Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers (update)

2007-08-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Moin, here's an update of the update. We have made good progress since last week and it is time to look at the list of showstoppers again: 78265 Add support for ICC color profiles This is now (IMO) sufficiently implemented for 2.4. Still some minor changes needed in the internals of the new

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2007-08-08 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:05 +, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote: I just stumbled across a similar issue with the latest version (at most a few days old, I'll update to the head later tonight (GMT) : If I select the whole image (pressing CTRL-A) and then I select a rectangle area out of that

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2007-08-07 Thread Karl Günter Wünsch
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 07:43, Sven Neumann wrote: 349340 Alt behaves incorrectly for new rectangle/ellipse selecti... Should probably be looked at. We should get the interaction right for the 2.4 release and not change it later unless absolutely needed. I just stumbled across a similar

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2007-08-07 Thread Simon Budig
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 374854 possible optimizations in Script-Fu This one can possibly be closed or moved from the milestone. Waiting for a comment from Kevin. [...] 438997 Output on stdout when using script-fu console Looks like a low-hanging fruit. Some help

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2007-08-07 Thread Laurenz Gamper
Hi gimp developers, I am using 2.3.x for quite some time now and it was wonderful to see how things were getting better with each release. Thank you very much and keep on the good work. Laurenz Gamper ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-20 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:35:35 +0100 On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:54 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: And a few RFEs which would be needed to get the print dialog to functionality comparable to the existing gimp-print plug-in. I don't know whether

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-20 Thread Akkana Peck
Sven Neumann writes: I don't think that comparable functionality is a goal of the new Print plug-in. People can always install the gutenprint plug-in if they need this functionality. Robert L Krawitz writes: Whatever one thinks of all the color adjustments and the Gimp-Print/Gutenprint UI

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-19 Thread Akkana Peck
Sven Neumann writes: thanks for looking at the plug-in. It would help a lot if we could split your list into problems of the Print plug-in and problems of the GtkPrint API. The latter would have to be reported against GTK+. I've filed a gimp bug (#387604) on the unit factor problems (I suspect

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-19 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:54 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote: And a few RFEs which would be needed to get the print dialog to functionality comparable to the existing gimp-print plug-in. I don't know whether these belong to gtkprint or gimp: - No way to adjust margins - Page Setup should be

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I am picking up on a mail that is more than a month old, but the issue is still unresolved. Let me bring it to your attention again. On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 21:59 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list I posted earlier. We

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-18 Thread Akkana Peck
Sven Neumann writes: That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list I posted earlier. We need to check if the new print plug-in is ready for release. Since I don't use GTK+ 2.10 yet, I didn't get a chance to have a look at it yet. [ ... ] It should at

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-12-18 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, thanks for looking at the plug-in. It would help a lot if we could split your list into problems of the Print plug-in and problems of the GtkPrint API. The latter would have to be reported against GTK+. Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-19 Thread gg
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:24:10 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this damn ML reply-to setting again. I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I get a msg from the list ,

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-18 Thread Mukund
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahh, I did not see what your previous comment meant. Caught out by this damn ML reply-to setting again. I'm subscribed to several lists which operate in a more logical way: I get a msg from the list , I hit reply in my email client and it replies to the list.

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-18 Thread jernej
On Saturday, November 18, 2006, 21:24:10, Mukund wrote: It actually isn't. You may want to read this: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Thankfully, some e-mail clients can work around this annoyance (sadly, it's not automatic, so I often misdirect my first message on such lists).

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-17 Thread gg
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:26:14 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: when you said your list of stoppers was open for discussion I though you meant is was open for discussion. Open for discussion on the mailing list, yes.

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-16 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:51:10 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is still drift on rotation tool using interpolation=NONE How pointless to tell me. Please make sure that there's a bug report about it and that it

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-16 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: when you said your list of stoppers was open for discussion I though you meant is was open for discussion. Open for discussion on the mailing list, yes. But if you send your mail to me alone (which is what the mail header

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: I would also like to further improve the color management preferences. In this case it seems like a good idea to try to get something that resembles the Photoshop color management configuration in terms of terminology and policies. Sven, I would strongly

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:51 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: I would strongly recommend work out common terminology with developers of other open source projects instead. Having uniform terminology is one of the reasons the OpenIcc project [1] exists: commercial applications fail to

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: I know about the OpenICC project and I am subscribed to the mailing-list. But I don't think they can provide me with a decent proposal for color management policies and what terms to use. If by them you are referring to developers of Scribus, ICC-Examin, LProf

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 21:05 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: If by them you are referring to developers of Scribus, ICC-Examin, LProf etc. and technical specialists of Lexmark, HP and Adobe, then, most likely, yes -- they can. If you are referring to somebody else from that list, then

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 10:05, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: I know about the OpenICC project and I am subscribed to the mailing-list. But I don't think they can provide me with a decent proposal for color management policies and what terms to use. If

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:02 -0800, Hal V. Engel wrote: Also some time ago I put together a fairly detailed description of what was needed and where this should be located in the GIMP menu structure that I submitted to this list. There have been similar proposals from others as well.

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/15/06, Sven Neumann wrote: That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list I posted earlier. We need to check if the new print plug-in is ready for release. Since I don't use GTK+ 2.10 yet, I didn't get a chance to have a look at it yet. What requirements should

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: That brings up another showstopper for 2.4 that is missing from the list I posted earlier. We need to check if the new print plug-in is ready for release. Since I don't use GTK+ 2.10 yet, I didn't get a chance to have a

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 11:38, Sven Neumann wrote: snip With the exception of printer CM support there is not that much work that needs to be done to GIMP to finish off the CM implementation. Printing is left to plug-ins, so we don't need to deal with it except for providing ways

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Robert L Krawitz
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:38:07 +0100 On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:02 -0800, Hal V. Engel wrote: One area were many on the OpenICC list agree is that the photoshop/proprietary OS approach to CM could be substantially improved in the area of

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-15 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 19:22 -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote: The gimp-print/guten-print plug-in is developed by different people and is not at all coupled to the GIMP release cycles. We should however consider to make the print plug-in that's being shipped with GIMP aware of