[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13.txt

2013-02-15 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: d

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-06.txt

2013-02-15 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before pos

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-03.txt

2013-02-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-04.txt

2013-02-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
ated to your comments inline below. > >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:11:02 +, Brian E Carpenter >>>>>> said: > > BC> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > BC> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-A

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic-13.txt

2013-01-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-eman-rfc4133bis-05.txt

2013-01-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Documen

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-04.txt

2013-01-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before post

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-04.txt

2012-12-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Bert, inline again... On 27/12/2012 09:45, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote: > Thanks for your review Brian, > inline > > On 12/26/12 12:50 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Please see attached review. >> >> Brian >> >> >> >> >> draft-ie

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib-04.txt

2012-12-26 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-04

2012-12-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks Meral. We will take care of these if a new version is required; otherwise they can be handled by the RFC Editor. Regards Brian On 19/12/2012 06:13, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at http://w

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
> RFC3261 has a specific error for this: 420 (Bad Extension). OK, excellent. Sorry to have gone on about this but SIP is a big mouthful for a generalist reviewer. Regards Brian Carpenter On 07/12/2012 15:59, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 12/7/12 8:44 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: &g

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Oops, that crossed with my note. In that case maybe a small clarification *is* needed in the draft. Regards Brian Carpenter On 07/12/2012 13:19, David Hanes wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Actually, I had just copied the draft authors on that thread and Brian was > not on it. Below is Paul's respons

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
> If the Registrar does not do this (e.g. because it hasn't been updated >>> to support the new tag), what does the UA do when it receives the >>> 200 OK response that doesn't include the tag? >> Paul, can you share your views on this issue? >> &

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
y recourse would be to fail the REGISTER request > with a suitable error response. If that's the standard behaviour, it would of course answer my question. Brian > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Brian E Carpenter < > brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 05/12/2012 11:01, Kevin Fleming wrote: > The language in RFC 3840 doesn't appear to contemplate the situation you've > proposed. In its world, registrars can either support prefs (and will > accept "Require: pref") or they don't, and they don't have knowledge of > which feature tags are register

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-06.txt

2012-12-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-05

2012-11-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
2012 14:24, Russ Housley wrote: > I do not see changes based on this discussion. There should be some, right? > > Russ > > > On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > >> On 17 November 2012 00:16, Brian E Carpenter >> wrote: >>> I don't

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-05

2012-11-17 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Martin, Thanks for the review, comments in-line. On 16/11/2012 21:28, Martin Thomson wrote: > Try again, this time with the right recipients. > > On 16 November 2012 12:22, Martin Thomson wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the F

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt

2012-11-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before postin

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt

2012-10-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sipcore-proxy-feature-11.txt

2012-10-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipcore-proxy-feature-09.txt - Brian's comments

2012-09-10 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks, Christer and Paul. Your proposed changes seem fine to me. Regards Brian On 10/09/2012 10:45, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for your review! Comments inline (). > > (I also include Paul's comments) > > >> Comment: >> - >> >> I have to say that this is a

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipcore-proxy-feature-09.txt

2012-09-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: d

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-02.txt

2012-08-24 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new ve

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-yegin-pana-encr-avp-06.txt

2012-08-10 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new ver

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-02.txt

2012-08-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-08.txt

2012-07-17 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-yegin-pana-encr-avp-03.txt

2012-07-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-yegin

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-08.txt

2012-07-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-6

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-11.txt

2012-06-17 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docum

Re: [Gen-art] [spfbis] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-12 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I've looked at the changes in the -10 version, and it's much clearer to me, thanks. If I'm asked to review it again it will be "Ready". Regards Brian On 2012-06-09 16:35, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi Pete, > > On 2012-06-09 16:29, Pete Resnick wrote: >&g

Re: [Gen-art] [spfbis] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Pete, On 2012-06-09 16:29, Pete Resnick wrote: > Brian, > > On 6/7/12 8:28 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >>> S Moonesamy wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Brian Carpenter wrote: >>>>> Also, RFC4406 states that "Sending dom

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818 (updated)

2012-06-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I haven't cc'ed the IETF or IESG since my comment is only a *minor* process issue, but this can be forwarded as you think fit. If the IESG can see a way round it consistent with RFC 2026, that would be fine by me. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this d

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818

2012-06-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Aaargh. My head hurts. Thanks Martin. I will update my review. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2012-06-08 19:25, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 8 June 2012 00:33, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Please see attached review. I haven't cc'ed the IETF or IESG since >> my comment is

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC2818

2012-06-08 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I haven't cc'ed the IETF or IESG since my comment is only a process issue, but this can be forwarded as you think fit. If the IESG can see a way round it consistent with RFC 2026, that would be fine by me. Brian I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this document.

Re: [Gen-art] [spfbis] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2012-06-07 08:58, Hector Santos wrote: > S Moonesamy wrote: > >>> Brian Carpenter wrote: >>> Also, RFC4406 states that "Sending domains MAY publish either or both >>> formats" (i.e. spf1 or spf2.0). That being so, I would ideally expect >>> to see nine rows in the results table: >>> >>> SPF RR

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: [spfbis] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Restoring the Gen-ART CC since we need the discussion in the archive. Thanks Murray, see below... On 2012-06-07 06:12, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > For some reason you were dropped from the Cc: list. Forwarding for your > consideration. > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Murray

Re: [Gen-art] [spfbis] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Restoring the Gen-ART CC since we need the discussion in the archive. See below... On 2012-06-06 20:43, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Barry, > At 12:23 06-06-2012, Barry Leiba wrote: >> Leaving the entire message below, because Brian doesn't appear to have >> been copied on it. > > I didn't copy Brian

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-09.txt

2012-06-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sp

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt

2012-05-12 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-levine

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-03.txt

2012-05-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docume

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-12.txt

2012-03-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. . Doc

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-12.txt

2012-02-23 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks! That seems to fix my comments. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2012-02-23 08:54, Tom Taylor wrote: > I have just submitted draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-12.txt, > incorporating responses to the Genart reviews by Joel Halpern and Brian > Carpenter. Thanks to both of them for their suggest

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03

2012-02-18 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Joel, Writing as an interested party, not a reviewer: On 2012-02-19 09:12, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comment

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt

2012-01-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00.txt

2012-01-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks for the review, Miguel. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2012-01-13 00:41, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-13.txt

2012-01-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-gerhar

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-11.txt

2012-01-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2012-01-03 03:17, Tom Taylor wrote: > Thanks for the review, Brian. > > On the 'incomplete state machine' issue: I'll think about additional > text to make sure things keep on moving along. Thanks! > > On the matter of PRI, etc.: I was working straight from the Syslog RFC, > RFC 5424. I can

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-11.txt

2012-01-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pc

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04.txt

2012-01-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Doc

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04.txt

2011-12-13 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ohye-c

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-12.txt

2011-12-13 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. . Doc

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-openid-07.txt

2011-11-23 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-11.txt

2011-11-17 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-gerhard

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-openid-06.txt

2011-11-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
vity might also be considered an open issue. The RFC Editor has definite concerns about such references (this came up in today's RFC Editor Advisory Group meeting). Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-10-17 14:41, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Please see attached review. > I am the assi

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt

2011-10-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-fecframe-rtp-raptor-05.txt

2011-10-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-fecframe-rtp-raptor-05.txt

2011-10-24 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-fe

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-openid-06.txt

2011-10-16 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ki

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-05.txt

2011-10-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new versi

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt

2011-09-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-spreche

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-05.txt

2011-09-26 Thread Brian E Carpenter
wfm Thanks Brian On 2011-09-27 02:17, Barry Leiba wrote: > Thanks for the review, Brian. > >> I was briefly confused by Section 2.4. (Notify tag ":importance") >> >> It only mentions three possible values of "Priority" but RFC 3261 >> mentions four (the extra one is "emergency") and states th

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-05.txt

2011-09-25 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-si

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-01.txt

2011-09-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I am happy with the changes made in the -02 draft, so s/Almost ready/Ready/. Regards Brian ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt (updated)

2011-09-15 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached UPDATED review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-01.txt

2011-09-15 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt

2011-09-12 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-09-13 04:33, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Brian > > Re > > > > "In MPLS-TP, the GAL ... MUST NOT be used with PWs." > > RFC 5586 doesn't explain this at all, so a sentence in the present draft > like "This restriction was originally imposed because " would be quite > informative. >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-marf-not-spam-feedback-01.txt

2011-09-08 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-i

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-dijkstra-urn-ogf-06.txt

2011-09-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Do

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt

2011-09-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. D

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt

2011-08-18 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ie

Re: [Gen-art] Secdir review of draft-doria-genart-experience-04

2011-08-03 Thread Brian E Carpenter
(CCs trimmed) Thanks Tobias. > On a personal comment/addition: > But maybe worth considering is that availability and integrity of sent > reviews is also important: > I noticed that recently some emails to mail-aliases did not get delivered to > the respective lists and therefore reviews and/or

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dijkstra-urn-ogf-06.txt

2011-08-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-dij

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Review of draft-doria-gen-art-08

2011-07-21 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Assuming you mean draft-doria-genart-experience-04, > - Section 4.3 links to I-D.rfc-editor-rfc2223bis - this draft expired in > 2008. New target needed. http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide.html. There's nothing else afaik. Regards Brian On 2011-07-21 23:41, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Forg

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-update-07

2011-07-13 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Pete, On 2011-07-14 10:16, Pete McCann wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a ne

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-07-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
sh Jethanandani wrote: > Was there a resolution to this issue? Should we update the title to say > "Implementation guideline and clarification of sender behavior in > persist condition"? > > On 6/5/2011 8:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> It would be a lot clearer to a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-05

2011-07-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Roni, Thanks for the review. > In section 3 fifth paragraph ""An alternative approach is to to use" OK. I do need to update the draft because of a security comment, so this will be fixed. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-07-07 01:40, Roni Even wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer f

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-flow-ecmp-03

2011-07-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Thanks Miguel. > Nits: Please expand acronyms at their first occurrence. This includes: "GRE". Noted, in case there's a new version needed; if not this can be done as an RFC Editor note. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2011-07-01 20:38, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > I have been selected as the Gen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-01

2011-06-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-06-07 22:10, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> On 2011-06-07 11:57, Fred Baker wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> [RFC3056] Carpenter, B.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-01

2011-06-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-06-07 11:57, Fred Baker wrote: > On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >>>> [RFC3056] Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, "Connection of IPv6 Domains >>>> via IPv4 Clouds", RFC 3056, February 2001. >>>> >>>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-01

2011-06-06 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Fred, See my comments in line. I'm on travel, but should be able to do an update if necessary, after the LC ends. Alexey, Thanks for the review. On 2011-06-07 05:16, Fred Baker wrote: > Thanks Alexey > > Brian, I would presume that the IESG will be looking for an update responsive > to these

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-06-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Wes, > This document contains no protocol and alters no protocol. True, but it makes a strong statement about what implementations must do. I had a quick look, and most implementation guidelines are Informational, although one or two (e.g. RFC 5625) are BCP. It would be a lot clearer to a new r

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-06-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
uot;. Can this be done? I am > not sure.. > > How do we move forward on this one? > > -Anantha > >> -Original Message- >> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM >> To: We

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-06-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Wes, > In TCPM, it was determined that RFC 1122 is not wrong or flawed, just > potentially unclear. That's a judgment call that the WG's entitled to make, of course. (Side comment: it would be useful for reviewers outside the WG if writeups noted why a document was in a particular category w

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-06-04 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Doc

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-persist-04.txt

2011-05-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of RFC5343 to DS

2011-05-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Document: RFC5343.txt (to Draft Standard) Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2011-05-20 IETF LC End Date:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-02.txt

2011-05-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-13.txt

2011-05-19 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt

2011-05-11 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-05-11 18:29, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > On 2011-05-11 01:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >> Review Date: 2011-05-11 >> IETF LC End Date: 2011-05-12 >> IESG Telechat d

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt

2011-05-10 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

2011-04-28 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Hi Geoff, On 2011-04-28 17:13, Geoff Huston wrote: > On 23/04/2011, at 11:51 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >>> It is a matter of local routing policy as to the actions to be >>> undertaken by a routing entity in processing those routes with >>> "un

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

2011-04-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the dra

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-15.txt

2011-04-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the dr

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of RFC5343 to DS

2011-04-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this document. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Documen

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-15.txt

2011-04-16 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: d

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

2011-04-12 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-04-12 14:15, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> On 2011-04-10 03:13, Geoff Huston wrote: >>> On 09/04/2011, at 10:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> >>>> Please see attached review. >>>&

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

2011-04-10 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-04-10 03:13, Geoff Huston wrote: > On 09/04/2011, at 10:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Please see attached review. >> >> > > > > Thanks Brian, > > I'm not sure as to the appropriate form of response, but let me respond to >

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

2011-04-09 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: dr

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-rtt-option-05.txt

2011-04-07 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Please see attached review. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draf

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >