis :-)
While the price could be a lot lower, the
https://www.cbmstuff.com/proddetail.php?prod=WiModem232
https://www.cbmstuff.com/proddetail.php?prod=WiModem232=all
mentioned on one of the pages is pretty similar to what
I had in mind: some WiFi controller plus a RS232
DOS did networking a lot better with ISA and some PCI NICS. WiFi came
after DOS was no longer being developed. There might be some 900MHz
WaveLAN things that work for DOS if the point is to make a machine
connected wirelessly.
If the machine has serial you might consider a Wifi232[0] or one of
Hi! To do some additional name-dropping on the DOS WiFi topic here:
https://www.olimex.com/Products/IoT/ESP32/ESP32-GATEWAY/open-source-hardware
https://www.hackster.io/techbase_group/arduino-esp32-serial-port-to-tcp-converter-via-wifi-66d341
Hi!
> Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment:
>
> "Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS."
>
> (http://freedos.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/WiFi)
This meant "USB dongles which serve as WiFi or Bluetooth modems
have no DOS drivers"
Simon,
I can read from a USB stick without any extra tricks, as long as it is
inserted before booting (which usually means I have to make sure the
bios is set to boot from disk 1st; I find it easier to write the files
to the Freedos disk from inside Windows, if I need to do that).
However, I'm
021 10:27:13
Predmet: [Freedos-user] networking/wifi
Hi all,
Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment:
"Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS."
(http://freedos.sourceforge.ne
Hi all,
Am just wondering if this is the current status, or some old comment:
"Wireless devices connected via USB can not yet be used with FreeDOS."
(http://freedos.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/WiFi)
/Tomas
___
Freedos-user mailing list
I'm interested in this approach, but I'm finding it hard to find
documentation and software.
From what I've heard so far, it seems using the on-board modem will be
more of a hassle than just using serial or parallel to connect to
something else with ethernet.
I'd like to stick with free/libre
Or DOSPPP.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:32 PM Louis Santillan wrote:
> You could also use something like EPPPD and Arachne includes a dialer
> packet driver as well (might even be EPPPD).
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM geneb wrote:
>
>> > On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote:
>> >
You could also use something like EPPPD and Arachne includes a dialer
packet driver as well (might even be EPPPD).
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:13 PM geneb wrote:
> > On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote:
> >
> >> Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected
>
On Jul 10, 2018, 1:23 PM, David McMackins wrote:
Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected
to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain
about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC?
David, you might be well served by looking into
I understand this. I guess my question was really: where can I get a
packet driver that will communicate over my phone line instead of a
typical NIC?
Happy Hacking,
David E. McMackins II
Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation (#2296972)
Associate Member, Free Software Foundation
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:58:01 -0400, dmccunney wrote:
> Any chance of posting that somewhere that doesn't require a gopher
> client to access it?
You mean like http or whatever? Bleh. Where would be the fun then?
Gopher-disabled people are free to use one of the few web proxies out
there.
Afaik, TCP/IP interfaces to a packet driver, which then works directly with the
NIC. It shouldn't matter over which medium you're ultimately communicating, as
long as it presents the packet interface which TCP/IP expects.
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Jul
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM Mateusz Viste wrote:
>
> Does it have a parallel port? If so, then you could run PLIP. I wrote a
> gopher article about connecting a no-NIC PC to the LAN through its
> parallel port using PLIP:
>
> gopher://gopher.viste.fr/1/myinfobase/?disp2017-03-05 plip bridge
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 21:08:35 -0500, David McMackins wrote:
> I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an
> ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an old modem in it. I've
> been going through the networking guide referred to by Rugxulo, and I
> got down to
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:24 PM David McMackins wrote:
>
> Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected
> to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain
> about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC?
I don't see why not. TCP-IP is a
Even if I did, that doesn't answer my question. Even if I get connected
to dial-up, will TCP/IP applications still work, or will they complain
about drivers since they are trying to access a NIC?
Happy Hacking,
David E. McMackins II
Supporting Member, Electronic Frontier Foundation
Have you tried setting up a Linux box as a dial-up server? [0]
[0] https://www.howtoforge.com/linux_dialin_server
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:10 PM David McMackins
wrote:
> I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an
> ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an
I have a 1998 Sony Vaio running FreeDOS. This model did not include an
ethernet controller (or wlan), but it does have an old modem in it. I've
been going through the networking guide referred to by Rugxulo, and I
got down to running NICSCAN.EXE only to realize *oops!* this computer
doesn't even
Here's a reference, by the way, on the ipconfig usage that I mention
below: ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANMAN/KB/Q183/8/58.TXT
A couple more observations:
When I booted up this morning, ipconfig c:\net once again reported the
lease expired, but the expiration time coincided exactly
: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, Error 5:
Access has been denied
The router provides DNS.
On 6/16/2015 10:39 AM, Dave Kerber wrote:
Do you have a DNS server configured?
-Original Message-
From: John Hupp [mailto:free...@prpcompany.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9
?
-Original Message-
From: John Hupp [mailto:free...@prpcompany.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 10:42 AM
To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, Error 5:
Access has been denied
The router provides DNS.
On 6/16/2015 10:39 AM
Do you have a DNS server configured?
-Original Message-
From: John Hupp [mailto:free...@prpcompany.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:48 AM
To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, Error 5:
Access has been denied
: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, Error 5:
Access has been denied
Here's a reference, by the way, on the ipconfig usage that I mention
below: ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANMAN/KB/Q183/8/58.TXT
A couple more observations:
When I booted up this morning, ipconfig c:\net once again
OK, I think now that there is more than one issue.
After reviewing the fact that older Windows PC's have great difficulties
connecting to Vista shares, I thought then that it probably shouldn't be
surprising that this is very difficult to impossible for the MS-DOS
Network Client.
To test this
Fundamentals -- you may be onto something. Though TCP/IP initialization
completes without error, running ipconfig /all yields No DHCP data
available. I get the same result from two identical cards, both
configured the same way.
I do note that both cards are old non-PNP ISA cards, which I
you can install a normal client on a computer and make and reord the
transition data using wireshark, and compare, or just sniff the data and
see if for example yhe request exit well formed from client, in some cases
the error code in the packet data is more explained that what you can see
at
bt you write: Linux machines on the LAN connect to the server OK with the
same account., record the transaction on that machine and compare.
2015-06-15 0:15 GMT+02:00 John Hupp free...@prpcompany.com:
Yes, but in this case I'm not seeing that have any successful case to
compare against.
On
for example you can do this by looking at the data coming from the client
network interface sniffing with wireshark outgoing data from the client
2015-06-15 6:09 GMT+02:00 Louis Santillan lpsan...@gmail.com:
Be sure that you have a good IP, gateway, and DNS setting from your DHCP
server.
On
Forgive me if I didn't catch it, but are you able to ping successfully w/o
a full network setup (just connect via packet driver and DHCP) and are you
able to use wget or fdnpkg and download a file?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/2015 10:38 AM,
questions about FreeDOS.
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking: With MS Client, Error 5:
Access has been denied
I just tried changing the DOS client from DHCP to static configuration,
and I still get the same net use error.
Furthermore ipconfig /all still reports No DHCP data available.
Shouldn't
I found out that ipconfig usage is not as expected for the DOS client.
Ipconfig /all is meaningless. In my case, the one and only good
command is ipconfig c:\net.
This then reports (now again under DHCP), an IP address, gateway, and
DNS server as expected. But it reports Lease Expired. Even
Thanks, but making that change did not make a difference.
I have also now edited the HOSTS file to add the server there, due to
what I read at
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/misc1/BUSSYS/LANMAN/KB/Q130/5/38.TXT about not
being able to ping the server. So I can indeed ping the server now, but
access
I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully initializes with
TCP/IP via DHCP.
But when I try net use z: \\server\share and enter the password (with
a user name that matches the Win Vista peer server account), I get
Error 5: Access has been denied.
Likewise, net view \\server yields
Did you check the NTLM compatibility mode in Vista?
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa
There should be a DWORD named LmCompatibilityLevel set to value of 1
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:32:34 -0400, John Hupp free...@prpcompany.com
wrote:
I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:32 PM, John Hupp free...@prpcompany.com wrote:
I installed MS-DOS Network Client, which successfully initializes with
TCP/IP via DHCP.
But when I try net use z: \\server\share and enter the password (with
a user name that matches the Win Vista peer server
I use to resolve this kind of problem by monitoring the network traffic;
capture the traffic data on the network wen the transaction go well aand
when not and compare it, in this way you can understand more, in the past i
use to do in this way to resolv problems.
2015-06-14 22:22 GMT+02:00
Though my initial interest (and testing) was oriented toward moving
files on the LAN, I also find that I cannot ping web sites. I get
DGN0217: Remote name cannot be resolved.
On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, John Hupp wrote:
Thanks, but making that change did not make a difference.
I have also now
Be sure that you have a good IP, gateway, and DNS setting from your DHCP server.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 3:37 PM, John Hupp free...@prpcompany.com wrote:
Though my initial interest (and testing) was oriented toward moving
files on the LAN, I also find that I cannot ping web sites. I get
I care. :) I don't use dosemu as often as before, but it's good to
know. I recall some problems with network slowness in dosemu, so it
might be of use if I get around.
Cheers,
Bojan.
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:36:24 +0200
Mateusz Viste mate...@viste-family.net wrote:
Hi!
Not sure anybody
Hi!
Not sure anybody cares, but here I go :)
I spent a few hours on taprouter today, therefore I am releasing a new
version now. The biggest (most visible) change is that I wrote a DHCP
server module. This makes taprouter easier to use, because there's no
need anymore to configure manually
Hi all,
It has been a long time now that I use DOSemu for most (if not all) of
my FreeDOS-related needs, and I'm quite happy with it.
However, I noticed that DOSemu is scary for many people when it comes to
networking, because setting it is not that much intuitive for people
lacking in-depth
Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within QEMU.
So, my questions are:
• QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio); is
there a packet driver for it for
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within
QEMU. So, my questions are:
• QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio);
is there a packet driver
I'm interested in running multiple instances of FreeDOS within
QEMU. So, my questions are:
• QEMU offers a “simplified” networking hardware (AKA virtio);
is there a packet driver for it for FreeDOS?
• I've seen mentions of XFS — a (free software?) DOS
Christian Masloch said:
Don't read Dissecting DOS though.
Why not?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers
conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine.
Sure, that's the obvious easy way out.
But wouldn't it be better overall (and wiser) to 1). actually find
out what MS-DOS does, and 2). fix it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-)
sure. as always: talk is cheap
good luck
Tom
conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine.
Sure, that's the obvious easy way out.
But wouldn't it be better overall (and wiser) to 1). actually find
out what MS-DOS does, and 2). fix it in FreeDOS' kernel?;-)
If you are indicating that you want to volunteer... ;-) (... if that
Whatever the issue is, it is apparently not that easy to find or fix. Reading
RBIL for INT 21.5C, it seem to indicate that DR-DOS never was able to figure
out how to do it, and it wasn't until Novell got involved that it actually
started working correctly.
(E)DR-DOS could be another
Thanks. Here's some comments if you care to read them. Not all of them are
particularly relevant to our thread's topic.
MSDOS, and presumably FreeDOS, does not natively provide a framework for
safe filesharing and file locks, this needs to come from the server
software
working in
Whatever the issue is, it is apparently not that easy to find or
fix.
whatever the issue is, nobody is going to fix it anyway
Reading RBIL for INT 21.5C, it seem to indicate that DR-DOS
never was able to figure out how to do it, and it wasn't until
Novell got involved that it actually
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Tom Ehlertt...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
conclusion: don't use FreeDOS as a 'server' machine.
Sure, that's the obvious easy way out.
But wouldn't it be better overall (and wiser) to 1). actually find
out what MS-DOS does, and 2). fix it in FreeDOS' kernel?
Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
try using MSDOS or linux (or even Windows) for the
'server' machine, and see if the problema go away
I did the test with MS-DOS in the server and FreeDOS in the
client.
The problem vanished.
I even used MODE con rate=32 which is the fastest
Pentium definitely came in a 233MHz version, but I thought the 300MHz version
was Pentium II only.
-Original Message-
From: Rugxulo [mailto:rugx...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:10 AM
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking
Hi
The highest clock rates that were sold were 200MHz for Pentium, 233MHz for
Pentium MMX, and 300MHz for Mobile Pentium MMX. The late mobile chips were
made with a finer process (250nm IIRC).
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:25:01 -0400, David C. Kerber
dker...@warrenrogersassociates.com wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 um 07:37 schrieb Rugxulo:
Excellent details, even better if it actually works! ;-)
I just can say that I had Debian 4 running quite a few years on several 486SX33
with 20 MB RAM. Because the installation was the hardest part on such an old
machine, I pulled out the drive on
Hi Ulrich,
All in all, I think it is a good to have proof that clients with
FreeDOS and MS Client 3.0 can authenticate, read and write to a
GNU/Linux Samba server. In my opinion such a scenario is a
better idea than to run a server with MS Client [..]
Yes, that looks like the best suggestion
Hi again Ulrich,
What about NeOS? Is it a possibility in my case? Does it run
under FreeDOS? Is it reliable?
I downloaded it some time back, but didn't spend much time on
it and haven't been able to make it run so far.
Marcos
--
Marcos Fávero Florence de
Am 17.06.2012 um 19:21 schrieb Marcos Favero Florence de Barros:
It's good to know that it's possible, but we won't need
passwords, at least for now -- I've checked it twice with
management.
As I wrote, if you add:
guest account = YOURUSERNAME
in the smb.conf global section and
public =
Hi,
On Jun 17, 2012 6:32 PM, Ulrich Hansen uhan...@mainz-online.de wrote:
Ah, and NEOS:
I didn't have time to really create a NEOS network here. I will look into
it some other time. But at least the readme sounds good at first glance.
The NEOS installer works on my old laptops (486SX33) but
Michael B. Brutman wrote:
I don't think you have a networking problem; I think it is a
hardware problem, or very bad device driver settings.
Could you give any hints on the device driver settings part?
General failure reading drive C is a bad sign. I would make a
new backup of that server
Hi Marcos ,
So where exactly is the file server that's storing the data
file(s) in this scenario? Is it on the doctor's PC, assistant's
PC, or some other location?
In another location.
could you be more specific about
1) where is the database located (not geografically, but what machine)
I remember databases benefitting from a high amount of file handles,
not 'benefit'. for some problems, many handles are needed, otherwise
the database will not work at all.
there is NEVER spurious problems caused by too many handles.
but likely that's already being taken care of by caching
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
Op 16-6-2012 15:25, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros schreef:
I downloaded SHARE from Japheth's site, and it turned out to be
the same file I had. Where could I find other versions? I Couldn't
find it by searching the
I'm running FreeDOS, but yes, Linux is a possibility. This
database project started modestly in 2006, but now the Health
Center is relying more and more on it, so I want it to be very
safe.
in that case don't gamble with untested share.exe
Still I would definitely prefer to stay with FreeDOS
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
Japheth's SHARE is probably the one and only SHARE for FreeDOS. no use
to search the internet
If I remember correctly (but haven't tested), Japheth made some minor
adjustments for FreeDOS (only) to SHARE to work
but likely that's already being taken care of by caching
software.
???
UIDE and LBACACHE will only work with INT 13h (local) drives, not network
drives. Caching shouldn't be an issue, at least for the clients -- could be a
problem on the server, though.
According to RBIL, DR/Novell/Caldera
Hi Tom,
This might be irrelevant to the case at hand.
if the answer to 2) is 'FreeDOS' then either SHARE.EXE is not running
or SHARE.EXE is buggy. the latter is quite likely as it was never
really tested against network access.
If you know; does FreeDOS's file locking (ie SHARE) propagate
Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
[..] test your setup against an MS-DOS environment instead of
FreeDOS? That could determine (or rule out) some issues.
Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
try using MSDOS or linux (or even Windows) for the
'server' machine, and see if the problema go
Am 15.06.2012 um 23:26 schrieb Marcos Favero Florence de Barros:
It did work, but it turned out to be very fragile.
As soon as the two people use the database more intensively, the
system crashes -- in most cases, both server and client. If on
the other hand they do things slowly, it works
Pardon the intrusion from my unexperienced self, just a few questions
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Ulrich Hansen uhan...@mainz-online.de wrote:
I have read that MS Client with MS DOS works OK for you. But if you want to
stick with Free Software, why not use a real Samba server
Hi Ulrich, Mike, others,
The DataPerfect database I developed for the our public Health
Center has been running for 6 years. Doctors and nurses now
asked me to increase the number of computers to 8, and connect
them into a network.
I was very confident that the network would run smoothly because
Hi Marcos :-)
- General failure reading drive C
- LBACache error
- Disk is write protected
- Not ready reading drive G
...
the internet they never had any issues with networking, except
when the client was trying to cache writes -- which is not my
case, as I only use UIDE
Marcos,
As far as networking is concerned, I abuse my older machines all of
time. I don't think you have a networking problem; I think it is a
hardware problem, or very bad device driver settings.
General failure reading drive C is a bad sign. I would make a new
backup of that server hard
Marcos:
So where exactly is the file server that's storing the data file(s) in this
scenario? Is it on the doctor's PC, assistant's PC, or some other location?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Networking-tp34020890p34021413.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - User mailing list
Hi Bret,
So where exactly is the file server that's storing the data
file(s) in this scenario? Is it on the doctor's PC, assistant's
PC, or some other location?
In another location.
For the time being, the teams of doctors and assistants are
still using their (non-networked) computers.
I'm
At 07:14 PM 6/15/2012, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros wrote:
If all goes well, technicians from the municipality will run the
network cables in the building for us. But we don't want them to
start drilling walls and roofs before we are sure the system is
robust.
I haven't touched DataPerfect
Garrison Ricketson wrote:
... years back, like 15,or 16 years ago, I did connect my laptop,
the early, Tandy, ...I dont remember the whole name,...
As Ulrich Hansen already wrote, this might have been the program laplink and
Norton Commander provided a similar function. Both programs are
themouse wrote:
Hello,
I have the internet card and the drivers. So now what. I looked up all
I could and there are alot of
sites some the link works some they don't.
I'm not really sure what needs to be done.
thanks,
Adam
1) Run the file crynwr.bat inside the directory FDOS
If you've already installed the network driver in autoexec.bat, just skip that.
2)As suggested by Eric Auer configure the file WATTCP.cfg file as follows:
my_ip = dhcp
netmask = 255.255.255.0
gateway = 0.0.0.0
domain_list =
Hi Adam,
If I understood correctly, you are using a Lifebook 770tx with
PCMCIA-Slot. So which card did you buy? Which PCMCIA software do you
use to enable the card?
And what kind of network do you want to use? Surf the web and email
with arachne, connect to ftp and ssh servers, set up your
Uli,
I bought ORiNOCO Classic Gold PC Card.
http://www.orinocowireless.com/products/wifi/client/goldpccard/index.html
I know wireless is a risk but I checked in the documentation it had
dos and linux drivers :)
and I downloaded the ISO with all of that on it.
the iso has
several directories
usul schrieb:
Uli,
I bought ORiNOCO Classic Gold PC Card.
http://www.orinocowireless.com/products/wifi/client/goldpccard/index.html
I know wireless is a risk but I checked in the documentation it had
dos and linux drivers :)
and I downloaded the ISO with all of that on it.
Well, wlan is
usul schrieb:
But I can do that from another pc that i usually have next to me. but
it would be nice to have a complete evironment.
And I have forgotten to say...
You are most likely much faster with browsing the web and mailing if you
use a modern computer, modern multi tasking operating
environment to run
your dos programs.
--- On Mon, 3/30/09, Michael Reichenbach michael_reichenb...@freenet.de wrote:
From: Michael Reichenbach michael_reichenb...@freenet.de
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] Networking
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 2:02 PM
I am testing a few Linux OSes to see what works best.
Tried Tiny, DLS-N, Puppy so far. :)
Just a matter of seeing which one likes the linux driver the best.
And looks better, I don't really like the look and feel of DSL.
Trying a flux based puppy tonight :)
But yeah I was thinking that I would
usul schrieb:
But yeah I was thinking that I would cheat for some of the stuff
for developing on FreeDos at first but later I would try and do everything
I could inside.
Cheat? Which kind of?
Because you are not doing everything on pure DOS this makes your
development more worse? That's s
mr,
Because you are not doing everything on pure DOS this makes your
development more worse? That's s strange mind.
:) I'm strange I admit that but thats not whyI think it would be
cheating, you are coming from the wrong angle.
If I am immersed in the environment, then its better because the
usul schrieb:
I want to,
ftp, telnet, browse the web with arachne, SVN when I port the
commandline client. etc.
A ftp-server for DOS that works reliable for me is ftpsrv32.exe from
the wattcp32 package available at:
http://www.filegate.net/utiln/utilnet/wt32apps.zip
Its not secure at
Ok, now I got your point and must agree. :)
-mr
usul schrieb:
mr,
Because you are not doing everything on pure DOS this makes your
development more worse? That's s strange mind.
:) I'm strange I admit that but thats not whyI think it would be
cheating, you are coming from the wrong
Ulrich Hansen schrieb:
A ftp-server for DOS that works reliable for me is ftpsrv32.exe from
I forgot to mention Datalight Sockets again, which is a FTP server
that runs as TSR in DOS. See the mail at:
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Servers
And by the
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
