Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
Okay, then what purpose does the Save a copy command do these days
when from the user's perspective the ONLY difference between it and
Export is the target file format? I suggested it once that the
former should now be treated as a
Adding this shortcut would train users to use a workflow with an
artificial stumbling block inbetween
Okay, then what purpose does the Save a copy command do these days when
from the user's perspective the ONLY difference between it and Export is
the target file format? I suggested it
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:40:47 +0200
From: si...@budig.de
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?
Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
Okay, then what purpose does the Save a copy command do these days
when from
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:19:29 +0200
From: si...@budig.de
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?
Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
there is something we can do to help the non-pro - and it does not
interfere
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Paul Naude wrote:
Thanks for the reply Ken
It sounds like you received such a reply once and if that indeed is true, it
is very sad, because when we start closing doors to the masses, we are on
our way to become isolated and later forgotten, regardless of what
I just summarized the common responses to concerns about the Save/Export
redesign.
Personally, I'll be sticking with 2.6 until the current crop of developers move
on
to some more rewarding tasks and are replaced by more agile and reasonable
people.
On 8/20/2012 8:49 AM, Paul Naude wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine ha scritto:
Paul,
As for closing doors to the masses, here is an example. I'm in the
process of interviewing a free software developer who does software,
where each release is downloaded like 400 times. Around the globe. And
there are, like, 2 releases a year.
Yet the guy
Naude p.na...@esteq.com,
Cc:
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Date:
08/21/2012 08:12 AM
Subject:
Re: [Gimp-user]
Save, Save As and Export separated?
Sent by:
gimp-user-list-boun...@gnome.org
I just summarized the common responses to concerns
about the Save/Export redesign.
Personally
Hi Alessia.
Alessia (ale...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm really asking because I'm not pro and I don't want to became but
I'm, say, an amateur that us, for now, GImp in quite basic way ( or
better in a purpose oriented way) and this thing of the exporting
behavior is quite annoying ( to me)
Simon Budig ha scritto:
Hi Alessia.
Alessia (ale...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm really asking because I'm not pro and I don't want to became but
I'm, say, an amateur that us, for now, GImp in quite basic way ( or
better in a purpose oriented way) and this thing of the exporting
behavior is quite
On 08/21/2012 03:12 PM, Alessia wrote:
I'm really asking because I'm not pro and I don't want to became but
I'm, say, an amateur that us, for now, GImp in quite basic way ( or
better in a purpose oriented way) and this thing of the exporting
behavior is quite annoying ( to me) especially
On 21 August 2012 10:12, Alessia ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine ha scritto:
Sorry if I jump in the discussion so out of nowhere ( I'm currently reading
it because I use Gimp even if I'm not a professional).
I can understand your ( I mean your and developers') reasons, even if
The paradigm for saving work was figured out and became a standard action years
ago.
New; Open; Save; Save As; have all the functionality that is needed. Along with
a few carefully thought out warning dialogs -- that's all that is needed.
If one is really concerned about losing work, one
Joao S. O. Bueno ha scritto:
On 21 August 2012 10:12, Alessia ale...@gmail.com wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine ha scritto:
Sorry if I jump in the discussion so out of nowhere ( I'm currently reading
it because I use Gimp even if I'm not a professional).
I can understand your ( I mean your and
Ken Warner ha scritto:
The paradigm for saving work was figured out and became a standard
action years ago.
New; Open; Save; Save As; have all the functionality that is needed.
Along with
a few carefully thought out warning dialogs -- that's all that is needed.
If one is really concerned about
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:05:37 -0300
From: gwid...@mpc.com.br
To: ale...@gmail.com
CC: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Save, Save As and Export separated?
And it is really that: not any o f the other fantastic features
included in GIMP 2.8 is been commented upon
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Paul Naude wrote:
Hi Gimpers
I only recently upgraded to 2.8 from 2.6 and was wondering if I am the only
one missing the option to edit the file extension in the SAVE form which
basically allowed you to Save, Save Copy, Save As or Export to any format
from
You will be told to use other image manipulation software because GIMP is now
only for professionals that Save XCF files. And you will be told in no
uncertain terms that the decision to make GIMP only save XCF files is well
documented (so how can there be any question of the propriety of that
Like I said
On 8/20/2012 9:04 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
On 20.08.2012 16:36, Ken Warner wrote:
You will be told to use other image manipulation software because GIMP
is now only for professionals that Save XCF files. And you will be told
in no uncertain terms that the decision to make
19 matches
Mail list logo
