From: Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:12:27 +0100
Last thingy, about professional use of Gimp, isn't this a bit of a
chicken-and-egg thing? I can't imagine anyone using a program that
doesn't do CMYK, serious halftoning and easy font work (with the
Hi all.
Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
(usually RFCs followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
sent to the list in June with a list of active 1.2 bugs (the thread was
1.2
Hi all.
Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
(usually RFCs followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
sent to the list in June with a list of active 1.2 bugs (the thread was
1.2
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Branko's talk of a bug week got me thinking recently, and I just noticed
that one of the few mails which got left in my gimp-developer mailbox
(usually RFCs followups, but not in this case) was a mail that Sven
sent to the list in June with a list
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 13:10, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
snip
I can imagine professional use of a program without any of these
things these days (the font stuff is most likely to be an issue). A
lot of printers that get professional use have Mac/Windows drivers
that take exclusively RGB
While we're at it -- why does GIMP 1.3 suddenly have a lot of new tools
(Select by color, Adjust brightness, etc.) that you can find in the other
menus too, sometimes just as easy? (The icons look a lot like the same for
me, and IMHO they're mostly clutter :-) )
Is there any way to
I think the problem we have here is that there's quite a big difference
between the developers and the users of the program. The people who make open
source racing games probably do that because they like to play racing games
as well. The average Gimp developer seems to do it because they
Sorry that it took so long, Simon ;)
Anyways, I had some conversation with two graphics designers about CMYK
problems and the Gimp at the Systems, and I think it might be worthwhile
to read the following sometimes true observations. Remember, they are
hearsay ;)
1. colour matching for photos
Mitch, Sven.. when you have time.. Can you make a to do for developers
that want to help?
Already done.
See TODO.xml
Seth
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
On Tuesday, 27 Nov 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
Anyways, I had some conversation with two graphics designers about CMYK
problems and the Gimp at the Systems, and I think it might be worthwhile
to read the following sometimes true observations. Remember, they are
Hi,
Rebecca J. Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mitch, Sven.. when you have time.. Can you make a to do for developers
that want to help?
http://developer.gimp.org/gimp-todo.html
it's generated from TODO.xml as found in the source tree. Doesn't cover
everything that needs to be done, but it
Hmm .. this is a pretty cool writeup. :)
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:10:15PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
[...]
CONCLUSIONS - THE 60% WAY TO CMYK
If one were so bold as to draw some conclusions, they would
probably be very similar to these:
[...]
3. Educate users about channels
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally it got me lookign at bugzilla (a habit that has since
lapsed), and looking at the thread it seemed to lead to the resolution
of a fair few bugs. Do people think that doing this on a regular (say
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 15:30, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Rebecca J. Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mitch, Sven.. when you have time.. Can you make a to do for developers
that want to help?
http://developer.gimp.org/gimp-todo.html
it's generated from TODO.xml as found in the source
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 14:50, Seth Burgess wrote:
snip
Allow me to correct some impressions...
Very little has happened recently in the way of scripts or filters; saying
that gimp developers concentrate on that is ridiculous.
Sorry, my bad. Jargon problem it seems. In Gimp, scripts and
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:33:22PM +0100, Lourens Veen wrote:
Yes, but then we're still talking about printers here. The colour posters I
designed were printed as well (on a digital press as they called it, which
from what I gather is just an industrial strength printer), but that only
Okay, so I misjudged the state of development Gimp is in. I remember trying
to find out some time ago how hard it would be to contribute things to Gimp,
but I gave up pretty soon. In another thread Rebecca Walter suggested
creating a TODO for developers that want to help. I'd like to
As the subject says: what happened to GIMP News and Kernel Cousin
GIMP?
These were great (if somewhat irregular) sources of information. What
happened to them? I prefer reading through Kernel Cousins to reading
through mailing list archives.
--
branko collin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lourens Veen wrote:
Last thingy, about professional use of Gimp, isn't this a bit of a
chicken-and-egg thing? I can't imagine anyone using a program that doesn't do
CMYK, serious halftoning and easy font work (with the added note that my X
server crashes regularly on TrueType fonts rendered
Hi all,
Apologies - I accidentally took this off-list for a couple
of mails. Returning to the list now.
Cheers,
Dave.
Dave Neary wrote:
Raphael Quinet wrote:
Well, the easiest way to do that is to use one of the
existing queries for open bugs and click on the Sev
or Pri column
Hello Branko,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-11-27 at 1640.22 +0100):
As the subject says: what happened to GIMP News and Kernel Cousin
GIMP?
These were great (if somewhat irregular) sources of information. What
happened to them? I prefer reading through Kernel Cousins to reading
through
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Avi Bercovich wrote:
CMYK, halftoning etc. would be nice indeed, but possibly a Photoshop xcf
plugin might be easier?
I don't know of any GIMP developer willing to spend the $$$ to get the
SDK for Photoshop.
--
I love
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Dave Neary wrote:
By mailing the 10/15 most critical bugs on a monthly basis
to the list, I think people will be more likely to fix
them. I know that I was when Sven last posted his trawl
through outstanding bugs. It also has the benefit of
connecting the very
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Avi Bercovich wrote:
eh I work as a webdesigner in an Amsterdam based 'top tier' New
Media company. I do little in the way of print graphics thus this may be
a bit off-topic... But, all my work is done in GNU/Linux in GIMP, whilst
my co-workers use Macs and
On 27 Nov 2001, at 10:39, Kelly Martin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Avi Bercovich wrote:
CMYK, halftoning etc. would be nice indeed, but possibly a Photoshop
xcf plugin might be easier?
I don't know of any GIMP developer willing to spend the $$$ to get the
SDK for
Raphael Quinet wrote:
I see... But unfortunately it would be difficult to mail the top 10
bugs to this list every month. The first problem is technical: I
don't have the time to set up such a thing. The second problem is
related to the information that would be sent: some bugs have a
Kelly Martin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Avi Bercovich wrote:
CMYK, halftoning etc. would be nice indeed, but possibly a Photoshop xcf
plugin might be easier?
I don't know of any GIMP developer willing to spend the $$$ to get the
SDK for Photoshop.
what $$$ are
Hi,
2. Associate sRGB or any other colourspace with the saved data in
tiff/eps. It doesn't matter wether it's true or not, just give
programs something to depend on.
Well, actually this would be true. sRGB is defined using the phosphors
standartised for HDTV and used for
I just thought I'd let you folks know that I just checked support for
reading (writing will come later) XCF files to the ImageMagick library
(http://www.imagemagick.org).
Right now you'd need to get it via CVS, BUT it will be part of the standard
5.4.1 distribution due on Friday.
Leonard
Branko Collin writes:
Maybe I am mistaken about this, but it would seem that Adobe offers
the Photoshop SDK and the Photoshop file format specifications for
free download at
http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/gapsdk/PhotoshopSDK.html.
Yep. Except that they don't document the
So...
Is anyone actively working on GIMP 2?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 22:48, Laramie Leavitt wrote:
So...
Is anyone actively working on GIMP 2?
Well.. YES. Since 1.3 is the path to GIMP 2 and a lot of people are
working there butts off on 1.3.. I would say that is a BIG HUGE YES!
No one can even think about GIMP 2 until GIMP 1.3 is
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:48:33PM -0700, Laramie Leavitt wrote:
Is anyone actively working on GIMP 2?
Insofar as there is activity on GIMP 1.4, yes.
Kelly
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Kelly Martin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:48:33PM -0700, Laramie Leavitt wrote:
Is anyone actively working on GIMP 2?
Insofar as there is activity on GIMP 1.4, yes.
Kelly
Is anyone working on it insofar as it relates to GEGL and all that?
If I understand this
34 matches
Mail list logo
