http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/953801/diff/1/5
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/messages/JsonResults.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/953801/diff/1/5#newcode28
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/messages/JsonResults.java:28:
// javac
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/953801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
running the test in your continuous build environment with remote debugging
enabled and attaching to it with a debugger to see what is going on.
Thanks again. John
I did that already but will do it again now that I have a better
understanding of the GWT Junit code.
(I only have to use some
LGTM
Talked offline. Agree that your change is pretty safe. But please be sure to
land the corresponding addon-gwt change in lock step.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Let's hold off on this one until we find a real solution to the bad create
api issue. The
It may be a day or two before I can take this review, Zach. Sorry for the
delay.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:49 PM, zac...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Add a ControllerBinder in UiBinder so that UiHandlers can be bound on
both the
controller and the view. This allows views
Let's hold off on this one until we find a real solution to the bad create
api issue. The sketch in https://jira.springsource.org/browse/ROO-1456 will
not do it.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:10 PM, amitman...@google.com wrote:
Point taken on the view contention front. I think Thomas is right that
setting and clearing the view delegate should happen in start() and stop(),
not in the constructor. Thanks, Thomas.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
lgtm
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/907802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The only blocker bug I see on your list is the one about the pom.xml tweak
for Rajeev.
https://jira.springsource.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hiderequestId=12040
The JRE tests are actually pretty easy to write, especially if you
copy
It seems odd to make these changes to deprecated classes. The NamedFrame
case LGTM
On 2010/09/12 11:24:12, Konstantin.Scheglov wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/865801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not very clear to me how EntityProxyId helps us achieve very
simple scenarios.
How do you use this thing when you have pre and post operations to do
in an activity?
If I have an edit scenario, let's say a user
Also note RequestFactory#find(EntityProxyId)
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.comwrote:
It's not very clear to me how EntityProxyId helps us achieve very
simple scenarios.
How do you use this
LGTM
Thanks, one nit.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/881802/diff/1/2
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/HandlerEvaluator.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/881802/diff/1/2#newcode279
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/HandlerEvaluator.java:279: //
Normalize
You should be able to add JRE tests for these diagnostics, especially if
you factor them into a separate helper class. See EditorModelTest for an
example.
On 2010/09/28 17:20:16, rjrjr wrote:
Please fix DTRF and re-enable the commented out block before
submitting.
Please fix DTRF and re-enable the commented out block before submitting.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/929801/diff/1/2
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/rebind/RequestFactoryGenerator.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/929801/diff/1/2#newcode157
LGTM
On 2010/09/30 01:53:37, amitmanjhi wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/936801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/943801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Please be careful with that kind of quick hack. What will happen to the
person who writes the next test?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/931802/diff/1/6
File user/test/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/SimpleFoo.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/930801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
On 2010/09/29 15:53:31, amitmanjhi wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/932801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Gives the ability to specify css values within the CellTreeView if the
node is a leaf or a branch.
Also changed the padding-left/right of children within the tree.
an example of the css to allow the tree to display the children in a
grid is:
.cellTreeItemLeaf {
Just to reiterate: please make sure that this fix lands with the test that
it fixes.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:45 AM, cromwell...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr, robertvawter,
Description:
Fix asJsonString() to properly encode nulls
Please review this at
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/931802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to migrate to EntityProxyId and all I can get is
java.lang.AssertionError: encodedId required
When do you get this? What did you call? Presuming you got it by calling
stableId on a proxy, where did that
Ray C, can you take this review?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:20 PM, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Adding more unit tests to RequestFactoryTest. Refactoring SimpleFoo to
use a HashMap to store records instead of a singleton.
Please review this at
Reviewers: rice,
Description:
Fix nonstandard two method handler interface that probably would have
broken UiBinder.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/941801/show
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/event/logical/shared/AttachEvent.java
M
As discussed, please fix samples/expenses too. Below I've answered the
XXX blockers you pointed out so you should be able jump on it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/924801/diff/2001/3007
File user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/AbstractProxyListActivity.java
(right):
Hi,
Was wondering if I could get a code-review done on this patch please.
It adds two classes, one that is only placed on leaves and one that is
placed on branches.
It also changes the way indentation works so that the whole set of
children of a branch are indented as a group rather than
LGTM
Thanks!
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:46 PM, b...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Fix ClassCastException in AbtstractRequestContext.isChanged();
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/931803/show
Affected files:
M
At the moment we always fetch all non-entities, and only treat with() as
additive, to add related entities into the mix.
I'm a bit concerned about that, actually. With the RF overhaul we no longer
have a client side cache to confuse things, so I wonder if we should try to
get sparse DTOs in place
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/938802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/947801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Submitting.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/AbstractProxyEditActivity.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/diff/1/3#newcode83
user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/AbstractProxyEditActivity.java:83:
setWaiting(true);
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Fix exit on cancel from create activity. Wasn't going to a
new place, so you couldn't try to create again.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/950801/show
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/CreateAndEditProxy.java
Flushing comments accumulated so far. Still reviewing.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/924801/diff/2001/3010
File user/src/com/google/gwt/editor/client/AutoBean.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/924801/diff/2001/3010#newcode21
Bob is in transit today. We're working on a fix.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob,
any suggestions for a work around for the moment?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
For the editor part, I can see in the
I have to admit that I skimmed the code generators.
I'm as reviewed as I can be. LGTM once I've looked through the changes
we all discussed off line to base update events on the version number
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/924801/diff/13001/7090
File
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Changes in com.google.gwt.app land to catch up to the RequestFactory
overhaul. In particular, nukes PropertyColumn, and reworks
AbstractProxyEdit now that create semantics have changed. Made APE a
bit less monolithic in the process.
I will still be busting
The editor framework can give you the info for the with calls, but it's up
to you to use it. If you want everything, put the contents of
RequestFactoryEditorDriver.getPaths() into your with() call.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Any relational
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/948801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/949801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/ROO-1488
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Bob is in transit today. We're working on a fix.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob,
any suggestions for a work around for the moment?
Nice, but now I have to ask you for OptionalFieldEditorTest
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/948801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/950801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Oops, forgot the renderer tests. Added.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thanks, will fix.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 3:22 AM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/diff/8001/9006
File user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/FindAndEditProxy.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/diff/8001/9006#newcode50
Caught that case, fix is in http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/950801
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:22 AM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/946802/diff/8001/9005
File user/src/com/google/gwt/app/place/CreateAndEditProxy.java (right):
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/930802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Package re-org in advance of 2.1 RC.
* Proxy specific places and activities are half baked, and have been
banished to the expenses sample (which will later be updated to use
them)
* com.google.gwt.app has been broken up into gwt.place and
gwt.activity
* ui
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM with the following changes.
We need a follow up that makes Foo and Bar more realistic, s.t. the
counter is incremented only when they actually change. You might use
AutoBean to simplify that.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/930802/diff/1/3
File
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2
File user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2#newcode77
user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java:77:
super(click, keydown);
Which class would it
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Lgtm.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/953801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Verified manually that using GWT.isProdMode() as an early exit indeed
gets rid of Class.getName()
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/931801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2
File user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2#newcode77
user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java:77:
super(click, keydown);
On 2010/10/05
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2
File user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/diff/1/2#newcode77
user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/cell/CellExample.java:77:
super(click, keydown);
Sorry, I haven't kept
LGTM with doc changes below.
Should also add tests that we really don't post extra wide side effect
updates, as we discussed.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/958801/diff/1/2
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/client/impl/AbstractRequestContext.java
(right):
Bob has offered to take the review.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: rjrjr, robertvawter,
Description:
Send an update notification to a stale client by comparing the incoming
version
number, with the version number on the server. This code path will only
be
taken if the ORM system has not flagged any errors.
Hacked the test harness so that the version
Mostly LGTM with some small suggestions.
However, I think there is one big thing that needs further discussion --
I think instead of trying to change the code, I suggest we change the
Eclipse warnings to not warn about unused parameters in
implemented/overridden methods.
Per our offline discussion, you should do the version check before bothering
with any diff checks — if the client is stale, we know it needs to update
the entity regardless of what happens when the method fires.
It's tempting to rip out the diff mechanism entirely, but this is not the
the time.
Per our offline conversation, I'll
• move TakesValue back into user.client
• move RequestFactoryEditorDriver back into requestfactory.client
• segerate the user.client.ui dependent bits of editor into
editor.ui.client
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
Revision: 8934
Author: rchan...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 05:31:20 2010
Log: Fixes to use Java 1.5 compatible JARs
Fixed DynaTableRf eclipse .classpath to use json-1.5.jar
Fixed build scripts and eclipse classpaths to use java 1.5 compatible
StreamHtmlParser JAR
Review at
Reviewers: cromwellian,
Description:
Remove remaining use of JSON.stringify() and replace with simple
StringBuilder concatenation.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: cromwellian
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/960801/show
Affected files:
D
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/955801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8935
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 05:40:44 2010
Log: Changes the default row count of HasDataPresenter from
Integer.MIN_VALUE to a more reasonable 0. We use the boolean
isRowCountExact to determine if we actually have 0 rows, or just think we
do.
Review at
Revision: 8936
Author: fre...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 06:38:51 2010
Log: Fix verifyPositionStatic() so that RootPanel.get() is explicitly
allowed, e.g.
RootPanel.get().add(widget, x, y), by whitelisting a BODY parent element.
Also, only perform parent==offsetParent test when both parent
Reviewers: zundel,
Description:
Remove dependency on CastableTypeMap from deRPC
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/943803/show
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/rpc/linker/CastableTypeDataImpl.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/rpc/linker/ClientOracleLinker.java
Reviewers: kathrin,
Description:
Remove extra slash from request URL of Showcase source files to be
compatible with servers that do not all double slashses.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/961801/show
Affected files:
M
Revision: 8937
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 09:11:00 2010
Log: Fix ROO-1488 where forward references were not correctly resolved.
Patch by: cromwellian, bobv
Review by: bobv, cromwellian
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/958801
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/943803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/961801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/954801/diff/1/6
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/OptimizerStats.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/954801/diff/1/6#newcode91
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/OptimizerStats.java:91: *
Return a human readable string
Commited in r8936
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/931801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Submitted http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8932
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:59 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/930802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The updated patch incorporates the feedback.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:59 AM, amitman...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode78
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java:78:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode1381
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java:1381:
*
Revision: 8938
Author: r...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 10:23:33 2010
Log: Original change by Ray Cromwell
Add validation of context methods and proxy against domain objects.
Add verbose diagnostic messages.
Add test cases for RequestFactoryModel.
Review at
committed as r8935
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/950802/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8939
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 10:47:22 2010
Log: Remove remaining use of JSON.stringify() and replace with simple
StringBuilder concatenation.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: cromwellian
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/960801
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/954801/diff/1/19
File
samples/expenses/src/main/java/com/google/gwt/sample/expenses/client/ExpenseDetails.java
(left):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/954801/diff/1/19#oldcode46
Revision: 8940
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 10:51:03 2010
Log: Remove extra slash from request URL of Showcase source files to be
compatible with servers that do not all double slashses.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/961801
Review by: kpro...@google.com
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
Avoid an infinite loop in toString() for collections that directly
include themselves
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/962801/show
Affected files:
M user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/AbstractCollection.java
Index:
committed as r8940
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/961801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:26 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode78
Done everything.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:32 PM, b...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode1381
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/962801/diff/1/2
File user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/AbstractCollection.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/962801/diff/1/2#newcode146
user/super/com/google/gwt/emul/java/util/AbstractCollection.java:146:
sb.append(value == this ? (this
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This emulates JRE behavior, as pointed out in
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5297.
Dan
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:11 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/962801/diff/1/2
File
On 2010/10/05 21:16:39, rice wrote:
This emulates JRE behavior, as pointed out in
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5297.
Ok.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/962801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode78
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java:78:
Updated patch incorporates the feedback, including adding the additional
test.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:14 PM, amitman...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8941
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 14:33:18 2010
Log: Fix Eclipse / Checkstyle / Javadoc warnings
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/954801
Review by: j...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8941
Modified:
Revision: 8942
Author: jbrosenb...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 11:17:13 2010
Log: Remove dependency on CastableTypeMap from deRPC
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/943803
Review by: zun...@google.com
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8942
Modified:
Revision: 8943
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 14:37:58 2010
Log: Fix 'ant dist-dev' and 'ant-doc' builds:
1) Add memory to java heap for 'gwt.javac'
2) Break up a line in JsonResults that caused javac to exit
3) Remove an annotation in SafeHtmlHostedModeUtils that caused javadoc
Comment by saglikpasaji:
Genel içerik ve özgün makaleler ile a
href=http://www.saglikpasaji.com;sağlık/a pasajı sizler ile burada a
href=http://www.saglikpasaji.com;dengeli beslenme/aküçüklerin a
href=http://www.oyuncun.com;oyun oyna/ama merağını a
101 - 200 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
