Hi,
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 13:22, Dave Neary wrote:
A number of people have suggested that a list of attendees who have
confirmed they're going would be useful - so could anyone who plans to
be there reply to the lists saying so, please? Don't forget to register
at
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Sounds
Hi all,
Do people think that it is worthwhile for the GIMP to have a stand at
GUADEC? It would perhaps be a way to sell some t-shirts, have a couple
of computers with people doing demos, and have an easy popint-of-contact
for people when they were on their down-time.
The problem is that it
Hi,
GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
Filters-Blur-Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1649.35 +0200):
Sorry, but what other scripts or plug-ins are you referring to? IMO it
would be a good thing to have a simple and fast plug-in that does the
job w/o a dialog and I fail to see what other plug-in would provide
this functionality.
Convolution
Hi,
I'm having problems compiling Gimp 2.0.1 on my Conectiva Linux 9 machine.
The error is:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../app
-I/usr/local/gtk+/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/glib/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/local/glib/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/local/glib/include/glib-2.0
Hi Simon,
Visually pressing down CTRL or ALT is immediately visible in the tool
options: The mode switch will switch accordingly. What else would you
suggest to communicate this more clearly?
When users are concentrated on drawing a path (and at the same time are
exploring different keyboard
Hi,
[this is a response to both jimmac and sven]
Selection shortcuts:
No, I didn't know that there is a difference between the modifiers
pressed when you start to create the selection and the modifiers you
press while adjusting the selection - it's really very powerful and
Hi,
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think my distribution should have two separate packages:
fontconfig-devel and xft-devel. I have already asked them to consider
creating them but until I eventually manage to get these packages I'm
looking for another solution.
On the other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a simple
replacement ?
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
Please rephrase that to a powerful
Hi,
Ellen Reitmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But another reason why I think it is better to keep the dialogs for
transformation is that it is uncommon to have confirmation/cancel
buttons in the tool options dialog. I'm not sure, but as much as I'm
concerned there is no tool that makes actual
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 06:15:15PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote:
Hi Simon,
Visually pressing down CTRL or ALT is immediately visible in the tool
options: The mode switch will switch accordingly. What else would you
suggest to communicate this more clearly?
When users are concentrated on
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 06:16:47PM +0200, Ellen Reitmayr wrote:
Hi,
[this is a response to both jimmac and sven]
Selection shortcuts:
No, I didn't know that there is a difference between the modifiers
pressed when you start to create the selection and the
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other side, I believe gimp should be able to use just the
indicated fontconfig installation. I'm setting the following variables
on gimp configuration and still can't compile gimp:
GSR - FR wrote:
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
The main reason not to use convmatrix is that internally it always
does a 5x5 convolution, regardless of the matrix entries. This means
it should take almost three
Hi,
thanks again for taking all of this time to review TheGIMP. once
again i am curious about samples personal projects of yours that you
used TheGIMP for. having actual ideas and needs for graphics tends
to make the gimp make more sense, in my experience.
Carol, can you please stop this.
Hi,
GSR - FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1759.17 +0200):
calling the convolution matrix plug in and scripts to preset it a
simple replacement ?
Well, what would you call a script that just puts a menu entry and
calls convolution matrix with a fixed matrix?
Hi,
Rodrigo Severo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You didn't suggest a fix for GIMP
Yes, I did. As it seems there is some doubt about, let me try to
make it clearer:
My suggested fix is to make gimp use the indicated (through the proper
variables) fontconfig library no matter which other
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:20:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
thanks again for taking all of this time to review TheGIMP. once
again i am curious about samples personal projects of yours that you
used TheGIMP for. having actual ideas and needs for graphics tends
to make the gimp
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
The GIMP build process already uses the environment variables you were
talking about. There is no way to change how the compiler looks for
headers, at least not in the GIMP source tree.
Ok, I think I'm persuaded.
I will keep trying my luck with Conectiva.
Tahnks again,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:09:49PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 08:20:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
and someone who through things through enough to say rtfm because
and someone who thought things through enough to say rtfm because,
even
carol
Carol Spears wrote:
in the united states, there exists a condition where people are being
educated for a test. teachers that do not teach the content for the
test are removed.
For usability tests? I doubt that this is the case, though it might
explain the usability of the software produced by a
i think we won the usability test when we were able to provide someone
as well-rounded and decent as roman to help with the tests.
this is a volunteer effort. and then they need more? they needed more
from suse, who they must have paid.
carol
___
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:26:39PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
in the united states, there exists a condition where people are being
educated for a test. teachers that do not teach the content for the
test are removed.
For usability tests? I doubt that this is
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:49:50PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 09:26:39PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
no, i really meant what i said. i am actually very nervous about this
because i had in real life a roman who failed a test that was made for
testing purposes.
Sven Neumann wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality.
[...]
So the question is, is anyone actually using this
functionality? Are
Sven Neumann wrote:
So the question is, is anyone actually using this
functionality? Are there scripts out there that rely on
plug-in-blur-randomize to be available?
Christopher Curtis wrote:
Is it possible to remove the dialog without removing the options?
Yes, it is possible, that's why
27 matches
Mail list logo
