Andrei Simion wrote:
> Does anybody know where I can download GIMP-Python from? Our sysadmin
> says that whatever he found on the Internet does not work.
What did he find, and why does it not work?
Michael
--
GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki > http:
Hi,
Does anybody know where I can download GIMP-Python from? Our sysadmin
says that whatever he found on the Internet does not work.
Thanks,
Andrei
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mai
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 11:36 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Does reviewing mean that someone goes through scripts, marks forgotten
> messages and err... unmarks those that should not be translated?
Sure, I might have forgotten a message or two. But the main point of
such a review is tha
On 10/5/06, Sven Neumann wrote:
> In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
> mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
> someone could review the strings that have been marked for translation.
> I would like to point translators to the n
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 00:16 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
>
> In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
> mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
> someone could review the string
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 15:51 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
In the meantime, while Carol is trying to steal your time with pointless
mails, the Python i18n effort is basically done. It would be nice if
someone could review the strings that hav
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 10:31 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> the internationalisation of the Gimp Python bindings and plug-ins is
> still pending:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
We have come a good deal further here in the meantime. The framework for
internationalisation
Hi,
the internationalisation of the Gimp Python bindings and plug-ins is
still pending:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
Does this mean that noone is interested in having the existing Python
scripts in GIMP 2.4? It should not be difficult to make the plug-ins use
the existing ge
Moin,
Regarding http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287 some progress
has been made in CVS. To avoid i18n problems, the procedure registration
in pygimp has been changed (in a hopefully backwards compatible way). It
shouldn't be too difficult to add i18n now. But still, there hasn't been
On Monday 14 August 2006 04:17 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have opened a bug report on what I believe to be the remaining
> issues with gimp-python:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
>
> Even though I said earlier that's it's perhaps too late for adding
> i18n support, I
Hi,
I have opened a bug report on what I believe to be the remaining issues
with gimp-python:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351287
Even though I said earlier that's it's perhaps too late for adding i18n
support, I feel now that we absolutely need to do this if we want to
install any
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:20 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346001)
>
> I consider this both sad and grave. IMHO, the build of python-fu by
> default, and support for it under Redmond OS is one of the greatest
> things in this developm
In bug #346001, Sven wrote:
>Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GIMP developer, points: 23)
> 2006-06-27 13:47 UTC [reply]
> If you ask me, Python-Fu must not install any plug-ins at all
> as long as the user interface doesn't hold up to our standards. This
> includes complete internationa
On Sunday 04 June 2006 02:45 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 11:58 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
wrote:
> > For C plug-ins that might be true. However, python plug-ins are
> > not good in dealing directly with pixels - that is, for rendering
> > things.
>
> There is n
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 11:58 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> For C plug-ins that might be true. However, python plug-ins are not
> good in dealing directly with pixels - that is, for rendering things.
There is no need to access pixels directly. We are not asking the C
programmer
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 12:07 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
> The plug-in, I'm writing, creates a number of layers, every layer receives an
> object, for example a circle (created by ellipse selection, an selection
> fill), but somewhen, don't know why, the layer contains not only the desir
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 16:58 schrieb Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris:
> On Saturday 03 June 2006 09:53 am, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > > That sounds as if you don't clear the layer before you use it
> > > > for the f
On Saturday 03 June 2006 09:53 am, Simon Budig wrote:
> Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > That sounds as if you don't clear the layer before you use it
> > > for the first time. Layers created from a Plugin are not
> > > initialized from the ver
Alan Horkan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote:
> > That sounds as if you don't clear the layer before you use it for the
> > first time. Layers created from a Plugin are not initialized from the
> > very beginning. They need to be cleared using e.g. gimp_drawable_fi
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Simon Budig wrote:
> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 14:29:02 +0200
> From: Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp-python: Artefacts when creating layer
>
> Sebastian Breuers ([EMAIL PR
Sebastian Breuers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The plug-in, I'm writing, creates a number of layers, every layer receives an
> object, for example a circle (created by ellipse selection, an selection
> fill), but somewhen, don't know why, the layer contains not only the desired
> circle but also
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The plug-in, I'm writing, creates a number of layers, every layer receives an
object, for example a circle (created by ellipse selection, an selection
fill), but somewhen, don't know why, the layer contains not only the desired
circle but also some artefacts. Stripes, areas of
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 19:44 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Quoting Sebastian Breuers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
> > selection by using an internal gimp function.
> > If it's not, could someone give me a hint, how to achieve this
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 23:16 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
> Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 19:54 schrieben Sie:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:48 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
> > > i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
> > > selection by using an internal
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 19:54 schrieben Sie:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:48 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
> > i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
> > selection by using an internal gimp function.
> > If it's not, could someone give me a hint, how to ach
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 13:48 +0200, Sebastian Breuers wrote:
> i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
> selection by using an internal gimp function.
> If it's not, could someone give me a hint, how to achieve this in creating an
> own function?
Use gimp-ima
Quoting Sebastian Breuers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
selection by using an internal gimp function.
If it's not, could someone give me a hint, how to achieve this in creating an
own function?
I don't use Python-fu but the followin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i wondered if there is a possibility to check, if a point is in a given
selection by using an internal gimp function.
If it's not, could someone give me a hint, how to achieve this in creating an
own function?
seb
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Manish Singh wrote:
>
> >> By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it
> would make the whole thing even more complicated.
> >
> > One line of scheme to call your python script won't increase the
> > complexity ap
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 03:01:31PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >i asked because i put instructions of how to do this online.
> >
> >i have a crontab that runs gimp.
> >
> >that being said, it has been running for so long now, i have no idea
> >what sort of mess it is making, but
Carol Spears wrote:
i asked because i put instructions of how to do this online.
i have a crontab that runs gimp.
that being said, it has been running for so long now, i have no idea
what sort of mess it is making, but it was all so easy that it was a
pleasure to put the instructions online.
Manish Singh wrote:
>> By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it
would make the whole thing even more complicated.
>
> One line of scheme to call your python script won't increase the
> complexity appreciably.
The problem is that if i have huge lists and complex python
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:02:51PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >what os will you be using this on?
> >
> >carol
>
> I'm developping it for and under a Debian-testing system (on amd k7),
> and plan to use it possibly also on an Ubuntu Linux.
> I won't need windows support.
>
i asked because i put i
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> >Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
> >
> >-Yosh
>
> I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
> the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
>
what os will you be using this on?
carol
I'm developping it for and under a Debian-testing system (on amd k7),
and plan to use it possibly also on an Ubuntu Linux.
I won't need windows support.
Ministeyr
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-develo
Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
-Yosh
I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
forth, so it would make the script quite complex to have to use the
batch
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 03:31:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
> I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
> occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
> xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
> the ui?
> I need something
Hello,
I need to make an external Python administration script, wich
occasionnally uses gimp functionnality (especially to convert to/from
xcf files). Is there a way to use this functionnality without starting
the ui?
I need something like that:
import gimp_noui as gimp
gimp.s
Hi,
Greg Yasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi. Are there any plans to eventually include Gimp-python in the
> GIMP package?
>
> I would like to be able to do automation without having to learn
> Perl or Scheme.
the current development version comes with python bindings. It is not
yet decided
Hi. Are there any plans to eventually include Gimp-python in the GIMP package?
I would like to be able to do automation without having to learn Perl or
Scheme.
Thank you.
-Greg Yasko
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.
Hi all.
I have written a small Gimp Shell to explore Gimp Python (I currently
use the debian-testing packages for this).
Simply drop it in ~/.gimp-1.2/plug-ins .
To be able to use it (/Xtns/Python-Fu/Gimp-Shell)
you have to start the Gimp from an Terminal.
The thing has completion and history.
42 matches
Mail list logo