Hi,
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 15:00 -0400, Paka wrote:
> * Sven Neumann [08-19-09 14:49]:
> >
> > Integrating PhotoPrint into GIMP is just a matter of a tiny plug-in that
> > can be distributed along-side PhotoPrint.
> >
>
> Is this being perused or in the planning stages?
It is certainly not som
* Sven Neumann [08-19-09 14:49]:
>
> Integrating PhotoPrint into GIMP is just a matter of a tiny plug-in that
> can be distributed along-side PhotoPrint.
>
Is this being perused or in the planning stages?
--
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 11:34 -0700, Hal V. Engel wrote:
>
> I no longer use either the GutenPrint GIMP plug-in or the GTK+ UI in GIMP as
> I
> exclusively use PhotoPrint now. Having this directly integrated into GIMP
> would be a plus for me.
Integrating PhotoPrint into GIMP is just a ma
On Tuesday 18 August 2009 04:44:29 pm Robert Krawitz wrote:
> What might be really nice is if PhotoPrint could be used as a print
> plugin for GIMP -- it supports everything in Gutenprint except curves,
> and the UI is much nicer in many ways than the Gutenprint plugin
> (which I've had to maintain
Robert Krawitz wrote:
>Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:26:55 -0500
>From: Erik Lotspeich
>
>Thank you for the perspective. It seems that the printing part of Gimp
>is a second-class citizen that doesn't have the refinement of the rest
>of Gimp.
>
>I have always seen Gimp as a
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:32 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> > It is in GTK+, not in GIMP. You are complaining to the wrong people. We
> > are just using the portable Print API and expect things to work on all
> > platforms. If that is not the case, then someone needs to fix the
> > platform-sp
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:26:55 -0500
From: Erik Lotspeich
Thank you for the perspective. It seems that the printing part of Gimp
is a second-class citizen that doesn't have the refinement of the rest
of Gimp.
I have always seen Gimp as a Photoshop competitor, so I'm thinking
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:03 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> Not only
> that, but it didn't have the "use original image size" button to
> auto-fit the image.
Actually the dialog is supposed to come up with the image in the
original size (provided that this size does not exceed the printable
a
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 11:26 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> Thank you for the perspective. It seems that the printing part of Gimp
> is a second-class citizen that doesn't have the refinement of the rest
> of Gimp.
You misunderstood that. The Windows platform is the second-class citizen
here
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:03 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> I posted a detailed report of the issues that I was having to the
> gimp-user mailing list. The response from everyone was that it was
> common knowledge that native Gimp printing was problematic and to use
> Gutenprint. Not a singl
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 09:15 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> One of the most common applications for Gimp is to print photos. If the
> Gnome print functionality is not up to this task, maybe it should not
> have been chosen.
Pretty please, check your terms. gnome-print is a framework that has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Thank you for the perspective. It seems that the printing part of Gimp
is a second-class citizen that doesn't have the refinement of the rest
of Gimp.
I have always seen Gimp as a Photoshop competitor, so I'm thinking what
if my mother-in-law (o
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Yes, it is well known that GTK+ printing (and thus GIMP printing) on
> Windows doesn't really work that well. My advice is always to use some
> other application to print images then instead,
And just in case, there is now an experimental bu
> I have tried all possible permutations of paper size between Gimp and the
> Windows driver. Since this setup works great for all other applications
> (e.g. Word, IE, Firefox, etc.), I don't see how the problem could lie
> anywhere else than Gimp.
(The problem is in GTK+ more likely, but that G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Robert,
> As Sven said, it was decided to decouple GIMP and Gutenprint quite a
> while ago. I (as Gutenprint project lead) agree with that decision.
> It also gives us opportunities to do things that would be more
> difficult if we were tied to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sven,
Thanks for your reponse.
> It works nicely for me and for most other users. If it doesn't work for
> you, then there appears to be a bug or some misconfiguration on your
> system. Perhaps you should try to isolate the problem and open a bug
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:47:57 -0500
From: Erik Lotspeich
The native printing does not appear to work properly either on
Windows or Linux. Are there plans to improve this? Can Gutenprint
be made to be a dependency? Are there efforts to add CUPS support
directly to Gutenprint?
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 22:47 -0500, Erik Lotspeich wrote:
> It seems as though there are now two options to print with Gimp: the
> gutenprint plugin and the native printing.
>
> The native printing does not appear to work properly either on Windows
> or Linux. Are there plans to improve this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I guess I created a fuss on the gimp-users mailing list a couple of
weeks ago. Now, I want to ask some questions about the state of Gimp
printing and its future direction.
It seems as though there are now two options to print with Gimp: the
gute
19 matches
Mail list logo
