] package.
Small amounts of this can be done on bug reports.
Get involved with overlay projects like sunrise to increase the usages of
packages you like. Maybe oneday you'll even become a gentoo developer and can
make a package mainstream.
Oleg.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Foundation
2008/3/13, Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gnome 2.22 was out recently. When does it come in portage?
When the gentoo-devs add it!
They are aware of the newly released gnome, so be patient!
Regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
and the
changed settings in /etc/conf.d/clock are worth consideration too!
Regards,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:51:59 am Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Daniel Black (dragonheart) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+ 01 Apr 2008; Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] use.mask:
+ mask ssh2 as net-libs/libssh2 does not have keywords yet
How likely is it that libssh2 is anytime soon keyworded
) but this is of course subject to the state of
affairs when we get that far :)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21 Apr 2008)
# Masked by treecleaners for bug 160267. Removed in ~60 days.
# Has been included in 2.6 kernel series.
net-fs/coda-kernel
Are you sure? codafs has been in the kernel for years but I think the
external package is
of help/information
from me, just contact me to this email...
Thanks for your help with everything, please pop in from time to time
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
.
In the solitude of effectively a one person herd, and i'm largely to blame,
you've done exceptionally well. I'm note sure I could of coped as long.
I'm hoping at the end of such a dedicated time you have had some fun.
Keep well in whatever you do next.
--
Daniel Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo
. Don't know if
there is an extra tag for proxy maintainers though.
[1]
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-video/ttcut/metadata.xml?view=markup
[2]
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-tv/channeleditor/metadata.xml?view=markup
Regards,
Daniel
.
As for external packages that rely on kernel sources, if there is any
remaining breakage in the stable tree please make sure an appropriate
bug is blocking #232070.
Daniel
x11-misc/touchcal
any volunteers? :)
Otherwise I'll push them towards maintainer-needed in a couple of weeks
time.
Thanks,
Daniel
squeezecenter-7.2.1.ebuild: bonjour? ( net-misc/mDNSResponder )
bonjour use flag pulls in net-misc/mDNSResponder
vlc-0.9.5.ebuild: $(use_enable avahi bonjour)
avahi use flag enables bonjour support in vlc. Maybe the avahi flag
should be replaced with zeroconf here too.
Regards,
Daniel
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:44 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
snip
bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
that needs to be changed.
zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
Daniel
implementations.
--
Regards,
Daniel
?
snip
Do I need to write it by myself?
This packages have never been in the tree. Take a look at bug #159086.
Also this overlay [2] may be of help.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/159086
[2] http://overlays.gentoo.org/dev/dang/browser
--
Regards,
Daniel
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:10:57 -0500
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:38 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
snip
The maintainer MUST NOT NEVER EVER NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT remove the
latest stable ebuild
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:50 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not about arches just being slackers. This is about arches
denying stable (or even ~) for some reason. If I cannot drop an old
version
get to interact with a lot of very
intelligent people upstream and you end up learning a lot.
Email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you are interested!
Thanks,
Daniel
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:10:57 -0500
Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-11-16
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242708
Please help us fix these in the stable tree in advance of the stabling date.
Thanks,
Daniel
list, please. I'm happy to help, but there
are many people there who would also appreciate being part of the
discussion.
Thanks,
Daniel
functionality like
etc-update, dispatch-conf, cfg-update or etc-proposals?
--
Regards,
Daniel
, and remove
from tree at the end of the month.
Daniel
Mike Frysinger wrote:
can people who feel adventurous unmask sandbox-1.3.2 and give it a spin on
their systems before i unmask it for everyone ...
Thanks for looking after this important package. 1.3.2 isn't in CVS, did
you mean 1.3.1?
Daniel
think having stuff build
out of the box instead of dying in the middle of emerge outweighs
pulling in some extra stuff with default settings.
Regards,
Petteri
+1
Daniel
Daniel Drake wrote:
I'm tentatively planning to request that gentoo-sources-2.6.27 gets
marked stable on x86+amd64 on December 15th, assuming we have fixed all
regressions (we have some open, which will hopefully be fixed soon).
We're still on track for December 15th stabling, so please make
clear the fact that
the current stable has problems which is affecting your schoolwork).
Please could you fix that?
Thanks!
Daniel
rate going up in the
next week or so.
Great!
Daniel
Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47:
Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org posted
1229371818.21630.7.ca...@txslpc1d36.wkst.vzwnet.com, excerpted below, on
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:10:17 -0600:
# Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org (14 Dec 2008) # Dead upstream,
masked for removal in ~30 to 60 days.
Douglas Anderson schrieb am 16.12.2008 01:28:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Pielmeier
daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com wrote:
Duncan schrieb am 16.12.2008 00:47:
While I'm at it, is there anything useful to display metadata.xml? In
particular, the long descriptions and use flags can
2008/12/16 Daniel Pielmeier daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com:
Hm, looks like I have mixed up something here. The pruneworld option
looks for packages that _have reverse dependencies_ and thus are
probably unneeded and not the other way round
Besides that, is there anything similar to dep
as replacement for finding out
uneeded entries in /etc/portage
--
Regards,
Daniel
-default-opts in combination with --noreplace.
--
Regards,
Daniel
at bug #233184 and close it.
--
Regards,
Daniel
Thanks for all your great work over the years.
Much appreciated.
Best wishes for whatever you end up doing.
--
Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Foundation
package
breaks due to this upgrade, it's your responsibility to fix this in the
stable tree before this date. You can ask me for help. As long as it's
gone jan 15th, your broken packages will not hold back the kernel from
going stable...
3. Who's brave enough to put ext4 on / ? :)
Daniel
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
All .28 series kernels (all rc kernels and the final one, too) do
not compile on Alpha at all.
Please file this at the Gentoo bugzilla as well, so that we can keep
track. We can possibly even help fix it.
cheers,
Daniel
TPM support has been in the linux kernel for a while.
The current version doesn't build and is probably outdated (bug #249291).
app-crypt/tpm-module will be removed before February 2009.
--
Daniel Black dragonhe...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Foundation
I'm not sure I want to see this list being a QA list for commits.
If there is a commit that raises an interesting question for everyone sure put
it here.
Otherwise please take up QA faults with the author or devrel if you think they
are consistantly under-standard.
just my 2c.
--
Daniel
Petteri Räty wrote:
Why wasn't this sent to gentoo-dev-announce?
It should be posted on front page gentoo.org if that is not already in
the works.
Thanks,
Daniel
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 19:44 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
snip
i'll tweak the eclasses to use quoting for now
no one suggested doing any of this crap you're talking about. if you want to
get all retarded, dont install the masked ebuild. i gave a heads up to
people
who
brought up the issue in the first place.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
interested in ways of making this easier. Before I give this more thought, I'd
be interested to know if anyone has already got any scripts or tips :)
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
for the heads up.
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12:36 Wed 04 May , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all there are a lot of questions to answer:
- Who can do the certification?
- What must be done to become certified?
- What hardwaretypes will IBM offer
Well i also was very surprised to become this offering from IBM. I tried this for a long time with very less success :(
All i can say is that i talked to IBM's Senior IT Architct for Principal Linux Services and he told me that theres a chance to do this. Of cause he didn't said something about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| Another useflag-related question.
|
| Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
|
| encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
|
| this is a loose definition which is quite
all the jokes before... :) )
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
I don't really see why USE=svga is enabled by default. This brings svgalib
into emerge system. svgalib is quite problematic and not used much anymore.
Any objections to dropping it from the default USE flags?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| yes, it's finally that time ... after months of hearing us say 'we
want to get
| new baselayout stable asap', we're serious
|
| so can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they
notice any
| regressions ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
| On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 22:15 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
|
|-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|Hash: SHA1
|
|Mike Frysinger wrote:
|| On Thursday 26 May 2005 10:04 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
||
||I'm asking because I
install the alsa-driver package (recommended) which is actively
developed and is higher quality than emu10k1 anyway.
Please post any comments/objections at http://bugs.gentoo.org/94954
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Please keep future information regarding this poll public on gentoo-dev or
similar.
[publicising on gentoo-dev with permission from Grant Goodyear]
Dear all,
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
eligible to vote.
The proposals up for vote:
- The FOSDEM
Daniel Drake wrote:
- Form a task force for additional study (Task-Force)
-core mail (7 June 2005) from jstubbs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(will be available on gentoo-dev as a response to this message)
Jason Stubbs' proposal:
I'm past this deadline, but I'd like to propose a modified keeping
to Gentoo user relations with
your experiences, what information you are lacking, and where you would expect
to find it.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
feed URL's.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
of mine who happens to be involved with telephony with his
company, i know zero about that, i do know he does use VoIP, so maybe he
finds your hack nifty
|
| Jim
hope you better luck next time in #gentoo-dev
Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
for a single-user weblog.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
. The suggestion was to create a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
alias which bugs could be assigned to. The discussion was a while ago but I
don't recall any negative points being raised.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
better into having its own assignee. Most
resolutions suggest that no further action is needed, I don't think this is
the case here (remember we are talking about RESOLVED NEEDMAINTAINER...)
As well as that, people could add themselves to the email alias if they are
interested.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev
going to get any attention.
Assigning it to a dedicated alias would get it out of my way and into the view
of people who potentially want to maintain the package and maybe join the herd
too.
And yes, it certainly makes sense to have relevant herds CC'd on these bugs.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
site to be used instead of kernel GLSA's.
The site is used internally at the moment and proving very useful, and will
probably be finished and made public before the end of this year.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Or do like the rest of us did when we started and ask speciffic questions on
the forums. Well frmulated questions usually recieve answers withing a few
hours, sometimes even less.
--DA
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:15:26 -0400
Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
...)
I think we need some real bugzilla documentation that covers both basic usage
and also policies on bugs/resolutions/ownership and what to do if you think
your bug is being ignored. This is also on my todo list but has been for a
long time.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
wasnt going to
be included for 2.6.12 final.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
that they will introduce.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
snip
Who is the other husband/wife developer team?
Well before she left and he went MIA there was Eric and Aida Sammer...
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
...
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
development model.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
be used as a reference thing, e.g. on a kernel bug, I'll say
please try this patch, user says how?, it would be nice if i could point
them to a specific page on the tech doc.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
suggestions would be worthwhile to a development
community which you haven't had much involvement in (at least, not as much
involvement as the people you are speaking to).
Good luck :)
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
, just ask.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
unpack
pushd /var/tmp/portage/blah/work/blah
patch -p1 /path/to/patch
popd
ebuild blah.ebuild merge
I think the latter version is easier since it doesn't require as much
background knowledge. And the patch technique is useful to know for if you
need to patch a kernel or something like that.
Daniel
Allen Parker wrote:
parrot
yah, what he said!
/parrot
On another note, Casey, you should attempt to figure out if anything
you've said might have been taken the wrong way... a while back, i
managed to get myself banned from #apache after going off like an
idiot and then making a comment that was
.
3. Your previous experience developing web-applications and working with
related software (don't worry if this isn't much).
4. Any experience you have with blogs/aggregation/RSS/...
Feel free to spam me with related ideas/comments if you have any :)
Thanks,
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
, providing a loose form of archives and a search
facility. I'll make sure we consider this.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
:9898/
[2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~pythonhead/planetdb.tbz2
This looks really good. You can get the gentoo-specific stuff by checking out
the planet module from Gentoo SVN.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I've started the ressurection of the service provided at g.o/stable during the
weekend. The biggest task is the convert the queries from postgresql with
subselects to mysql, but the work is almost finished.
I will be posting the messages to this malinglis once a day as before.
If you have any
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11404 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11406 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
far better
then ppc64 vs. ppc as the dev/user base is far larger) but I think that
it is something to move towards if the ratio is close enough even if it
means denying some functionality to one group or the other until some
bugs are solved.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
!
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
council that (I hope) will be active in approving
or rejecting GLEPs, perhaps someone should be writing a GLEP about
combining x86 and amd64?
-g2boojum-
Just out of curiousity, what makes people think that the amd64 team will
sit still for having all of x86 foisted off on them?
--
Daniel
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:59 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:26:37 +0100 Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Arch teams need to be allowed to override maintainers where
| appropriate,
|
| Why not talk to the package maintainers instead, and convince them
|
On Sunday 04 September 2005 04:52 pm, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 21:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
If it isn't fit to be marked stable, it shouldn't be out of
package.mask. ~arch means candidate for going stable after more
testing, not might work.
Agreed, but we both
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11795 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
#include linux/kobject.h
sysfs_create_file(device-cdev.kobj,pid_sfs);
I can not insert module. Kernel says something like this:
Error inserting module -1: unknown symbol sysfs_create_file
sysfs_create_file is only available to GPL modules. Is yours
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL)?
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12219 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
that the devs have a much easier time staying on top of
keywording issues. We've basically said that we trust the ATs to know
how to test a package, and we'll take their word for it that it works.
It's been very useful for us, and we think it will be useful for others.
Daniel
(former AT)
--
gentoo-dev
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 00:05 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Simon Stelling wrote:
This has been in the todo-list for quite a while, but finally it's done.
I'm curious what you think of it.
I'm curious how much change this would involve for the people involved.
Perhaps you could explain how
. Don't base
your judgement on this.
One final point, if you are running vesafb-tng and have =1GB RAM then try
turning off vesafb-tng for now.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Ivan Yosifov wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
are running vesafb-tng and have =1GB RAM then try
turning off vesafb-tng
Why ?
Actually, this shouldn't matter, as this only occurs with 64gb highmem. I only
mentioned it as this is the only random crasher
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12071 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
is that it makes it difficult for people who cross
compile packages for use on other systems only, in which case it might make
sense for the possibility to override the behaviour.
Daniel
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi!
I just opened this in gentoo-portage-dev, but Jason Stubbs told me my
ideas are either bad or belong to THIS list, so i try my luck again...
I'd like to have a functionality that prints out what the useflags of a
ebuild are good for. Some are obvious, others are not. Example:
The useflag
We've discussed adding this to metadata.xml a few times in the past,
but every time there was opposition from a vocal minority of one who
claimed that USE flags should always do exactly the same thing for
every package.
why do minorities rule?
Actually i agree that in general use flags
In my opinion, the easiest way would be a wiki.
Indeed. But why do you need to modify all the ebuilds?
do i have to? of course it is not necessary to modify 10k ebuilds in a
week. The line could be added on the next regular update. And as said
below, it could also be generated
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12916 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 13:47 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
2.0.51_rc4
And by 2.0.51_rc4 he really meant 2.0.53_rc4. :)
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
bitness where it would work
looses functionality unnecessarily.
Yeah I know this adds a whole additional layer of complexity to the
picture but seeing how DEPEND=!arch? ( use? ( app-foo/bar ) ) is
against policy there has to be some way to control it.
--
Daniel Ostrow
Gentoo Foundation Board
201 - 300 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
