On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:50:44 Elwin Estle wrote:
> I am hardly an expert on this whole issue. I would like to see a side by
> side comparison of prints made from 8 bit vs 16 bit images to see just
> exactly what the difference might be. I think your average person probably
> wouldn't care.
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:05:51 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
> think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
> is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in development know
> very well that
> On 10/2/07, gimp_user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 01 October 2007 16:09:23 jim feldman wrote:
> > > Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > > * Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-01-07 13:29]
> > > >
> > > >> In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right
> >
> > tool
> >
> > > >
On Friday 28 September 2007 10:45:14 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 04:04 -0700, gimp_user wrote:
> > While the absence of a recognised skill transition route (i.e. no skin
> > similar to PS) is a serious obstacle affecting the ability of multiple
> > individuals to collaborat
On Monday 09 July 2007 05:18:23 Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 05:02:19 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > That would mean more developers, features and a bigger
> > and better community of users. IMHO gimpshop is a great idea. According
>
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:37:01 Manish Singh wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to
> > fail and those who wish it to succeed but are afraid of offending some
> >
interested in functionality
rather than the politics of past struggles.
David Southwell
Davd
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:37:01 Manish Singh wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to
> > fail and those who wish it to succeed but are afraid of offending some
> >
On Monday 09 July 2007 02:06:53 Simon Budig wrote:
> David Southwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On the first point my reaction to those adopting an authoritarian
> > position is "come on guys loosen up". It gives the impression that a few
> > people with an a
On Monday 09 July 2007 02:05:43 Karine Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:11:09 -0700
>
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems to me there are two issues which seem to be confused and
> > rolled into one seeminly illogical construct.
> >
&g
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:37:01 Manish Singh wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to
> > fail and those who wish it to succeed but are afraid of offending some
> >
ant to do so would make a
vaulable contribution to gimp by remaining silent.
Lets work together to make the community larger and therefore stronger. Gimp
needs to mature. It suffers from feature starvation in many crucial areas
(one of which gimpshop has begun to solve) and anyone
On Sunday 08 July 2007 12:07:55 Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 07:48 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I just want to make clear that people who are accustomed to be positively
> > helpful deserve encouragement and others, not of that disposition, IMHO
&
On Sunday 08 July 2007 08:05:45 Kim Johansson wrote:
> Then it seems like it will come some day. ;)
>
> http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq#head-455dd92a98eee71c3c35de7fd48065e75d3c
>92ca
>
> 2007/7/8, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * David Southwell <[
On Sunday 08 July 2007 07:42:04 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-08-07 10:36]:
> > On Sunday 08 July 2007 02:41:26 you wrote:
> > > Please ask on the gimpshop user list then. You might find that there
> > > is no such list. Bu
On Sunday 08 July 2007 02:41:26 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 02:34 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > I have installed ports/gimpshop on my fFreebsd 6.1 system. I want to
> > compare its functionality with photoshop with which I am extremely
> > familar an
Hi
Is there any chance of Gimp supporting 16 bit color in the near future? or is
it doomed to be limited to 8 bit which is not really suitable for
manipulating high quality digital images?
David Southwell
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user
t sure how the plugin will work with GimpShop.
>
> There is also DigiKam, which, with appropriate plugins, can handle Canon
> RAW files. I have a Rebel XT and this is what I use when I want to mess
> with RAW files.
>
> --- David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
Hi
I have installed ports/gimpshop on my fFreebsd 6.1 system. I want to compare
its functionality with photoshop with which I am extremely familar and use
extensively on my Win XP system.
I have started gimp and have two newbie questions.
1. How do I get to start gimpshop? The docs seem to ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
