Von: carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It kept happening no matter what I tried UNTIL I tried this anchoring.
You can also turn floating selections into new layers.
The interesting question is how you did get crop to produce a floating
selection in the first place.
Either the definition of crop
Also Carol you can right mouse click on the floating layer and select new
layer which can be very useful.
Regards Pete
PS Welcome to the gimp
The Mac doesn't have right click. Instead, you use with your left hand the
control key and with your
right the mouse bar on the macbook (or a left mouse
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:09:23 jim feldman wrote:
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-01-07 13:29]
In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right tool
for me at this time. I want to retain all my bits. So until GIMP
natively supports 12-bits or
On Friday 28 September 2007 17:28:36 jim feldman wrote:
Greg wrote:
I appreciate all the info and discussion on this. It's a lot more than
I expected...and that's a good thing.
I guess what I really want to know is, am I going to see any noticeable
loss if image quality from my 12-bit
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:41:02 carol irvin wrote:
I've done some photography but usually I end up painting over it and
converting it to mixed media as I really prefer painting to photography. I
think for users who are drawn to art and painting, GIMP may satisfy their
needs more easily.
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:57 -0400, carol irvin wrote:
The Mac doesn't have right click. Instead, you use with your left
hand the control key and with your
right the mouse bar on the macbook (or a left mouse button if you were
using an actual mouse). I have
used this on the floating
i used to teach in a college setting but in a non-art dept. the commercial
art courses were all given with adobe products. this was good from one
standpoint, i.e. that the students would be using the programs that an ad
agency or similar would be using. It was bad from the standpoint though
On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:00:45 George Farris wrote:
Though you object to selective discussion of your discorse, you have
at least twice falsely referred to gimp's lack of a tool for non-
distructive editing. The term is a contradiction in itself. Perhaps
you can take the time to
Hi,
I've got a small problem with creating splash screens for grub with
my GIMP. I need to create a file *.xpm.gz with this things:
Basic instructions:
* xpm file format
* 640x480
* 14 colors only
and I have no idea, how to mange it. Any hints? ;)
Frank
P.S. I'm using 2.4rc1.
On 10/2/07, gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:09:23 jim feldman wrote:
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-01-07 13:29]
In any event, from what you've told me, GIMP may not be the right
tool
for me at this time. I want to
Hi,
while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in development know
very well that everything you asked for is already on our roadmap. You
can even
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 18:32:02 +0200 Frank Lanitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've got a small problem with creating splash screens for grub with
my GIMP. I need to create a file *.xpm.gz with this things:
Basic instructions:
* xpm file format
* 640x480
* 14 colors only
and I have no
I am hardly an expert on this whole issue. I would like to see a side by side
comparison
of prints made from 8 bit vs 16 bit images to see just exactly what the
difference might
be. I think your average person probably wouldn't care. It has been mentioned
that
monitors are poor venues on
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:50:44 Elwin Estle wrote:
I am hardly an expert on this whole issue. I would like to see a side by
side comparison of prints made from 8 bit vs 16 bit images to see just
exactly what the difference might be. I think your average person probably
wouldn't care. It
David Southwell wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 10:05:51 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
while your explanation of non-destructive editing is all fine, I still
think that your postings to this list are nothing but noise. This list
is about using GIMP. The users who are interested in development
--- carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i opened gimp and just used the default black brush and made a bunch
of black squiggles on a white canvas. then i altered that version
with a filter. and, drum roll please, made them into two layers!
I did this in 2.2.17 and I didn't get another
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-02-07 13:47]:
Much unnecessary quote removed.
One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to edit an
image for your own use and can revisit the original then the absense of
non-destrucitve editing features may not be a handicap. The
--- Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you need to abandon the jpeg format as it is lossey (google for
it) and you need to shoot RAW.
I know, but if you can retain your original bit-depth, the lossyness
isn't as noticeable, especially if you set the compression to the
lowest
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:58:47AM -0700, Greg wrote:
--- Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you need to abandon the jpeg format as it is lossey (google for
it) and you need to shoot RAW.
I know, but if you can retain your original bit-depth, the lossyness
isn't as noticeable,
no, my habit on this type of thing is to separately save the two versions
(to desktop while working; to be moved when done). I then pick one of the
images with SelectAll and EditCopy. I then go to the other image and hit
EditPaste. I now have 2 layers which show up in the layers palette, one
Patrick Shanahan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-02-07 13:47]:
Much unnecessary quote removed.
One thing I forgot to mention is that if you are simply trying to
edit an image for your own use and can revisit the original then the
absense of non-destrucitve
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:38:38 -0400
From: carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Bit-depth Processing
... The instructors don't
care about
anything but the artistic merit of the results. If I were the student, I'd
just go
Hi David,
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:35:36 -0700
From: David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Bit-depth Processing
IMHO photoshop is NOT a tool designed for the average user.
I would like to, respectfully, disagree. Photoshop IS meant for an
average user. Just
greetings
please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5 x
11.0 inches. It'd be a one shot deal for a poster, not something generated
randomly on a website.
I was thinking using layered letters and rotating each letter, but any
suggestion would be helpful.
thanks
On 3 Oct 2007 01:23:24 -, mike reqavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greetings
please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5x
11.0 inches.
Closest I could come up with was the Filters-Animation-Rippling
--
Tim Jedlicka, Network Entomologist
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 3 Oct 2007 01:23:24 -, mike reqavey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
greetings
please point me in the direction of how I could make a captcha around 8.5 x
11.0 inches. It'd be a one shot deal for a poster, not something generated
randomly on a website.
I was thinking using layered
26 matches
Mail list logo
