Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-leechcraft/*, virtual/leechcraft-*

2020-09-22 Thread Georg Rudoy
tment, although it has a single net-im/kadu[xmpp] revdep. Maybe worth dropping it to m-n then. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-leechcraft/*, virtual/leechcraft-*

2020-09-22 Thread Georg Rudoy
t/lc-vrooby > > app-leechcraft/lc-xproxy > > app-leechcraft/lc-xtazy > > app-leechcraft/leechcraft-meta > > app-leechcraft/liblaretz > > virtual/leechcraft-browser > > virtual/leechcraft-downloader-http > > virtual/leechcraft-notifier > > virtual/leechcraft-quark-sideprovider > > virtual/leechcraft-search-show > > virtual/leechcraft-storage-device-manager > > virtual/leechcraft-task-show > > virtual/leechcraft-trayarea > > virtual/leechcraft-wysiwyg-editor > > > > eclass/leechcraft.eclass > > > -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cleaning up the installation handbook (Legacy boot / MBR / ...)

2020-05-02 Thread Georg Rudoy
that was booted in legacy mode and I had no control over that as far as I can tell. That was a very recent, freshly ordered Ryzen 3700 Hetzner server. Dunno if such anecdotical evidence proves anything though. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

2020-04-20 Thread Georg Rudoy
'd take to get that into ::gentoo once I'm done. BTW having things like servant in ::haskell as opposed to ::gentoo is like having boost in some C++ overlay as opposed to ::gentoo. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

2020-04-20 Thread Georg Rudoy
odel wrt API and linking? > and C. More stable API (and ABI). -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PR] ivy, mvn, sbt, gradle builders improvement for ebuild development

2020-04-20 Thread Georg Rudoy
ntoo's approach to haskell is to use dynamic linking and expose the dependencies to the package manager (which I sure agree is the right thing to do), so what should be right the solution here? -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-04-14 Thread Georg Rudoy
On 14.04.2020 at 08:36 user Joonas Niilola wrote: > media-fonts/iosevka (b,v) Can take a look at PM'ing this (unless somebody else is interested). -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ standard in ebuilds

2018-09-17 Thread Georg Rudoy
() noexcept (false); void yes () noexcept (true); void foo1 (decltype ()) {} void foo2 (decltype ()) {} the compiler will [1] mangle foo1 and foo2 differently depending on whether it's built using C++ <= 14 or C++ >= 17. [1] https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/xmZTBO -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror

2018-09-13 Thread Georg Rudoy
re optimizer passes. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing policy about -Werror

2018-09-13 Thread Georg Rudoy
m/0xd34df00d/leechcraft/commit/fa8ff9dc315e894fada4aaf73534bdfc15121cb3 [3] https://github.com/0xd34df00d/leechcraft/commit/6b26961b52b6e8277db39b084f483d1959253313 -- Georg Rudoy

Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-08 Thread Georg Rudoy
sted time trying to figure out what is going on > there is no mention of what ever happened from Gentoo that indicates > anything improper took place. Single-point samples are not really representative. The messages wltjr sent and the bugs/PRs/etc he linked convinced me in quite the contrary, at least, about the legitimacy of the current actions. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: Accidental spoofing -> Re: [gentoo-dev] We Are All wltjr On This Blessed Day

2017-12-05 Thread Georg Rudoy
in the maillist management software. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-19 Thread Georg Rudoy
make. Just my two cents. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-31 Thread Georg Rudoy
ant, or the world has migrated to qt5 and the benefit of still supporting qt4 is not worth the effort and clumsiness? > Send all your PRs via Github, mentioning my handle @SoapGentoo. Thanks, will do. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

2017-01-30 Thread Georg Rudoy
reviously proxy-maintaining it via Maxim Koltsov aka maksbotan. What's the best way for me to step up and maintain it more directly? Would PRs on github work? -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] moving gcc-5.2 to unstable

2015-10-01 Thread Georg Rudoy
ary compiler will effectively make programs non-buildable with clang (and perhaps icc, not sure about its status). -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

2015-08-11 Thread Georg Rudoy
missed the fourth option: the package can not be built without Qt GUI, but it supports building with either Qt version at the same time. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-05-03 Thread Georg Rudoy
and possibly a bunch of other features depending on Perl that would pull it when enabled. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-05-03 Thread Georg Rudoy
— it's pure 03. I could live with some kludges in C++11, but they became incompatible with some of C++14. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-05-03 Thread Georg Rudoy
the useflag. It could be unmasked on the per-package basis again, I guess? Then there is a question of the default (globally unmasked and per-package masks vs globally masked and per-package unmasks), but that's a relatively minor one. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-05-02 Thread Georg Rudoy
that seems the best fit for the USE flag name. We have idn or gnutls or python etc USE flags after all, not support_international_names_in_blah or allow_secure_news_fetching_in_foo or build_scripting_support_for_baz. Or I just didn't get you here, sorry me in this case :) -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: c++14 global USE flag

2015-04-24 Thread Georg Rudoy
released, so this should probably be settled once and for all. I'm CCing LeechCraft author just in case. I'm on this list, no need to :) -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git?

2014-09-15 Thread Georg Rudoy
in information that is subject to change. How frequently the list of supported arches does shrink? Is it statistically significant? -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git?

2014-09-15 Thread Georg Rudoy
pretty extensively, and gcc 4.7 already cannot swallow all of it). The patches for existing code hardly change ever, probably once in a few months. This is hardly applicable to Gentoo though as corresponding ebuilds already require gcc = 4.8. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does the scm ebuild masking policy make sense for git?

2014-09-15 Thread Georg Rudoy
2014-09-15 10:24 GMT+01:00 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:11:08 +0100 Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com wrote: How frequently the list of supported arches does shrink? Is it statistically significant? The amount of software that exists makes this impossible

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

2014-08-17 Thread Georg Rudoy
libraries' ebuilds to multibuild to support qt5 builds). I don't know, though, how (and whether it's possible) to automate sed'ing the library names in qmake/cmake/whatever build system, since you'll have to have different ones for qt4 and qt5 builds. -- Georg Rudoy

[gentoo-dev] Supporting both Qt4 and Qt5 builds

2014-08-11 Thread Georg Rudoy
for previously disabled Qt version requires rebuilding the whole library twice. What's your opinion on this? I've attached the useflag-based variant as a draft. -- Georg Rudoy kqoauth-0.98-r2.ebuild Description: Binary data

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4.8 may be needed in stable for www-client/chromium-38.x

2014-07-29 Thread Georg Rudoy
. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flags upower and udisks (split from udev in some cases)

2014-07-18 Thread Georg Rudoy
you considered udisks2? For example, lc-vrooby can use any of udisks:0 and udisks:2, but the rdeps that get pulled and the backends that get compiled are controlled by the flags. -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on any ABI changes?

2014-06-14 Thread Georg Rudoy
14 июня 2014 г. 19:45 пользователь Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com написал: On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 + hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Ciaran McCreesh: On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: However, this means that we

[gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler

2014-02-26 Thread Georg Rudoy
unlikely :)). [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx1y.html [2] http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html under C++1y section -- Georg Rudoy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler

2014-02-26 Thread Georg Rudoy
2014-02-26 12:35 GMT+04:00 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com wrote: I'm currently considering using C++14 in my project, particularly features that aren't supported by gcc 4.8 and are barely supported by 4.9 [1], but the standard

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on clang as a compiler

2014-02-26 Thread Georg Rudoy
2014-02-26 12:52 GMT+04:00 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org: Dnia 2014-02-26, o godz. 12:26:06 Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com napisał(a): I'm currently considering using C++14 in my project, particularly features that aren't supported by gcc 4.8 and are barely supported by 4.9 [1

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-20 Thread Georg Rudoy
of incompatibility though, with more obscure error messages, like with autogenerated move ctors and the likes. I've hitted it myself a couple of times in more or less complex template code, but can't think of an example off the top of my head unfortunately. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-19 Thread Georg Rudoy
] in your original post for the list). -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in libraries?

2013-12-18 Thread Georg Rudoy
? -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour

2013-06-16 Thread Georg Rudoy
on exact ebuild maintainer. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft

2013-03-06 Thread Georg Rudoy
2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu: On 06/03/2013 08:07, Maxim Koltsov wrote: 1) Do you agree with adding new category? Not really... are you going to add any more packages? Yes, definitely. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft

2013-03-06 Thread Georg Rudoy
ebuilds like leechcraft-azoth into more smaller ones. Each use flag there is basically a separate plugin, and as plugins could be built separately, there is no need in recompiling all of them just to install/uninstall/etc a single one. That single azoth thingie adds around 30 more packages. -- Georg

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft

2013-03-06 Thread Georg Rudoy
to be about 6 users who have LeechCraft installed (which ranks it slightly south of 70,000th). Debian's popcon is slightly irrelevant as LC isn't available in Debian repos. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft

2013-03-05 Thread Georg Rudoy
category in the foreseeable future, and leechcraft-base suggests also something like leechcraft-addons. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new qt category

2013-01-17 Thread Georg Rudoy
2013/1/17 Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org: but I think dropping the qt- prefix will lead to overly generic/already existing package names: gui declarative dbus core opengl etc. I don't see any value from dropping the prefix that would justify this. +1. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd/udev split

2013-01-14 Thread Georg Rudoy
to be stable enough. After all, sadly, upstream udev has much larger userbase than eudev. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/boost: boost-1.46.1-r1.ebuild metadata.xml boost-1.49.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.51.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog boost-1.47.0.ebuild boost-1.35.0-

2012-11-01 Thread Georg Rudoy
as well say let's just keep the newest gcc 4.7 in portage, since there is software that fails to build with gcc 4.6 and earlier, for example. -- Georg Rudoy LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree

2011-07-20 Thread Georg Rudoy
the popularity, but that's rather unimportant issue, according to Gentoo's policies. --   Georg Rudoy   LeechCraft — http://leechcraft.org