On 6/24/07, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > Did you actually try it with another GTK+ application that has
> > support for XInput devices?
>
> I don't know of another one but GIMP.
> Could you please point me such an application for testing?
Inkscape?
Alexandre
Hi Sven,
> And yes, there are many bug reports. About five to ten per day. And
> only a handful of people dealing with them. And still we manage to
> maintain a pretty stable number of unresolved bugs. We have even
> managed to cut down this number siginificantly over the last years.
Certainly it
* El 24/06/07 a las 14:57, Sven Neumann chamullaba:
> > Bug GIMP is the only application, graphic or not, that showed this
> > problem, in several years of daily use. The mouse works on every
> > other application perfectly, and always did.
>
> Did you actually try it with another GTK+ application
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 20:40 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Bug GIMP is the only application, graphic or not, that showed this
> problem, in several years of daily use. The mouse works on every other
> application perfectly, and always did.
Did you actually try it with another GTK+ applicatio
Hi,
the point you are completely ignoring is that the vast majority of all
bug reports is answered very quickly. Major problems are usually fixed
within a few days and patches are reviewed very quickly. It may happen
that a bug report is not dealt with for a longer period of time. But
this happens
Hi Sven,
> > So, yes, I state, publicly, again: this bug has been ignored for
> > months (in fact, for years, since Fedora 4, and we are now in
> > Fedora 7). No matter if you let me 'get away' or not.
>
> These bug reports have not been ignored. They are not GIMP bugs and
> have been reassigned a
Hi Mukund,
> > Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version >= 2.3.18)
> > needs "libexif >= 0.6.15", while there is no RPM repository
> > with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
> > based distros have the libexif outdated).
>
> Ah good. So there lies your problem :-)
Ye
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:36 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> But I sent this email, with subject "still the same bug" on April 30
> to this list (Gimp-developer Digest, Vol 56, Issue 1, to be precise):
>
> : However, about a year or two ago, I reported a bug in Bugzilla:
> : the mouse buttons
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:36:01 +0200, Luis A. Florit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Look at this for example:
>>
>> > So:
>> >
>> > 1) Is the EXIF source in the all the 3 cameras (of 3 different
>> > brands) broken?
>> > 2) Why all the other graphic programs that I use (showfoto,
>> > gqview, gthum
* El 22/06/07 a las 8:53, Sven Neumann chamullaba:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:18 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> > From aggressive answers, to unanswered mails (not that bad),
>
> It would help a lot if you could try to be more precise in your mails.
> That would avoid the need to ask f
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:18 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> From aggressive answers, to unanswered mails (not that bad),
It would help a lot if you could try to be more precise in your mails.
That would avoid the need to ask for details. If a dialog is titled
"Save as JPEG", then why do you
Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version >= 2.3.18)
> needs "libexif >= 0.6.15", while there is no RPM repository
> with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
> based distros have the libexif outdated).
>
> Observe that version libexif 0.6.15 has
Hi Luis
Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version >= 2.3.18)
> needs "libexif >= 0.6.15", while there is no RPM repository
> with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
> based distros have the libexif outdated).
Ah good. So there lies your problem
Hi Luis
Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> Please excuse me, Mukund, but I will be very surprised
> if this has something to do with broken EXIF data.
As I'm yet to see the actual original image in question, speculating
about what is wrong with it is pointless. Please attach the image to the
bug and we'l
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:25 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Compiling the trunk, I saw that GIMP (also version >= 2.3.18)
> needs "libexif >= 0.6.15", while there is no RPM repository
> with libexif version bigger than 0.6.13. (Probably most RPM
> based distros have the libexif outdated).
[...]
Sa
> Hi Mukund,
>
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > > > Here is the bug in question:
> > > >
> > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
> > >
> > > In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
> >
> > Yes, it's not limited to Bibble.
Hi Mukund,
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > > Here is the bug in question:
> > >
> > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
> >
> > In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
>
> Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stat
On 6/22/07, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> Thanks for (yet another) (double) stupid answer, Sven.
We are not going to compensate loss of Carol by become rude ourselves
are we? Could we possibly take a deep breath, count to 10 and smile
friendlier to each other?
Alexandre
_
> > I have a Panasonic FZ50 whose EXIF data was always preserved by
> > GIMP. Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and
> > immediately saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the "Save as..."
> > dialog, there is no option to save (or not) the EXIF, as it always
> > was. Not evey a gre
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:58 +0100, Alex Pounds wrote:
> > There has never been such an option in the "Save as..." dialog.
>
> My copy of the Gimp disagrees with you on this point:
>
> http://www.ethicsgirls.com/stuff/exifshot.jpg
That's not the Save As dialog which would be the file-choo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 07:59:08AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:01 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and immediately
> > saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the "Save as..." dialog, there is
> > no option to save (or not)
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:01 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> I have a Panasonic FZ50 whose EXIF data was always preserved by GIMP.
> Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and immediately
> saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the "Save as..." dialog, there is
> no option to save
Hi Luis
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:01:16PM -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
> > Here is the bug in question:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
>
> In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
>
Yes, it's not limited to Bibble. That's a title stated by the rep
I can prove this for RAWs from UFRaw CVS as plug-in (exiv2 2.14 SVN)
with Minolta G500 and Minolta 7D and jpg from Sony alpha RAW (Photoshop
CS2).
Luis A. Florit wrote:
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446809
>
> In fact, this bug in 2.3.18 is not related (only) to Bibble.
>
> I h
Hi Mukund,
> Hi Alexander
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:06:53AM +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> > Haven't found in bugs and SVN changelog. GIMP 2.3.18 (Windows) deletes
> > exif data from images.
> >
>
> There is a similar bug on bugzilla.gnome.org filed against the GIMP
> component (it may
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:52:50PM +0530, Mukund wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:06:53AM +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> > Haven't found in bugs and SVN changelog. GIMP 2.3.18 (Windows) deletes
> > exif data from images.
> >
>
> There is a similar bug on bugzilla.gnome.org filed agai
Hi Alexander
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:06:53AM +0300, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
> Haven't found in bugs and SVN changelog. GIMP 2.3.18 (Windows) deletes
> exif data from images.
>
There is a similar bug on bugzilla.gnome.org filed against the GIMP
component (it may have been closed recentl
Haven't found in bugs and SVN changelog. GIMP 2.3.18 (Windows) deletes
exif data from images.
--
With respect
Alexander Rabtchevich
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gi
28 matches
Mail list logo
