Op 21-9-2012 0:20, Louis Santillan schreef:
> Wayback when ('94/'95), I had this running perfectly fine on MS DOS
> 6.22, Win95, Win98 (boot to DOS).
Then get it working again like this, and additionally/optionally swap
out components (memory drivers, shell, kernel) to see which the culprit
is.
Wayback when ('94/'95), I had this running perfectly fine on MS DOS 6.22,
Win95, Win98 (boot to DOS).
-L
On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Op 18-9-2012 8:05, Louis Santillan schreef:
> > I verified the game won't run with 64M, 32M, & 16M. They all fail
> > with the EMS erro
Op 18-9-2012 8:05, Louis Santillan schreef:
> I verified the game won't run with 64M, 32M, & 16M. They all fail
> with the EMS error. Added LOAD to the JEMMEX line as well. No
> positive effect. Host is an Apple Mac Mini 2.3GHz C2D with 16GB RAM
> running the latest Virtual Box 4.2. The VM is
So I've been able to free up a larger block of UMB (143k) by adding
"I=B000-B7FF I=BC00-BFFF I=C800-EFFF" to jemmex. However, fps fb pro 95
still finds 0k of the 8mb free ems.
-L
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Rugxulo >
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf A. Quint
> >
wro
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf A. Quint wrote:
> At 10:10 AM 9/18/2012, Louis Santillan wrote:
>>There's only 13K upper mem free according to mem/c. I believe it is
>>in one block. And, iirc, all that most apps need is to be able to
>>swap a 4k page at a time. My guess is that jemmex
At 10:10 AM 9/18/2012, Louis Santillan wrote:
>There's only 13K upper mem free according to mem/c. I believe it is
>in one block. And, iirc, all that most apps need is to be able to
>swap a 4k page at a time. My guess is that jemmex doesn't implement
>ems in a way that fps fbpro expects which is
There's only 13K upper mem free according to mem/c. I believe it is in one
block. And, iirc, all that most apps need is to be able to swap a 4k page
at a time. My guess is that jemmex doesn't implement ems in a way that fps
fbpro expects which is why it finds 0k free ems.
I'm using the same defaul
Are you absolutely sure there are no errors when when you are installing the
EMM? What screen messages do you get when it is loading?
I'm guessing what may be happening is that you have enough poorly placed
(virtual) hardware ROM modules that the EMM can't find a contiguous 64k block
of upper
I verified the game won't run with 64M, 32M, & 16M. They all fail
with the EMS error. Added LOAD to the JEMMEX line as well. No
positive effect. Host is an Apple Mac Mini 2.3GHz C2D with 16GB RAM
running the latest Virtual Box 4.2. The VM is configured with VT-X.
*If* you're interested, you c
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Louis Santillan wrote:
> I tried 64MB & 32MB. The game still sees 0K EMS. Mem/c also reports 0K
> available via Int 15h which seems odd.
Ignore MEM, it often reports wrong numbers on things other than
conventional memory.
Dunno exactly what to tell you. T
I tried 64MB & 32MB. The game still sees 0K EMS. Mem/c also reports 0K
available via Int 15h which seems odd.
-L
On Saturday, September 15, 2012, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> 1GB sounds really big. I remember some games had troubles detecting memory
> above a certain amount, due to some kind of over
1GB sounds really big. I remember some games had troubles detecting memory
above a certain amount, due to some kind of overflowing in their mem counters.
I'd suggest trying to set a more classic amount of ram on your vbox machine...
Like 64MB or so.
Mateusz
/ Mobile mail /
Louis Santillan w
Hi all,
I'm having trouble running an old favorite DOS game that requires EMS
inside of VirtualBox (Sierra Front Page Sports Football Pro 95). The
game requires 576K Conventional RAM, and 2MB EMS. I've configured
VirtualBox to have 1GB and installed FPS FB Pro 95 to a 32GB FAT32
drive with FreeD
13 matches
Mail list logo
