C# is Microsofts version of Java, only it sucks and its even slower than
java.
- Original Message -
From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
whats c# usefull for? Is it like MFC but easier and can also
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Kalin
Sent: 27 February 2002 10:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
C# is Microsofts version of Java, only it sucks and its even slower than
java.
- Original Message -
From: Tom
been useless.
Regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Simon Rose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 13:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
Hi,
I have only used .NET in a minor way for my employer, and not
C# at that.
The IDE is very nice
been useless.
Regards,
Ron
-Original Message-
From: Simon Rose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 13:27
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
Hi,
I have only used .NET in a minor way for my employer, and not
C# at that.
The IDE is very
:)
- Original Message -
From: Commando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
At 02:14 PM 27/02/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Sure, but file format specs like this change all the time (Remember Word
95-97-98/2000/2002
Message-
From: Commando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 15:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
At 02:14 PM 27/02/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Sure, but file format specs like this change all the time
(Remember Word
95-97-98/2000/2002?)
What
yeh I noticed that, shuved an int before it to stop it from moaning
- Original Message -
From: Yacketta, Ronald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
or find bugs in the code ;)
like in weapons.h
haveWeapon
]
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
Yacketta, Ronald wrote:
or find bugs in the code ;)
like in weapons.h
haveWeapon or is it Hasweapon *shrug* forget not at home in front of
code has no type, .NET cries, bitches and moans about it.. says it is
defaulting to type int etc..
just a minor detail
: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
Correct, but I see no mention of it under Studio 6.0
I only recently noticed the error when I compiled under .NET
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Florian
Zschocke
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 4:54 PM
:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
Might it be because the .NET compiler is more rigid to C++ standards?
Then again, standards and MS usually make a good joke! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yacketta,
Ronald
-Original Message-
From: Commando [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
At 02:14 PM 27/02/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Sure, but file format specs like this change all the time (Remember
Word
95-97-98/2000/2002?)
What
PM
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
whats c# usefull for? Is it like MFC but easier and can also be embedded in
web pages?
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Navia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
just think
no they wont
When I compile dlls using vs.net they work fine on other computers without
vs.net on
- Original Message -
From: Michael Shimmins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:55 AM
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
You realise that to play your
What is .net ?? I don't know...
Also see this...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/vs/techinfo/default.asp
Jeffrey botman Broome
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
: [hlcoders] Argh!
You realise that to play your mod everyone will need the .net framework?
Michael Shimmins
The Absconder Effect (http://www.tae-mod.com)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yacketta,
Ronald
Sent: Monday, 25 February 2002 12
]] On Behalf Of Yacketta,
Ronald
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
How so?
I have already tossed DLL's to friends for testing, they are on ME/2k
and have No problems playing.
-Ron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
And is CHalfLifeTeamplay defined wherever this class is declared?
david
-Original Message-
From: Yacketta, Ronald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 5:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlcoders] Argh!
Okay, stupid basic C++ question *sigh*
Why does
, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: [hlcoders] Argh!
Okay, stupid basic C++ question *sigh*
Why does this
class CSgRoundRules : public CHalfLifeTeamplay
{
Blah
Blah
Blah
};
Result in this
GB_RoundRules.h(6) : error C2504: 'CHalfLifeTeamplay' : base class
undefined
: [hlcoders] Argh!
You have to define the CHalfLifeTeamplay class before you can that
class. So, whenever you have #include SgRoundRules.h you need to add
#include teamplay_gamerules.h before it.
- Original Message -
From: Yacketta, Ronald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
: public CHalfLifeTeamplay
{
...
...
...
};
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yacketta,
Ronald
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
ARGH!
Stupid compilers ;)
I had the includes
: public CHalfLifeTeamplay
{
...
...
...
};
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yacketta,
Ronald
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlcoders] Argh!
ARGH!
Stupid compilers ;)
I had the includes
umm what are the posibbilities of two Jim Hunter's being on the same
list
-Jim
- Original Message -
From: Jim Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
Is it possible that your header is being included
]] On Behalf Of klank
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
umm what are the posibbilities of two Jim Hunter's being on the same
list
-Jim
- Original Message -
From: Jim Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday
Jim Hunters unite! We will take over the list!
- Original Message -
From: klank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
umm what are the posibbilities of two Jim Hunter's being on the same
list
-Jim
Amazing! I'm also named Jim Hunter!
Oh wait, never mind. My name's David Dynerman.
Sorry :\
david
-Original Message-
From: Jim Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
Jim Hunters unite! We
]]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh!
Jim Hunters unite! We will take over the list!
- Original Message -
From: klank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [hlcoders] Argh
26 matches
Mail list logo
