Here are my random two cents
On 1/5/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 19:57 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:58:57AM +, Kurt Lieber wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 01:17:06PM -0500 or thereabouts, Chris Gianelloni
wrote:
Gentoo is
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject line:
A New Linux Way
Learn to send emails correctly?
Text as follows:
Hello fellow Linux Users!
We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
Please visit the website for more information, but here is the
On 1/19/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lares Moreau wrote:
Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
I will be posting daily updates until it goes into ~arch, planned
On 1/25/06, Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 19:13, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Ahh, so you were the idiot that ran those tests. Congratulations...you
needlessly did a --emptytree world after you had already done
--emptrytree system in order to bloat your results.
What eactly is your point? Of course they are.
On 1/26/06, Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 08:06, Chris Gianelloni spammed:
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 20:23 -0600, Mikey wrote:
If you actually downloaded a pristine stage1 or a stage3 tarball you
might notice that
On 2/10/06, Klaus-J. Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list, but I am not new to Gentoo.
Would you please discuss a GLEP draft, which I believe it might improve
the usability of Gentoo?
Text at:
http://www.seismic.de/gentoo/gentoo_mask_proposal.html
Seems like a huge
On 2/28/06, Renat Lumpau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when a user
files a report at bugs.gentoo.org
I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to
Asking developers to proxy takes almost as much time as it does to
ask them to maintain a package by themselves. The developer is
directly responsible for anything he commits, so he will have to still
test the ebuild, still test any revisions, and still follow the
package to make sure there are
On 3/23/06, Daniel Goller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:15 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Asking developers to proxy takes almost as much time as it does to
ask them to maintain a package by themselves.
wrong
The developer is
directly responsible for anything he commits
A secondary package manager is a package manager that instead of
directly aiming
at replacing portage as primary package manager.
What does it do instead?
The first restriction is that no packages in the tree must rely on
the secondary
package manager. While packages may provide a
On 6/10/06, Markus Ullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
as well.
1) m-w / m-n requirement
On 6/14/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 22:34 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
It's not irrelevant; you're just not reading it properly. You might
notice that metadata.xml contains tags other than herd, like, say,
maintainer. In the example that sparked this,
On 6/20/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
[snip]
I don't see how any other suggestion is simpler than mine for developers
or users. Maybe I missed something in skimming the discussion.
To summarize:
- USE=qt enables support for the most current qt.
On 6/21/06, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:03:21 -0400:
[Stefan Schweizer wrote...]
qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
Maybe I just need a little time to warm
On 6/22/06, Graham Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's a newer way to control the same thing that userlocales controlled,
but I didn't understand it when it was posted here.
Though, AFAIK, there is no way of retaining the old behaviour, of
building all
On 7/30/06, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 July 2006 18:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Personally I'd expect the council to block the thing permanently.
hard to address any sort of concerns here, so i guess i'll just regurgitate
the council log to you
it's hard for users to
On 7/31/06, foser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello dear followers,
tonight after a some deliberation I have decided to step down as gnome
lead in favor of AllanonJL. As far as I am concerned AllanonJL has been
the acting lead for quite a while now, while I was too busy to devote
much time to
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers?
We didn't need 3000 more
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing
One thing... Maybe its just me... or maybe they are in no way related,
but I seem to have heard of a lot more 'libtool' problems when using a
snapshot version instead of a regularly numbered version, is there a
reason?
On Apr 7, 2005 11:46 PM, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can stable
Well it would be nice to have it all abstracted, wouldn't stablizing a
package get exponetially harder? Not only would each arch need to be
tested, each combination of packages on each arch would need to be
tested, if FEX openpam became usable on linux instead of just
linuxpam, each arch that
This time I'll say something useful :)
Nathan, you seem to be misunderstanding open source. You get the I
can ask for features or suggest things part, but not that I can add
features or do things part. No one is stopping you, or me, or an
average joe, or George W. Bush, from peer reviewing.
putty pretends to be an xterm and dies at xtermcontrol --get-bg... I
can test other things if you need.. just give me some idea :)
On 8/21/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:26 +0200 Henrik Brix Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| * Install, either with
mine ended up spitting out large amounts of gibberish and ruining
the readability of the terminal... why would it be so different?
On 8/22/05, Tavis Ormandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On
Maybe I'm incorrect, but I believe Kristian was not saying use XML,
but using xml as a comparasison (I know there is a better word.. but
its escaping me... that comparassion thing on the SAT's). He's not
saying to use xml, but in order to extend portage, extend it much like
xml extends html, with
If it was an extra ebuild, the profiles directory would need to exist
outside of /usr/portage, would it not? This to prevent it from being
blown up at next sync.
On 8/29/05, Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 11:59 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As I understood it,
bugs.gentoo.org
On 8/31/05, Forrest Voight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I made ebuilds for the player, stage and gazebo projects. (playerstage.sf.net)
How can I commit them to the ebuild tree?
Thank You,
Forrest
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
The problem is, trying to fix ebuilds in tree is a lot more
complicated.. You have to fight with multiple herds, and multiple
developers, and explain to them why it should occur, in order to get
anything to happen.. In addition, even a global gigantic one liner to
add quotes to $D and $S would
Assuming, as I do... that ~arch is utf-8 clean, it must not be that
wierd a character, and therefore, probably acceptable for sed also.
On 9/17/05, Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:42:09AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Something strange I noticed... Some
On 10/2/05, Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/10/05, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
On 02/10/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but
whatever stirs your pot. ;P
It makes sense
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
take place in ebuild ...
] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| | into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge
Hello,
I am a frequenter of #gentoo-*, as many of you know :)
Tonight, hanging out in #gentoo, I observed a huge amount of incorrect
information once again.. tonight about profiles, cascading and all
that jazz, which to be honest is fairly undocumented. I decided to
give a miniclass on how it
Most likely because no one has added it, why do you ask?
On 10/12/05, Norguhtar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RUMI Szabolcs wrote:
Hello!
Tomcat 5.5 is out since a year now and still didn't make it into portage.
It doesn't even depend on JDK 1.5.0 in a sense that there is a compat
tarball
On 10/20/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:34 pm, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 22:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:19 pm, Dave Nebinger wrote:
i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx /
s/where headstarted by a blog post by Stuart/where headstarted by bug 11359/
To jump right in :)
On 10/31/05, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached in plain text form is glep 42 for the discussed thread.
It's rather long, but I hope it details any sort of questions that may be
a genius!). Make this part of system,
convince the baselayout guys (this is a lot easier even) to make
emerge an alias that calls $(news-update) after emerge, and whaddya
know, we have liftoff!
On 10/31/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
s/where headstarted by a blog post by Stuart/where
-0500 Dan Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| WRT links in file updates, this seems completely backwards. If a user
| was admining over ssh, it would be far easier for them to load www.g.o
| in their browser vs. copying link from terminal to their browser, but
| for that matter, why is ssh
Two things.
One, if users run --sync in a cronjob, which many do, this preemptive
goes out the window.
Two, an alternative to that, if we are all recoding portage anyways :)
Have portage place a special note next to any items with relevent
news when -a or -p is passed, and then, emerge --news
erm, and how exactly do you propose that the user who
doesn't-read-the-site-because-it-has-no-useful-information-currently
will learn about errata.g.o?
On 11/3/05, Nathan L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
Not necessarily the
For simple translations? No.
For translations that span the same bredth (old version checking is
probably going to be fairly needed if we used xml as a main version,
and all other pretifying stuff is necessary.
On 11/4/05, Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 04 of November 2005 19:39
``Content-Type:``
Must be ``text/plain``. Mandatory.
Why have this header at all then?
``Posted:``
Date of posting, in ``dd-mmm-`` format (e.g. 14-Aug-2001). UTC time in
``hh-mm-ss +`` format may also be included. This field is mandatory.
How will prescendse be handled if two
this can be found in the docs at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/
On 11/5/05, Armindo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am member of LUG, and we are interested in becoming a Gentoo Mirror!
We are wanting to know info about system requirements and
configuration.
Cumps
Armindo Silva
--
I suppose my only question is, why can't examples be inlined at the
bottom of the glep, and simply use a in document link to reference
them?
On 11/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, this is a change to the GLEP process, so it itself needs to be a
GLEP... All it does is propose
An internation standard that utilizes an international language... hrm
On 11/7/05, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
051107 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
7 Nov 2005 15:12:20 -0500 Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm serious -- Gentoo should try to follow international standards
The format
Okay, it works according to my useless opinion :)
On 11/7/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:34:44 -0500 Dan Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I suppose my only question is, why can't examples be inlined at the
| bottom of the glep, and simply use
Forever.
Gentoo releases mean absolutely nothing, they do absolutely nothing.
The news should stay until the upgrade occurs
On 11/10/05, Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:07:37 -0800 Mike Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What about something
On 11/16/05, Zou, Yixiong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a gentoo package for some internal software. I
followed
several Howtos online and created the ebuild file for my package. But
somehow
ebuild always return me the same error over and over again:
$ ebuild
I've been running my latest install with features=test, makes it
simple to test packages requiring stablizization and all that... at
least partially..
However, I've seen a few packages that fetch stuff during the test
phase from the internet, which seems like a _really_ bad idea to me.
For 1,
As an AT... albiet a very busy/cannot help as much as I'd like one...
The only useful thing I see in here is ro-cvs access. This
facilitates testing by allowing the tester to get the ebuilds as they
are committed, instead of syncing and hoping not to get banned from
rsync servers.
I could care
On 11/19/05, Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:44:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Funy, I was just pondering that myself... is authenticated rsync
really possible?
Yes, it has its own auth mechanism. We actually use it for some automated
cron
at?
On 11/19/05, Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:44:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Funy, I was just pondering that myself... is authenticated rsync
really possible?
Yes, it has its own auth mechanism. We actually use it for some automated
cron
Personally, I do not think the tree is the place for anything besides
that which relates to the tree. I really do not think users would
appreciate there sync being burdoned by Developer x broke his toe
this week ; developer y is going to italy ; We recently recieved 3
new mirrors and have all
BSD is dead jokes are dead.
Lets move on to the next thing!
Developers working on bsd are dead! SHortest development time ever thunder!
oh, and who let ferringb write the intro's, needs more verbosity
WHens Gentoo/Opensolaris coming? /me hides
On 11/20/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/22/05, R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 16:26 +0100, Marc Hildebrand wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[..]
Now, on the topic of the tarballs.
Give me one example of something that you can do with a stage1 or stage2
tarball that you
On 11/23/05, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the proposal again. If there's an issue with it, shoot it down,
but from
forgot my sarcasm tags :)
Get the idea though?
On 11/23/05, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
23.11.2005, 20:07:15, Dan Meltzer wrote:
Can we get all current developers renamed to nick.developer then? just
to alleiviate any confusion someone may have...
[snip a buttload or two
On 11/23/05, Mike Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/22/05, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give me one example of something that you can do with a stage1 or stage2
tarball that you cannot with a stage3 tarball.
I may not be the typical user, but I use Stage1 to build servers,
On 11/27/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote:
It's great!
Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles.
+1, and it would be better if the FEATURES, instead of removing the generated
files, would disable the building
Random thought May be completely off base.
Could this debug info be NFS shared? assuming like computers, or would
it be different on each computer.
On 11/27/05, Tavis Ormandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 12:50:30PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
I'm in favor of it enabled per
bugs.gentoo.org
http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual/
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ebuild-submit.xml
not gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
On 12/10/05, Herbert Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A great software that would be fun to have on Gentoo is texmaker.
Gcc has also moved to subversion...
On 12/10/05, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 11 December 2005 00:56, Luca Barbato wrote:
svn so far was good but I don't know which big projects had it deployed.
KDE uses subversion, depending on what you call big of course.
--
Jason
On 12/10/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| current agenda:
| none ?!
How about a decision on what's to be done to fix the GLEP 41 mess?
glep 41 was approved... people ranted, it fell off the maps... I
Point of Clarity,
and the ``mysql-5`` database format changes.
These changes actually occured in mysql 4.1, not mysql-5
On 12/10/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Main changes since the previous edition:
* File format tweaks.
* Changes to the way relevance headers work to make
On 12/11/05, Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:35:50AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Although most package updates are clean and require little user action,
occasionally an upgrade requires user intervention during the upgrade
process.
Recent examples of
If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it
should be approved?
/devils advocate
On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide
instead
On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:30:52 -0500 Dan Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Internationalisable
|Being able to provide messages in multiple languages may be
| beneficial.
|
| Not quite sure, is it required for GLEP's
Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an ammendatory GLEP
On 12/13/05, Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
| | Proposed change:
| |
| | ``Posted:``
| | Date of posting, in ``-mm-dd``
Whoops, sending to the list is a good idea
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:51:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs
To: Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope, but the changes further on.
Created
Here, have a goat.
It's on me
no, literally, get it off!
On 12/16/05, Jeffrey Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To all,
After blowing my upgrade window by almost 2 hours bugzilla is back up,
albeit missing the pretty Gentoo theme. I will be putting that in after
I've taken a break, because
Why not $(portageq newsdir) ? Currently, that would return only the
one for main tree, but if/whenever multi repo support it added, it
could return a space delimted list. This makes it simple to manage,
and lets the portage crew
a) figure out what they want to do
b) implement it while keeping
On 12/16/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| Brian agreed with you that the extended dep syntax will be necessary
| at some point in the future. I also agree. So, knowing that glep 42
| doesn't require extended depset syntax, can we stop playing this game
|
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xorg-x11/migrating_to_modular_x_howto.txt
followed it this morning :)
On 12/23/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
the
On 12/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:37 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| It's really pretty simple- get off your butt and chip in if you want
| it, else you're on _our_ timeline (eg, we implement it when we deem
| it sane/ready to go).
On 12/24/05, Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 12/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:37 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| It's really pretty simple- get off your butt and chip in if you want
| it, else you're
On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59, Simon Stelling wrote:
Actually stricter, and there are way too many people to put that in
without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even
sure.
You're mixing up
and my bad.
I am not yet awake.
It died cause of runpaths on strict, it just showed both, and I wasn't
thinking when I sent earlier email...
On 12/26/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/26/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 December 2005 13:59
On 12/26/05, Lares Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 00:59 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:45:00 +0100 Stefan Schweizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| That will increase the sync time for all of our users - can we please
| keep this info out of the
On 12/26/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 08:12:03PM -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 12/26/05, Lares Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 00:59 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:45:00 +0100 Stefan Schweizer
[EMAIL
On 12/29/05, Jory A. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
mozextension.eclass to the tree. You can find mozextension.eclass at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass . You can
On 12/30/05, Stefan Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/30/05, Dan Meltzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/29/05, Jory A. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
On 10/5/06, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Weber wrote:
You don't unterstand me, sorry.
There is no Universal-CD, a User must to download the LiveCD which
forces he/she to use the Ncurses/X11-Installer, because there is no
Stage3-Tarball.
OH RLY? Maybe just read the options you
On 10/20/06, Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a random thought that popped into my head:
We could have a commit fest where everyone who wants to compete kicks in
some small amount of money(say $5) maybe the foundation kicks in a
little
On 10/22/06, Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
[snip]
I think masking is premature; there was never any sort of decision made in the
previous discussion(s) about this.
Relooking at the discussion, it appears
How much would gentoo make in a ciaran vs. devrel fight?
On 10/22/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Purpose:
To increase funding for Gentoo Infrastructure and events.
Overview:
Developers volunteer to dual off against other developers (including
retired developers!) in the ring. We
I think you gave the wrong forum link :)
On 10/23/06, George Prowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A user has stated this in a thread. Could someone respond please?
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-510146.html
I suggest that the devs don't hard mask packages, especially ones
depended on by
On 11/9/06, Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, here's the complete log from the Council Meeting + a short
summary.
Summary:
All council members was present (Andrew Gaffney (agaffney) proxied for
Chris Gianello (wolf31o2)).
Agenda was:
1. Reply-to-list
2. SPF
3. QA update / plans
I don't think that officially supported ebuilds that are officially
unsupported is a good idea. If they were officially supported then
they would in effect never be removed, just simply placed somewhere
else. It seems to me that this should be a third party project if
anything.
On 12/19/06,
see http://dev.gentoo.org/~antarus/projects/soc/glep-0052.txt and
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/42044/match=
On 1/17/07, Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2. See the results (and as-yet unpublished GLEP) of Antarus's Summer
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
On 1/28/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a bit,
due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
Java team asked arch teams if they object
On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do?
Top posting...
Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the
eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been proven
stable already
I'm replying here because I couldn't decide whether or not it made
more sense to reply to your email, your blog post, your reply to
flameeyes blog post, your radio commercial, your television
advertisement, or your phone call.
The things that this doesn't do (Or if it does it isn't documented)
On 3/5/07, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:49:10 -0500
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we want to discuss is a possible timeline for completion, and
what resources you may need to get it done within the agreed timeline.
Notice that I used
This thread is gay.
On 3/11/07, Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:34:41 +
Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh? Excuse me, but as I tried to indicate in another message, I'm as
much on YOUR side as anyone else's.
Then stop continuing the thread.
On 3/13/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Has anyone stopped to think... he might have an ulterior motive here?
Clearly, it's trolling, the quote above should demonstrate that beyond
doubt. However, one must ask what the reason might be for such
deliberate trolls.
Yes
On 3/14/07, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:45:01 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
QA is supposed to avoid fixing other people's code where things are
actively maintained.
I usually ask before messing with other's stuff but
On 4/17/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
OMG NO! Please reconsider.
I'm pretty
On Thursday 26 April 2007 3:40:06 pm Robin H. Johnson wrote:
So as a not-so-brief follow-up to solar's email, here is a brief
proposal on the automatic assignment stuff, incl. one spot that we might
need to add an attribute to metadata.xml.
Assignment process, triggering:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 9:12:35 am Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Dear people,
In a few days KDE 4 alpha 1 will be released, and we would like to give as
many people as possible the opportunity to have a look at the next
generation linux desktop. Thus an article is being prepared to explain to
people
On Friday 04 May 2007 4:49:47 pm Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
Thanks to zmedico we now have support for news items on infra-side and heck
they are ready to use. And we should use them!
Attaching news item for paludis 0.24.
Justification: major config format change.
How does this fit the
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
