Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Carol Spears wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:27:40AM +, Eric Pierce wrote: Implementing the import/export of a dynamic text layer from psd would be a nice addition though. someone just needs to do this, and i think that someone said that they could do this -- someone needs to just take the time to do it. IIRC, one of the prerequisites for this is an API for text layers. Currently, all you can do is to add text in a new layer or a new floating selection. The API should provide such things as getting/setting the font, text, the dimensions of the text layer, alignment, justification, ... This list doesn't claim to be accurate or comprehensive, but you get the idea. I don't know if anything has already been done to CVSHEAD regarding this. HTH, Michael -- Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Gregbair ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Anyway, Fireworks can import PSD files with the text layers. I'm 101% positive Adobe didn't tell Macromedia how to do this, so if Fireworks can, maybe some smart GIMP person can. I am pretty sure, that Macromedia licensed the current PSD specification from Adobe. They can afford to sign a NDA and it is probably relatively cheap compared to the efforts to reverse engineer it. Bye, Simon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Hi Greg, Gregbair wrote: And, no they don't publish the extensions. Anyway, Fireworks can import PSD files with the text layers. I'm 101% positive Adobe didn't tell Macromedia how to do this, so if Fireworks can, maybe some smart GIMP person can. It's not quite that straightforward. Presumably, MM used Adobe's SDK for PSDs, which includes the specs of the file format. Up until PS 6 these were available free. Since then, there is a licence agreement to sign which is very unfriendly to free software. This is a bit of a problem for the GIMP. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV: http://dneary.free.fr/CV/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
I am pretty sure, that Macromedia licensed the current PSD specification from Adobe. They can afford to sign a NDA and it is probably relatively cheap compared to the efforts to reverse engineer it. Bye, Simon Just thought I'd mention that Autodesk bought Macromedia - and Autodesk has a long history of being uncooperative in releaseing a useful descriptino of their AutoCAD .dwg or .dxf filetype. For more on 3d / 2d filetypes in open source look at blender3d.com and: http://www.opendesign.com/about/whtpaper/whynot.htm Duncan -- Linux user #372812 pgpabwAw2ljKk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 03:08 +0100, Simon Budig wrote: Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [MM Fireworks] He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen it firsthand... is there any truth to this!? PNG can handle custom application specific chunks of data, so it is perfectly possible that Fireworks uses custom data blocks, not specified in the PNG standard. I have no idea if MM published these extensions, but a PNG file just using the standard chunks cannot handle multiple layers. This actually sounds very interesting. I really like the way Inkscape's native format uses the SVG with some extensions to store similar extra attributes of the image, yet it's correctly parsed and rendered by any SVG renderer. Having to deal with maintaining thousands of icons in XCF exported PNGs makes it sound like a good approach. On the other hand, it could be too bloated to be used as the final output format. Interesteing idea though. cheers -- Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Quoting Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 03:08 +0100, Simon Budig wrote: Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [MM Fireworks] He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen it firsthand... is there any truth to this!? PNG can handle custom application specific chunks of data, so it is perfectly possible that Fireworks uses custom data blocks, not specified in the PNG standard. I have no idea if MM published these extensions, but a PNG file just using the standard chunks cannot handle multiple layers. This actually sounds very interesting. I really like the way Inkscape's native format uses the SVG with some extensions to store similar extra attributes of the image, yet it's correctly parsed and rendered by any SVG renderer. Copied from Firework's online manual... In addition to supporting PNG as an output format, Fireworks actually uses PNG as its native file format for day-to-day intermediate saves. This is possible thanks to PNG's extensible ``chunk-based'' design, which allows programs to incorporate application-specific data in a well-defined way. Macromedia has embraced this capability, defining at least four custom chunk types that hold various things pertinent to the editor. Unfortunately, one of them (pRVW) violates the PNG naming rules by claiming to be an officially registered, public chunk type, but this was an oversight and should be fixed in version 2.0. This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Hi, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IIRC, one of the prerequisites for this is an API for text layers. Currently, all you can do is to add text in a new layer or a new floating selection. Right. The PSD plug-in would have to be able to create a text layer based on the information read from the PSD file. The current PDB API for text layers is too limited for anything but very simple layers. The API should provide such things as getting/setting the font, text, the dimensions of the text layer, alignment, justification, ... This list doesn't claim to be accurate or comprehensive, but you get the idea. I don't know if anything has already been done to CVSHEAD regarding this. No, but it's on the list of things that we would like to have for GIMP 2.4. That doesn't mean that it will necessarily be there. What's needed most at the moment is a list of functionality that is needed. We could then try to design an API based on our needs. The implemenration will probably not be too difficult. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything, not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to read psd to a minimum to force people away from stealing and using photoshop. it would make sense if you look at it like a war. I'd say quite contrary. Giving the abilkity to read PSD will make it possible for people to convert their old work and give them a way to escape. THEN i spent a week following things on #gimp some. there was lots of talk and exchange of facts about the gimp raw plug-in. i haven't seen anything here about the raw plug-in, but i did see that Adobe has released an updated raw thing themselves. all this stuff, and i just got to sit back and ask myself, whatsup? Jakub, do you know whatsup with all this? As for the raw format (DG, Digital Negative), Adobe did the right thing and published the spec. [1] [1] - http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html, http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/license.html -- Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Carol Spears wrote: Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:03:30 -0800 From: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED], GIMPUser Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:40:13AM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:13 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:26:49PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote: In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option and lock-in of their software. define lock-in please. Lock-in as in f*ck I'm screwed now i have to use Adobe products to have access to all my work. everyone has their own things that lock them into something and out of other things. while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything, not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to read psd to a minimum to force people away from stealing and using photoshop. it would make sense if you look at it like a war. If anything being able read PSD files makes it easier to move files away from Adobe Photoshop and into the GIMP. I think the ability to write good PSD files would do more to keep users from working with both the GIMP and Adobe Photoshop but I never believe the developers would deliberately keep functionality to a minimum. I would have thought that developers rather choose to work on the many other challenges that interested them more instead and because the lack of specifications from Adobe made the job a lot more difficult. people who save their work in psd must be 1) secure that their place of employment will always use photoshop and computers that run it or PSD files are understood by Paint Shop Pro and most most other graphics software because Adobe did provide some specifications for a while and even if they do not provide the same kind of information for the latest versions of PSD they are dominant enough that others have made an effort to provide some compatibility. If you want to share files with users of other graphics software (besides the gimp) without flattening the image then PSD is the most obvious choice for sharing Layered images (MNG isn't widely supported yet and if there are other good choices they are not as obvious as PSD). 2) fairly certain they will always be able to afford it or steal it. photoshop has done its part in the world to continually demand that everyone purchase bigger and better computers with each new release; everyone counts on things that i have found to be not dependable. Adobe Photoshop Elements is not as extortionately priced as the full commercial version of Adobe Photoshop, apparantly the older verison is even bundled with some digital cameras. Cheap versions of Photoshop can be legally obtained, I expect I could pick up a second hand copy of Photoshop 6 quite cheaply (the university I attend has some copies of PS6 on special machines). For the ordinary users that doesn't understand or care about Free Software that isn't such a bad deal. But my point is that with PS Elements and cheap older versions there are probably more legitamate Photoshop users than ever. i get upset with the independent groups. i cannot remember the graphic but someone appeared on #gimp with a psd for an event that was sponsored by a group that was supposed to be all for freedom (it was anti-music or anti-copyright, iirc). I'm surprised they didn't flatten the image to a PNG file but there really isn't that much choice if you want to preserve layers in a format that a wide range of applications will be able to understand. THEN i spent a week following things on #gimp some. there was lots of talk and exchange of facts about the gimp raw plug-in. i haven't seen anything here about the raw plug-in, but i did see that Adobe has released an updated raw thing themselves. all this stuff, and i just got to sit back and ask myself, whatsup? - Alan H. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:15:36PM +0100, Jakub Steiner wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything, not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to read psd to a minimum to force people away from stealing and using photoshop. it would make sense if you look at it like a war. I'd say quite contrary. Giving the abilkity to read PSD will make it possible for people to convert their old work and give them a way to escape. heh, weird. usually i am the optimistic one. :) THEN i spent a week following things on #gimp some. there was lots of talk and exchange of facts about the gimp raw plug-in. i haven't seen anything here about the raw plug-in, but i did see that Adobe has released an updated raw thing themselves. all this stuff, and i just got to sit back and ask myself, whatsup? Jakub, do you know whatsup with all this? As for the raw format (DG, Digital Negative), Adobe did the right thing and published the spec. [1] [1] - http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html, http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/license.html okay, that is cool. better to have an enemy who is somewhat healthy and plays fair! carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Hi. So. TIFF format can have layers, and that is documented (although just using the 'normal' blending mode). Can Photoshop work with layered TIFF's? I think the support for layers in TIFFs is a lot easier to achieve than trying to figure out the PSD file, since the TIFF standard is documented, and that would be a good format for interchange of layered images. What do you say? JS -- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
One of the admins at my work purportedly uses Macormedia's Fireworks for raster image editing. He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen it firsthand... is there any truth to this!? And getting back to an earlier debate (file format 'lock-in' / divide and conquer), I've read somewhere that MS Word stole the word processing scene back in the day by: 1) implementing a damn near perfect WordPerfect (word pro leader at the time?) import filter but (in)conveniently lacked any WordPerfect output filter. 2) offering Word inexpensively For what it's worth, I think the Gimp would excel and enlighten if it had the best psd import AND export filter as possible. But I've learned to live with the current state of the psd filter at work. I use Gimp for 95% of my work (web devel/print work), and the main print guy uses PS for everything. The times when our work overlaps, I can conveniently save to psd for him from the Gimp if layers are an issue, and that has been a decent working solution for the 2+ years I've been at my current employment. Implementing the import/export of a dynamic text layer from psd would be a nice addition though. Eric P. On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:10:14PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote: Hi. So. TIFF format can have layers, and that is documented (although just using the 'normal' blending mode). Can Photoshop work with layered TIFF's? I think the support for layers in TIFFs is a lot easier to achieve than trying to figure out the PSD file, since the TIFF standard is documented, and that would be a good format for interchange of layered images. What do you say? JS -- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Eric Pierce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [MM Fireworks] He told me that the default file format is png! I called him a bold faced lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format. I asked him about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves can DO LAYERS. I haven't seen it firsthand... is there any truth to this!? PNG can handle custom application specific chunks of data, so it is perfectly possible that Fireworks uses custom data blocks, not specified in the PNG standard. I have no idea if MM published these extensions, but a PNG file just using the standard chunks cannot handle multiple layers. Bye, Simon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
RE: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Budig Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:09 PM To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd PNG can handle custom application specific chunks of data, so it is perfectly possible that Fireworks uses custom data blocks, not specified in the PNG standard. I have no idea if MM published these extensions, but a PNG file just using the standard chunks cannot handle multiple layers. http://www.macromedia.com/support/fireworks/export/fw_export_vs_sav/fw_expor t_vs_sav02.html And, no they don't publish the extensions. Anyway, Fireworks can import PSD files with the text layers. I'm 101% positive Adobe didn't tell Macromedia how to do this, so if Fireworks can, maybe some smart GIMP person can. HTH, Greg ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: there are differences between the native photoshop files and the native gimp files. gimp can handle different sized layers and other things. I'm not too certain Photoshop doesn't. In fact, I believe Photoshop simply doesn't expose the fact to the interface and resizes layers on demand. gimp cannot read psd text information as editable, it reads it only as a painted layer; at least to the best of my knowledge. it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not everyone can use psd. In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option and lock-in of their software. cheers -- Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Jakub Steiner wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not everyone can use psd. In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option and lock-in of their software. You could also argue that you're similarily locked in when using XCF... at least on systems where you can't install the GIMP. Michael -- Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Michael Schumacher wrote: Jakub Steiner wrote: On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not everyone can use psd. In many cases people just want to convert their old work. They don't use proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option and lock-in of their software. You could also argue that you're similarily locked in when using XCF... at least on systems where you can't install the GIMP. Is the XCF format proprietary? If not, then this is not a valid comparison. -- Until later, Geoffrey ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Hi, Selon Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Michael Schumacher wrote: You could also argue that you're similarily locked in when using XCF... at least on systems where you can't install the GIMP. Is the XCF format proprietary? If not, then this is not a valid comparison. It's not proprietary, in the sense that the information needed to read/write it is publically available, however it's an internal GIMP format, and in the past people have been asked not to support reading XCFs, since the format might change radically, and without notice, if the needs of the GIMP dictated it (they didn't always agree though - ImageMagick can read XCFs). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary Lyon, France ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Dave Neary wrote: [...] ImageMagick can read XCFs). More or less, I heard. Often less. Michael -- Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jakub Steiner wrote: Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:26:49 +0100 From: Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: GIMPUser Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu, Enesha Fairluck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 19:41 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: there are differences between the native photoshop files and the native gimp files. gimp can handle different sized layers and other things. I'm not too certain Photoshop doesn't. In fact, I believe Photoshop simply doesn't expose the fact to the interface and resizes layers on demand. From my observation that is what it does alright. gimp cannot read psd text information as editable, it reads it only as a painted layer; at least to the best of my knowledge. Importing PSD Text layers as text isn't supported yet. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151686 it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not everyone can use psd. PSD may not be a properly open standard but if you want to swap files with other graphics applications and still keep your layers it is the best option at the moment because lots of applications do understand PSD. Hopefully MNG or something like it will become more popular for sharing layered graphics in future but for now PSD is firmly entrenched. In many cases people just want to convert their old work. or they downloaded tutorials and samples from the web that were in PSD format They don't use proprietary formats by ignorance, but simply because of a lack of option and lock-in of their software. Very True. - Alan H ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
Good evening all, I am having some trouble, and I hope someone out there can help me:) I have a .psd template that I got from someone on the net. I tried opening it in the gimp 2.0 running on mandrake 10.1 and the file opens, and the layers are there, but on the layers panel, the layers are all represented as like a grey box / checker pattern, and I cannot edit any of the text in the layers. I was able to successfully open the file with Photoshop 8CS on windows xp running in a virtual machine, and edit the text in the layers. PS did say something about updating when I opened the file, so I even tried saving a copy of the file after the update, but it still behaves badly in gimp. Am I perhaps loading something wrong? Could I change some export settings in PS to make it more gimp friendly? Or am I just SOL? heh. I could work on it in PS via the virtual machine, but I really prefer to keep windows shutdown and use my unix tools instead. Thanks in advance for your help:) --nesha -- Ad Aspera un Astra ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:29:45PM -0500, Enesha Fairluck wrote: Good evening all, I am having some trouble, and I hope someone out there can help me:) I have a .psd template that I got from someone on the net. I tried opening it in the gimp 2.0 running on mandrake 10.1 and the file opens, and the layers are there, but on the layers panel, the layers are all represented as like a grey box / checker pattern, and I cannot edit any of the text in the layers. I was able to successfully open the file with Photoshop 8CS on windows xp running in a virtual machine, and edit the text in the layers. PS did say something about updating when I opened the file, so I even tried saving a copy of the file after the update, but it still behaves badly in gimp. Am I perhaps loading something wrong? Could I change some export settings in PS to make it more gimp friendly? Or am I just SOL? heh. I could work on it in PS via the virtual machine, but I really prefer to keep windows shutdown and use my unix tools instead. well, unfortunately you are sol and will need to use your viral windows machine. there are differences between the native photoshop files and the native gimp files. gimp can handle different sized layers and other things. gimp cannot read psd text information as editable, it reads it only as a painted layer; at least to the best of my knowledge. it would be nice if everyone would stop making psd files since not everyone can use psd. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:58:49PM -0500, Enesha Fairluck wrote: Evening, and thanks for the reply:) Well that isn't the best of news I'll grant you:) Is there no way to convert the psd to something that gimp could import in that way? i am tempted to say definately not so that someone would show me to be wrong soon, so Definately not!. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
