carol irvin wrote:
bit processing is now such a huge email that I am having trouble
telling when I want to read it and when I don't. There is some really
good creative info coming in on it which I don't want to miss. But
there is also some sort of continuing feud going on under that same
In response to an excellent suggestion from Carol I have reposted this item
under the above title. Should anyone wish to continue this discussion then
please do so here rather than under the Bit-depth Processing title as it gets
a bit confusing when discussions drift off topic.
Thanks Carol
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 13:02:02 Simon Budig wrote:
Not just noise, his points have some merit. But they are directed to
the wrong audience and the intended audience already knows about his
points. That ironically makes his mails pointless...
If you regard my contributions as noise then
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 11:52:13 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-02-07 13:47]:
Much unnecessary quote removed.
One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to edit an
image for your own use and can revisit the original then the absense of
Von: gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you regard my contributions as noise then please do not waste you time
reading them unless you are trolling to start a flame war. If so you will
not be successful here because I will follow a policy I have followed
over 30 years on mail lists -- keep on
What's the opinion here of Beginning GIMP: From Novice to
Professional, by Akkana Peck, Apress, 2006?
It's supposed to cover GIMP 2.4.
http://www.bestbookdeal.com/book/detail/1590595874
Dick Moores
___
Gimp-user mailing list
On Thursday 04 October 2007 03:41:05 Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you regard my contributions as noise then please do not waste you time
reading them unless you are trolling to start a flame war. If so you will
not be successful here because I will follow
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:55:35 -0700, gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 13:02:02 Simon Budig wrote:
Not just noise, his points have some merit. But they are directed to
the wrong audience and the intended audience already knows about his
points. That ironically
gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...] This layer would hold instructs that would apply my
adjustment [...]
Yes! In fact, when I first started to work with layers I'd expected
the layers to work like this (i.e. store change instructions instead
of pixels).
Being an old Unix hacker, I'd go
On 10/4/07, Dick Moores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the opinion here of Beginning GIMP: From Novice to
Professional, by Akkana Peck, Apress, 2006?
It's supposed to cover GIMP 2.4.
http://www.bestbookdeal.com/book/detail/1590595874
I'm a novice, having used the Gimp to process photos for
On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:42:55 Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 02:55:35 -0700, gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 13:02:02 Simon Budig wrote:
Not just noise, his points have some merit. But they are directed to
the wrong audience and the intended
Hello,
If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all
possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:03:14 David Heino wrote:
Hello,
If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across all
possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV?
Think in pixels. If you need to cater for full screen digital projection
1024x768
http://en.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/Gimp/OptimisingImagesForWeb?topic=WebHome
http://gimp.org/tutorials/
http://meetthegimp.org/?cat=8
http://www.gimpguru.org/
http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/
http://gug.sunsite.dk/
--
carol
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Since I read that many of us are in agreement about not wanting to continue
reading about the ongoing feud, I just wanted to let everyone know that I
will not be reading any more emails which have the above two headings.
Those seem to be the two that the feuders are using. Thus, if a comment is
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:20:33 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an image already has a filename associated to it, then open the Save
file-chooser in that folder. Otherwise use the folder of the most recent
save operation. Would that make sense?
Definitely. That should be the
hi gimpusers!
please, what is the difference between a plug-in and a script? I am asking
because I never know if I should copy a plug-in (e.g. from the
registry.gimp.org - site) in to the plug-in or the script folder. I'ts
always a try and error thing. And most of the times it's working when I am
Dick Moores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the opinion here of Beginning GIMP: From Novice to
Professional, by Akkana Peck, Apress, 2006?
I think that Peck's book is by far the best available book about the
subject. It has some slight defects (what book does not have?), but its
coverage is
Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
I found on for PS (which should be useful), but wondered if gimp has one
Yes on my install, it's the last icon, looks like a small black ball
with an extension on it. Keystroke shortcut is: Shift+D
--
Until later, Geoffrey
Those who would give up essential
I found on for PS (which should be useful), but wondered if gimp has one
--
Gracia...Cooleemee, NC Registered Linux user #263390 -ZENWALK 4.4
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mynameistaken/
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and
carrying the cross- Sinclair Lewis
--- carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know it is terribly easy for me to end up with mud after I overdo
it
with all the plug-ins, styles, custom shapes and so forth that I've
amassed in the PS program.
Like your national park pics? :) Actually, I like the surrealistic
look it gives
El dt 02 de 10 del 2007 a les 18:20 +0200, en/na Sven Neumann va
escriure:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 23:31 +0200, Pere Pujal i Carabantes wrote:
I see the Recently Used (files) entry in file-chooser. Can it hold
Recently Used Dirs ?
For the Save dialog, this would probably make more
--- carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I cropped was to use the horizontal selection marquee tool
and then pressed ImageCrop in the menu of the image. When the crop
was completed, I had my nice cropped image BUT I also had a floating
layer and thus 2 layers in the layers palette.
On Thursday 04 October 2007 13:51:41 Geoffrey wrote:
Yes on my install, it's the last icon, looks like a small black ball
with an extension on it. Keystroke shortcut is: Shift+D
Thanks..I know gimp has it, BUT I'm looking for a tutorial.
--
Gracia...Cooleemee, NC Registered Linux user
--- Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think though that we need more people pointing out the
obvious
flaws in GIMP.
Obvious to whom? Do you speak for the list members?
We are all very well aware of them...
We are?
...and you are just stealing our precious time.
Again, do you
Kevin Cozens wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
There is an amazing video describing an image resizing algorithm that
removes (or adds) pixels based upon their importance to the subjecto
of the photo. Can this be implemented in The Gimp?
Of course it can be implemented in GIMP. It just takes
On Thursday 04 October 2007 13:51:41 Geoffrey wrote:
Yes on my install, it's the last icon, looks like a small black ball
with an extension on it. Keystroke shortcut is: Shift+D
Thanks..I know gimp has it, BUT I'm looking for a tutorial.
Why not ask meetthegimp, he does some great
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 21:03 +0100 schrieb norman:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 13:51:41 Geoffrey wrote:
Yes on my install, it's the last icon, looks like a small black ball
with an extension on it. Keystroke shortcut is: Shift+D
Thanks..I know gimp has it, BUT I'm looking
On Friday 05 October 2007 04:21:32 carol irvin wrote:
I've always suspected that this is because art is my escape from reality.
Ah, well, at least you know what that is... that an Open Free
escape is much safer more useful than one of those complex
psycho-whatsisnames. (-:
Cheers; Leon
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:03:14 David Heino wrote:
is 72 dpi still sufficient across all possible monitors--a
little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV?
There ain't no simple answer to that.
A simple laptop screen starts at about 1024x768 pixels (dots)
so a 72DPI picture to cover that
On Friday 05 October 2007 00:22:59 carol irvin wrote:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/Gimp/OptimisingImagesForWeb?
topic=WebHome
http://gimp.org/tutorials/
http://meetthegimp.org/?cat=8
http://www.gimpguru.org/
http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/
http://gug.sunsite.dk/
All mookbarked
David Heino wrote:
If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient
across all possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large
screen HDTV?
DPI has nothing to do with screen resolution. On screen, most images are
displayed pixel-for-pixel (unless the application is
On Thursday 04 October 2007, Konstantin Svist wrote:
Kevin Cozens wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
There is an amazing video describing an image resizing algorithm that
removes (or adds) pixels based upon their importance to the subjecto
of the photo. Can this be implemented in The Gimp?
From: David Heino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I am producing images for the web, is 72 dpi still sufficient across
all
possible monitors--a little lap top screen to a large screen HDTV?
Read here: http://scantips.com/no72dpi.html
More information about resolution, DPI etc. from the main site:
--- mike reqavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around
8.5 x 11.0 inches.
\
---'
/
Sorry. Couldn't resist. :)
A plugin is an executable - ie. it's a program you can run, like you
can run Inkscape or GIMP.
A script is a set of text instructions which are run by a script
interpreter (script-fu).
Thus, it's easy to tell the difference:
* If it has a .scm extension, it's a script
* Failing that, if you can
Hi Leon,
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 06:57:39 +1000
From: Leon Brooks GIMP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] photo resolution
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
..
One possible/partial answer is to use some JavaScript to read
the window's dimensions alter the width height
Apologies if people get this duplicated but I didn't receive my own message and
thought it may have been lost.
--
Hi there,
I have a question on copying a portion of an image in gimp. First, a little
context. I needed to create a
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 17:12 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:20:33 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an image already has a filename associated to it, then open the Save
file-chooser in that folder. Otherwise use the folder of the most recent
save
39 matches
Mail list logo
