R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Nobody answered, so I did a test.
I tried to use by mistake RACF structure as NEWCKPT1.
Here are the results.
IXL013I IXLCONN REQUEST FOR STRUCTURE IRRXCF00_P001 FAILED.
JOBNAME: JES2 ASID: 0018 CONNECTOR NAME: JES2_BROT
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Nobody answered, so I did a test.
I tried to use by mistake RACF structure as NEWCKPT1.
Here are the results.
IXL013I IXLCONN REQUEST FOR STRUCTURE IRRXCF00_P001 FAILED.
JOBNAME: JES2 ASID: 0018
Guys,
But, the question is HOW ?
I mean, we have been talking about sceurity and encryption, etc... but how
does all that work. Meaning, what are the code blocks that we need to
develop ?
Also, what type of network setup should be there between Mainframes and its
TCP/IP server ?
---
Parin
On
For further information on (conforming) what Rich states, see:
http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dfsaptg1/2.4.2.10
Specifically,
If the output MOD name parameter is not specified, IMS formats the message
using the MOD named in the MESSAGE OUTPUT DESCRIPTOR NAME field of
Hi Bob,
Whenever Ive done DR and I have tested with a lot of customers and
invoked in anger on two previous occasions, at SunGard the Tape Hardware
(E.g. 9310 ATL and 9840C Drives) has never been the same as at the Primary
Data Centre location, but its been good enough for DR. So generally we
-- snip --
Example:
IEASYM (00,Z0,L)
NUCLST Z0
PARMLIB SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB SYS1.PARMLIB
PARMLIB SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
SYSCAT CATL00133CCATALOG.LPLEX.MASTER
SYSPARM (Z0)
*-*
* SL20 SPECIFIC VALUES
Dennis Trojak wrote:
Has anybody seen any updates to the 3/31/2007 date for End-of-Service on
z/OS 1.5? The IBM web site still has an * next to it indicating it has
not been officially announced yet.
Is there any offering available from IBM that will still get you z/OS
1.5 for those of us still
John Eells wrote:
[...]
You can order the same version of a z/OS product for which you are
already licensed at no additional charge. So if there is any
significant possibility you will get stuck, it's in your best interest
to order releases before they get withdrawn from marketing even if
The mod name specifies the format used for the display to the screen. If it
is specified, it will over-ride the default.
Usually the first call to IOPCB will specify the modname, second and later
calls will specify the modname only if they want to change the format.
Mike
On 12/6/05, sudhanshu
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
John Eells wrote:
[...]
You can order the same version of a z/OS product for which you are
already licensed at no additional charge. So if there is any
significant possibility you will get stuck, it's
Does anyone have any experience of the above and if so have you noticed any
performance degradation because of 64 bit instruction emulation on 32 bit
instruction hardware. Better still, can anyone quantify it.
Jim McAlpine
--
R.S. wrote:
Does it mean, I can order, let's say, z/OS 1.7 or CICS TS 3.1
(I'm on
lower levels) and have no obligation to migrate within one year ?
I was told I have to migrate within one year from delivery otherwise
I'll pay for both versions.
Just curious.
There is only one _version_
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 12/6/2005 8:59:57 A.M. Central Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is only one _version_ of z/OS, with seven _releases_
so far. Whether there are version license
Have you ever seen a situation where the START command is issued, but the
address space fails with no diagnostics:
05340 13:30:58.39 WWALSH 0290 START
BBO6ACR,JOBNAME=BBOS001,ENV=CPAC.CPAC.BBOS001
05340 13:30:58.44 0090 IRR812I PROFILE BBO6ACR.* (G) IN
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:01:19 -0600, Alan Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had many times that our Customers IDCAMS DELETE statements fail due
to a
DATASET IN USE condition. We would like to somehow trigger a GRS display
or perform
a GQSCAN at the time this occurs but have been unable to
Another mention of the Hannaford system is here:
http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,106776,00.html?source=NLT_AMnid=106776
(Mind the wrap. http://tinyurl.com/anju3 should work temporarily for those of
you who have trouble with the wrap.)
From the article:
The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Walsh
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: START fails no diagnostics!
Have you ever seen a situation where the START command is
issued,
In a message dated 12/6/2005 9:12:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any ideas?
Probably need to look down the syslog and see if BBOS01 is
purged. Default sysout for STC could be set to a PURGE class.
So if you've got access to JCL change SYSOUT=* to SYSOUT=H
or
Been meaning to post. The AFP-l FAQ. Maybe it will help.
_http://www.botos.com/afp/faq.html_ (http://www.botos.com/afp/faq.html)
I'd stay away from the topica site as much as possible. Almost
like phising. But maybe that's just me...
I am not sure how your output processing is set... but you might check the
OUTDISP on the OUTPUTCLASS associated with JOBCLASS(STC) to make sure your
output is being saved.
-Rob Schramm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
One thing I usually do with STCs that fail, is to run the STC JCL as a batch
job. It would not matter if the job failed, but I would be able to see if
there were any data sets that were not valid or if there were some other
issue or messages.
//TSTJCL JOB ...
//S1 EXEC
I think the most important action--but not necessarily the first--is V XCF
OFF. That should stop ongoing I/O in as synchronized a manner as possible
across all applications.
$PJES2 will most certainly never complete, but it will prevent any new
tasks from starting. I would NOT do a TERM because
I am a bit confused.
Dose the term 'DB2 catalog' in the original posting refer to
the ICF catalog that points to data sets of any type
or the special set of objects in DB2 that contains DB2 system information.
I fankly assumed it was the second case ...
There is nothing uniquely DB2 about the
-- snip --
NUCLST Z0
PARMLIB SYS1.LPLEX.PARMLIB
PARMLIB SYS1.PARMLIB
PARMLIB SYS1.IBM.PARMLIB
SYSCAT CATL00133CCATALOG.LPLEX.MASTER
*-*
* SL20 SPECIFIC VALUES*
We run Oracle on z/OS here but i haven't come across a VSAM Transparency
option. i had a quick look in Oracle Metalink and someone had asked a
similar question and the answer was
Oracle's SQL*Loader will load MVS VSAM data directly into Oracle tables.
However we do not offer a VSAM
Has anybody seen any updates to the 3/31/2007 date for End-of-Service on
z/OS 1.5? The IBM web site still has an * next to it indicating it has
not been officially announced yet.
Is there any offering available from IBM that will still get you z/OS
1.5 for those of us still stuck on G5 hardware?
In a recent note, Lizette Koehler said:
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:01:57 -0700
One thing I usually do with STCs that fail, is to run the STC JCL as a batch
job. It would not matter if the job failed, but I would be able to see if
there were any data sets that were not valid or if
Hello: IBM APAR OW40658 details how to determine if a S822 abend is due
to outstanding captured UCB's.
They provide the IPCS command 'IOSK CAPTURE' which will provide the
'CAPE' address. They further state to look at the 'NOCJECNT' field of the
'CAPE' to determine if there are outstanding
In a message dated 12/6/2005 12:42:02 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This also has put small z/OS and z/VM operations into a bind - no place to
grow except to higher-priced hardware if they want to go beyond z/OS 1.4
(and z/VM 4.4, I think). Hopefully IBM will take
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/06/2005
01:37:25 PM:
Hello: IBM APAR OW40658 details how to determine if a S822 abend is due
to outstanding captured UCB's.
They provide the IPCS command 'IOSK CAPTURE' which will provide the
'CAPE' address. They further state
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:01:57 -0700, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I usually do with STCs that fail, is to run the STC JCL as a
batch
job. ...
Another technique that has worked for me is to override MSGCLASS.
S whatever,MSGCLASS=x where x is your hold class. That will save
AMEN! Seems like they're just killing themselves(and us too)
by not having a low end package for development and testing.
Most folks will take the path of best ads and convert to something
else, whether it's Oracle/Grid or Blade servers.
There is, of course, a low end package for development
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:30:53 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
This technique is far less effective if the STC JCL contains system
symbols. There's another good argument here for supporting symbols
in batch JCL.
...
For that kind of test it's a whole lot faster to stick some SET
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/05/2005
at 08:49 AM, Daniel Cremieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am converting a rexx program to cobol and having this problem . The
data is , for example x'0123' and after conversion , it must have
the value 123 (decimal)
In rexx , the statement is : decvalue =
In a recent note, Patrick O'Keefe said:
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:18:55 -0600
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:30:53 -0700, Paul Gilmartin
[log in to unmask] wrote:
This technique is far less effective if the STC JCL contains system
symbols. There's another good argument here for supporting
As an unsollicited follow-up, there seems to be a little more going on. Dr
Frank Soltis made
some comments at COMMON that don't seem to have been reported in the English
language press:
I'm surprised that the first referencable account appears almost three months
after FCS and is
ostensibly (Computerworld) only a two-way in a range that supposedly includes a
54-way.
Nothing better to be proud of?
I've heard rumours about catastrophic z9 acceptance, but this is even more
On this general topic, has anyone else priced z800s lately? A z800 ranges
from ~40 (smaller than the smallest Multiprise 3000) to ~630 MIPS with 10
capacity settings over 4 engines. Minimum memory is 8 GB. Runs all
software (i.e. it's 64-bit). It's even Parallel Sysplex capable.
Just for
I know of numerous 10,000+ MIPS z9 accounts, but I'll let those shops speak up
for themselves should they so choose.
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
Enterprise Technology Infrastructure
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
(404) 575-2798
Seeing beyond money (sm)
-Original Message-
From:
Hi all,
I have created an online IMS-DC program that uses only
one screen(mfs)both for taking input and displaying
the output.The data is fed into the screen first and
once enter key is pressed,we get the output ,which
contains output message.
The problem is if user does not feed any value and
What effect would a Quiesce have? This is a clean, safe way to end
all I/O but what incomplete transactions will be lost?
Tom
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:13 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
I think the most important action--but not necessarily the first--is V XCF
OFF. That should stop ongoing I/O in
It sounds like your transaction may be defined as NONRESPONSE instead
of RESPONSE. You probably can get more help on the IMS discussion
group which can be joined at PO.MISSOURI.EDU (IMS-L).
On 12/6/05, sudhanshu Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have created an online IMS-DC program
There were also 54 way machines shipped, also some (not 54 way) Linux only
ones, but until it is official reference
marian
On 12/7/05, Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of numerous 10,000+ MIPS z9 accounts, but I'll let those shops
speak up for themselves should they so
$PJES2 will most certainly never complete, but it will prevent any new
tasks from starting. I would NOT do a TERM because you lose all control
at that point.
From experience on education systems I'd say the $PJES2 isn't even
necessary. I've always seen JES2 stopping after the V XCF OFF before
If you only have about 20 minutes of batteries left, do as orderly a
shutdown as possible. (Even our heavily loaded production system doesn't
take 20 minutes to come down.)
As pointed out before, get the major players down (IMS, DB2, CICS) - those
that have business critical transactions that may
45 matches
Mail list logo
