Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-04.txt

Alex, Thanks. Indeed, as I said, I'm not suggesting any change to the draft. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2010-02-16 21:40, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote: FYI, my responses to that Gen-ART review from December are attached. Alex -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-10.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-10.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-10.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-04

David, The problem is that we cannot make this a required format. Like it or not, there is a range of ways to represent an IPv6 address in text form, and has been for many years. 2001:DEAD:BEEF:: and 2001:deAd:BEeF:: are the same address. The draft is very precise on this point: The

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART reviewof draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-04

. Thanks, --David -Original Message- From: gen-art-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:27 PM To: Black, David Cc: 6man-cha...@tools.ietf.org; akawamu...@mesh.ad.jp; i...@ietf.org; kawashi

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-bryan-metalink-25.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-08.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Attention: you may need to resend mail

Hi Gen-ART people, It's now clear that due to the SpamAssassin bug reported by Glen, pretty much every message sent to the list between 2010-01-01 00:00* and sometime January 4 was lost (automatically discarded) due to a faulty spam score. So, if you sent anything important, or if you're aware

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bryan-metalink-24.txt

, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote: On 2009-12-21 11:21, Anthony Bryan wrote: Brian, thank you for the review happy holidays. :) The latest revision (-25, unsubmitted) contains changes due to comments during last call: http

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bryan-metalink-24.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-bryan-metalink-24.txt

On 2009-12-21 11:21, Anthony Bryan wrote: Brian, thank you for the review happy holidays. :) On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-12.txt

[corrected subject line] I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc4995bis-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-16.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

I'm quite happy for the subject matter experts to decide between these two approaches. Thanks Brian On 2009-11-27 01:46, Julian Reschke wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Nov 17, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: These are the sort of changes that would, I believe, give

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-04

Vijay, I think the difference is that the Java run-time system includes the ability to automagically prefer v6 or v4. Specifically, the JDK provides java.net.preferIPv4Stack and java.net.preferIPv6Addresses. So if the programmer chooses to use FQDNs then the run-time will act according to those

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

, at 11:53 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: These are the sort of changes that would, I believe, give sufficient indication to a would-be user of PATCH of how to make it somewhat safe. Personally I'd prefer to see it made more prominent by starting with something like: Clients requiring to verify

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

These are the sort of changes that would, I believe, give sufficient indication to a would-be user of PATCH of how to make it somewhat safe. Personally I'd prefer to see it made more prominent by starting with something like: Clients requiring to verify the consistent application of a patch

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

Julian, On 2009-11-13 23:35, Julian Reschke wrote: Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2009-11-13 20:19, Julian Reschke wrote: Brian E Carpenter wrote: As far as I can tell, the proposal places the burden for ensuring atomicity entirely on the server. However, PATCH is explicitly not idempotent

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

Roy, Just a couple more comments below, and then I will have said all I can usefully say. On 2009-11-14 12:57, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Nov 13, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2009-11-13 23:35, Julian Reschke wrote: Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2009-11-13 20:19, Julian Reschke

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and telechat review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09.txt

Wearing my RFC Editorial Board hat, I have persuaded Bob Braden to update the instructions to authors. Brian On 2009-10-29 19:05, Jari Arkko wrote: Yeah, that's the wrong definition of Updates as far as I can tell. I would say remove the Updates. Jari Brian E Carpenter wrote: Hmm

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and telechat review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09.txt

with the earlier document. sounds like the definition of a normative reference, not an update. Over to the ADs to decide... Regards Brian Carpenter On 2009-10-29 08:49, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for your comment. Please see response inline. On 09-10-24 10:22 PM, Brian E

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC and telechat review of draft-ietf-dna-simple-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-pop-07.txt

On 2009-10-18 01:26, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Brian E Carpenter wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review ofdraft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-09.txt

(repeat with administrivia fix, sorry) I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-post-repair-rtcp-xr-06.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-pop-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Note that

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-09.txt

I'm happy with the proposed changes, as far as my review goes. I agree with Marc, it seems correct to verify such changes in normative requirements with the WG. Brian On 2009-10-16 06:32, Marc Blanchet wrote: these changes are enough important that we must have wg review on this before

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-09.txt

Hi Cyrus, On 2009-10-13 17:16, Cyrus Daboo wrote: Hi Brian, Thank you for your review. Sorry I have been busy on other subjects these last few weeks and am only now getting around to replying. --On September 21, 2009 10:34:33 AM +1200 Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E Carpenter; draft-ietf

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Brian, I got your double comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

comment, but I had made a response it on 8th Aug. I attached my response below in case. Regards, Shoichi Sakane From: Sakane, Shouichi (shouichi.sak...@jp.yokogawa.com) Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 10:50 PM To: Brian E Carpenter; draft-ietf

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idnabis-tables-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-12.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-rohc-hcoipsec-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-05.txt

This is a manual repeat as I have been getting error messages from the tools server on the authors' address alias. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Corrected Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt

[Resend with corrected address for the WG chairs.] [Also one of the authors' addresses fails: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.1.6 recipient no longer on server: zre...@jaist.ac.jp' ] I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-08.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-07.txt

specified elsewhere, rather than creating the protocol itself. As such informational would appear to be appropriate. regards Keith From: Shida Schubert [mailto:sh...@ntt-at.com] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 1:35 PM To: Brian E Carpenter Cc: draft

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mipshop-rfc5268bis-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mipshop-rfc5268bis-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Retry: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Retry: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

And: Randy's address is wrong in the I-D, hence mail to the generic address doesn't reach him. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these

Re: [Gen-art] Retry: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

On 2009-04-11 12:57, Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote: Thanks for the responses. ... - when you mention disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 I am assuming this comes with the new boiler plate change. If yes, the new boiler plate changes would also be addressed. FWIW, this document has been

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-06.txt

On 2009-04-07 03:42, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:35:23AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:30:21AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Summary: Almost ready; needs one clarification. Comments: I was expecting the sentence quoted below

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-06.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-end-of-lib-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-11.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-decoding-dependency-05.txt

Hi Thomas, On 2009-02-04 22:24, Thomas Schierl wrote: Dear Brian, all, Brian, thanks a lot for carrying out the review! Here are our replies: 1. We do not think that it is required for the offerer to find out, why the offer has been rejected. At least we do not know any context where

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-12.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-03.txt

of problems they are ment to address have not yet been seen with IPv6 deployments. Pedro. On Jan 7, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-03-carpenter.txt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt (correctedSubject)

-Message d'origine- De : Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Envoyé : dimanche 14 décembre 2008 00:20 À : Tim Winter Cc : Mischa Dohler; General Area Review Team; Dave Ward; draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-r...@tools.ietf.org; roll-cha...@tools.ietf.org; hous...@vigilsec.com

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi-03.txt

comments on the responses or should we go ahead with posting the -04 version? - Pradosh | -Original Message- | From: Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat) | Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 10:34 AM | To: 'Brian E Carpenter'; General Area Review Team | Cc: softwire-cha...@tools.ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-avt-post-repair-rtcp-xr-04.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt (corrected Subject)

Thanks, Tim, I'll look forward to the next version then. As far as the MUST/SHOULD language is concerned, I'll be interested to see the IESG's current view; my personal view is that capitalisation isn't needed for design requirements. Brian On 2008-12-14 11:29, Tim Winter wrote: Brian,

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-softwire-encaps-safi-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-07.txt

Sorry - wrong subject in previous mail, due to hasty cutpaste. This is a telechat review. I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt

Hi Hesham, see in line. Especially on the GRE point, I think there's still an open issue. On 2008-12-01 21:50, Hesham Soliman wrote: Hi Brian, Thanks for the review and apologies for the late response. I'll only respond to comments that need further discussions or include your questions. I

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-07.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-imapext-filters-06.txt

Thanks Alexey. Just two re-comments below: On 2008-11-24 18:42, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian, Thank you for your review. Brian E Carpenter wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-02.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mext-nemo-v4traversal-06.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-05.txt

, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Comments: Here, then, is a generic re-statement of this structure, in pseudo- ASN.1: What's pseudo-ASN.1? This is normative, so why isn't it ASN.1? RFC2743 lays out the *abstract* API for generic security services. RFC2743 uses pseudo-ASN.1. I kept

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-05.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj-09.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-10.txt

-10-07 04:25, Alan Johnston wrote: Brian, Thanks for your review of the document. See my answers and comments below marked with AJ Thanks, Alan Brian E Carpenter wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-10.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-sun-dime-itu-t-rw-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-05

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-05

[corrected the subject field] I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-sun-dime-itu-t-rw-01.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-sun-dime-itu-t-rw-01.txt

Hi Hannes, On 2008-07-29 20:47, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: A short note on: I am rather surprised that it is proposed to assign a vendor-specific application identifier when the primary usage is not specific to a vendor; an ITU-T Recommendation is not a vendor. RFC3588 says Vendor-Specific

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-sun-dime-itu-t-rw-01.txt

See below... On 2008-07-30 09:22, Sun, Dong (Dong) wrote: Brian, Concerning your comment: The main information is conveyed by the Rw interface: o Resources reservation and/or allocation request for media flows; o QoS handling request such as packet marking and policing to use;

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-manner-router-alert-iana-03.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-snmp-engineid-discovery-02.txt

FWIW I'm happy with the text in the -03 draft; not quite what I originally expected, but completely logical. Thanks Brian On 2008-06-27 05:56, Randy Presuhn wrote: Hi - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Randy Presuhn' [EMAIL

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >