Re: [Gimp-user] Website
On 12/5/06, Ben Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I guess I am going to take on a redesign of the website (pending > developer approval), and I am going to need the community's help. From > time to time I will mail this list and the GimpWin list with specific > requests. > > I don't aim to totally demolish everything that is there already, but a > lot of work needs to be done. What's good should stay, what's not > should go. I don't believe in changing stuff just for the sake of > changing it. I can't make any timeframe promises as I am very busy, but > for the foreseeable future, I am committing to this project. > > A graphic program's website should be graphically stimulating. I am > humbled by the artistic skills of lots of you guys/gals, and will call > upon you a bit as you no doubt can do better than I. > > After a few minutes work I have lots of ideas and will post mock-ups > soon on some webspace I have. Right now I'd like to ask members to > please post any suggestions/requests for the website. I would like to > add your ideas to mine and get GIMP some real web presence! > I like the new site :) -- Anthony Ettinger phone: 408-656-2473 resume: http://chovy.dyndns.org/resume.html Currently available for contract work blog: http://www.chovy.com ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Website
Well, I guess I am going to take on a redesign of the website (pending developer approval), and I am going to need the community's help. From time to time I will mail this list and the GimpWin list with specific requests. I don't aim to totally demolish everything that is there already, but a lot of work needs to be done. What's good should stay, what's not should go. I don't believe in changing stuff just for the sake of changing it. I can't make any timeframe promises as I am very busy, but for the foreseeable future, I am committing to this project. A graphic program's website should be graphically stimulating. I am humbled by the artistic skills of lots of you guys/gals, and will call upon you a bit as you no doubt can do better than I. After a few minutes work I have lots of ideas and will post mock-ups soon on some webspace I have. Right now I'd like to ask members to please post any suggestions/requests for the website. I would like to add your ideas to mine and get GIMP some real web presence! Ben W. ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
Yes. for me, Gimp is for making my job easier... and those dboxs do that nicely :) On 6/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Joey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks, but for an outer glow, I much preffer to use the scriptfu > shadow; Make the color white and change the x and y offset to 0. This > works very will for me and it is quick :) > > On 6/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> BTW, does anyone know how to make an 'inner glow' on a shape? >> >> I posted a tutorial on GIMPtalk which covers shadows and glows. Ahh, I thought you wished to learn *how* to make an inner glow whereas what you really wanted to know is how to select options on a particular user interface ;-). Personally, I hope GIMP doesn't ever become the "GNU Dialog Box Manipulation Program". ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- http://joey101.net - my blog on web development ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
Quoting Joey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Thanks, but for an outer glow, I much preffer to use the scriptfu shadow; Make the color white and change the x and y offset to 0. This works very will for me and it is quick :) On 6/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW, does anyone know how to make an 'inner glow' on a shape? I posted a tutorial on GIMPtalk which covers shadows and glows. Ahh, I thought you wished to learn *how* to make an inner glow whereas what you really wanted to know is how to select options on a particular user interface ;-). Personally, I hope GIMP doesn't ever become the "GNU Dialog Box Manipulation Program". ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On 6/24/06, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 01:13:56PM -0400, Joey Marshall wrote: > >> > >do not mention the acronym php. > > Is 'py' better? :) > I use django and turbogears. They make web development a lot easier. > I came from php about 7 or 8 months ago... never to return. > if py means python, it seems to be easier to get that installed on gimps computer. yes, I mean python :) > But PS isn't better than GIMP... that's the problem! lol > the people who disagree with you will go away though, if we write the tutorials that way. Hmm... yes but, who is the website for? I was thinking it was for people who wanted how to learn gimp... not learn how much they are missing out on cause they don't want to pay $900 for PS. I think that the approch of one is better or comparible to the other will put off a lot of users... no matter which side is taken. I think the best position to put PS in is no position at all. Just never mention it. :P I do like your idea. But I don't think it would be appropriate on gimps main website. > >i am actually frightened to ask drc to do this since i kicked him in > >Norway. > > > >any thoughts? > > not everyone uses the default gtk theme... I personally think it looks > ugly (the one thing I don't like about gimp under KDE) > well, the web site is not going to be like kde vs gtk. is it now? i didn't mean to kick him. i was making a joke actually. the theme that is being used on all of the gimp web sites right now is fine. is it old though. or is it? I think it looks fine. Look on the internet archives and you'll notice that googles template hasn't changed for years and years. Because it was good they didn't have to change it. I think gimps current template is good :) Joey -- http://joey101.net - my blog on web development ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 01:13:56PM -0400, Joey Marshall wrote: > >> > >do not mention the acronym php. > > Is 'py' better? :) > I use django and turbogears. They make web development a lot easier. > I came from php about 7 or 8 months ago... never to return. > if py means python, it seems to be easier to get that installed on gimps computer. > But PS isn't better than GIMP... that's the problem! lol > the people who disagree with you will go away though, if we write the tutorials that way. > >i am actually frightened to ask drc to do this since i kicked him in > >Norway. > > > >any thoughts? > > not everyone uses the default gtk theme... I personally think it looks > ugly (the one thing I don't like about gimp under KDE) > well, the web site is not going to be like kde vs gtk. is it now? i didn't mean to kick him. i was making a joke actually. the theme that is being used on all of the gimp web sites right now is fine. is it old though. or is it? at what point did we start to speak about the toolkit icons? carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On 6/24/06, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:18:35PM -0400, Joey Marshall wrote: > On 6/24/06, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It doesn't have to be *versus*, both can be useful for different things. > > no, I'm not arguing one better than the other... > that actually could be funny though. actually i have seen so many web sites and opinions tauting photoshops superiority that i think it is about time for gimp to make such a web site. it could be a two sided tutorial. photoshop on the left, gimp on the right. show how easy it is to do things with photoshop and how difficult it is to do with gimp. maybe we could even work out a deal with amazon where we get some of the proceeds for selling photoshop. we could actually make money keeping them alive. that wouldn't be helping gimp users though :P And really, I think that would be difficult to do... as you can do the same stuff in gimp as you can PS with just as much ease. > > >> There are two main differences that stood out to me. > >> > >> The first is the amount of affects and tools available. > > > hmm, maybe someone should ask Sven Neumann and/or Mitch Natterer to refresh our memories about the differences between what is considered a tool and what is considered a plug-in. > > > >> The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop > >> does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts > >> more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. > > > >There is a request for these kinds of live layer filters in bugzilla. > >(Photoshop has normal filters too.) > > > >> Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpful > >> for have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and a > >> help desk. > > > >It might be appropriate to use the Wiki for that kind of information but > >it depends what you have in mind and the developers want. > > I'm a web developer. And could quickly create a website to do it. :) > I just wouldn't want to if noone would be interested in something like it. > do not mention the acronym php. Is 'py' better? :) I use django and turbogears. They make web development a lot easier. I came from php about 7 or 8 months ago... never to return. > > > >> Basically, people could post their questions on how to get a desired > >> effect on an image. > > > >People use the lists for this kind of thing, also places like Deviant Art > >and the GUG > >http://gug.sunsite.dk/ > > There are two problems with the these three methods that I can see. > The number 1 reason is that a lot of people won't use them. A lot of > people don't even know what mailing lists are. Or won't want to > register on a forum just to ask a question. > The next big reason I don't think those methods are good enough, is > that not everyone will find them... I sure didn't with google. > "good enough" is a some what relative phrase. i think it would be more fun and interesting to write tutorials about how gimp sucks compared to photoshop and sell copies of photoshop there. if google doesn't work to find things, whose fault is it? The website owner's fault. They are responsible for it aren't they? ;) if you search for "gimp" with googles moderately safe search filter, you will find both of those things. from my experience, people search for their specific problems. > Also, the same things get asked over and over. The idea behind an FAQ > is to answer those questions asked over and over again once and for > all... so to speak. > if we did something completely interesting like selling photoshop and write tutorials demonstrating photoshops superiority; we would not have to figure out how to get google or those other sites to work the way you expect. But PS isn't better than GIMP... that's the problem! lol > I think it should also be located (or linked to) on the official gimp > website. People will find it a lot faster that way. > the site needs a redesign. i make all web sites look like gtk or gimp widgets lately. i don't know if that is such a good thing for the main page at www.gimp.org. the apparatus for remaking the web site is almost there. the site now needs an html and css redesign. i am actually frightened to ask drc to do this since i kicked him in Norway. any thoughts? not everyone uses the default gtk theme... I personally think it looks ugly (the one thing I don't like about gimp under KDE) Joey ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:18:35PM -0400, Joey Marshall wrote: > On 6/24/06, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >It doesn't have to be *versus*, both can be useful for different things. > > no, I'm not arguing one better than the other... > that actually could be funny though. actually i have seen so many web sites and opinions tauting photoshops superiority that i think it is about time for gimp to make such a web site. it could be a two sided tutorial. photoshop on the left, gimp on the right. show how easy it is to do things with photoshop and how difficult it is to do with gimp. maybe we could even work out a deal with amazon where we get some of the proceeds for selling photoshop. we could actually make money keeping them alive. > > >> There are two main differences that stood out to me. > >> > >> The first is the amount of affects and tools available. > > > hmm, maybe someone should ask Sven Neumann and/or Mitch Natterer to refresh our memories about the differences between what is considered a tool and what is considered a plug-in. > > > >> The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop > >> does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts > >> more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. > > > >There is a request for these kinds of live layer filters in bugzilla. > >(Photoshop has normal filters too.) > > > >> Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpful > >> for have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and a > >> help desk. > > > >It might be appropriate to use the Wiki for that kind of information but > >it depends what you have in mind and the developers want. > > I'm a web developer. And could quickly create a website to do it. :) > I just wouldn't want to if noone would be interested in something like it. > do not mention the acronym php. > > > >> Basically, people could post their questions on how to get a desired > >> effect on an image. > > > >People use the lists for this kind of thing, also places like Deviant Art > >and the GUG > >http://gug.sunsite.dk/ > > There are two problems with the these three methods that I can see. > The number 1 reason is that a lot of people won't use them. A lot of > people don't even know what mailing lists are. Or won't want to > register on a forum just to ask a question. > The next big reason I don't think those methods are good enough, is > that not everyone will find them... I sure didn't with google. > "good enough" is a some what relative phrase. i think it would be more fun and interesting to write tutorials about how gimp sucks compared to photoshop and sell copies of photoshop there. if google doesn't work to find things, whose fault is it? if you search for "gimp" with googles moderately safe search filter, you will find both of those things. > Also, the same things get asked over and over. The idea behind an FAQ > is to answer those questions asked over and over again once and for > all... so to speak. > if we did something completely interesting like selling photoshop and write tutorials demonstrating photoshops superiority; we would not have to figure out how to get google or those other sites to work the way you expect. > I think it should also be located (or linked to) on the official gimp > website. People will find it a lot faster that way. > the site needs a redesign. i make all web sites look like gtk or gimp widgets lately. i don't know if that is such a good thing for the main page at www.gimp.org. the apparatus for remaking the web site is almost there. the site now needs an html and css redesign. i am actually frightened to ask drc to do this since i kicked him in Norway. any thoughts? > You may see things differently than that, and that's ok. We all are > entitled to our own opinions :) > this is where gimp gets stuck. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On 6/24/06, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It doesn't have to be *versus*, both can be useful for different things. no, I'm not arguing one better than the other... > There are two main differences that stood out to me. > > The first is the amount of affects and tools available. Adobe have provided limited support to third party developers over the years allowing them to create PSD files and third party plugins. Using the PSPI plugin* by Tor Lillqvist you will be able to use some of these plugins with the GNU Image Manipulation program if you want. I like gimp not having as many. :) > The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop > does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts > more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. There is a request for these kinds of live layer filters in bugzilla. (Photoshop has normal filters too.) > Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpful > for have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and a > help desk. It might be appropriate to use the Wiki for that kind of information but it depends what you have in mind and the developers want. I'm a web developer. And could quickly create a website to do it. :) I just wouldn't want to if noone would be interested in something like it. > Basically, people could post their questions on how to get a desired > effect on an image. People use the lists for this kind of thing, also places like Deviant Art and the GUG http://gug.sunsite.dk/ There are two problems with the these three methods that I can see. The number 1 reason is that a lot of people won't use them. A lot of people don't even know what mailing lists are. Or won't want to register on a forum just to ask a question. The next big reason I don't think those methods are good enough, is that not everyone will find them... I sure didn't with google. Also, the same things get asked over and over. The idea behind an FAQ is to answer those questions asked over and over again once and for all... so to speak. I think it should also be located (or linked to) on the official gimp website. People will find it a lot faster that way. You may see things differently than that, and that's ok. We all are entitled to our own opinions :) Joey ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Joey Marshall wrote: > Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:39:57 -0400 > From: Joey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu > Subject: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop > > I don't know if this would be better going to a different list... so > sorry if this is going to the wrong place! > And the "Gimp vrs photoshop" means that I will be comparing two of the > features of the two... not to argue one better than the other. It doesn't have to be *versus*, both can be useful for different things. > I was reading on a forum where this guy was posting that his son is an > all out photoshop user, and would often challenge him to do something > in gimp that he did in photoshop. Depends on what you ask and how well you know your software. It all comes down to changing the colour of pixels and I've seen some amazing work created using only mspaint. Different software might allow you to get more work done faster > There are two main differences that stood out to me. > > The first is the amount of affects and tools available. Adobe have provided limited support to third party developers over the years allowing them to create PSD files and third party plugins. Using the PSPI plugin* by Tor Lillqvist you will be able to use some of these plugins with the GNU Image Manipulation program if you want. > The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop > does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts > more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. There is a request for these kinds of live layer filters in bugzilla. (Photoshop has normal filters too.) > Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpful > for have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and a > help desk. It might be appropriate to use the Wiki for that kind of information but it depends what you have in mind and the developers want. > Basically, people could post their questions on how to get a desired > effect on an image. People use the lists for this kind of thing, also places like Deviant Art and the GUG http://gug.sunsite.dk/ -- Alan ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
Thanks, but for an outer glow, I much preffer to use the scriptfu shadow; Make the color white and change the x and y offset to 0. This works very will for me and it is quick :) On 6/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, does anyone know how to make an 'inner glow' on a shape? I posted a tutorial on GIMPtalk which covers shadows and glows. It doesn't cover 'inner glows' specifically (that is left as an exercise for the user) but it might give you a nudge in the right direction. It might not even be the best approach, I was trying to come up with a methodology which was easy to describe and to remember while still being flexible. The easiest solution to shadows and glows is probably Iicci's "Layer Effects" plug-in but I wanted some visual feedback of what I was doing (as opposed to just enterring numbers). Like most of the tutorials (and scripts) that I've written, since writing it I have learned so much that I feel I should rewrite it incorporating what I have learned. Tutorial link: http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Shadows-And-Glows-3-d-Effects-4624-1.html ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
BTW, does anyone know how to make an 'inner glow' on a shape? I posted a tutorial on GIMPtalk which covers shadows and glows. It doesn't cover 'inner glows' specifically (that is left as an exercise for the user) but it might give you a nudge in the right direction. It might not even be the best approach, I was trying to come up with a methodology which was easy to describe and to remember while still being flexible. The easiest solution to shadows and glows is probably Iicci's "Layer Effects" plug-in but I wanted some visual feedback of what I was doing (as opposed to just enterring numbers). Like most of the tutorials (and scripts) that I've written, since writing it I have learned so much that I feel I should rewrite it incorporating what I have learned. Tutorial link: http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic/Shadows-And-Glows-3-d-Effects-4624-1.html ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:39:57PM -0400, Joey Marshall wrote: > I don't know if this would be better going to a different list... so > sorry if this is going to the wrong place! > eh, the list isn't being used as often as it used to be and this is more like the gimp-user list of the old days that i used to enjoy so much. out of appreciation, for the sweetness of this letter and for the memory of how wonderful it used to be, i am actually glad to respond. > And the "Gimp vrs photoshop" means that I will be comparing two of the > features of the two... not to argue one better than the other. > the success of gimp has been to not compete with Photoshop. when we fail is probably when there is a lot of people pasting things they read or making everyone feel bad because software(TM) doesn't work as well as software(GPL). if you look at how business is run, GIMP doesn't have any to run. on the otherhand, there is a group of people whose life and happiness depend on selling software. that business has actually in the time i have been involved with GIMP congealed into one big group macromedia, adobe and a few others are now all the same. poor gimp has gotten an aqua theme from this merger. dunno how i feel about that. sometimes, i clear my mind of the noise by considering that it is out of politeness that gimp waits for photoshop to get safely into first place again. like, how big is there web design group and what is the smallest computer they use? when you answer questions like this and consider the people who make gimp, you kinda have to laugh. so sure, photoshop does a lot that GIMP doesn't. some of those things might actually be useful > Anyway, I have been a gimp user for quite a while, And I have learned > how to harness a lot of the power underneath it's features. > i suggest that you would be able to work with any pixel manipulating application and probably end up chuckling at the different words they use or some of the "we think you are probably retarded" gui decisions they make. after working with me and linux and then upgrading to windows XP, my friend saw that the windows machine that made that thing were comparing her to a teletubbie with that default desktop image. i remember when i compared gimp-1.2 to photoshop5, i was extremely disappointed with how much photoshop really could not do compared to gimp. the availability of the canned effects only made me chuckle. > BUT, that takes a lot of time! And I'm sure there are a lot of things > I don't know how to do (as far as effects go). > > I was reading on a forum where this guy was posting that his son is an > all out photoshop user, and would often challenge him to do something > in gimp that he did in photoshop. He said that he was always able to > do it. I know I can't... as well as a lot of other people (especially > those just learning it). > personally, i haven't had a human being challenge me, but i have managed to do any tutorial i found. there might be one exception to this -- i cannot remember it specifically. i got bored with a magazine i purchased to try to make the tutorials with. > I had tried out photoshop to see what it was like. And was able to get > the hang of it within a few hours because of it's similarities to the > gimp (Note: I use Gimp for web development... which is what I was > messing around with photoshop with. I did not explore the photo > editing of photoshop). > some of their photo effects work but look silly. i saw one where the time of day was changed by a lighting plug-in. occasionally, when i see this used on television, i chuckle. > There are two main differences that stood out to me. > > The first is the amount of affects and tools available. Photoshop had > far more than the gimp. It's menus are allot longer. I don't like > that. Gimp's tools are more flexible. Like I can make a glow by using > a white scriptfu shadow with a 0 offset (this concerns my idea for the > website). > the developers are trying to keep the menus shorter. i realized when i tried to do something with them a while back that i am too much of a menu nester. logic does not always make the best gui this way. > The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop > does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts > more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. > So say you put a shadow on it. When you edit the layer, the shadow > updates as well. > They only had this for the simpler effects it seems though (ones that > didn't take a lot of time to apply). I found that very nice for > designing web designs. > Photoshops snapping was also pretty cool... but not cool enough to > want in the gimp. > layer effects. i have heard and heard about these. since photoshop was not written well enough to run on linux without a helper library i am too much of a linux snob to use, i have not tried or seen this yet. it was explained to me much like you explained it here. i have seen dis
Re: [Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
On 6/22/06, Joey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpfulfor have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and ahelp desk.I like this idea. I've seen faq-o-matics that have worked well. http://faqomatic.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/1.html ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Website idea and comments on Gimp vrs photoshop
I don't know if this would be better going to a different list... so sorry if this is going to the wrong place! And the "Gimp vrs photoshop" means that I will be comparing two of the features of the two... not to argue one better than the other. Anyway, I have been a gimp user for quite a while, And I have learned how to harness a lot of the power underneath it's features. BUT, that takes a lot of time! And I'm sure there are a lot of things I don't know how to do (as far as effects go). I was reading on a forum where this guy was posting that his son is an all out photoshop user, and would often challenge him to do something in gimp that he did in photoshop. He said that he was always able to do it. I know I can't... as well as a lot of other people (especially those just learning it). I had tried out photoshop to see what it was like. And was able to get the hang of it within a few hours because of it's similarities to the gimp (Note: I use Gimp for web development... which is what I was messing around with photoshop with. I did not explore the photo editing of photoshop). There are two main differences that stood out to me. The first is the amount of affects and tools available. Photoshop had far more than the gimp. It's menus are allot longer. I don't like that. Gimp's tools are more flexible. Like I can make a glow by using a white scriptfu shadow with a 0 offset (this concerns my idea for the website). The second is the way the filters are applied. I like how photoshop does it better. Instead of applying to the image itself... it acts more like a filter. You apply it to the layer. So say you put a shadow on it. When you edit the layer, the shadow updates as well. They only had this for the simpler effects it seems though (ones that didn't take a lot of time to apply). I found that very nice for designing web designs. Photoshops snapping was also pretty cool... but not cool enough to want in the gimp. Now I guess those two things are just my opinion. So you may disagree with me on that. Now for my suggestion on the website. I think it would be very helpful for have a section that would be like a cross between an FAQ and a help desk. Basically, people could post their questions on how to get a desired effect on an image. Then other people who know how could answer these questions in the form of an example. Then all the questions and answers would be indexed (maybe according to rating) in an FAQ format. That way, if someone who was new to gimp wanted to know how to put a white glow around their image, they could look their. If no one has asked that question, they could. And then it would be answered once and for all, for all people! Anyone else think this would be a good idea? I think it would be quite helpful. BTW, does anyone know how to make an 'inner glow' on a shape? regards, Joey Marshall ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Website updates for 2.2 release
Hello everyone, So time has come to start thinking about the information provided on the website before the 2.2 release is out. The first thing that is needed is some information on how to update from 2.0 to 2.2 and how to have 2.0 and 2.2(-preX) installed side-by-side. This is a great time for everyone that wants to help with the website to come forward and help. If you are interested then join the gimp-web list and help to start discussions and even help with the information on the website. As all may understand what the main reason is for the updates is to keep up-to-date with the application itself and so we need to start thinking about making 2.0 information into 2.2. At the moment I do not have a list of TODOs but I am sure with this mail that we all can start discussing the different places that needs updating and what would be good to add to the site. Right now we just need to start thinking about the information that needs updating and not adding new sections etc. So please come with ideas and help us to get a even better website then it was before. Regards, -- Niklas Mattisson ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Website maintainer proposal
Hi Niklas, Niklas wrote: > So on to the topic of this mail. At the first meeting we discussed the > website and who to contact about things conserning the site, I said that > I was willing to give it all a try and try to bring things up again. This is brilliant news. It will be really great to have someone to go to with content for the site again. I wish you the best of luck. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV: http://dneary.free.fr/CV/ ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Website maintainer proposal
Hello GIMP lists, This was my first attending at a GIMPCon meeting. First of all I would like to thank everyone that was able to come. I would also like to thank David Odin for a nice picture of me, I usually don't become good in photos but the one he took is really nice. So thanks. :) So on to the topic of this mail. At the first meeting we discussed the website and who to contact about things conserning the site, I said that I was willing to give it all a try and try to bring things up again. Because of this proposal it would be good to hear what everyone else that did not attend at the meeting thinks about this. If no onehas objections against this, then I will try my best to get things going with the website. Anyhow, I hope that all of you who attended at GUADEC-2004 had a lot of fun. Thank you once again for a great time. Regards, -- Niklas Mattisson ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
