Re: How to send images with image map to client and create widget with it
thx, especially for the security hint. On Friday, 14 September 2012 16:45:29 UTC+2, Jens wrote: So for each image to server requests are necessary: 1 to get the dto and create html with image-url 2 to get the image from servlet Yes, although the second request is done by the browser and not by your GWT app. To remove the browser request, you would need to use data uris (base64) and use the data uri instead of the server url. But as you said, you don't want that. Just be aware of XSS attacks. A possible man in the middle attack could probably modify the raw html while its send from server to client. The html would then contain some evil javascript that will be executed by the browser in your app's context as soon as you render the html. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7eI0GotdbWAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Gwt-OpenLayers Project
Hi folks, there is a little example wrapping with gwt the Openlayers project. Here the demo : http://demo.gwt-openlayers.org/gwt_ol_showcase/GwtOpenLayersShowcase.html Here the documentation : http://www.gwt-openlayers.org/ Regards Giuseppe -- Giuseppe La Scaleia CNR - IMAA geoSDI Sviluppo Software C.da S. Loja 85050 Tito Scalo - POTENZA (PZ) Italia phone: +39 0971427305 fax: +39 0971 427271 mob:+39 3666373220 mail: giuseppe.lascal...@geosdi.org skype: glascaleia web: http://www.geosdi.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Integer and int are not equal... Especially if received via JSNI
Yes, this manual boxing is what i did to solve this. I don't use DevMode because it's a bit difficult to configure my environment for it: i use JBoss as my app server and the app is deployed via .ear archive with some other modules it needs to work... I'm sure it's possible to configure somehow, just i didn't need it. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/GDMftMpDRz8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Is there any chart library for GWT?
U can also look at this http://www.moxiegroup.com/moxieapps/gwt-highcharts/ On Thursday, 13 September 2012 21:58:28 UTC+1, Rui Afonso wrote: You can also check GWT Charts: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-charts It's a GWT library based on Google Chart Tools: https://developers.google.com/chart -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/e7lV3fkrQeQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
application architecture ideas: Appli
Howdy- I've been playing with different approaches to building large, complex applications and I've finally rolled my thoughts into an article as well as a tiny, tiny framework to go along with it. I would love for any thoughts or feedback: http://tysoncodes.blogspot.com/2012/09/gwt-mvp-nope-do-it-better.html (Disclaimer: I finished writing this about 20 minutes ago and haven't done much proofing yet so please excuse any blatant stupidisms. The library may have issues too. Will be refining both over the next few weeks.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/nFUKG9wtbe0J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: highlight mouse-overed row in CellList?
thanks a lot! it works like a charm!
a minor revision for your style:
.myCellList *table*:hover {
background-color: #ebebeb !important;
}
thank you!!
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:29:58 AM UTC+2, Andrei wrote:
Create a CSS style
.myCellList tr:hover {
background-color: #ebebeb !important;
}
and add this style to your CellList.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/1S7jZV5EuXIJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Integer and int are not equal... Especially if received via JSNI
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:17:17 AM UTC+2, pash7ka wrote: Yes, this manual boxing is what i did to solve this. I don't use DevMode because it's a bit difficult to configure my environment for it: i use JBoss as my app server and the app is deployed via .ear archive with some other modules it needs to work... I'm sure it's possible to configure somehow, just i didn't need it. :) It'll save you hours: https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCompilingAndDebugging#How_do_I_use_my_own_server_in_development_mode_instead_of_GWT's -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/7i_ND6_T8lIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: application architecture ideas: Appli
On Monday, September 17, 2012 12:30:20 PM UTC+2, tyson wrote: Howdy- I've been playing with different approaches to building large, complex applications and I've finally rolled my thoughts into an article as well as a tiny, tiny framework to go along with it. I would love for any thoughts or feedback: http://tysoncodes.blogspot.com/2012/09/gwt-mvp-nope-do-it-better.html (Disclaimer: I finished writing this about 20 minutes ago and haven't done much proofing yet so please excuse any blatant stupidisms. The library may have issues too. Will be refining both over the next few weeks.) Could we please just stop confusing ActivitiesPlaces and MVP? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/FjAAiU5AtJgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: application architecture ideas: Appli
Could we please just stop confusing ActivitiesPlaces and MVP? +1 Maybe we should write an example app that only deals with Activity Place and that uses some widgets that internally do MVP. So no Activity implements Presenter stuff. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/dpeDHzi9SfoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: add two pagers to cellTable widget
Hi Andrei, This doesn't work. I guess the reason is that whenever you add a paper to another widget, it'll do remove-from-parent first. This is to make sure one widget can only have one parent. Thanks, On Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:26:34 AM UTC+2, Andrei wrote: Create one pager and add it to two places. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/uBWrD8nPE2kJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT Bean Validation + Hibernate Validator version?
What is the officially supported Hibernate Validator versionhttp://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/org/hibernate/hibernate-validator/that should be used in conjunction with GWT JSR 303 Bean Validationhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/BeanValidation? (Note: I'm using the word official, because the EXPERIMENTAL flag has now been removedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/jyaODjNwVj0/discussion in trunk.) *4.0.2 GA* 4.0.2 GA is the version the validation sample uses in its pom.xmlhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/validation/pom.xml. But this doesn't really work: Compiling with -strict fails with Errors in 'jar:file:/path/to/gwt-2.5.0.rc1/gwt-user.jar!/org/hibernate/validator/super/org/hibernate/validator/constraints/impl/URLValidator.java' Line 20: The import org.hibernate.validator.constraints.URL cannot be resolved Line 26: URL cannot be resolved to a type *4.2.0 Final* I also tried 4.2.0 Final, but this fails twofold: First problem: [ERROR] Errors in 'jar:file:/path/to/gwt-user.jar!/org/hibernate/validator/super/org/hibernate/validator/engine/PathImpl.java' [ERROR] Line 72: The constructor NodeImpl(String) is undefined Second problem: Version 4.2.0 requires Joda time, which cannot be used on the client side * * *4.1.0 Final* * * After some experimenting, I found that this is the only version that really works. So I'd like to know, if this is the best version to use for now, and where we can find out when to upgrade to which newer version. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/1KT13z1edJ0J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CSS 3 transition+ GWT
CSS3 transitions are triggered by changes in properties. It can be any property, like display: none changing to display: block. You can change any property of a widget from your code, and it will trigger the transition automatically. Suppose you want a widget to slowly increase in size. You tie a transition to the width and height properties. Then you call myWidget.setSize(100px, 100px) in your code, and it will trigger your transition effect. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/-mJRa4Nmd0IJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Bean Validation + Hibernate Validator version?
This has actually been reported a few days ago: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7661, and in the comments on the wiki page. GWT is built against 4.1.0 Final and depends on Hibernate Validator internals (NodeImpl, PathImpl implementations, etc.), so I'd suggest you stick to that version, at least for compiling your client code (you could use 4.2.0 GA on the server-side for instance). On Monday, September 17, 2012 2:45:52 PM UTC+2, Chris Lercher wrote: What is the officially supported Hibernate Validator versionhttp://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/org/hibernate/hibernate-validator/that should be used in conjunction with GWT JSR 303 Bean Validationhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/BeanValidation? (Note: I'm using the word official, because the EXPERIMENTAL flag has now been removedhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/jyaODjNwVj0/discussion in trunk.) *4.0.2 GA* 4.0.2 GA is the version the validation sample uses in its pom.xmlhttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/samples/validation/pom.xml. But this doesn't really work: Compiling with -strict fails with Errors in 'jar:file:/path/to/gwt-2.5.0.rc1/gwt-user.jar!/org/hibernate/validator/super/org/hibernate/validator/constraints/impl/URLValidator.java' Line 20: The import org.hibernate.validator.constraints.URL cannot be resolved Line 26: URL cannot be resolved to a type *4.2.0 Final* I also tried 4.2.0 Final, but this fails twofold: First problem: [ERROR] Errors in 'jar:file:/path/to/gwt-user.jar!/org/hibernate/validator/super/org/hibernate/validator/engine/PathImpl.java' [ERROR] Line 72: The constructor NodeImpl(String) is undefined Second problem: Version 4.2.0 requires Joda time, which cannot be used on the client side * * *4.1.0 Final* * * After some experimenting, I found that this is the only version that really works. So I'd like to know, if this is the best version to use for now, and where we can find out when to upgrade to which newer version. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/oe3QjqYzAN8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Bean Validation + Hibernate Validator version?
Ok, thanks. On Monday, September 17, 2012 3:34:48 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: This has actually been reported a few days ago: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7661, and in the comments on the wiki page. GWT is built against 4.1.0 Final and depends on Hibernate Validator internals (NodeImpl, PathImpl implementations, etc.), so I'd suggest you stick to that version, at least for compiling your client code (you could use 4.2.0 GA on the server-side for instance). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/5eA3hmlrQSUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CSS 3 transition+ GWT
I use transitions and they work fine just by using the style object to update the property. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 7:51:59 PM UTC-4, regnoult axel wrote: Hi Andrei, I will try to answer the best I can regarding to your questionsand most of all, regarding to want I have understood about CSS transition and animation *1 - Why do you need to activate it in your code?* * * What I am looking for, for example, is to manipulate CSS transitions + animation such as cool effects... For example, I want to show a popup with a funny and cool effect (animation + transition) and I can not show this effect just with :hover...so I want to do it programatically (for example, when the user scroll at the top of the page, it will appear a slideshow trailer, and this apparition should be sexy thanks to CSS transition/animation)... *2 - Do you plan to do something else when the transition activates?* If you are talking about something related to the widget's animation, not especially...I am just looking for the cool effect... And I am also asking about how to use these CSS transition, because, the only example I have seen is using :hover to activate the transition. So in a more general way, I am asking if there is alternative to activate these CSS transition without :hover. And, I am asking these question on the GWT forum, because, I just would like to see a simple example manipulating CSS 3 + GWTMaybe I could study some existing lib like VISUAL FOX ( http://code.google.com/p/visualfox-fx/) Cheers, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/UZG2isXZLXEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Bean Validation + Hibernate Validator version?
Should GWT 2.5 SDK then bundle Hibernate Validator 4.1.0 if it depends on that specific (older) implementation? Or at least mention it somewhere in the docs that Hibernate 4.1.0 is the way to go? -- J. Am Montag, 17. September 2012 15:54:20 UTC+2 schrieb Chris Lercher: Ok, thanks. On Monday, September 17, 2012 3:34:48 PM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: This has actually been reported a few days ago: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7661, and in the comments on the wiki page. GWT is built against 4.1.0 Final and depends on Hibernate Validator internals (NodeImpl, PathImpl implementations, etc.), so I'd suggest you stick to that version, at least for compiling your client code (you could use 4.2.0 GA on the server-side for instance). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/XDE-rgW6QxcJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CSS 3 transition+ GWT
I would encourage you to create to classes and change the class to trigger
the transition. For example, if you want to change the width, do this:
.narrow-animation {
width: 100px;
transition-property: width;
transition-duration: 1s;
}
.wide-animation {
width: 400px;
transition-property: width;
transition-duration: 2s;
}
Then, in GWT, use addStyleName and removeStyleName to add the appropriate
class to trigger the animation.
For last year's Google I/O, I submitted a little project that used CSS
transitions to animate a countdown timer. The code just changes the class
on an element and the transition takes care of the animation.
You can see it here http://code.google.com/p/pulazzo-lastcall/ (in the
demo, choose a date in the future to trigger the countdown).
-Andy
On Saturday, September 15, 2012 12:34:00 PM UTC-4, regnoult axel wrote:
Hello,
I do not succeed to use CSS3 transition with GWT...I do not understand how
to activate the transition without using :hover in the css file.
W3C says that :
*The effect will start when the specified CSS property changes value. A
typical CSS property change would be when a user mouse-over an element...*
*
*
So I have:
focus{
*height*: 100px;
transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
-webkit-transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
}
focus:hover
{
*height*: 200px;
}
This works, but I do not succeed to activate the transition using :
/*
*/
@UiHandler(focus) void mouse__Over(MouseOverEvent e)
/*
*/
{
// TODO - WHICH CODE TO INSERT HERE TO ACTIVATE THE TRANSITION (on
the focus panel) ?
}
If you could complete the TODO in order to activate the transition, it
would help me...
(I have tried focus.addStyleName(), focus.setHeight() but the transition
does not appear !)
Thanks you,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/VN1XSLeEjEQJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Opening a browser in development mode in Eclipse
Hi there, I'm having some problems with my Eclipse, GWT settings. When I try to run my code in development mode, clicking the URL opens up my code in a text editor. Currently it's set to Open with default system browser. - I tried to Add a new browser and added Chrome with the location: /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome but with that setting, double-clicking the development mode url did not open anything at all. - I also tried setting the gwt external browser: export GWT_EXTERNAL_BROWSER=/opt/google/chrome/google-chrome but that did not seem to have any effect. This started happening when I switched to Indigo from Galileo. I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx. Thanks for any suggestions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/KxDaEcQTh5IJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: hard time to get GWTTestCase to work
Not everything can be tested with unit tests. I write a lot of generator + linker code, so, by necessity, I must use GWTTestCase, as I am testing the compilation process. If your tests don't involve the gwt generator, then definitely don't incur the overhead of GWTTestCase, but if you are working in the generator layer, or if you want to test a functional gui in the browser, then you should use GWTTestCase. It might be possible with selenium to achieve the in-browser tests, but you will likely need to run the gwt compile anyway, so you might as well just use the testing suite provided. =} On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:49:38 PM UTC-6, Ed wrote: @ tanteanni : Easiest solution: don't use GWTTestCase... It simple doesn't work well and if you have it working, it's hard to maintain... Try to do everything through unit testing... Nowedays I can test almost everything through unit tests, and works well. Google around for awesome testing with IsWidget, if I remember correctly, and you find some forum posts of me that might help you in the correct direction... - Ed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/VE4aPJxwRuQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Project architecture
Each application has a logical architecture . I'm asking weather my application (made with GWT RPC+MYSQL+deployed on tomcat) has a three layered architecture or a client/server architecture ? In other terms , the database does it constitute a layer or is it integrated in the server layer ? I need this information to write the report . I think it's a concrete question ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/2kgbeqeHgagJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Data (objects) on the first view?
Hi, This question was asked before (2007) but I'm wondering if there's a better way to load data in the first page. I have a shopping application that displays product data in the first page, then when you click on a product it loads a second page with more detail. It would be preferable to pass a product object to the client on the first page, so that common data elements (name, id, price) could be handled the same way on both pages. I can't see anyway to do this, aside from using a callback in the module load method to fetch the product list and then render those page elements. This adds a _very_ noticeable lag to the rendering on the first page. If I push the same data as text labels, etc. It's much faster and the page renders seamlessly. Is there any way to push non-visual data to the client on the first page? thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/sn7ip0lLgZIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT AND SOAP
Blake McBride blake1024@... writes: Greetings, I ran through the same issues. Spent quite a bit of time banging my head against the wall. (Still am!!) I sense a lot of GWT stuff is simple to those who already know HTML/JavaScript/CSS/JSP/etc.. They understand what is going on underneath, what the limitations are, and what common workarounds are. For those of us non-experts in the above technologies, GWT is very difficult. It seems to be filled with arbitrary limitations and arbitrary mechanisms. It is sad in a way because I believe GWT was meant to hide all that stuff. In spite of all these frustrations however, I have found GWT to be the best thing out there. HTML is the worst environment I've ever seen for writing interactive applications by far! Naturally, GWT includes a communications mechanism that works and is sufficient if you write the front-end and backend in GWT. There is no need for trying to use another mechanism - you'd be adding a lot of unnecessary work. On the other hand, if you already have an existing back-end and you are trying to link it up with a GWT front-end you need something else like SOAP. I spent a huge amount of time trying all sorts of ways to get this working with little success for a long time until I finally settled on something that worked well. What I did was use GWT to create the front-end and backend so that the two sides were communicating in native GWT. I then had the GWT backend create a socket connection with the real backend and communicate with it. I created all of the code to very easily form the socket connection and have the ability to bi-directionally communicate via named methods and arbitrary structured data. This can all be done without adding new classes for each communication (to specify the arguments). Another beauty of this is that the real server and the GWT server can be operating on different machines, different URL's, different ports, etc.. I offered the code to the GWT community before but there was no interest. I haven't spent the time to package up the code due to the lack of interest but if you want it I'd be happy to package it up and give it to you. Let me know. Thanks, and good luck. Blake McBride On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Nitheesh Chandran nitheesh- xupyepad5z7eqncyljx...@public.gmane.org wrote:Okay thanks for the information. Do you have experience of writing a soap client on the GWT server ? or else can i get any links regarding that ?Or do we have any alternatives that can be used instead of SOAP ? On Thursday, July 26, 2012 1:59:28 AM UTC+5:30, Rob Whiteside wrote:You are right that GWT does NOT have built in support for making SOAP calls. GWT (like all javascript that runs in the browser) is subject to Same-Origin-Policy rules. So you couldn't call any remote soap service anyway. You can to do GWT- RPC to get to your server, then write a soap client on the server that sorta proxies the calls to the soap webservice. --RobOn Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:54:52 PM UTC-7, Nitheesh Chandran wrote: HI, Can we use GWT and SOAP ? i read from some documents that GWT does not have a built in support for SOAP and another document says it can be used in server side of GWT. it is a little bit confusing. Can anyone give me a clarification on this. Also i read SMART GWT has built in support for SOAP webservices. But i am looking for GWT AND SOAP. Is that possible ? Thanks Nitheesh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Two footers in a CellTable?
Is there a way within the standard CellTable to add two footers to the table? I need to have two separate non-editable total rows, and I was hoping to be able to do it without having to customize objects or create a separate table for the totals. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/HgWPAWBu6PkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Project architecture
You can do both, it depends on many details. Your DB is always part of the server layer. Op maandag 17 september 2012 21:09:37 UTC+2 schreef nessrinovitta het volgende: Each application has a logical architecture . I'm asking weather my application (made with GWT RPC+MYSQL+deployed on tomcat) has a three layered architecture or a client/server architecture ? In other terms , the database does it constitute a layer or is it integrated in the server layer ? I need this information to write the report . I think it's a concrete question ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/a8EdwT7M0FkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: hard time to get GWTTestCase to work
Just curious: where do you use your linker and generators for? (I always tried to avoid them as much as possible, don't like hem). Op maandag 17 september 2012 20:06:10 UTC+2 schreef Ajax het volgende: Not everything can be tested with unit tests. I write a lot of generator + linker code, so, by necessity, I must use GWTTestCase, as I am testing the compilation process. If your tests don't involve the gwt generator, then definitely don't incur the overhead of GWTTestCase, but if you are working in the generator layer, or if you want to test a functional gui in the browser, then you should use GWTTestCase. It might be possible with selenium to achieve the in-browser tests, but you will likely need to run the gwt compile anyway, so you might as well just use the testing suite provided. =} On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:49:38 PM UTC-6, Ed wrote: @ tanteanni : Easiest solution: don't use GWTTestCase... It simple doesn't work well and if you have it working, it's hard to maintain... Try to do everything through unit testing... Nowedays I can test almost everything through unit tests, and works well. Google around for awesome testing with IsWidget, if I remember correctly, and you find some forum posts of me that might help you in the correct direction... - Ed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZL75OU9_eeoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT AND SOAP
The simplest way to call Soap with GWT is to make a normal RPC service call to the remote servlet. Once you are in the servlet you are in the server side java code. From here you can make your SOAP call using your favourite Java soap client generator. We use axis 2 via maven but eclipse can generate the soap client for you from the wsdl. Return the data from the soap call to the gwt client code via the rpc call and serliazable beans. I wouldn't try to call soap directly from the generated java script client code. On Aug 8, 2012 9:20 PM, Vassilis Virvilis vasv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody, Sorry for the late post. I was offline On 07/26/12 16:31, Blake McBride wrote: Greetings, I ran through the same issues. Spent quite a bit of time banging my head against the wall. (Still am!!) I sense a lot of GWT stuff is simple to those who already know HTML/JavaScript/CSS/JSP/etc.. They understand what is going on underneath, what the limitations are, and what common workarounds are. For those of us non-experts in the above technologies, GWT is very difficult. It seems to be filled with arbitrary limitations and arbitrary mechanisms. It is sad in a way because I believe GWT was meant to hide all that stuff. In spite of all these frustrations however, I have found GWT to be the best thing out there. HTML is the worst environment I've ever seen for writing interactive applications by far! Couldn't put it better my self. Naturally, GWT includes a communications mechanism that works and is sufficient if you write the front-end and backend in GWT. There is no need for trying to use another mechanism - you'd be adding a lot of unnecessary work. On the other hand, if you already have an existing back-end and you are trying to link it up with a GWT front-end you need something else like SOAP. I spent a huge amount of time trying all sorts of ways to get this working with little success for a long time until I finally settled on something that worked well. What I did was use GWT to create the front-end and backend so that the two sides were communicating in native GWT. I then had the GWT backend create a socket connection with the real backend and communicate with it. I created all of the code to very easily form the socket connection and have the ability to bi-directionally communicate via named methods and arbitrary structured data. This can all be done without adding new classes for each communication (to specify the arguments). Another beauty of this is that the real server and the GWT server can be operating on different machines, different URL's, different ports, etc.. I am on a similar position right now. We are evaluating ways to bridge SOAP and GWT. If you are using Apache-CXF as your GWT backend you could use their javascript support and to JSNI from GWT to their client javascript library (http://cxf.apache.org/docs/**javascript-clients.htmlhttp://cxf.apache.org/docs/javascript-clients.html). Unfortunately in my case I can't use it because I have a strict requirement for ws-security that cxf's generated javascript does not support. So we are looking to build GWT RPC as middle end (as you suggested) and maybe auto generate the java interface files. I offered the code to the GWT community before but there was no interest. I haven't spent the time to package up the code due to the lack of interest but if you want it I'd be happy to package it up and give it to you. Let me know. I would be very interested to see how you solved this problem. Thanks Vassilis Virvilis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@**googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+** unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/google-web-toolkit?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en **. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: application architecture ideas: Appli
Hi, I would suggest that you include a comparions of your approach with some popular MVP implementations (e.g. gwtp, mvp4g). For example: - http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/wiki/Mvp4g_vs_GWTP Also, take a look at Thomas's posts: - http://tbroyer.posterous.com/tag/gwt David Chandler's posts: - http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/category/google-web-toolkit/ and Andreas Borglin's posts re gwt-presenter (and gwt-dispatch): - http://borglin.net/gwt-project/?page_id=10 Cheers Rob Kiahu.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8f_uRNa4x0AJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: application architecture ideas: Appli
Rob, thanks for the suggestion. that's a great idea. I'll put something together. On Sep 17, 2012 3:49 PM, Rob rob.fergu...@uptick.com.au wrote: Hi, I would suggest that you include a comparions of your approach with some popular MVP implementations (e.g. gwtp, mvp4g). For example: - http://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/wiki/Mvp4g_vs_GWTP Also, take a look at Thomas's posts: - http://tbroyer.posterous.com/tag/gwt David Chandler's posts: - http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/category/google-web-toolkit/ and Andreas Borglin's posts re gwt-presenter (and gwt-dispatch): - http://borglin.net/gwt-project/?page_id=10 Cheers Rob Kiahu.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8f_uRNa4x0AJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: hard time to get GWTTestCase to work
Anywhere you find yourself re-writing the same code more than three times, you would likely benefit from a generator. Linkers are only useful if you need to translate java source into artifacts other than the embedded js. For gadgets and files that require xml configurations, it may be more work up front to write a generator + linker combo, but it will save piles of frustration because your config file comes from your source code, rather than being edited by hand. Currently, I'm doing a lot of work with creating my own cross-platform dependency injection framework (by implementing java.util.ServiceLoader for gwt). The easy part was getting the generated javascript to work; the hard part was getting dev mode to work correctly, since it does not honor super-source overrides. I prefer to work with interfaces and annotations as much as possible, and generators really help fill the gap without having to manually bind an interface to a factory or, even worse, just hardcoding an implementation. My next task for code generation will be to subclass java.lang.Thread and have it export a generated artifact to a web worker. Rather than manually export multiple modules for the web workers and test them with trial, error and lots of recompiles, I'm just going to write a generator which acts as a generic ThreadFactory, spits out a controller interface that will speak through to the web worker (or js object if web worker unavailable), and link the actual worker code into a separate js compile. This way, I can get the boilerplate right exactly once, and then reuse that boilerplate by calling GWT.create(GwtThread.class) any time I want to offload tasks to a web worker. On Monday, September 17, 2012 3:11:38 PM UTC-6, Ed wrote: Just curious: where do you use your linker and generators for? (I always tried to avoid them as much as possible, don't like hem). Op maandag 17 september 2012 20:06:10 UTC+2 schreef Ajax het volgende: Not everything can be tested with unit tests. I write a lot of generator + linker code, so, by necessity, I must use GWTTestCase, as I am testing the compilation process. If your tests don't involve the gwt generator, then definitely don't incur the overhead of GWTTestCase, but if you are working in the generator layer, or if you want to test a functional gui in the browser, then you should use GWTTestCase. It might be possible with selenium to achieve the in-browser tests, but you will likely need to run the gwt compile anyway, so you might as well just use the testing suite provided. =} On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:49:38 PM UTC-6, Ed wrote: @ tanteanni : Easiest solution: don't use GWTTestCase... It simple doesn't work well and if you have it working, it's hard to maintain... Try to do everything through unit testing... Nowedays I can test almost everything through unit tests, and works well. Google around for awesome testing with IsWidget, if I remember correctly, and you find some forum posts of me that might help you in the correct direction... - Ed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Gmv3jx9lTTkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Problem with JSNI in Dev Mode (Facebook Connect)
remove this: function() {
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/y2l0uIBiKDYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Getting the default DateBox() picker to advance year at a time
Hey Thanks man, really nice and helpful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/B5s7pQIULyQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
(d) does not apply to SmartGWT. No GWT update has ever broken SmartGWT or broken backcompat. (e) does not apply to SmartGWT. Nightlies are available for all editions - see smartclient.com/builds (c) presumably means customizing a widget by messing with it's DOM or overriding internal methods. SmartGWT has a big range of documented and supported customization APIs that don't involve low-level hacking, and if these break, we consider it a bug and fix it. (a) (b) [performance stuff] needs to be considered in light of what actually drives performance for your application. SmartGWT is designed for complex enterprise applications, so we do not optimize for first-ever page load experience (doesn't apply to apps used repeatedly and for long sessions). Instead we optimize for maximal data reuse, since round-trips to the app server database are almost always the thing to optimize in enterprise apps. A deeper discussion is in the SmartGWT QuickStart Guide, Evaluating SmartGWT chapter. In a nutshell: - the drawbacks of Sencha are not the drawbacks of SmartGWT - get clarity on what performance characteristics will matter for your end users, *then* look at performance from that perspective. If you hyper-optimize the wrong thing, your app will be slow for your end users. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:26:02 AM UTC-7, Andrei wrote: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/N01iJIj6y5wJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Smart GWT / GWT Ext.... which one is better?
(d) no release of GWT has ever broken SmartGWT. We don't rely on much from GWT other than Java-JavaScript translation, so there is little room for something to break. (c) This may refer to breakage from customizations like modifying a component's DOM or overriding internals. In SmartGWT we have documented extension points, and if they break, we consider it a bug and fix it (e) We provide nightly builds at smartclient.com/builds, so there is never a delay. (a), (b) [performance stuff] We focus on optimizing for enterprise applications, where first-time-ever page load is not much of a concern because the users repeatedly return to the app and use it for longer sessions. Similarly we focus on reducing trips to the server and/or database since this is usually the bottleneck in an enterprise application. A deeper discussion of this is in the SmartGWT QuickStart Guide, Evaluating SmartGWT chapter. In a nutshell: - your experience with Sencha breakage doesn't apply to SmartGWT - carefully consider what will actually drive performance for end users. If you heavily optimize the wrong thing, your users will have a slow application. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:26:02 AM UTC-7, Andrei wrote: I prefer the third option: I don't use either of them. I build very complex user interfaces, and so far I never regretted going with pure GWT. Here are a few advantages of this option: (a) Much smaller compiled code size. This also means faster compile times for developers and faster page load times for users. (b) Better performance. I had 3 years of experience with Sencha. Their widgets look nice (why we chose them in the first place), but in some complex UIs with lots of data you start to notice the lag relative to pure GWT. Remember that showcase widgets usually represent a very simple use case. (c) Easier customizations. The simpler the widget, the easier it is to modify it as you need. There is a lower probability of breaking something. (d) There is a lower probability that the next release of a library would break your code. I remember how much pain we had with Sencha's updates (2.0, 2.1, etc.) I hope it's much better now as Sencha moved closer to pure GWT implementation of their widgets. (e) Faster updates. Once a new feature is available in GWT, you can use it right away. With libraries you have to wait until their updates. I suggest that you use one of these libraries in two cases: 1. Your knowledge of CSS is not great, so you want a professional look for your app out of the box. 2. You see some widgets in these libraries that you absolutely must use, and you don't want to spend your time building them in pure GWT. P.S. Don't let GWT Designer drive your choice of a library. Once you learn GWT, you may end up never using the Designer. I find it much easier and faster to build new views in Ui:Binder, and then simply hit a refresh button in a browser to see how my page looks like. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/J5PA5KI8sSUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Building Custom UI Components
Hello, I am a novice to GWT. Can you please tell me how I would go about building custom UI components that would be presented to the user on an as needed basis. That is, will these components be built using HTML/Javascript and where can I get more information on this. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/plb8MLecqY0J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Making a button fire inside a custom AbstractCell
I also had trouble with this...I think the browser event might be consumed
by the custom cell so it never fires the eventhandler, but you can still
get the event in the onbrowserevent method of abstractcell.
Give the element an id and then use the event target to get the button fire
event...
Element target = Element.as(event.getEventTarget());
if (target.getId().toString().equals(my_button_id))
{
Window.alert(my button was pressed!)
}
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:01:54 AM UTC-4, Tod Jackson wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to make any
difference. The CellTable I'm working with is in a custom DialogBox, I
don't suppose that would make any difference would it? I know I've had to
do a little extra before when using DialogBoxes...perhaps I'll try to
eliminate that as a possible culprit. Thanks again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/j6wDuD5DZ3kJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Unable to open GWT designer?
I have Eclipse 4.2 installed with google plugin,GWT designer,app engine and GWT sdks. I don't have windows builder installed. Whenever I am trying to open entrypoint class of the Google Web Application project with GWT designer it fails to open the file reporting an error that it could not parse web.xml file. Should I install windows builder or is it some other problem with GWT designer? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/R6MPaBvc71wJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: no run as GWT application in Eclipse 3.7 (indigo)
Do not choose the whole project to run. Choose the java file, and you will be able to see the run as GWT app. Bora On Thursday, August 4, 2011 7:13:45 PM UTC+3, pagod wrote: Hi, I recently installed Eclipse 3.7 and need to be running projects that use the GWT. I've installed the various components as described on the information pages and now my configuration looks like this (copied from Eclipse's installed software): Google App Engine Java SDK 1.5.21.5.2.r37v201107211953 com.google.appengine.eclipse.sdkbundle.e37.feature.feature.group Google, Inc. Google Plugin for Eclipse 3.72.3.3.r37v201107211953 com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.e37.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. Eclipse Platform3.7.0.v20110530-9gF7UHNFFt4cwE-pkZDJ7oz- mj4OSEIlu9SEv0forg.eclipse.platform.feature.groupEclipse.org Eclipse Help System1.3.0.v20110327-7i7uFFiFFt6ZqnbOrMXLd1 org.eclipse.help.feature.groupEclipse.org Eclipse RCP3.7.0.v20110216-9DB5Fm1FpBGy_AaVz-mFamgY org.eclipse.rcp.feature.groupEclipse.org Equinox p2 Provisioning for IDEs.2.1.1.v20110526-6- Bg9JXOePwKUTU7X0teV1RtDu-e org.eclipse.equinox.p2.user.ui.feature.groupEclipse.org - Equinox Add-on Function for p2 1.0.0.v20110519-7A4FD3DiVOManmZvpLOsnBhnPQM3 org.eclipse.equinox.p2.extras.feature.feature.groupEclipse.org - Equinox Equinox p2 Core Function1.0.0.v20110519-8290FZ- FWmE7gdAgmOPL2_Corg.eclipse.equinox.p2.core.feature.feature.group Eclipse.org - Equinox Equinox p2 RCP Management Facilities 1.0.0.v20110519-782EoBqNKGUkVQrqOf0z-BhnPQM3 org.eclipse.equinox.p2.rcp.feature.feature.groupEclipse.org - Equinox Google Web Toolkit SDK 2.3.02.3.0.r37v201106211634 com.google.gwt.eclipse.sdkbundle.e37.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. GWT Designer Core2.3.2.r37x201107161253 com.google.gdt.eclipse.designer.hosted.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. GWT Designer Editor2.3.2.r37x201107161302 com.google.gdt.eclipse.designer.editor.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. GWT Designer GPE2.3.2.r37x201107161423 com.google.gdt.eclipse.designer.gpe.feature.feature.groupGoogle, Inc. Now when I want to run my project, I go to Run as... and there I can select Web application as a target type. My other colleagues all have another option GWT Application, which apparently allows things like hot code updates. This option doesn't appear in the list of possible target types (neither in Run as... nor in Debug as... of course). I've tried uninstalling/reinstalling the complete GWT set, no improvement... Any idea why this option is not available for me, and what I should do to activate it? Thanks a lot! pagod -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Z6v64sR_sooJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
printing problem: when I print content of my iframe (I use gwt-print-it) all what is left on the right side of printable page is cut off and stays not printed at all
I print big form that has fixed dimensions. If I'd use Letter parer size it should fit in 4 pages (2 pages wide and 2 pages high). I already started using PrintIt class (gwt-print-it) and it solves most basic problems for me. But when I try to print whole big form it only prints top left as the 1st page and top bottom as the 2nd page leaving the right side not printed. Does anyone know proper way of printing wide big pages? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Nbf7cUYFL2cJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT Frame Load Wrong Page in IE 8 (Different Than The URL Showed In URL Toolbar)
May be the frame of the first tab isn't hiding along with the first tab. can you provide some code so that i can get into the problem?? On Monday, September 17, 2012 6:52:59 AM UTC+5:30, the.wizard wrote: Anyone help me please? any clue? On Friday, August 31, 2012 10:13:54 AM UTC+7, the.wizard wrote: Anyone can help me? Still no luck with this problem... :( On Monday, August 27, 2012 8:43:36 AM UTC+7, the.wizard wrote: Hello everyone, I have a GWT Application that use couple of GWT Frame to load other site content. Let say in the left side of my application I have tree menu, and every time user click one of those menu, it will open a new tab in the right side of my application, and in the tab item, it will load other site content. Let say first I click tree menu A1, the application then open a new tab item in the right site with URL http://application.first.com/first.aspx. After that I click the other tree menu B1, the application then open a new tab item in the right side with URL http://application.first.com/second.aspx. After that, I hit the F5 key, and the browser reload again. Then I repeat the step from the beginning, when I click tree menu A1, the application open a new tab item in the right side, but the content that loaded is from http://application.first.com/second.aspx, but when I do right click in the frame area, it will show me that the currently accessed URL is http://application.first.com/first.aspx. Have anyone ever experience this problem? Because I really stuck in here, the other major browser working just fine (FF and Chrome), only IE 8 that give me this problem. Any comment and advice will be appreciated. Thanks. Regards, the.wizard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/riZnbfNtgk8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Unable to open GWT designer.
I have Eclipse Juno with Google Plugin,GWT designer,Windows builder,google app engine sdk,GWT sdk installed. My problem is that I am not able to use GWT designer. Whenever I try to open entrypoint class with GWT designer in design view it reports an error that not able to parse web.xml. So what should I do to make it work? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/6Y964Ipf2I4J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Unable to open GWT designer.
Also there is no option to create a windows builder project in new project dialog box. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/xae9NTXJZREJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: CustomScrollPanel issue (extra div overlays generated impacting performance?)
Hi Seth,
Is the drag functionality completed for the custom scrollbar ?
Thanks
Deepak
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Deepak Singh deepaksingh...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Seth. I will wait.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:23 AM, GWTter seth@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deepak,
Sure, I'll let you know once I add that functionality. Could be a little
while as that currently is not a priority compared to my other items, but
it definitely is needed and will be added.
-Seth
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 4:30:01 PM UTC-4, Deepak Singh wrote:
Ok.
So request you to update me when you add this drag functionality. OR you
can give me some hints/suggestion so that i could also try a bit.
Will be waiting for this one.
Thanks
Deepak
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:47 AM, GWTter seth@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deepak,
Yes, sorry, I forgot to mention that I hadn't added the drag
functionality to the scrollbar since I had put that on hold to focus on
some other issues. So you should see the functionality with the scroll
wheel only currently.
-Seth
On Wednesday, April 4, 2012 1:26:44 PM UTC-4, Deepak Singh wrote:
Hi Seth,
It works. Thanks.
But the scrolling happens only through the mouse wheel movement, it
does not scroll by dragging the bar in up and down direction.
It simply gets dragged like an image.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:53 AM, GWTter seth@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deepak,
The most you should need to do is the following:
AbsolutePanel absPanel = new AbsolutePanel();
for(int i = 0; i 10; i++){
SimplePanel simp = new SimplePanel();
simp.setHeight(100px);
simp.setWidth(500px);
simp.getElement().getStyle().setBackgroundColor(green);
absPanel.add(simp);
}
MyScrollPanel scrollPanel = new MyScrollPanel();
scrollPanel.setHeight(500px);
scrollPanel.setWidth(100px);
scrollPanel.add(absPanel);
RootPanel.get().add(**scrollPane**l);
If the above code does not give you a green scrollable box then you
should recheck your code. With the code I sent you and the above code,
you
should have a custom scroll bar (not native). You should at the very
least
have the above code working. Hope this helps. Let me know.
-Seth
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 1:59:33 PM UTC-4, Deepak Singh wrote:
Hi Seth,
I added the styles to myVerticalScrollBar. and added the entire page
content to MyScrollpanel but still the default scrollbar is there.
Its not overridden.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:39 PM, GWTter seth@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deepak,
Yes, you would need to apply some style to your scrollbar so that
it at least has width (or height if you were using the horizontal
scrollbar). If you look at the MyVerticalScrollBar constructor, the
line
'this.setStyleName(**verticalScrollBar)' sets the style for
the scrollbar. This style is not defined in the myScrollPanel.css as
that
CSS file is only meant for the cornerpanel styling. You would need to
define the style verticalScrollBar in your main CSS file. For
example:
.verticalScrollBar{
width: 10px;
background: blue;
}
Also, make sure that the content you're scrolling is within the
MyScrollPanel, since only content within the MyScrollPanel will have
the
custom scroll bars, anything not within a CustomScrollPanel will still
default to the native implementation. Hope this helps.
-Seth
-Seth
On Monday, April 2, 2012 11:44:57 AM UTC-4, Deepak Singh wrote:
Nothing more than what i sent you.
I have just myScrollPanel.css as mention above.
Could you pls guide me with css if i need to apply some css over
vertical scrollbar?
Thanks in advance
Deepak
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:19 PM, GWTter seth@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deepak,
This looks good to me. What style are you using for the vertical
scrollbar?
And thanks for the repost.
-Seth
On Sunday, April 1, 2012 3:50:12 PM UTC-4, Deepak Singh wrote:
Hi Seth,
I am posting my code here:
myScrollPanel.css
@CHARSET ISO-8859-1;
.customScrollPanel{
}
.customScrollPanelCorner{
opacity: 0.0;
}
MyScrollPanel.java
public class MyScrollPanel extends CustomScrollPanel {
/**
* Extends the CustomScrollPanel Resources interface so that we
can add our own css file and still reuse the Resources and Style
interfaces
from CustomScrollPanel
* @author SL
*
*/
public interface MyScrollResources extends Resources{
@Source(com/pdstechi/client/**myScrollPanel.css)
Style customScrollPanelStyle();
}
public MyScrollPanel(){
super((MyScrollResources)GWT.**create(MyScrollResources.
**class));
this.setVerticalScrollbar(new MyVerticalScrollBar(),
MyVerticalScrollBar.**getScrollBarWidth());
// this.setHorizontalScrollbar(**new
MyHorizontalScrollBar(), MyHorizontalScrollBar.**getScrol***
*lBarHeight());
}
}
MyVerticalScrollBar.java
public class MyVerticalScrollBar extends Widget implements
VerticalScrollbar {
private double scrollBarHeight = 0.0;
private
check if layout already exists in main layout
hi guys
I am working on GWT and i have something like
public class QuickSearch extends Canvas
{
private HLayout mainBodyLayout = new HLayout(); //the main layout
containing other layouts.
//button layout
private Layout getButtonLayout()
{
//here i want to check IF mainBodyLayout already contains
getButtonLayout() , if it does not contain only then add it like
mainBodyLayout.addMember(getButtonLayout());
Any idea how i can check if getButtonLayout() is already present in
mainBodyLayout ?
return VLayout;
}
thanks in advance.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/_Q5wH_Z-1GwJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Project architecture
Apparently you have a three-layered architecture. But this should not be a case of big concern, because such classification is very high level and does not bring any light to the real architecture of your project when you discuss one. It just the way you make major application separation, but things get more interesting going deeper in each part. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/rHXQ1Gv7ADAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
[gwt-contrib] Re: Update Maven sample pom.xml files to use maven-compiler-plugin's annotation processing functiona... (issue1828803)
LGTM Note that Mac users may have to refresh the project after first import in order to force APT to run. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: Update Maven sample pom.xml files to use maven-compiler-plugin's annotation processing functiona... (issue1828803)
Thanks David - when I tested on the mac, I didn't have to refresh the project after first import provided that I actually did an Update Project after enabling Maven Annotation Processing on the project. I noted this in bold on the Wiki page. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:15 AM, drfibona...@google.com wrote: LGTM Note that Mac users may have to refresh the project after first import in order to force APT to run. http://gwt-code-reviews.**appspot.com/1828803/http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: Update Maven sample pom.xml files to use maven-compiler-plugin's annotation processing functiona... (issue1828803)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/diff/9001/samples/dynatablerf/pom.xml File samples/dynatablerf/pom.xml (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/diff/9001/samples/dynatablerf/pom.xml#newcode120 samples/dynatablerf/pom.xml:120: version2.3.0-1/version Oh, I'm really sorry I let it slip through: the plugin should be updated to 2.5.0-rc1 here, or the (unfortunate) gwt-servlet dependency has to be reintroduced (and possibly the plugin updated to 2.4.0). And the validation sample should also benefit from this change (it too apparently needs a bit of love: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/D2nrOqJeMmA/discussion) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1828803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] submit chrome dev mode plugin to chrome web store?
+[skybrian] Ok, so it looks like we'll have to go ahead and rebuild the crx on our side. I've added Brian, who has been playing around with the crx build process. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Rajeev, I just gave it a try and it seems that we need to do some actual changes to make this work. The chrome web store is complaining about the manifest version of the plugin: An error occurred: Manifest version 1 is unsupported. Please upgrade to manifest version 2. I will give this another look tomorrow. It`s getting too late in Germany right now. -Daniel Am 13.09.2012 um 01:09 schrieb Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com: Sorry, this totally fell off the plate. Daniel, would you be able to submit it to the Chrome Webstore? On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Rajeev, what is the status here? Can I help? -Daniel Am 19.08.2012 um 17:10 schrieb Robert Hanson iamroberthan...@gmail.com: @Rajeev, you mentioned that you were going to post the plugin to the Chrome store. Is that still the plan, or did you run into some issues there? I'm working on some documentation that is about to go to press, and just want to make sure I have the right instructions in there. Thanks. Rob On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote: Hey Daniel, We do need to post the chrome devmode plugin to the webstore. I'll take care of that this week. I also need to rebuild the devmode plugin, as there were some fixes that went into it a while back that were never put into a distributable binary. Rajeev On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Istvan Soos is...@google.com wrote: Hi, A quick fix that might help: 1. right click on the chrome iconPropertiesShortcut 2. add in target: --enable-easy-off-store-extension-install 3. open chrome and navitage to extensions ( chrome://chrome/extensions/) 4. drag and drop on it the plugin (should be in your download folder if you tried to install it before and didn't succeed) Regards, Istvan On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, today at work I was setting up a GWT installation on windows for a new coworker and noticed that with chrome 21 we can not install extension anymore. (They need to be in the chrome web store). I also noticed an issue popping up on the issue tracker on the exact same thing: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7569 Does anyone have this covered or are we just hearing about this change to chrome right now? -Daniel -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] submit chrome dev mode plugin to chrome web store?
Yep, back on the Chrome plugin this week. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote: +[skybrian] Ok, so it looks like we'll have to go ahead and rebuild the crx on our side. I've added Brian, who has been playing around with the crx build process. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rajeev, I just gave it a try and it seems that we need to do some actual changes to make this work. The chrome web store is complaining about the manifest version of the plugin: An error occurred: Manifest version 1 is unsupported. Please upgrade to manifest version 2. I will give this another look tomorrow. It`s getting too late in Germany right now. -Daniel Am 13.09.2012 um 01:09 schrieb Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com: Sorry, this totally fell off the plate. Daniel, would you be able to submit it to the Chrome Webstore? On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Rajeev, what is the status here? Can I help? -Daniel Am 19.08.2012 um 17:10 schrieb Robert Hanson iamroberthan...@gmail.com: @Rajeev, you mentioned that you were going to post the plugin to the Chrome store. Is that still the plan, or did you run into some issues there? I'm working on some documentation that is about to go to press, and just want to make sure I have the right instructions in there. Thanks. Rob On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote: Hey Daniel, We do need to post the chrome devmode plugin to the webstore. I'll take care of that this week. I also need to rebuild the devmode plugin, as there were some fixes that went into it a while back that were never put into a distributable binary. Rajeev On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Istvan Soos is...@google.com wrote: Hi, A quick fix that might help: 1. right click on the chrome iconPropertiesShortcut 2. add in target: --enable-easy-off-store-extension-install 3. open chrome and navitage to extensions ( chrome://chrome/extensions/ ) 4. drag and drop on it the plugin (should be in your download folder if you tried to install it before and didn't succeed) Regards, Istvan On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, today at work I was setting up a GWT installation on windows for a new coworker and noticed that with chrome 21 we can not install extension anymore. (They need to be in the chrome web store). I also noticed an issue popping up on the issue tracker on the exact same thing: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7569 Does anyone have this covered or are we just hearing about this change to chrome right now? -Daniel -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
Do you think it would be possible to share the BUILD file(s), or a stripped-down version of it, even privately? I'd love to see how it compares to Maven and other build systems. Now back to the CL: given the move to Git soon, which will require some changes on your side, is it wise to make such a change now? I mean, MOE [1][2] for instance can very well sync external src to internal java (transmogrify as they call it). On the other hand, given that the new Git repos will be populated from Google's internal repo, maybe the answer to the above is yes, and take advantage of the repo move to transmogrify them back to src (along with rollbacking the changes to the Ant files) outside Google. [1] http://code.google.com/p/make-open-easy/ [2] http://code.google.com/p/moe-java/ On 2012/09/17 19:13:46, skybrian wrote: This is a good place for an experiment, since in practice, very few people build the plugins. The bigger picture is that we don't particularly like BUILD files that call ant, since they slow down builds for everyone at Google. There's no reason to rebuild every GWT app and run all the tests because one Java file in gwt.user changed that most people don't even use. Outside Google, people seem to prefer Maven, and I expect we won't want to use that internally either. So I'd like to see if we can just build GWT code directly. If Google can move away from ant and open source moves to Maven, we'll end up with two independent build systems instead of three that are intertwined. (Or four, if you count the plugin Makefiles. But I doubt we can get rid of those.) - Brian On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:45 AM, mailto:j...@jaet.org wrote: So why not do it in the BUILD file the same way the rest of GWT does, which also doesn't have a java directory? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1834803/ http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1834803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
On 2012/09/17 20:43:56, tbroyer wrote: Do you think it would be possible to share the BUILD file(s), or a stripped-down version of it, even privately? There's a high-level overview here: http://google-engtools.blogspot.com/2011/08/build-in-cloud-how-build-system-works.html It doesn't explain the GWT-specific rules, but conceptually they're not that different from the cc_library rules, or a Makefile for that matter. Since you name the files you want to include (often using globs), anything not named isn't a build dependency, so the compiler won't see it and changes don't force a recompile. We normally have separate build rules for each GWT module and apps can declare what they use. is it wise to make such a change now? I'm not suggesting doing the larger changes any time soon. As I said, this is an experiment. But I'm wary of using remapping to make open source and internal directory structures look different. I think it will make things like applying patches more complicated; we won't be able to just use the patch command. It seems like we should be able to find a compromise that lets us keep the directory structures identical, and that's one less thing for maintainers to worry about. I know ant is very flexible when it comes to directory structure; can Maven be configured as well? http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1834803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
LGTM. I mean, ideally it would be src/main/java :), but Maven can cope with any directory name for this. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:36 AM, skybr...@google.com wrote: Reviewers: cromwellian, Description: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with Google's internal build system. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1834803/ Affected files: M plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/build.xml A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/DevModeOptions.extra.xml A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/DevModeOptions.gwt.xml A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptions.java A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptions.ui.xml A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptionsResources.java A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/HostEntry.java A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/HostEntryStorage.java A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/LocalStorage.java A plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/java/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/resources/DevModeOptions.css D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/DevModeOptions.gwt.xml D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptions.java D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptions.ui.xml D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/DevModeOptionsResources.java D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/HostEntry.java D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/HostEntryStorage.java D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/LocalStorage.java D plugins/npapi/DevModeOptions/src/com/google/gwt/devmodeoptions/client/resources/DevModeOptions.css -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Regarding Issue 1601804: Fix leak in LayoutImplIE6
(I seem to be unable to post this comment to the code review...) In regards to the code review posted at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1601804, I would love to see this land in 2.5, as we have some large customers who are still using IE7. And, no surprise, we're having some memory issues... Unfortunately, when I applied this patch to our code base, part of our app failed to render. The problem seems to be in the LayoutImplIE6 class, though I'm not sure exactly what's going wrong. Clearly the DOM is generated differently, and that's expected. If someone can provide a pointer or some more details on how the layers are supposed to be used in the onAttach now vs. previously, I will try to take a look and get a better understanding of what's going wrong. Thanks, jay -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
[gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1834803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
There's no reason to rebuild every GWT app and run all the tests because one Java file in gwt.user changed that most people don't even use. Just to understand more, how does avoiding ant solve the problem? If RarelyUsedFile.java in gwt-user changes, then from my reading of the blog post, the gwt-user input/digest would have changed, so the gwt-user label would be considered dirty, so it seems like all downstream projects would have to rebuild it anyway. Regardless of ant being used or not. Unless ant's output is not deterministic? Just curious. - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
It doesn't explain the GWT-specific rules, but conceptually they're not that different from the cc_library rules, or a Makefile for that matter. Just curious, but would stealing Lex Spoon's scala-gwt approach (writing .jribble ASTs to disk, like .class files), allow the Google build system to do more incremental analysis and so less recompilation? E.g.: 1. IDE or CLI compiles .java - .jribble (resolved AST) 2. PrecompileModule bundles .jribble - .gwtars 3. Compiler uses .jribble+.gwtars to generate .js output I guess the unit cache/gwtars were supposed to already solve this (avoiding reparsing of the AST), by caching ASTs. But then why do we still have the slow startup? E.g. why is not everything like primed superdevmode refreshes (which I, sigh, have still not played with yet)? - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: Just to understand more, how does avoiding ant solve the problem? If RarelyUsedFile.java in gwt-user changes, then from my reading of the blog post, the gwt-user input/digest would have changed, so the gwt-user label would be considered dirty, so it seems like all downstream projects would have to rebuild it anyway. Yes, that's true, nothing changes if there's one build target for gwt-user.jar and every project uses it and it includes everything. But if we split things up into separate build targets (and associated jars) for different GWT modules, downstream projects can declare what they use. (For example, it seems reasonable to require projects to declare where they're using GWT-RPC or RequestFactory or GWTTestCase.) Ideally there would be a jar for each GWT module, though I doubt we'll get that far. I'm assuming we don't want to duplicate the dependency tree in three places (GWT modules and Ant and Google's build), nor do we want to divide up the open source build into that many jars. - Brian -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
But if we split things up into separate build targets (and associated jars) for different GWT modules, downstream projects can declare what they use. Cool, makes sense, thanks for the sanity check. nor do we want to divide up the open source build into that many jars. I dunno, I assumed we were headed towards 1 module == 1 jar, but would defer to others/Thomas since he's been working on it. - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: In the Chrome plugin, rename src to java for compatibility with (issue1834803)
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: nor do we want to divide up the open source build into that many jars. I dunno, I assumed we were headed towards 1 module == 1 jar, but would defer to others/Thomas since he's been working on it. Well, that's just an assumption - I don't really know what the plan is. Maybe it's easier with Maven? - Brian -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
