Ah yes, thx for reply.
I was looking at that as well. Adobe is using its own DNG converter
https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/adobe-dng-converter.html
I heard good things about it, but too bad for me that its only win/osx
again and it is yet again another layer of conversion. That is why i wa
Am 12.07.2018 um 17:05 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
Could you elaborate please? what is your choice of converter that is giving
you best result ?
"decent converter" is not a suggestion.
I use Adobe Camera Raw, since I happen to own a Photoshop CS6 license.
Lightroom uses the same raw conversio
> Use a decent raw converter and convert to 16 bit TIFF.
Could you elaborate please? what is your choice of converter that is giving
you best result ?
"decent converter" is not a suggestion.
Thanks.
> To be clear, you're using PTGui not merely to develop the raw images,
> but also to stitch/fuse
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2018 08:45:47 UTC+2 schrieb Groogle:
>
> > Other than the work required (which may be non-trivial, balanced
> > against the fact that the Hugin developers have other things they
> > want to do, not to mention lives outside of Hugin), there's no
> > reason Hugin couldn't d
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:57:26 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
>> PTGui uses only a fraction of that possibilities. I'd never shoot raw
>> only for PTGui's raw import. It's not worth the hassle at all.
>
> What is your suggested workflow then ?
To be clear, you're using PTGui not merely to develop
Am 12.07.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
What is your suggested workflow then ?
Use a decent raw converter and convert to 16 bit TIFF.
--
Erik Krause
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
A list of frequently aske
> PTGui uses only a fraction of that possibilities. I'd never shoot raw
> only for PTGui's raw import. It's not worth the hassle at all.
What is your suggested workflow then ?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:18 AM Erik Krause wrote:
> Am 12.07.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
> > I know t
Am 12.07.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
I know that PTGui is using dcraw, and there is nothing wrong with it. It is
also not true that dcraw will strip all dynamic range data. You can check
its possibilities here (https://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/)
PTGui uses only a fraction
wow, I did not expect such big and aggressive response :)
I did not meant to offend hugin hardcore fans :)
I know that PTGui is using dcraw, and there is nothing wrong with it. It is
also not true that dcraw will strip all dynamic range data. You can check
its possibilities here (https://www.cyber
On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 8:29:20 -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:15:19 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 8:10:08 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
>>> As much as I wish to stay with Linux (which is my main operating
>>> system) and Hougin
On 07/11/2018 11:17 AM, Marcel Brouillet wrote:
> I read about demosaic-ing and did my RAW-101 class :-). I'm still a noob on
> this. I understand the process would involve a RAW sticher, the PTO being
> generated on some initial set of (rough) converted files. Yet...
> Vladimir, why do you have
2018-07-11 18:19 UTC+02:00, Vladimir Nadvornik :
> On 07/11/2018 10:07 AM, Erik Krause wrote:
>> Am 10.07.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
>>> Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I am
>>> hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With PtGui
On 07/11/2018 10:07 AM, Erik Krause wrote:
> Am 10.07.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
>> Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I am
>> hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With PtGui for
>> eg. I am able to throw my Canon RAWs directly
Am 11.07.2018 um 11:09 schrieb David W. Jones:
Well, I think dcraw actually is a dedicated raw converter (it doesn't
do anything else) and certainly seems to offer a lot of command line
options (including dead or hot pixels, noise reduction, highlight
clipping/no clipping/blending/reconstruction,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:15:19 +1000, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 8:10:08 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
>> As much as I wish to stay with Linux (which is my main operating
>> system) and Hougin Open software, currently I am forced to run PtGui
>> via wine to do my jo
I read about demosaic-ing and did my RAW-101 class :-). I'm still a noob on
this. I understand the process would involve a RAW sticher, the PTO being
generated on some initial set of (rough) converted files. Yet...
Vladimir, why do you have the need to separate the colors ? Can't the
stitching b
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Note that the Unix (and thus Linux) way is to have multiple programs,
each able to perform one function and perform it well. It looks like
you're looking for the opposite.
Agreed - making a monolith is not the Unix way.
But allowing programs to work together in a
On July 10, 2018 10:07:07 PM HST, Erik Krause wrote:
>Am 10.07.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
>> Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I
>am
>> hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With
>PtGui for
>> eg. I am able to throw my Canon RA
Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes:
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 8:10:08 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
>> It streamlines simple work that has to be done without requirement
>> of 3rd party software in the process.
>
> It still requires mouse pushing. If you're looking for automatic raw
> conversio
Am 10.07.2018 um 17:10 schrieb Albert Szostkiewicz:
Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I am
hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With PtGui for
eg. I am able to throw my Canon RAWs directly and proper exposure merge is
being applied. With Hug
On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 at 8:10:08 -0700, Albert Szostkiewicz wrote:
> Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I
> am hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With
> PtGui for eg. I am able to throw my Canon RAWs directly and proper
> exposure merge i
Personally I am interested in stitching 360 full, true HDR images. I am
hoping to stitch and get as much of original data as I can. With PtGui for
eg. I am able to throw my Canon RAWs directly and proper exposure merge is
being applied. With Hugin I am forced to use 3rd party apps for conversion
in
On July 9, 2018 3:55:21 AM HST, Marcel Brouillet wrote:
>
>
>It shows my ignorance on what is in the raw format and what tasks the
>raw
>processor does. This being out of scope (not hugin related) let's not
>clutter this list, but I'd appreciate a recommended reading to
>understand
>what I'm mi
Also how should we handle bad pixels?
T. Modes schrieb am Mo., 9. Juli 2018, 21:18:
> Am Montag, 9. Juli 2018 16:02:06 UTC+2 schrieb nadv...@suse.cz:
>>
>> It might be possible to convert the mosaic data to independent channels
>> with transparency:
>>
>> source:
>>
>> RGRGRG
>> GBGBGB
>> RGRGRG
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2018 16:02:06 UTC+2 schrieb nadv...@suse.cz:
>
> It might be possible to convert the mosaic data to independent channels
> with transparency:
>
> source:
>
> RGRGRG
> GBGBGB
> RGRGRG
>
> to:
>
> RTRTRT
> TT
> RTRTRT
>
> TGTGTG
> GTGTGT
> TGTGTG
>
> TT
> TBTB
On 07/09/2018 03:18 PM, bugbear wrote:
> Marcel Brouillet wrote:
>> so merging RAW files seems to have sense to me.
>
> How (on earth) does one perform spatial interpolation on raw data that
> hasn't been de-mosaic'd ?!
>
> BugBear
>
Hi,
when I think about it...
It might be possible to conv
It shows my ignorance on what is in the raw format and what tasks the raw
processor does. This being out of scope (not hugin related) let's not
clutter this list, but I'd appreciate a recommended reading to understand
what I'm missing, if you have a good one.
Thanks you either way.
Le lundi
Marcel Brouillet wrote:
so merging RAW files seems to have sense to me.
How (on earth) does one perform spatial interpolation on raw data that
hasn't been de-mosaic'd ?!
BugBear
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received th
All the answers to this post assumed the raw processing is done before the
stitching (which would work on TIFF/JPG… files). I totally agree on the
objections.
However, does it make sense to* combine raw files into a raw output*, that
can further be processed in rawtherapy ?
Distortions, stitch
29 matches
Mail list logo