Re: [VOTE] HiveMind as a Jakarta sub-project

> > [X] +1 I support this proposal > [ ] -1 I don't support this proposal > [ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal > Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

Re: boilerplate LICENSE text in different formats

Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:37:48 -0500 > Shapira, Yoav wrote: > > > >I have started a wiki page at > > >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LicenseFormats for boilerplate text > > in > > >different formats. > > Cool and useful -- thanks ;) > > Ditto. :-)

Re: questions license for site documents

Quoting Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You're not saying that the boilerplate text should appear as comment in > every generated HTML document, are you? > Yes, I am. For the same reason that it's in every Java file. > Cheers, > Chris Craig -

Re: questions license for site documents

Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 + > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out > > there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be > > inclined to add both formulat

Re: Using apache feather logo

Quoting TANAKA Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I,m Yoshi TANAKA, a member of Japanese Jakarta user's group. > We're planning to make our stickers for give-aways to attendees at > Java Technology Conference in Japan to be held next week. > We'd like to include your feather logo into our stickers.

Re: jakarta-site karma?

Quoting Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In order to finally make an official mirrored release of Lucene 1.3, I > need jakarta-site karma so that I can update binindex and sourceindex. > > Would the powers that be please grant me this? > > Thanks, > Erik > Done. Craig

Re: The Name Jakarta

Quoting Uncle Roastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Why/how was the name Jakarta choosen? > > Thanks, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was the name of the conference room at Sun where a large number of the discussions about the original formation of the project, as well as the contribution of Tomcat from Sun t

Re: Differences

Quoting Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ted Husted wrote: > > >Perhaps once most of the Committers are on the PMC list, we can move the > administrative nonsense there again, and let the General list be the General > list again :) > > > > > > Looking forward to it. Do not remember when

Re: [License] for jars in CVS

Quoting Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I see what you are saying, but why is this an issue only with OGNL? Is it > because of license > > incompatibilities? 'Cause there are other jars in CVS both Apache and > non-Apache. > Harish, > > It isn't only an issue with OGNL, it is a g

RE: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

Quoting Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel F. Savarese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 17:40 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release > > >

Re: [VOTE] ORO 2.0.8 maintenance release

Quoting "Daniel F. Savarese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I know now may not be the best time to have a vote, but I would ask > the PMC to vote on approving the release of jakarta-oro 2.0.8. > The current code base contains important bug fixes and has gone too > long without a public release. > > [X

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Craig, this is elaborate, informative and puts the issue in my > perspective. May be this > should be put on the website too somewhere. > > Here are my inferences so far... > > > ASF is a group of projects administered by the Apache boa

RE: Why you *want* to be on the PMC

Quoting "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > If all the PMC's share the same website, who is responsible > > for the website as a global concept. For example, the need > > to do mirrors. > > > If a Jakarta-Site PMC exists, all other PMCs [jakarta sub-project based]

Re: Jakarta: Confederation or Single Project?

Quoting Harish Krishnaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could someone please explain the motivation behind the creation of Jakarta > and how it got to where > it is today? May be that would help answer some of the questions we have? > > -Harish > These comments are going to be (like anyone's would

Re: Confused with PMCs, TLPs, ASF and Power?

Quoting Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Then try this: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges > > It aims to be a starter course on why discssions about PMCs, TLPs, Jakarta > and the ASF appear, and possibly how they affect you. Be aware of the > disc

Re: [Proposal] HiveMind Service Framework

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Part of the proposal indicates the jakarta-commons is not the right home for > HiveMind, as it does not fit in with the charter of the commons (too many > dependencies, etc.). > Even if it were proposed that Hivemind stay in jakarta-commons, I do not share Martin's c

Re: Forrest skin for Jakarta-XX project

Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: (What about Struts?) At the moment, Struts uses hand-crafted XSLT stylesheets that preceeded the existence of Forrest (and Maven), but we are considering some alternatives based on both Forrest's and Maven's site generation facilities. Some proof-of-concept prototyp

Re: Changes to the jakarta-site

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > Date: 04 Sep 2003 10:49:50 +0200 > From: Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Changes to the jakarta-site > > Hi, > > I'd

Re: [ERR] [ANN] Cactus 1.5-beta1 has been released

n On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:44:34 +0900 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ERR] [ANN] Cactus 1.5-beta1 has been released > > Transmit Report: > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: karma anyone?

In general, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a good place, but I've filled in some blanks where I could. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Nathan Bubna wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 21:03:31 -0700 > From: Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

Re: Issues with XMLBeans proposal

Snipping to an issue I have with one particular comment. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > In summary the most serious issues to this proposal are: > > 1. diversity of committership. I'd personally like to see >51% of the > ACTIVE committership from a different company. So long a

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email ad

Re: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the "list"

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:44:26 -0500 > From: Howard M. Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Adminitrivia: Assigning new bugs to the "list" >

Re: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Danny Angus wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:11:17 - > From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PATCH] promoted sub-projects > > Although I've got karma I thoug

Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects?

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:09:14 -0500 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Jakarta: too many similar projects? > > Thanks Pier

RE: Karma request jakarta-site2

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:33:13 -0500 > From: Howard M. Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Karma request jakarta-site2 > > I'd like

Re: Karma request jakarta-site2

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, O'brien, Tim wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:12:51 -0600 > From: "O'brien, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Karma request jakarta-site2 > > Was trying to add my name t

Re: Karma for jakarta-site2

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote: > Date: 23 Feb 2003 21:41:06 -0600 > From: Jeffrey D. Brekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Karma for jakarta-site2 > > > I recently was involved with the release of Commons

Re: Licensing again.

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Timothy Halloran wrote: > Date: 10 Feb 2003 13:43:24 -0500 > From: Timothy Halloran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Licensing again. > > Does this mean the ASF has taken aw

Re: Licensing again.

On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Ellis Teer wrote: > Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:41:54 -0800 > From: Ellis Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Licensing again. > > Ditto plus some, > > Seeing the license iss

Re: [Fwd: Maven as a top-level apache project]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > 4. Can ASF Projects use Sun BCL licensed products? > > Yes, but ASF can't distribute them. > Each product you download from Sun's java.sun.com web site has a license that you have to agree to in order to download that JAR. In the case of several com

Re: No reply from root

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jeffrey Dever wrote: > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 12:22:01 -0500 > From: Jeffrey Dever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: No reply from root > > I am the release prime for the commons

Re: Forum Software.

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Robert Simmons wrote: > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:52:12 +0100 > From: Robert Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Forum Software. > > Then how do you answer the followin

Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:31:32 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Jakarta proposal: Pluto > > Alex McLintock wrote: > > > At 17:41 21/01

Re: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property

On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:21:03 -0500 > From: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [discussion] jakarta-gump as community property > > Gump is now two years old. It has had con

RE: Short Apache licence for source files

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Tim Vernum wrote: > Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:12:37 +1100 > From: Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Short Apache licence for source files > > > From: Ceki Gülcü [m

Re: [xdocs] Bug report (fwd)

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Henri Yandell wrote: > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:17:09 -0500 (EST) > From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [xdocs] Bug report (fwd) > > > I originally mentioned t

Re: [Poll result] Committers, who are we?

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 02:44:19 +0100 > From: Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Poll result] Committers, who are we? > > On 4/10/02 14

RE: Bug handling survey - 80:20 rule

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Danny Angus wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:45:48 +0100 > From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Bug handling survey - 80:20 rule > > > > So, how come the > >

Re: karma for jakarta-site2

On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, mohammad nabil wrote: > Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:39:51 +0200 > From: mohammad nabil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: karma for jakarta-site2 > > > hi, > hope somehuman read any of my mails to jak

Re: You guys are so funny.

On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [snip] > As for people shoving Maven down other people's throats, I'd like to know > where the Maven developers have been doing that. From what I can see the > Maven developers have been fairly balanced. > As I tried to point out in my parenthetica

Re: You guys are so funny.

On Fri, 3 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think I've been saying this long enough. . MERGE MERGE MERGE! I can't help sitting here thinking about how the committers on projects being told to "MERGE MERGE MERGE" must feel like two young adults whose parents want them to get married (an

Re: You guys are so funny.

On Thu, 2 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:24:58 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: You guys are so funny. > > > Berin Loritsch says: > > There are other

Re: Trademarks, copyright etc

On Thu, 2 May 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 09:13:47 +1000 > From: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Trademarks, copyright etc > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2 May 2002 08:

Re: jakarta subproject scope (was Re: Quick! convert all your projectsto maven!)

On Wed, 1 May 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 00:41:23 -0400 > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: jakarta subproject scope (was Re: Quick! conver

Re: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge

On 29 Apr 2002, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Date: 29 Apr 2002 14:41:20 -0400 > From: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [New Subproject Proposal] ObjectBridge > > Hi, > > I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBr

Re: Java is dead... but it could still be saved!

On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Gosh, I think I'll have to write my own programming platform one day to > avoid all this. > I thought you already did ... you mean I *cannot* write device drivers and run them on Cocoon? Rats ... :-) Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600 > From: Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: General Jakarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: possibly bug with tomcat 4 vs oracle 8.1.7 ??

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Giovanni Zorzan wrote: > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:17:00 +0100 > From: Giovanni Zorzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: possibly bug with tomcat 4 vs oracle 8.1.7 ?? > > we try to use JDBCStore again

Re: [PATCH] xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl

On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:44:14 -0500 > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl > > On 1/28

Re: BCEL project bug databas

Stephen, I can help you get this set up. Please send me offline what you'd like for: * Description of BCEL * Identifier and description of each component (so people can submit bug reports against that component * Version numbers to list in the bug database. Craig McClanahan On Thu, 24 Jan 2

Re: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

On 17 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: 17 Jan 2002 14:45:26 -0500 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: general at jakarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: POI Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

Re: [PROPOSAL] POI @ Jakarta

+1 Craig On 17 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: 17 Jan 2002 14:45:26 -0500 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: general at jakarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: POI Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PROPOSAL] POI

Re: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:27:54 -0500 > From: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PROPOSAL] Jakarta PMC bylaws change > > The number of PMC seats will be set at seven. Annua

Re: commit mails not send

Gerhard, They went to the moderator queue, and I just OK'd them. We'll fix the mail permissions to let these go directly shortly. Craig On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Gerhard Froehlich wrote: > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:02:02 +0100 > From: Gerhard Froehlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta Gene

RE: Groupware Website Recommendations

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Edson Alves Pereira wrote: > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:21:55 -0500 > From: Edson Alves Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Groupware Website Recommendations > > Sour

Re: Code conventions

On 9 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Date: 09 Jan 2002 00:07:00 -0500 > From: Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: general at jakarta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Code conventions > > >>> It's only two little lines extra to in

Re: crushed

On 7 Jan 2002, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > This whole experience has become a bit disheartening. Craig McClanahan > who is like an idol of mine said this: > > " > We will continue to do what we've done in the past -- reject projects > that > only want the "name recognition" value of being unde

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Peter Donald wrote: > Watchdog is TC specific - didn't know that ? Is it servlet/jsp specific or > tomcat specific? Could it be reimplemented over the top of Cactus or is it > tied to a specific infrastructure? > Watchdog is not Tomcat-specific - the validity tests should w

RE: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:56:30 +0100 > From: Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Commons Validator Packaging/Content > > At 19:00 07.01.2002 +01

Re: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > >I continue to see the last 11 months as a period of progress. > +1 > - Sam Ruby > Craig McClanahan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: More abuse of coding styles...

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:27:52 -0500 > From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: More abuse of coding styles... > > Rule #1 from The Elements

Re: Jakarta Status [was Code conventions]

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > > >- Sam Ruby > > > >P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml > >and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. > >Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we? > > +1 on t

Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 09:45:06 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: proposal for the jakarta startpage > > If everyone thinks the B

Re: Just the JARs

On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Just the JARs > > "Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote: > > Putting aside

Re: is a statement of the license in all source files?

On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > am i right in thinking that for legal reasons we need to > include the complete license text in every source file (rather than just > the short form)? > My recollection is that you are correct ... we need to be using the long form, at least f

Re: Coding style addition

On 15 Dec 2001, Kevin A. Burton - burtonator wrote: > > Perhaps. > > It might be a good idea to have a default recommendation or a global standard. > > ... anyway... > The most entertaining flamewars I've ever seen are atempts to gain consensus on whether to use tabs or not, and then how many

Re: Comment for Apache.org

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > if you want things to change, then you need to do something about it (am i > sounding like jon? ;) if you were to answer newbie questions - to the best > of your ability - then jon wouldn't have to make time to answer them. > there's somethi

Re: Cross site scripting

cesary if you do the getEscapedHtml() processing on everything? Craig On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:49:36 -0800 > From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PRO

RE: Cross site scripting

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Danny Angus wrote: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:51:55 - > From: Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Cross site scripting > > Craig wrote: > > That seems like a

RE: Cross site scripting

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:23:48 -0800 > From: Jeff Schnitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Cross site scripting > > > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[

RE: Using bzip2 for tarball

On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100 > From: Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Using bzip2 for tarball > > From: Da

Re: Standardized jar manifest entries? (Re: How do you version jarfiles?)

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jeff Turner wrote: > > Java's official versioning spec [1] seems curiously irrelevant. It talks > about API specifications, and implementations thereof; not the sort of > scenario most people deal with. It's primary use-case seems to be > applets (it amuses me how Sun docum

Re: Distributing the JSSE

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:30:56 +0100 > From: Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE > > Ainsi parlait Kasper Niel

Re: Integration

On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Frans Thamura wrote: > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:16:01 +0700 > From: Frans Thamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Integration > > Dear All, > > I see there is a lot of API in Apache... Jakarta and XM

Re: Distributing the JSSE

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Peter Donald wrote: > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:21:46 +1000 > From: Peter Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Distributing the JSSE > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:16, Kasper Nielsen wrote: > > > Because the amount of p

Re: BCEL @ Jakarta

+1 Craig On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:37:25 -0400 > From: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: BCEL @ Jakarta > > Hi, > > Markus has just informed me that he has removed the GNU regexp depende

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

Done. On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:38:09 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

I've set up the new top-level entry. Let me know what "components" and "versions" you would like set up, and I will do those as well. Craig On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:15:36 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Vincent Massol wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:37:54 +0100 > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Making Commons-Cactus a top level projet > +1 Craig McClanah

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Release Candidate 1 Available

The first Release Candidate for Tomcat 4.0 is now available. Only serious problems will be fixed between now and final release of Tomcat 4.0, which is currently scheduled for September 17, 2001. A second release candidate, if necessary, will be distributed on Thursday, September 13. Please down

RE: Using mod_jk with apache 1.3.20

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote: > Thanks for the response, but I don't know if it answers the question. Let me > expount a bit and I'll see if it makes things clearer. > Could you *please* do your expounding on the correct mailing list? The GENERAL list is for issues about Jakarta

Re: Possible bug in web.xml

Thanks for the report - I just checked in patches that will be reflected in tonight's nightly build (and shortly on the web site as well). For project-specific documentation like this, it would be helpful to submit bug reports against the documentation for that project. Craig McClanahan On Mon

Re: Enhancement to jakarta-site2 -- XSLT stylesheet equivalent to"site.vsl"

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > on 7/27/01 12:08 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please help me debug this stylesheet, and improve its compatibility with > > site.vsl, by checking out the jakarta-site2 module and running

Enhancement to jakarta-site2 -- XSLT stylesheet equivalent to"site.vsl"

For those folks who like the idea of using a common stylesheet for generating documentation and web sites from XML input documents across multiple Jakarrta projects, but don't necessarily want to be tied to Anakia, you now have a choice. I've added an XSLT stylesheet (xdocs/stylesheets/site.xsl)

jakarta-site2 process changes needed (heads up)

Heads up ... the old process for updating the Jakarta web site no longer works, since the CVS repositories are no longer present on daedalus. It's too late tonight, or I'd actually figure out how to update fix -- but wanted to warn anyone else who was going to try. The workaround is to use scp f

Struts install - error in SilverStream install doc (fwd)

Forwarding to STRUTS-DEV, where this kind of a report belongs. GENERAL is for discussion of Jakarta-wide project issues, not project-specific things like this. Craig McClanahan -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Armen Papshev <[EMAIL PROTEC

Three Commons Packages Released

The Jakarta Commons package is pleased to announce the availability of "Version 1.0" releases of three packages: * Beanutils - Generic manipulation of JavaBeans wrapped around the Java reflection APIs, including the ability to get and set nested and indexed properties. * Collections - A wide

Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Jason van Zyl wrote: > [ ]Craig McClanahan Just getting back from vacation, I've read this thread and tend to agree with the general consensus that it belongs more on the xml.apache.org side of the house, for several reasons: * This particular implementation is written in

Re: Proposal to make BSF an ASF project

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > The common criteria that we use for any new project is to ask what the > > existing developer and user community is like. I know that there is a large > > user community, but what is the developer community like? > > BSF does not have a large devel

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Struts 1.0 (Final) Released

As promised at JavaOne, the Struts project team is proud to announce the availability of Version 1.0 (final release) of the Struts Framework. The binary distribution is available at: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-struts/release/v1.0/ and the source distribution is available at:

Re: doinking around with a logo

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, bill parducci wrote: > "Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote: > > > > bill parducci at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> The little thinghie over the latter "a" is Copyright by Sun... > > > > > > it is LIKE it, but not the same. so i would disagree. > > > > I wouldn't want to eve

Re: Lucene acceptance in Jakarta

+1 (back at home recovering from J1). Craig On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ted Husted wrote: > Was there a post with a [VOTE] header? > > +1 > > I think Craig and Geir are tied up with Java One this week. > > Jon Stevens wrote: > > > > Re: Lucene being added as a Jakarta Project. > > > > 5 of 10 (n

Re: Theft of authorship

On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > I am referring to otherwise honest people who choose to contribute > their enhancements back to the project. They create new classes but in > the process remove the names of previous authors. They do this in > good-faith as otherwise they

Struts 1.0-beta-3 Released

Struts 1.0-beta-3 is a release candidate version of the Struts Framework, likely to be the final beta prior to the Struts 1.0 Final Release, which is currently scheduled for June 15, 2001. Please help identify any remaining bugs that need to be fixed prior to final release, and report them to our

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Turbine

Philosophical discussions are always worth a couple of cents of my own :-) On Wed, 23 May 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: > > From: Sam Ruby (23 May 2001 10:02 AM) > > > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > > > > > What is going on here? I fixed this code almost two days ago. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/bu

Struts 1.0-beta-2 Released

Struts 1.0-beta-2 is an update release in preparation for a final release of Struts 1.0 prior to JavaOne 2001. The changes included are documented in the release notes, at: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/release-notes-1.0-b2.html You can pick up your copy of this latest release at: http:

Re: Tomcat as webserver

Your best bet would be to ask Tomcat-specific questions like this on the TOMCAT-USER mailing list (send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe). You'll find thousands of people there who use Tomcat in a large variety of ways, including as a stand alone server. Craig McClanahan On F

Re: [proposal] Jakarta Deprecation Policy

On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jon Stevens wrote: > Well, there haven't been many flame wars around here recently, so let me > start one. I seem to be good at that. :-) > > What I propose is that we take this document (or one similar to it) and > migrate it up to the overall Jakarta Project instead of j

[ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0-beta-4 Released

Tomcat 4.0-beta-4 is the latest update to the next generation version of Tomcat 4.0. It supports the most recent specification updates (Servlet 2.3 Proposed Final Draft 2, JavaServer Pages 1.2 Proposed Final Draft 2), support for looking up users and roles in a JNDI-accessed directory server, and

  1   2   >