Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Manifest2 format

2005-12-06 Thread Francesco Riosa
Marius Mauch wrote: > Hi, > > As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html > > This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;) > > Marius > Really great that this has reached us, digest-* files are really annoying from

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
Luca Barbato wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >> * Anything involving XML. >> > > What about incidentally make the format yaml compatible? > > yaml.org Only if we (you?) are able to extract a considerably simpler subset of the specification, as is it's really overkill. > > /me runs where ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > GLEP: 42 > Title: Critical News Reporting +1 . -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Critical news reporting) updates

2005-12-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
Jason Stubbs wrote: [...] > As I said already, there will immediately be a bug asking for overlay > support. > Portage already supports multiple in a form whether anybody likes it or not. [...] BTW I love that feature ;-) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to date format of current GLEPs (was: GLEP 42 (Critical News Reporting) round five)

2005-12-13 Thread Francesco Riosa
Olivier Crete wrote: > On Tue, 2005-13-12 at 21:09 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? >> >> Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it >> *still* doesn't address the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Optimizing performance

2005-12-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
le, latest problems where in 2.6.14, additionally no devs in gentoo are (will?) support it the patch for grub it's still not in place I think. > > Are there any application-specific tweaks (e.g. "use the prefork MPM > with apache2")? What is known to break things, what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Optimizing performance

2005-12-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
Patrick Lauer wrote: > -user has the risk of many "use teh -fomglol flag, it si teh fast0r" ;-) > hardened doesn't have much to do with performance (although I'd be > interested what impact - if any - the different security features have!) fresh of typing (but worked on for few months) http://www.

[gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-01 Thread Francesco Riosa
We have currently 10371 ChangeLog files, > 25 MB totally . 1365 == 13% with size >= 4096 B, 12 MB totally rsync from "emerge --sync" has "--whole-file" between its options, that mean transfer the whole file if changed. To make things worse the bigger ChangeLogs are (oh, surprise) those that chang

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 > Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thoughts ? It's doable in some way ? > > Whatever way will get chosen, a full copy of every ChangeLog should be made > available somewhere (somewher

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Grobian wrote: > On 01-01-2006 21:35:34 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote with possible deletions: >> The information contained in the ChangeLogs is essential, and it must be >> kept, but, force the users to download all that data it's not optimal. >> >> That said I can

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | That said I can see only two ways to reduce the ChangeLog files (a > | centralized one is obviously not viable) > > 5) Anyone who really cares can use the excl

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Matti Bickel wrote: > Pawe?? Madej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via >> rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i >> go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got Gentoo for about 10 >> months I don't rem

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ok, last shoot, then let put this stuff to sleep. Description of the attachment at the end: Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 11:25 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: >>> I'm also for telling the users to rsync exclude the ChangeLogs if they >>> don't want them instead of getting rid of

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 00:35 +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: >> On Вск, 2006-01-01 at 21:35 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: >>> We have currently 10371 ChangeLog files, > 25 MB totally . >>> 1365 == 13% with size >= 4096 B, 12 MB totally

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql commercial

2006-01-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Steve Rodgers wrote: It isn't very clear to what it needed here but I'll try to answer anyway > Hi does anyone have any experience of deploying mysql commercial build into a > gentoo platform? not me, but I use the gpl version for commercial scopes > > Several mysql dependencies such as php w

Re: [gentoo-dev] mysql commercial

2006-01-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Jakub Moc wrote: [...] > Dunno what exactly "commercial" means here, it you mean official -bin, > there's some overlay and ebuilds in Bug 83424, there's also some weird [...] Please forget that one, it's broken, and the quantity and the size of the binary packages to download make an hell to maint

[gentoo-dev] [dRFC] slotted mysql ready

2006-01-08 Thread Francesco Riosa
MYARRAY[3]:(-2)}" , is this acceptable? The intention is to made mysql-5.0.18-r30 stable on 2005-02-15 at maximum on the first archs. AFAIK I'm the only one who have seen this stuff until now, any comment, any suggestion is highly apreciated. Francesco Riosa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [dRFC] slotted mysql ready

2006-01-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: [...] >> >> An eselect-mysql module has been prepared to create simlinks for the >> desired version of mysql making easy to switch between them (hopefully) >> >> The libraries (libmysqlclient & co) don't follow this logic and the >> higher version is always the default (simi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [dRFC] slotted mysql ready

2006-01-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: > Francesco Riosa wrote: >> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: [...] > > Now this is in my mind, a mind that looks for bugs and troubles before they come out. That's exactly what I'm looking for ;-) > > If mysql is slotted (and you said it it wil

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects and simple guides

2006-01-10 Thread Francesco Riosa
Lance Albertson wrote: > Aron Griffis wrote: >> Grant Goodyear wrote:[Tue Jan 10 2006, 11:09:15AM EST] >> >>> As an aside, it's ciarnanm has already put work in on developing an RST to >>> guidexml converter, so I wouldn't worry too much about RST not scaling. >> >> Could that be used dynam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Parallizing ebuilds - 'trivial' ebuilds

2006-01-13 Thread Francesco Riosa
>>> I would like to be able to limit the -jN when there is no distcc host >>> available or when compiling c++ code, otherwise my poor laptop is dead with >>> -j5 compiling pwlib when the network is down >> As far as I can tell distcc isn't smart enough for dynamic load balancing. >> One could

[gentoo-dev] guide/howto switching to slotted MySQL

2006-01-22 Thread Francesco Riosa
same time slotted MySQL will acquire keywording actually owned by the removed counterparts. The stabling of MySQL 5.0 will be retarded from 2005-02-15 to 30 days after the slotted packages keywording. regards, Francesco R. MySQL, upgrade and switch to slotted guide Francesco Riosa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds and USE flags

2006-01-24 Thread Francesco Riosa
Rene Zbinden wrote: > I am writing an ebuild for a program written in perl. This program has > the dependency of gnuplot but with the png flag enabled. What is the > gentoo way to enable this USE Flag for gnuplot when I emerge my program. > There is no "active" way, you could only check if the fl

Re: [gentoo-dev] guide/howto switching to slotted MySQL

2006-01-24 Thread Francesco Riosa
Chris White wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 10:06, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> Here there is a guide on howto switch to the slotted versions of MySQL. >> It's a first draft and to be totally usable some repoman commit are needed. > > You're probably better

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emerge snapshots

2006-01-24 Thread Francesco Riosa
A. Khattri wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Wernfried Haas wrote: > >> - adding buildpkg to your FEATURES builds binary packages, which makes >> it faster to revert to older versions if the new one cause >> problems. > > You could also use quickpkg, i.e. write a script that interates through > w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make logrotate a global USE flag?

2006-01-28 Thread Francesco Riosa
Doug Goldstein wrote: > Marcelo Góes wrote: >> It seems there are some ebuilds with a logrotate USE flag: >> >> use.local.desc:34:app-backup/bacula:logrotate - Install support files >> for logrotate >> use.local.desc:550:mail-filter/dspam:logrotate - Install support files >> for logrotate >> use.lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make logrotate a global USE flag?

2006-01-29 Thread Francesco Riosa
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:58:52 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You want people to recompile the whole package to get another >> text file installed? > > When would one recompile a package just for that? Only case i can > think of is when

[gentoo-dev] slotted mysql ready for testing (~arch)

2006-01-30 Thread Francesco Riosa
As the subject say, In less than 24 hours slotted mysql ebuilds will be unmasked, to point the finger they are: =dev-db/mysql-4.1.16-r30 =dev-db/mysql-5.0.18-r30 There is a migration guide [1] that explain some of the magic, thanks to the editors: Chris White, Jan Kundrát, Joshua Saddler to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Default Ebuild behaviour

2006-01-31 Thread Francesco Riosa
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:06:35 + "Benjamin Smee (strerror)" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> | On Tuesday 31 January 2006 15:47, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> | > For packages in the second group, not using a USE flag is silly. >> | >> | I take it

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] multislot mysql

2006-02-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ok, I've been realized that having a slotted mysql is not the dream of every end user ... or developer. Anyway I prefere too keep the possibility to do a similar install. A good solution should be to add the "multislot" USE flag to the ebuild and let it to decide whenever make it slotted or not,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multislot mysql

2006-02-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Carlos Silva wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:19 +0000, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> Ok, I've been realized that having a slotted mysql is not the dream of >> every end user ... or developer. >> >> Anyway I prefere too keep the possibility to do a similar install. &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multislot mysql

2006-02-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:19:18AM +0000, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> A good solution should be to add the "multislot" USE flag to the ebuild >> and let it to decide whenever make it slotted or not, sorry, this is not >> viable, yes it&#x

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Dev: zmedico (Zac Medico)

2006-02-05 Thread Francesco Riosa
Brian Harring wrote: > Hola all- > > Well looky here, we've got another new portage dev to report- Zac > Medico (zmedico). Areas of focus thus far are general stable work, > and work on the rewrite (you can thank him and marienz for the test > framework work). > > Additionally, Zac is the mai

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: Re: official branding ( gentoo )]

2006-02-06 Thread Francesco Riosa
Jory A. Pratt wrote: > Well that is it, your firefox will no longer say deerpark :) I will > commit the changes tomorrow morning. With the package currently maintained by me I'm constrained to _not_ modularize it because of linking issues between source files, still questionable but it's a questio

Re: Translation questions [was: Re: [gentoo-dev] I want to help, but I don't know where]

2006-02-22 Thread Francesco Riosa
Rafael Bugajewski wrote: > Mark Kowarsky wrote: > >> If you want to help >> http://www.securesystem.info/tiki-view_blog_post.php?blogId=3&postId=104 >> contains a good summary of what and how you can help out :). > > Thanks for the nice link. I read some stuff and now I know that the first > ste

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

2006-03-01 Thread Francesco Riosa
d version. [1] Yes. 12% [ 12 ] No. 75% [ 72 ] No preference. 11% [ 11 ] Best regards, Francesco Riosa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Change layout of distfiles

2006-03-06 Thread Francesco Riosa
Michael Renner wrote: > Introducing an additional directory hierarchy should fix this, and is > the common solution for this problem for various projects, be it debian > [1], cpan [2], slackware [3], etc. > > > One migration scenario for a better future: > > Create subdirectories named after th

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Alfredo Tupone (Tupone)

2006-03-06 Thread Francesco Riosa
Kito wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2006, at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Alfredo has joined the Gentoo team to help with the games herd. I'm sure >> he'll have a fun time "testing" all those games :) >> >> Alfredo writes about himself: >> "I live in Rome, Italy. > > > Italians, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

2006-03-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
Luca Longinotti wrote: > As the title says, what would you prefer for the future of MySQL in Gentoo? > Please take a moment to read > https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-438557.html and vote (and > eventually comment on it). > Thanks! http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125599 deprecation o

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

2006-03-24 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ramon van Alteren wrote: No dev but +1 from me. I liked slotted mysql a lot and use it extensively. It has helped us tremendously during our upgrade path and I would be very sad to see it go. Public opinion is just that, public opinion, doesn't neccesarily mean something went wrong. FWIW,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ati driver

2006-04-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
e hai menzionato. English speaking ppl, sorry for the italian. - Francesco Riosa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Having fun with compression

2006-05-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:30:23PM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> We have ~15k .tar.gz in distfiles. ~6500 .tar.bz2, ~2000 others. >> A short run over 477 distfiles spanning 833M gave me 586M of .tar.bz2 - >> roughly 30% more efficient! >> A comparison run with 7zip gave m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer wanted for sys-auth/pam_mysql

2006-05-10 Thread Francesco Riosa
. pam-mysql 0.7RC1 added to the tree, the package now belong to the "mysql" herd, still need to look in depth at the patches "pam_mysql-0.6_md5_openssl.patch" and "pam_mysql-0.6_md5_sasl2.patch", these, temporary have _not_ been applyed. rgds, Francesco Riosa -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Heritage

2006-05-10 Thread Francesco Riosa
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 00:55 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote: Grant Goodyear wrote: Curtis Napier wrote: [Tue May 09 2006, 09:49:27PM CDT] Larry our wonderful mascot is from a font collection that we DO NOT OWN THE COPYRIGHT TOO. Our esteemed ex-architect STOLE Larry. Legally

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Signing everything, for fun and for profit

2006-05-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 20/05/06, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the clarification. That scheme looks fine. The master > manifest will add about ~700k to the tree, but since it can be rsynced > the actual bandwidth usage day to day should be reasonable. > rsync option for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes to the way Java packages are built

2006-06-18 Thread Francesco Riosa
I'm surprised from the lack of "Thanks a lot Java Team", so please let me have the honour to be the first on this ml ;-) The work done has been impressive, the number of package involved great, thanks _a_lot_ for all you did. Francesco R. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] color management in gentoo (kde expecially) proposal for help

2012-02-23 Thread Francesco Riosa
bably to talk to the guys on #gentoo-kde, and if you have > questions about other software they can help you find the right people. will do that in the weekend too > Cheers, > Andreas > >> Hi, >>    my name is Francesco Riosa, I would be interested in a more >> complete su

Re: [gentoo-dev] color management in gentoo (kde expecially) proposal for help

2012-02-23 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/2/23 Johannes Huber : > Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2012, 15:47:09 schrieb Francesco Riosa: >> Hi, >>    my name is Francesco Riosa, I would be interested in a more >> complete support of the oyranos color managment programs in ::gentoo. >> Oyranos is intended to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1?

2012-03-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/3/11 Ciaran McCreesh : > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:52:40 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: >> Is there really much of a benefit to this?  I guess for anybody who >> runs scripts to mass-manipulate ebuilds it might be helpful, but I >> think all the package managers planned on supporting all the EAPIs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecate EAPI1?

2012-03-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
top-posting me too to avoid more confusion, sorry Se my other reply to this thread, upgrading in place an old gentoo install is nearly impossible, it's so bad that glibc breakage can occour, that require a knowledge of the system so high that everything else become nuances of a vague problem. Tell

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should ${T} be defined in pkg_prepare ?

2012-03-31 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/3/31 Tiziano Müller : > Am Samstag, den 31.03.2012, 14:44 +0200 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: >> > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Maciej Grela wrote: >> >> > I've read the PMS and I haven't found information whether this variable >> > is supposed to be set during pkg_prepare or not. >> >> There is no such

Re: EAPI 5 (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available)

2012-04-28 Thread Francesco Riosa
What's changed from 2006 in version handling? Il giorno 28/apr/2012 11:39, "Ciaran McCreesh" < ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> ha scritto: > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:07 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:27 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > * Get a versionator repla

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: remove ldap from desktop profiles use flags

2012-05-05 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/5/5 Michael Weber : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 05/05/2012 09:55 PM, Dale wrote: >> Not to mention, you add the possibility that the user may miss the >> change since they are not expecting it.  I would expect it when I >> was changing profiles but not so much ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!

2012-05-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger : > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then >> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!

2012-05-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger : > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing. >> >> Fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!

2012-05-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
2012/5/21 Mike Frysinger : > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote: >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote: >> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger: >> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos C

[gentoo-dev] bug XXXXXX sys-libs/tdb fail check for building library support

2012-06-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @ configure time Checking for building library support: not found setting MAKEOPTS=-j1 does not suffice FEATURES=-distcc is needed FYI the check is inside buildtools/wafsamba

Re: [gentoo-dev] force verbose build log as per PMS policy?

2012-08-01 Thread Francesco Riosa
+1 for verbosity Il giorno 01/ago/2012 13:21, "hasufell" ha scritto: > > We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose > build log for that which was approved: > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml > > Also we have bug https://

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build

2017-02-03 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-02-03 10:52 GMT+01:00 Lars Wendler : > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:32:30 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > >On 02/03/2017 10:10 AM, Benda Xu wrote: > >> William Hubbs writes: > >> > >>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like > >>> what I see. > >>> > >>> I have open

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: net-wireless/gr-air-modes/

2017-02-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-02-21 12:56 GMT+01:00 Alexis Ballier : > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:16:59 +1300 > Kent Fredric wrote: > > > Also, given its a - package, standards and assumptions of quality > > are typically much lower. > > not at all; a lot of people do maintain - pretty well in order to > follow upstr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 09/04/2017 18:15, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Not sure if this is practical, it may be less work if the use of Python and Ruby versions ( maybe others ) is reversed. Rather than adding all the versions that the ebuild supports. What if it only included versions it did not support? Rational

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 09/04/2017 23:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 04/09/2017 06:15 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Not sure if this is practical, it may be less work if the use of Python and Ruby versions ( maybe others ) is reversed. Rather than adding all the versions that the ebuild supports. What if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 09/04/2017 23:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 04/09/2017 12:15 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Not sure if this is practical, it may be less work if the use of Python and Ruby versions ( maybe others ) is reversed. Rather than adding all the versions that the ebuild supports. What if it on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 10/04/2017 00:20, Brian Dolbec wrote: On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 23:36:18 +0200 Francesco Riosa wrote: On 09/04/2017 18:15, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: Not sure if this is practical, it may be less work if the use of Python and Ruby versions ( maybe others ) is reversed. Rather than adding

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 10/04/2017 01:59, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 04/09/2017 07:15 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: If the package failed, all that would need to be done kinda like now is a given variable modified in the ebuild. Just marking what ever it did not work with. As mentioned that could be done via

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-04-21 18:21 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible : > Walter Dnes wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:52:20PM -0500, Matthias Maier wrote > > > >> (A-C) gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-4.9.4 are slotted separately. What is going to > >> be the default is entirely up to you. > > > > Good to hear. Like I said, on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 25/04/2017 18:44, Guilherme Amadio wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote: I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree. GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-04-26 0:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas K. Huettel : > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 14:35:48 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > Hi, > > > > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular > > older than the 4.9 branch. > > > > Masking is fine; some time later (maybe in a few months) I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-08-09 17:33 GMT+02:00 William L. Thomson Jr. : > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:07:04 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" wrote: > > > > What then is the benefit? If what is installed is the same from > > > package manager or binpkg. Also your redistributing another's > > > package in binary format which ma

[gentoo-dev] FEATURES=splitdebug and debugedit

2017-10-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
hi,     FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit which is a lagging behind upstream. However package app-arch/rpm (from which debugedit is forked) always install the same binary in ${ROOT}/usr/libexec/rpm/debugedit. In 2017 I don't see much value in maintaining a fork

Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=splitdebug and debugedit

2017-10-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-10-13 4:05 GMT+02:00 M. J. Everitt : > On 12/10/17 22:24, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > hi, > > > > FEATURES=splitdebug at the moment require package dev-util/debugedit > > which is a lagging behind upstream. > > However package app-arch/rpm (from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 hashes, take n+1-th

2017-10-19 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-10-19 23:00 GMT+02:00 Michał Górny : > W dniu czw, 19.10.2017 o godzinie 21∶08 +0200, użytkownik Michał Górny > napisał: > > > > 4. The new hashes that are stronger and commonly available are > > SHA3/Keccak (using sponges) and BLAKE2 (HAIFA). Both are diverse from > > our current algorithms,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: cmake + ninja vs autotools

2017-11-17 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 18/11/2017 00:35, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 11/16/2017 02:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >> It maybe worth considering switching the default generator in the >> cmake-utils.eclass from the default of emake to ninja. >> >> - : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_GENERATOR:=emake} >> + : ${CMAKE_MAKEFILE_

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC, PATCH] user.eclass: gracefully return when unprivileged

2017-11-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 11/20/17 05:09, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] > diff --git a/eclass/user.eclass b/eclass/user.eclass > index 86bcd282479..76a622df698 100644 > --- a/eclass/user.eclass > +++ b/eclass/user.eclass > @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ egetent() { > # Default uid is (pass -1 for this) next available, default s

Re: [gentoo-dev] AMD64 Arch Testers needed urgently

2017-12-12 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/12/2017 19:24, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> It seems that we've started lacking arch testers for AMD64 architecture. >> At this moment, there are already 159 bugs in amd64 backlog, and there >> is no noticeable progress. New stabilization re

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

2017-12-18 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/17/17 14:21, Michał Górny wrote: > ... > Rationale > = > > At this moment, syncing the repository implies fetching 'files' > directories of all packages, even though the relevant files are used > only when a ebuild referencing them is being built. This means that our > users fetch

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] New policy: 'files' directory must not be larger than 32 KiB

2017-12-18 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/18/17 14:01, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> It would be interesting instead to evaluate ways to remove _all_ files/ dirs >> from the tree, keeping ebuilds separated from data. > Arguably you could go a step further and n

Re: [gentoo-dev] The problem of unmaintained packages in Gentoo

2017-12-21 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/21/17 15:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > Part of me wonders if issues with stable are causing issues with > ~arch. If stable is regarded as stale that is going to push people > into ~arch who really intend to have stable systems. That said you do > want testing systems to have a reasonably low

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News: systemd sysv-utils blocker resolution

2017-12-27 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 12/27/17 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >>> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling >>> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
2018-01-09 22:20 GMT+01:00 Andreas K. Huettel : > [...] > * Whitelisting requires that one developer vouches for you. We intend this > to be as unbureaucratic as possible. > May I ask to some random developer to vouche for me (Francesco Riosa a.k.a. vivo)? I'd like to be ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change (v3)

2018-01-11 Thread Francesco Riosa
2018-01-11 17:27 GMT+01:00 Aaron W. Swenson : > This time with a version constrain that should allow this to expire at > some point in the future. > > Title: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change > Author: Aaron W. Swenson > Posted: 2018-01-11 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 2.0 > Display-If-Installed:

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and mark the package for newer versions of python. However (unless I'm missing something) PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE is not usable if: - the user want only python 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 15/01/2018 18:07, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added >> to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and >> mark the package fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-16 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 16/01/2018 08:57, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu pon, 15.01.2018 o godzinie 16∶27 +0100, użytkownik Francesco > Riosa napisał: >> In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added >> to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-16 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 16/01/2018 01:40, Alec Warner wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Francesco Riosa <mailto:viv...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 15/01/2018 18:07, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Francesco Riosa > mailto:viv

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Testing Gentoo with openQA

2018-02-04 Thread Francesco Riosa
2018-02-03 13:16 GMT+01:00 mudler : > Hi everyone, > > > This is an idea that has been floating around already, as some of you > already know, openQA [1] is a project that provides the ability to fully > test O.S. > Being used to routinely build Gentoo profiles, this idea is one of the first to

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of virtual/mysql and virtual/libmysqlclient

2018-02-14 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 14/02/2018 05:37, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:32:32PM -0500, Brian Evans wrote: >> I have a plan I would like some eyes on... >> >> I want to gradually *BAN* the use of virtual/mysql and >> virtual/libmysqlclient as dependencies. > Overall I agree, but there's some slig

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Extend ASM rules to ASM-ATT

2018-02-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
2018-02-25 10:06 GMT+01:00 Michał Górny : > Some CMake projects use ASM-ATT rather than ASM, so extend our rule > overrides to that. > for the curious: https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Assembler#ASM-ATT ASM-ATT This can be used for assembler files in AT&T assembler syntax. This includes the GNU ass

[gentoo-dev] python-any-r1 deps used only for testing

2018-02-28 Thread Francesco Riosa
hi, sys-devel/automake would to depend on python:2.7 if and only if "test" are enabled. For the tast it inherit python-any-r1 eclass than depend conditionally with test? ( ${PYTHON_DEPS} )" Additionally the ebuild call python_setup() in src_test() However this does not work, because eclass py

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proliferation of IUSE=static-libs in Gentoo

2018-03-08 Thread Francesco Riosa
2018-03-08 16:40 GMT+01:00 Michał Górny : > Hello, developers. > > I would like to bring to your attention an alarming trend in Gentoo > ebuilds -- the proliferation of IUSE=static-libs, that is a flag > allowing our users to build static libraries. > > I should like to remind you that static link

Re: [gentoo-dev] Functional portage with namespace

2018-03-17 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il 17/03/2018 00:40, Kent Fredric ha scritto: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 07:55:46 +0900 > Benda Xu wrote: > >> Ha, indeed many packages hardwrites "date of build" alike. That is a >> hard question to define reproducibility. I would rather ignore the >> timestamps when comparing two binaries. > If a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage fork: sys-apps/portage-mgorny

2018-03-23 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il 23/03/2018 10:48, Ulrich Mueller ha scritto: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Geaaru wrote: >> for both portage and your fork I think that could be interesting add >> an extension to PMS for define inside profiles or targets masking of >> packages of a particular repslository. Currently PMS doesn'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the State of PaX in the tree

2018-04-16 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il 16/04/2018 14:31, Anthony G. Basile ha scritto: > On 4/16/18 5:14 AM, Hanno Böck wrote: [snip] > >> >> There's also another question related to this: What's the future for >> Gentoo hardened? >> From what I can tell hardened consists of: >> * the things that try to make it compatible with grsec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustless Infrastructure

2018-07-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il 02/07/2018 17:36, Jason A. Donenfeld ha scritto: > Proposal: > - Sign every file in the portage tree so that it has a corresponding > .asc. Repoman will need support for this. > implementation detail: Adding an .asc file for every file would bring the total files from 130k to 260k. Would be p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-09 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-02-09 13:17 GMT+01:00 Rich Freeman : > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Kent Fredric > wrote: > > > > A pure udev system is in comparison, much simpler than a systemd system. > > I don't buy that at all. In systemd you have a unified object model > across device nodes, mountpoints, services,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-02-14 21:23 GMT+01:00 Mike Frysinger : > On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change > > > > the vir

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEW: split portage/repoman releases now in the tree

2016-05-16 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-05-16 3:39 GMT+02:00 Brian Dolbec : > > portage-2.3.0_rc1 and repoman-2.3.0_rc1 are now in the tree. > > portage-2.3.0_rc1 is essentially the portage 2.2.28 release with only a > few small patches applied. It mostly just installs less code, namely > the repoman code. > > So, now servers and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

2016-05-31 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-06-01 0:03 GMT+02:00 Mike Gilbert : > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: > > How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this > > approach? > > Why would you want to? > > In addition to Jörg Schaible answer: I do use my kde sessions with en_US langua

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

2016-10-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-10-25 19:15 GMT+02:00 William Hubbs : > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:10:06PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, William Hubbs > wrote: > > > If you are not using /dev/disk/by-* paths in fstab, you do not need to > > take any action for this news item. > > > > > > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: important fstab update

2016-10-26 Thread Francesco Riosa
2016-10-26 11:04 GMT+02:00 Michał Górny : > Dnia 26 października 2016 10:49:04 CEST, Joshua Kinard > napisał(a): > >On 10/25/2016 13:15, William Hubbs wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:10:06PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, William Hubbs > >wrote: > I

  1   2   3   >