Claus Berghammer (Bugzilla) wrote:
>
> Strange zoomout:
>
> I attached a picture that shows all steps to reproduce (I hope
> attachments are O.K. on this list?):
>
> gimp-zoomout-demo.jpg
I have to admit that that is a use case that should work. I think it's
possible to make that use case work wit
tks wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm writing X11 Mouse Cursor plug-in which enable GIMP to import and
> export a Xcursor file.
> Current release is here.
> http://registry.gimp.org/node/10764
>
> I have implemented almost everything which I think is necessary and
> it is ready for being merged in GIMP itself.
>
David Gowers wrote:
> I'm assuming that the separate layer modes will eventually separate
> into their own files for reasons of speed, in which case this is
> trivial to implement; request LAB color as the input format, apply
> normal blending to A and B channels,
> leave L channel unchanged from d
David Gowers wrote:
>> I have ported almost all (only Soft light pending) layer modes to a GEGL
>> operation. It is yet unclear if this will be eventually used or if it
>> will more serve as a reference implementation, but in any case would
>> improvements to how Color behaves best be written again
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Martin Nordholts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Gowers wrote:
>> I'm assuming that the separate layer modes will eventually separate
>> into their own files for reasons of speed, in which case this is
I meant separate operations, here.
>> trivial to implemen
Hi,
I tried discussing it on IRC couple of days ago, but, as usual for
IRC, it quickly went to absurd, so let's try it again.
There is a good chance of having a real investment into development of
GIMP starting next year and up to 2011. Right now I'm not in position
to say in a public list where
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So please think of several really important tasks and let me know what
> they are within next 2-3 weeks.
>
Hi
I'm not sure what level of detail you are after, or how feasible the
tasks should be, but here's a start. Some of these items overlap:
* Continue
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> I'm not sure what level of detail you are after
Generic, with further elaboration :)
> * Introduce so called Adjustment Layers
This is more or less what I was somewhat afraid of when I wrote the
previous letter :-) There are potential fe
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>> * Introduce so called Adjustment Layers
>>
>
> This is more or less what I was somewhat afraid of when I wrote the
> previous letter :-) There are potential features that are probably not
> thoroughly
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> This is more or less what I was somewhat afraid of when I wrote the
>> previous letter :-) There are potential features that are probably not
>> thoroughly investigated by usability team yet; at least there are no
>> specs for them at gui.
On Nov 2, 2008 6:26am, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
There is a good chance of having a real investment into development of
GIMP starting next year and up to 2011. Right now I'm not in position
to say in a public list where it would be coming from. I do know your
general
This has been discussed somewhat in the very distant past. The last
discussion ended with the verdict that recording user actions (and
playing then back later) would not be possible without rewriting the
Gimp core. So now that things are moving to GEGL, I'd like to resurrect
this feature request. F
Hi Viktor,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been discussed somewhat in the very distant past. The last
A lot, actually:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51937
> discussion ended with the verdict that recording user actions (and
> pla
Hi, Martin.
> If the patch is of high quality, I don't see why we would reject it.
OK, I will do my best.
Let me ask one more question.
My plug-in is currently depends on libXcursor. I think this will make
it messy to build for Windows. (But I have no idea about it because I
have never compiled
I was thinking
all colors can be specified with light wavelength measures isn't that true?
can't it be that instead of RGB color you say light color wavelength
instead? then say the same for YMCK color too?
then can't there be where the same wavelength measure means the same
color in RGB and
tks wrote:
> My plug-in is currently depends on libXcursor. I think this will make
> it messy to build for Windows. (But I have no idea about it because I
> have never compiled any binary for Windows.)
> If I steel handleds of lines of code from the source of libXcursor, I
> will be able to remove
Jason mclaughlin wrote:
> I was thinking
>
> all colors can be specified with light wavelength measures isn't that true?
That's not a bad incoherent rant ;)
I can recomend the book 'Understanding Color Management' by Abhay Sharma
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Color-Management-Abhay-Shar
17 matches
Mail list logo