On 09/01/2010 12:45 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> O Peter, Where Art Thou?
> This is getting nasty quickly.
>
>
> On 28.08.2010 20:13, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 07:32 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>>
> If I want a colour , I should find it on the colour menu . If I
> want to
>
O Peter, Where Art Thou?
This is getting nasty quickly.
On 28.08.2010 20:13, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 07:32 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
If I want a colour , I should find it on the colour menu . If I want to
select layers I should fine the necessary interface el
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:39 +0200, yahvuu wrote:
> On 27.08.2010 07:32, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > If people have troubles finding the Layers dockable, we should instead
> > look into making it more discoverable, like adding a 'Dockables' top
> > menu or moving them directly under 'Windows' instea
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 07:32 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> >> If I want a colour , I should find it on the colour menu . If I want to
> >> select layers I should fine the necessary interface elements on the
> >> layer menu.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable. We could duplicate the menu items from the D
Just the simple point of a basic user:
2010/8/28
>
> I think this is the logical error here from usage point of view. It is
> not the fact that they are "dockable" which means they should be grouped
> together. They should be grouped according to function.
>
> If I want to hide a layer I should
On 08/28/10 07:16, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> > Making the Layers dialog discoverable under the 'Layers' menu and color
>> > dialogs below the 'Colors' menu etc.. makes a lot of sense
> But won't that be a problem? Instead of having all dockable dialogs in a
> single place, a user would have to g
On 08/27/2010 12:39 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> On 27.08.2010 07:32, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> If people have troubles finding the Layers dockable, we should instead
>> look into making it more discoverable, like adding a 'Dockables' top
>> menu or moving them directly under 'Windows' instead of having a
On 08/27/10 12:39, yahvuu wrote:
> On 27.08.2010 07:32, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> If people have troubles finding the Layers dockable, we should instead
>> look into making it more discoverable, like adding a 'Dockables' top
>> menu or moving them directly under 'Windows' instead of having a sub m
On 27.08.2010 07:32, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> If people have troubles finding the Layers dockable, we should instead
> look into making it more discoverable, like adding a 'Dockables' top
> menu or moving them directly under 'Windows' instead of having a sub menu.
What about naming it the 'Dialog
On 08/26/2010 09:19 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:11 +0200, g...@catking.net wrote:
>
>> If I want a colour , I should find it on the colour menu . If I want to
>> select layers I should fine the necessary interface elements on the
>> layer menu.
>
> Sounds reasonable. We coul
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 22:05 +0200, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
> I'm not long enough on this list to know all the old discussions, but AFAIK
> Sven Neumann once (some years ago) was interviewed by the Chaos Radio, and
> mentioned there, that one person did a complete usability anylsis.
>
> I
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:11:25PM +0200, g...@catking.net wrote:
[...]
> Since the subject here is "(no subject)" I will add a related comments
> on some similar oddities in the menu system
[...]
Sorry, I was too tried, it was
"Re: [Gimp-developer] scanner support should be File->Acquire"
before
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 21:11 +0200, g...@catking.net wrote:
> If I want a colour , I should find it on the colour menu . If I want to
> select layers I should fine the necessary interface elements on the
> layer menu.
Sounds reasonable. We could duplicate the menu items from the Dockables
menu
On 26/08/10 19:50, oli...@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] scanner support should be File->Acquire
> Reply-To:
> In-Reply-To:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:54:38PM -0400, Christopher Curtis wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
On Saturday, October 25, 2008, 23:44:13, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> IMHO pkg-config could well have been designed/defined to work this way
> on Unix, also, but I don't think it can be changed at this stage, in
> case there really are some packages out there where the location of
> the .pc file is not
> Full cygwin development tree install.
Please avoid Cygwin if you are building native Windows software.
Cygwin is nice if you build Cygwin software, but presumably that is
not what you are wanting to do, if you want to build plug-ins that
work with the "native" Windows GIMP.
(Yes, I do know that
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 07:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It should not be particularly difficult to enhance your build system to
> build natively on Windows.
If you think this would be easy, then feel free to do that.
It would be a lot easier though if you just learned some of the bas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Well I'm not sure it is valid to call it "faulty" since you've obviously
>>
> It should not be particularly difficult to enhance your build system to
> build natively on
> Windows. I suggest looking at the Mozilla build system for an example of
> how to do this
>
Your solution is too much complicated. Current situation with "hidden"
binaries is much more acceptable from my POV. As the practice shows, the
persons who want to obtain bleeding edge version ask for it at the yahoo
win Gimp users group. They obtain the answer - some kind of "look
through the
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:10:20 -0400
"Bowman, Terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Help!!
> Trying to install perl fu on Redhat 7. I keep getting this message when i do
> Makefile.PL and then gives me errors on the make and make install
>
On 4 Jul 2002, at 1:56, Vanessa D wrote:
> I am realively new to GDK+. I would like to know how to compile the
> source files of Gimp in windows. Is it possible?
Tor Lillqvist is the maker of the most widely used Windows build of
the GIMP (as far as I can tell).
So, yes, it is possible to com
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 08:35, Fabian Frédérick wrote:
> What's up with those cool Perl plugins from the registry ? Not yet
> included in 1.3 !
The basic problem is that if every plug-in was included in the
distribution, it would be huge. No solution has yet been found for
dealing with this p
Hi,
"Vranyecz, Zoltan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How could I unsubscribe, from the GIMP mailing list?
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
the answer is right there
Hi,
Ken Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to build Gimp on OS/2 but am having trouble. Can
> somebody give me some guidance in this area? All the auto
> tools like autoconf, automake, and those give me errors like -
> aclocal: configure.in: 293: macro `AM_PATH_GLIB_' not found
24 matches
Mail list logo
