Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Compiling gwt on Mac ?

I managed to find a jdk 8 for my system and the build works. Thanks for the quick response. On 22 Mar 2023 at 13:23 +0100, Colin Alworth , wrote: > That patch is delayed since it turns out there are some tests that rely on > specific behavior from the JVM - a few JPMS violations in legacy dev

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2 Roadmap as it applies to future deprecations

In my case we have different codebases that overlap with reusable components. Not all projects are willing to invest in a newer jdk since they are basically in maintenance mode. If GWT would drop Java 8 it would be a problem. On the other hand, maybe it will finally force people to move on

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Goodbye IE 8–9 

+1 for dropping support for ie8-10. We still need to support IE11 in our app right now. But not for much longer. We are currently still compiling with 2.8.2 due to compilation issues with the 2.9 release (issues with generics) so dropping IE11 is not a big issue as well. On 30 Sep 2021, 18:49

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Goodbye IE 8–9 

We still need IE11 support in the banking sector. We still have a majority of customers that use IE11 due to technical reasons (plugins needed for accessing secure token don’t install properly in Chrome without internet access amongst others). What do you mean with “next version of GWT” if

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: HashCode H$ property should be not enumerable

Working in the bankings sector. We support all IE versions that are still available with a (payable) supported version of Windows. So for us it is IE11 and Edge. On 14 Jun 2020, 07:38 +0200, Alberto Mancini , wrote: > Hi, > I think that keeping just IE11 is ok. > > Thanks, >    Alberto > > >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

Is it acceptable that an official GWT implementation of the time API would be based on moment.js ? Or is it expected that it is all implemented with standard browser API and pure Java code ? On 5 Dec 2018, 15:03 +0100, Jens , wrote: > > > For the emulation changes I can live with what is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

I am using var in some simple cases and the gwt compiler did not have a problem. I don’t use them on lambda parameters though. So my code is using   Java 10 but not 11 features. For the emulation changes I can live with what is available now and get some more in a later release. But how does

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

Thanks Thomas, that fixed the problems! On 13 Jul 2018, 16:13 +0200, Thomas Broyer , wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 4:18:38 PM UTC+2, stuckagain wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > would you mind pushing a new snapshot release of your maven plugin release > > to sonatype ? > > I see that you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

Just a little bit, but mostly because we can’t seem to get the Java 10 working properly. We are having problems running the GWTTestCase using the maven plugin from Thomas. The snapshot release in sonatype of the maven plugin looks to be quite old so it is still depending on older versions of

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

I guess I am bit overworked :) ignore the last statement! On 12 Jul 2018, 16:18 +0200, stuckagain , wrote: > Thomas, > > would you mind pushing a new snapshot release of your maven plugin release to > sonatype ? > I see that you have migrated to a newer version of the surefire plugin on >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Update on J2CL

Thanks for the update, I fail to understand why the prerequisite of using bazel was enforced and why it seems to have such a big impact on opensourcing J2CL. As far as I understand Google is probably the only company that uses bazel, and internally that is not even the same product as the

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.2 release

Thanks guys! One question: - Migrate guava JRE emulation to GWT Does this mean I have to migrate to a newer version of guava ? On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:31 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > Today we released the next version of GWT, version 2.8.2. A few quick > highlights

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Business proposition of GWT 3.0 - what is it good for vs. other solutions out there?

I guess he is going through the same steps like most devs who relied on GWT. I recognise the same reactions I initially had. We also have huge applications build on GWT and we don't like rewriting hings that work. But sometimes it is a good moment to reflect on the choices that were made. With

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.1 release

I migrated my code immediatly (including the beta release of Elemental2) Seems to work fine so far. On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 at 14:18, Matic Petek wrote: > Thank you very much for this. > > > On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 9:30:20 PM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: >> >> I'm very

Re: [gwt-contrib] Elemental2 and JsInterop base beta releases available.

-- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this disc

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

I had the same issue that the EventListeners were not triggered. It was solved by adding -generateJsInteropExports to the SDM startup and to the gwtc arguments. Make sure that you delete the folder in temp that is generated by SDM. In my case, for unknown reason to me, adding the flag did not

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Thoughts on DevMode

Speaking of j2cl and GWT 3.0 it would be nice if somehow the development did not happen behind closed doors. It would give us a better indication of where it is heading. I feel a bit anxious about the future because of this. I do think GWT 2.8 is a great step forward and cutting all the old stuff

[gwt-contrib] Re: Proposed LauncherDir change, add template bindAddress replacement

A while back -bindAddress 0.0.0.0 was changed in GWT 2.8 to use the actual IP address instead of a local hostname to work better when operating in an environment where the local hostname isn't recognized by the client (specifically, things like windows tablets don't seem to recognize the mac

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: SNAPSHOT of 21 Sept breaks my build (invalid namespace

I'm using maven and I only have a dependency on 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT. I have forced an update of the snapshots in an eclipse refresh and now it seems to work. I guess it was a local maven/nexus issue ? I hope -strict becomes the default, why would you want to ignore errors ? In most cases it is hiding

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

I'm sure my stuff was working fine with JsInterop 1.0 but with JsInterop 2.0 the only solution seems to be to use Global.top.window.document As far as I remember I had it working somewhere half of July - but I might be wrong. Can I force in maven to take a very specific snapshot version of GWT

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

gt; On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:50 AM, David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I was depending on JsInterop Global.document to get access to UI >> components generated by my template engine. >> The Global object is now scoped window, so I guess it is accessing the >>

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

I'm sure that it worked before. I'm also seeing some other issues where I am using JsInterop to interact with some generated HTML - but I am still investigating if that is due to changes in GWT or in our codebase. I did not work on this project for about 8 weeks, so I have quite a backlog to go

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

I was depending on JsInterop Global.document to get access to UI components generated by my template engine. The Global object is now scoped window, so I guess it is accessing the wrong document as well ? On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 at 11:40, David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Hide GWT Development Mode window

Yes, just run in headless mode by adding "-Djava.awt.headless=true" to your VM arguments. I do this all the time on mac. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/headless-136834.html On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 11:56:24 AM UTC-7, Paul Stockley wrote: > > When launching the SDM code

Re: [gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

That would be — awesome. Pretty please? :) On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 11:13:09 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote: > > > The issue is that @JsFunction implementors must "extend >> java.lang.Object" as their parent. because standard library functions >> are/canbe implemented on classes with complicated

Re: [gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

to override > those > >>> other methods as well. > >>> > >>> You could nearly achieve this effect by just making a method reference > to > >>> the "apply" or "test" method, and passing that as an actual JsFunction &

[gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

I think it would be good to add @JsFunction to all of the java.util.function interfaces in the JRE Emulation so that we can use standard function signatures with JsInterop. Would that work? Any drawbacks? If you think that's a good idea, I can submit a patch. Thanks! -- You received this

[gwt-contrib] Re: Newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 ?

there because it didn't do that when both the plugin and GWT were on 2.8.0-beta1, but perhaps it's really an issue with the GWT snapshot. Being a snapshot, that's always a possibility of course. :) Thanks for your help! On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote

[gwt-contrib] Newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 ?

Is there a newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 that should be used with GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT? I want to try out the latest snapshots to keep abreast of the current status-quo, but I'm getting red highlights on JRE Emulation in IntelliJ that I don't get if I use GWT 2.8.0-beta1 with the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental 2 and J2CL timeline

As a GXT developer at Sencha, we are keenly aware of the community's concerns around the future of things like Widget, UiBinder, etc. and how GWT 3 might upend the apple-cart. GWT 3 is still very far away and its plans very nebulous. It's far too early to talk specifics, but I assure you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

, and your >>> classpath? It does sound like it might be a bug, but without the ability to >>> reproduce, it is difficult to say more. One case where it might not be a >>> bug despite its behavior: where it is reusing gwt-unitCache or the like >>> from an older versio

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

where it might not be a > bug despite its behavior: where it is reusing gwt-unitCache or the like > from an older version of gwt. > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:23 AM David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I managed to get this to run in a Debugger, from within the maven >> i

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

Apr 2016 at 14:41, David <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was working fine with GWT 2.8.0-beta1 using the exact same pom files. > When I point to GWT-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT I get this error. > So the only thing that changed is the version of GWT moving from beta1 to > SNAPSHOT. >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Addresses are different when running SDM with bindAddress 0.0.0.0?

I have incorporated the latest review feedback and reposted. Please review again. Thank you all for your patience as I learn the ropes... On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:51:05 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote: > > Hi Jens, et. al, > > I was just wondering if you thought &

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Addresses are different when running SDM with bindAddress 0.0.0.0?

Hi Jens, et. al, I was just wondering if you thought https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14300/ might get picked up in time for 2.8? It seems to have stalled out on the review front. Thanks! On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 3:55:34 PM UTC-8, Brandon Donnelson wrote: > > Thanks Jens, >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0-beta1 available for testing

I don't seem to have access to 19.0 snapshot, but 19.0 is out. However it does not work with gwt 2.8 beta1. So I am stuck on this since I will need to wait for 20.0 which will be released after gwt 2.8 is released. On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 at 17:43 Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

gt; Let's see what will happen with Elemental2 in the following couple of > weeks, I think Julien is working on it and if I remember well he > said somewhere that he will have something in the following month or two. > Anyway, I hope your fears will not come true. > > Cheers. > > On Mon, No

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

Good points and in most cases we are covered: - Using a Command Processor over GWT-RPC, but I will move it to a REST implementation. - GUI is split up in MVP and the important code is not depending on any GWT widgets or anything else. We are using UiBinder in our current application, but

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTCon 2015 keynote question

Thanks for all the feedback. But it does not put my mind at rest right now. It would have been much better if GWT 2.8 would have provided at least the basis for the future of GUI development - because that was one of its main selling points for me. I understand why element/widget/uibinder are

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Stop calling it GWT 3.0

to be a replacement for UiBinder or is it too early to ask that question ? Greets, David On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM James Horsley james.hors...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Daniel. It's great that the steering committee are discussing the topic this early in the process; in particular

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Stop calling it GWT 3.0

I'm excited that you guys are planning a radical change (really). I hope it becomes more clear on what we should be using to future proof our apps. I hope we will get some usable preview of Singular (if that is really going to be a replacement). Somehow I am not totally concerned that we will

[gwt-contrib] Write access to GWT_TOOLS subversion repository

What is the policy for write access to GWT_TOOLS subversion repository? I would like to upload new artifacts needed to verify Jetty 9 and HtmlUnit 2.16 upgrade change [1]. Can someone grant me write access or upload needed artifacts so that Gerrit verification can succeed? Thanks. [1]

[gwt-contrib] Re: Superdev and Jetty 9

Am Freitag, 19. Dezember 2014 10:48:05 UTC+1 schrieb david.o...@gmail.com: Am Montag, 15. Dezember 2014 14:45:11 UTC+1 schrieb Michael Vogt: Hello. Any work going on to solve https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7856/ https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7856/ Unfortunately

[gwt-contrib] Re: Superdev and Jetty 9

Am Montag, 15. Dezember 2014 14:45:11 UTC+1 schrieb Michael Vogt: Hello. Any work going on to solve https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7856/ https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7856/ Unfortunately not. I tried different approaches, but they all failed, because GWT depends

Re: [gwt-contrib] SuperDevMode sometimes puts member fields in __proto__ why is that ?

In my case it is a boolean, but not final, the value does change. Is there an optimisation that removes the field when it is false ? On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:41 PM, 'Roberto Lublinerman' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Yes,I meant (instance) final

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

Hi Rob, I'm using Jboss Fuse which uses Felix and it works fine in SuperDevMode. But did I read it right that you start the osgi container embedded with superdevmode ? I would love to know how I can achieve that as well because then I don't need to use the -noserver parameter anymore. I am using

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Question to Windows users

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: and you need to follow the steps very carefully (and hopefully no dependency has been changed since the document was written). I'm curious, which dependencies are you talking about? In my case it was the checkstyle

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Question to Windows users

Sounds like a hasle to require a VM... unless that VM would include everything to get started. Just setting up eclipse to be inline with the coding guidelines in GWT and setting up all the libraries etc are really painful and you need to follow the steps very carefully (and hopefully no

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 requiring Java7 for development - Action needed

No problem, we are on Java 7 for quite some time. I would not even object to Java 8 for the client side only, but I guess that can wait for 3.0. GWT/GUI development is really screaming for lambda's with all the event handling and async callbacks. On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Mohammed

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Bad link in GWT Documentation

It was in the main navigation panel. But as of this morning (GMT+1) it works fine. So I guess it had something to do with caching ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, which link? (on which page) (there used to be such a bug, but it was fixed a few

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

much that I don't see coverage reports for those tests (combined with all the rest of my coverage data). David On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote: No I did not try that one. I tried GWT

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

Hi Jonathan, Thanks for the pointer, I will certainly look into this. David On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Fuerth fue...@fuerth.ca wrote: Hey David, Christian Sadilek and I found a working solution to the GWTTestCase vs JaCoCo problem. Of course, it doesn't make GWTTestCase

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

One question: how do I use this on projects that do not use maven ? On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jonathan Fuerth fue...@fuerth.ca wrote: Hey David, Christian Sadilek and I found a working solution to the GWTTestCase vs JaCoCo problem. Of course, it doesn't make GWTTestCase any faster

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

the testing of those. And using GWTTestCases is really painful especially since we can't even proof that we are doing decent code coverage in our tests. David On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Nicolas Wetzel wetz...@gmail.com wrote: HI ! did you try gwt-test-utils ? it's a very good tool for testing

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

No feedback from the GWT developers ? On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:09 PM, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote: What is the state for supporting Emma with GWTTestCase ? I see that the documentation still refers to a very old version of Emma (and EclEmma). How can we use JaCoCo to do

Re: [gwt-contrib] Emma or JaCoCo support needs some attention

a generated class or a mocked class. David On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com wrote: Emma (which is already broken for some cases) is going to go away with dev mode. We have been talking about js based alternative but I'm not sure when that will be ready

Re: [gwt-contrib] Issue 8083, needs some input from GWT team

was the right data-type to use and it is not nice to have to redesign an application because the RPC system of GWT has limitations. David On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote: I agree; this seems like a workaround for one application that picked the wrong datatype

Re: [gwt-contrib] Issue 8083, needs some input from GWT team

and the BigInteger cooperate gives a big performance improvement. They only operation needed on the client-side is equals, which can also be optimized to do a String comparison when bother have not been parsed after RPC. David On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:30 AM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote: Have we

Re: [gwt-contrib] Issue 8083, needs some input from GWT team

changing to 24-bit integers for better performance * in browsers. */ transient int digits[]; Always nice to have TODO's in code that are not done :-) Who is jat ? David On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:14 AM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The lazy parsing would only happen during

Re: [gwt-contrib] Issue 8083, needs some input from GWT team

(or BigDecimal) when really needed. David On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:52 PM, John A. Tamplin j...@jaet.org wrote: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:14 AM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote: The lazy parsing would only happen during deserialisation in the client. I think it is safe to assume

Re: [gwt-contrib] serializing final fields

of the final keyword since it allow my IDE and Java compiler to warn me when I forget to initialize it. So I am a bit suprised that I did not see any warnings yet. David On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.comwrote: Does having the flag really make it that much more

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: gwt rebranding

Not that I have anything of authority here, but why not adopt Guice instead of all the gwt.xml trickery and call it the Guicy Web ToolKit David On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Kerry Wilson ke...@allthingswilson.comwrote: I would leave gorgeous out of it. I would just consider it a recursive

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cleanup: is IE6 JNI really needed?

We are doing development on machines not connected to the internet and I bet a lot of other GWT devs are in the same situation. So how can management depend on such a feature to decide on usage ? David On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: gwt issues marked as patcheswelcome don't show up under open issues

abandonware as well ? I'm really starting to regret chosing GWT for development. The only thing where there are many commits is the compiler optimisations and code splitting stuff ... in my opinion that is a waste of time since the browsers are getting faster every day anyway. David On Thu, Oct 6

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Any interest in having css3pie integrated with GWT?

I hope IE7 will not be dropped in short term. That would be dramatic for GWT apps that are used in the enterprise environments. In our case our customers are already very annoyed that we can not support IE6 decently enough. David On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com

Re: [gwt-contrib] maven source jars

spurious exceptions in DevMode So that's what been causing that for me--I never would have thought renaming the jar file would be a problem. Thanks for pointing that out! - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs

Re: [gwt-contrib] maven source jars

looks up classes in a gwt-user.jar instead of the gwt-user-2.4-SNAPSHOT.jar). Removing the JarIndex, or regenerating it, is easy, but still. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David

Re: [gwt-contrib] maven source jars

that isn't published? If so, could it be published? (To create the gwt-servlet-X-sources.jar that ends up in maven repos.) Ping? - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w: http://code.google.com/ b: http

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Activities and places - French translation.

? --- Vincent François vincentfrancois@gmail.com, France. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t

Re: [gwt-contrib] Was the lack of server side templating in GWT one of the reasons why Google+ team did not choose GWT ?

(Warren Buffet lingo: http://37signals.com/svn/posts/333-warren-buffett-on-castles-and-moats) -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/ b: http

[gwt-contrib] GPE 2.3 live on Indigo

For those who might have missed it in other threads, Google Plugin for Eclipse 2.3 is now available for Eclipse Indigo (3.7). See instructions here: http://code.google.com/eclipse/docs/getting_started.html GPE 2.4 is currently in beta, release coming shortly. /dmc -- David Chandler Developer

Re: [gwt-contrib] Earn $1000-$2500 per month

://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix issue 5807 on server side. Previously reviewed at 1370803. (issue1384802)

: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1384802/ -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.2.0 broke binary compatibility for code generation

apologize for the inconvenience, and for not informing you at the time of the release. /dmc -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.1 / gwt-incubator tables

a customer is a broad concept :-) On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: I complained about the same subject when 2.1 was released. After 2 years of waiting very little functionality in the new table was released. I can understand the motivation

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.1 / gwt-incubator tables

optimisations will remain a huge selling point ? David On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 nov, 16:12, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, as stated in this thread http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa

Re: [gwt-contrib] JsonRequestProcessor and multiple findEntity calls

a possibility to persist an entity in a single transaction and in a single call. Am I missing anything or it's really designed so? Regards, Alexei -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit http

Re: [gwt-contrib] JsonRequestProcessor and multiple findEntity calls

PS The refactoring I mentioned is available for review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1062801/show On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:35 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote: Hi Alexei, sorry for the slow response. I confirmed this with bobv and was working on a reply but got

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.1 MVP with GIN

direction here? Thanks, Tolga -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.1 MVP with GIN

Why not include Gin in GWT 2.1 ? It could maybe be useful inside the GWT codebase as well ? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:32 PM, David Chandler drfibona...@google.com wrote: Hmmm, I see my comments about GIN in the ActivityMapper have caught up with me. I haven't worked this out fully yet

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: RPC vs DeRPC in 2.1

the needed interfaces to use the RequestFactory approach. David On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:07 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote: RequestFactory is good for any kind of bean-like-object.  If you look at the DynaTableRf sample, the backing store is a trivial list of in-memory objects

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: RPC vs DeRPC in 2.1

Ok, I'll keep my fingers crossed! David On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 21, 11:44 am, stuckagain david.no...@gmail.com wrote: GWT contributors, Will there be a production quality RPC mechanism available in GWT 2.1 as part

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Compiler or widget.gwt.xml file optimisation for 2.1 ?

, indeed if this is not deemed important to the GWT team I can understand. What is important is that we can have the eclipse plugin/browser plugins without the need for an active internet connection. David On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:25 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2010

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Compiler or widget.gwt.xml file optimisation for 2.1 ?

the IE plugin is actually just an empty shell that needs to go to the internet to download the latest version. There are some very old versions of the browser plugins available in the trunk but I guess it was put there one day and totally forgotten afterwards ? David -- http://groups.google.com

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Compiler or widget.gwt.xml file optimisation for 2.1 ?

Hi Eric, It would be acceptable for testing purpose only. releases to production have to be official versions. But it would make it soo much easier to already start using features that should normally be available by the time we go to production. David On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Joel

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Compiler or widget.gwt.xml file optimisation for 2.1 ?

for non installers for the IE/Firefox/Chrome plugins that do not mandate an internet connection :-S. So maybe for the poor corporate developers in very secure environments that fight to get GWT accepted: think about us! ;-) David On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Eric Ayers zun...@google.com wrote

Re: [gwt-contrib] ImageResource to html

. I do not want to loose the advantage of an ImageResource. David On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David What do you mean by IMG tag, do you mean IMG with a src=/somefile on the server ? -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Command pattern and GWT.runAsync

Less maintenance on the async, declarative transaction management, undo, batching, less web.xml tweeking, ... there are many reasons why we also use a command pattern. On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote: Why use a uber command pattern for all

Re: [gwt-contrib] Tabless

actually fix all issues we had with the old widgets ? David On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote: No argument. And since we've never, ever managed to actually delete a deprecated class so far as I know

Re: [gwt-contrib] Command pattern and GWT.runAsync

the right for their design choices, no ? Or can you give the ultimate approach that we all should be using ? David On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Miroslav Pokorny miroslav.poko...@gmail.com wrote: Does it really make sense to give all serivices the same intf. Im sure because everything comes

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.0.1 breaks incubator 2.0 ... is a new release emminent ?

I didn't get the chance to test it out, due to corporate red tape :-( David On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:51 PM, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote: I'll take a look and make sure we can use the incubator jar with GWT 2.0. Thanks, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.0.1: is the history support iframe now mandatory ?

a ClearCase dynamic view) so it might just be that someone did some nasty checkin while I was testing. I'll double check tomorrow. David On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote: It shouldn't be -- if you kick off History's static initializer, it will GWT.create(HistoryImpl.class

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: r7517 committed - Adding RegExp to public GWT (native version, pure Java version, tests)

it is supposed to be so great. David On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote: I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT Incubator Status Update and Schedule

of GWT. Compiling from the sources means that we need direct access to the internet, but not all companies allow that. As long as we have some indication of what is mostly stable and what not, we can choose at what point we whish to start using a development build. David On Wed, Jan 20, 2010

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: CssResource unable to handle IE6 AlphaImageLoader

The bigest problem with the DirectX filter was that it caused a massive memory leak. David On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, j...@google.com wrote: I didn't say it was resolved. The memory-usage issues don't come up simply as a function of the number of images -- it's a function of the total

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Failing to find custom field serilializers in Oracle OC4J 10.1.3.5

I did not file a bug report yet. Do I need to do this or is it already done ? On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:20 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote: I don't know what the real problem is, but I'm sure that custom serializers are

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: wrong DTD generated for modules in GEP

Hi, Small question: Is there a reason why GWT is still using a DTD instead of a schema ? In Schema's you can put a lot extra information (inline docs) and eclipse also supports completions with schemas if you put the schema in the XML repository. David On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Fushion

Re: [gwt-contrib] now.. afetr GWT 2.0?

3) DataBinding Validation (btw see this post from Ray announcing something for Q1 2009 ;-) For me, it's the main feature GWT should have. Next would be pretty widgets, Drag'n Drop (in the framework, GWT DnD is very good, but DnD deserve to be in the framework by itself). And on top of it, yes,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Making command pattern RPC look like traditional GWT RPC

automatically for example). David On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Jamie Gennis jgen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been writing a GWT library to implement the command pattern for GWT RPC calls using the same interfaces that traditional GWT RPC uses.  Basically, when an app calls a method

[gwt-contrib] Re: will deRPC ship with GWT 2.0 ?

be very usefull (the incubator seems to be dead ?) since it is the main reason why people select ExtGWT or other GWT widget sets (which do not really use GWT the way they should). The only thing that is really missing in GWT is a decent RPC that can be trusted to just work. David On Mon, Oct 19

  1   2   >